• Our booking engine at tickets.railforums.co.uk (powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

Great Western Electrification Progress

Status
Not open for further replies.

coppercapped

Established Member
Joined
13 Sep 2015
Messages
3,103
Location
Reading
Have heard word it's cancelled!!! No idea why!

Perhaps too late in the day to reconfigure the service back to normal.

As there are no trains at all running into, through or out of Reading at the moment - apart from the Southern service to Waterloo from Platforms 4 and 5 - it would seem that your contact is talking from where the sun doesn't shine.

Generally, information trumps gossip... :)
 
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

LNW-GW Joint

Veteran Member
Joined
22 Feb 2011
Messages
19,779
Location
Mold, Clwyd
Network Rail have been criticised for using Portuguese Steel in stead of Welsh/British Steel in the new Splott Road Bridge.

To be truthful I can't see this being any different had there been a Labour government in Westminster so I think it's slightly opportunistic of them to complain.

That's a very slippery road.
Ban Portuguese steel and TAP won't buy Airbus planes (with Welsh wings).

NR will buy the best/cheapest bridge components they can.
Doubtless there were many other bridges needing steel for the GW electrification, and possibly there was a bulk deal.
Steel is a global commodity.
 

Filton Bank

Member
Joined
13 Aug 2017
Messages
81
As there are no trains at all running into, through or out of Reading at the moment - apart from the Southern service to Waterloo from Platforms 4 and 5 - it would seem that your contact is talking from where the sun doesn't shine.

Generally, information trumps gossip... :)

I don't know whether the full blockade is going ahead or not, but there was certainly some uncertainty yesterday pm. Which, if that genuinely was the case, would make it a bit late to reschedule everything to run through Reading, no?
 

coppercapped

Established Member
Joined
13 Sep 2015
Messages
3,103
Location
Reading
I don't know whether the full blockade is going ahead or not, but there was certainly some uncertainty yesterday pm. Which, if that genuinely was the case, would make it a bit late to reschedule everything to run through Reading, no?

Does not 'no trains are running' = 'full blockade'?

And if no trains are running, why not do the work one can do? I can imagine part of the work being postponed, but not all of it.
 
Last edited:

3973EXL

Established Member
Joined
2 Feb 2017
Messages
2,454
At Reading this afternoon only the main entrance giving access to 4 5 & 6 for Southern & N Downs services was open. Access to the rest of the station via 7 was blocked off.
Buses from the north side accessed outside the station via the old subway.
 

Andrewlong

Member
Joined
2 Jan 2013
Messages
373
Location
Earley
At Reading this afternoon only the main entrance giving access to 4 5 & 6 for Southern & N Downs services was open. Access to the rest of the station via 7 was blocked off.
Buses from the north side accessed outside the station via the old subway.

I concur. Notices were displayed indicating services were disrupted today and tomorrow.
 

FGW_DID

Established Member
Joined
23 Jun 2011
Messages
2,732
Location
81E
As there are no trains at all running into, through or out of Reading at the moment - apart from the Southern service to Waterloo from Platforms 4 and 5 - it would seem that your contact is talking from where the sun doesn't shine.

Generally, information trumps gossip... :)

Really! Whilst the block may have been on and some work was certainly taking place, I can safely say that what we were expecting to happen and had planned for, certainly didn't happen, at least not to the timescales originally given. I had quite a long access list today and didn't see one person on it. I'll pass on to my line manager, (sorry 'contact') that he was obviously talking out his arse. :roll:
 

coppercapped

Established Member
Joined
13 Sep 2015
Messages
3,103
Location
Reading
Really! Whilst the block may have been on and some work was certainly taking place, I can safely say that what we were expecting to happen and had planned for, certainly didn't happen, at least not to the timescales originally given. I had quite a long access list today and didn't see one person on it. I'll pass on to my line manager, (sorry 'contact') that he was obviously talking out his arse. :roll:

I apologise to unwittingly denigrating your line manager. But so many of the items posted here seem to originate from platform-end speculation and gossip it is difficult, in the absence of any other clues, to work out what is real and what is fantasy.

I understand that the SCADA telemetry systems have to be reconfigured to allow for the extended 'live' area of the overhead wiring, which was planned, and an auto transformer feeder wire somewhere in the Reading area which was not completed on time. This has to be done, so I understand, before the contact wire is energised. Is this what the issue is? On the other hand there have been the 'tweets' referred to above which claim that Maidenhead to Reading is now live.

So what is going on?
 

3973EXL

Established Member
Joined
2 Feb 2017
Messages
2,454
I understand that the SCADA telemetry systems have to be reconfigured to allow for the extended 'live' area of the overhead wiring, which was planned, and an auto transformer feeder wire somewhere in the Reading area which was not completed on time. This has to be done, so I understand, before the contact wire is energised.
So what is going on?

I don't know if this has any connection, two photos from the 12/7 of missing ATF wire.

In the first, the mast in the foreground, off the west end of platform 3/7, you can just see an ATF insulator with no wire in the bottom left area.

The second taken from the Up Westbury, again shows a mast next to the Festival line with the ATF wire missing.

This run was from the mast off the end of the platforms along side the Festival line on the downside.
 

Attachments

  • DSC00132.JPG
    DSC00132.JPG
    143.3 KB · Views: 103
  • DSC00131.JPG
    DSC00131.JPG
    138.8 KB · Views: 98

FGW_DID

Established Member
Joined
23 Jun 2011
Messages
2,732
Location
81E
I apologise to unwittingly denigrating your line manager. But so many of the items posted here seem to originate from platform-end speculation and gossip it is difficult, in the absence of any other clues, to work out what is real and what is fantasy.

I understand that the SCADA telemetry systems have to be reconfigured to allow for the extended 'live' area of the overhead wiring, which was planned, and an auto transformer feeder wire somewhere in the Reading area which was not completed on time. This has to be done, so I understand, before the contact wire is energised. Is this what the issue is? On the other hand there have been the 'tweets' referred to above which claim that Maidenhead to Reading is now live.

So what is going on?

Sorry, a bit of a very tired overreaction on my behalf. I wish I knew:( That info is a lot more specific than we got :roll: All we heard was a generic "it ain't happening".

I've seen similar tweets and as you say, hard to differentiate between genuine info and misinformed wibble.
 

jimm

Established Member
Joined
6 Apr 2012
Messages
5,235
I don't know if this has any connection, two photos from the 12/7 of missing ATF wire.

In the first, the mast in the foreground, off the west end of platform 3/7, you can just see an ATF insulator with no wire in the bottom left area.

The second taken from the Up Westbury, again shows a mast next to the Festival line with the ATF wire missing.

This run was from the mast off the end of the platforms along side the Festival line on the downside.

The autotransformer system isn't needed for them to operate electric trains.

I'm sure someone with the necessary technical expertise can give a detailed technical explanation but my understanding is that ATF's key function is to reduce power losses and ensure a steady traction current reaches the trains.

My memory may be playing tricks but I'm pretty sure they were doing electric testing between Didcot and Tilehurst before the ATF cables were all fitted.
 

spark001uk

Established Member
Joined
20 Aug 2010
Messages
2,326
The autotransformer system isn't needed for them to operate electric trains.

I'm sure someone with the necessary technical expertise can give a detailed technical explanation but my understanding is that ATF's key function is to reduce power losses and ensure a steady traction current reaches the trains.

My memory may be playing tricks but I'm pretty sure they were doing electric testing between Didcot and Tilehurst before the ATF cables were all fitted.

Isn't another main advantage that less feeder stations are required, as the ATF feed is used instead?
 

3973EXL

Established Member
Joined
2 Feb 2017
Messages
2,454
The autotransformer system isn't needed for them to operate electric trains.

I'm sure someone with the necessary technical expertise can give a detailed technical explanation but my understanding is that ATF's key function is to reduce power losses and ensure a steady traction current reaches the trains.

My memory may be playing tricks but I'm pretty sure they were doing electric testing between Didcot and Tilehurst before the ATF cables were all fitted.

I wasn't making any reference to whether ATF is needed or not.

It was a response to the post I quoted about the possibility of an incomplete section.
 

SpacePhoenix

Established Member
Joined
18 Mar 2014
Messages
5,492
Plenty of the Orange Army at work on the Reading West Curve, all other train movements stopped - Picture below is just before the Reading West Junction (On the West Curve). Taken at 15:20Hrs

Is that a new type of mast in that picture or one that's only used in certain situations/places?
 

Groningen

Established Member
Joined
14 Jan 2015
Messages
2,866
Am i correct in the view that the electrification is over budget and that is why some other lines do not get the electrification also.
 

coppercapped

Established Member
Joined
13 Sep 2015
Messages
3,103
Location
Reading
Am i correct in the view that the electrification is over budget and that is why some other lines do not get the electrification also.

Yes, it's not only very over budget, it's about two years late as well. The National Audit Office has published a report here about the whole sorry story. :(
 

coppercapped

Established Member
Joined
13 Sep 2015
Messages
3,103
Location
Reading
So, does anybody know whether the overhead was energised over the weekend?

(You can't tell by just looking and I don't intend to go and touch it with a wet finger... :D )
 

swt_passenger

Veteran Member
Joined
7 Apr 2010
Messages
31,541
Is that a new type of mast in that picture or one that's only used in certain situations/places?

The square bit on the mast supporting two adjacent sets of cantilevers and registration arms appears elsewhere through section overlaps.

It possibly looks a little unusual here because these are on single track masts, many of the overlaps completed so far are within areas with successive sets of four track portals.
 
Last edited:

FGW_DID

Established Member
Joined
23 Jun 2011
Messages
2,732
Location
81E
So, does anybody know whether the overhead was energised over the weekend?

(You can't tell by just looking and I don't intend to go and touch it with a wet finger... :D )

I'm looking at an email that says the OLE has been declared as 'Live'.

I think it was more the testing that was planned over the weekend that didnt happen, obviously they have done whatever outstanding work there was, to declare it live.
 

gsnedders

Established Member
Joined
6 Sep 2015
Messages
1,472
I'm looking at an email that says the OLE has been declared as 'Live'.

I think it was more the testing that was planned over the weekend that didnt happen, obviously they have done whatever outstanding work there was, to declare it live.

Do they actually have to do any outstanding work to declare it live? Surely the important point of declaring it live is the fact that it must now always be considered to be live and procedures followed assuming it is, not that it necessarily actually is!
 

LNW-GW Joint

Veteran Member
Joined
22 Feb 2011
Messages
19,779
Location
Mold, Clwyd
Am i correct in the view that the electrification is over budget and that is why some other lines do not get the electrification also.

Actually ALL SIX current electrification projects are both late and over budget, although the GW one is much the worst performer.
Network Rail has cut/deferred many of its other projects as a result, not just electrification.
Another large factor is the reclassification of NR's debt as belonging to the public sector, which means it cannot borrow its way out of the budget problem as it has done in the past.
 

GRALISTAIR

Established Member
Joined
11 Apr 2012
Messages
7,928
Location
Dalton GA USA & Preston Lancs
Actually ALL SIX current electrification projects are both late and over budget, although the GW one is much the worst performer.
Network Rail has cut/deferred many of its other projects as a result, not just electrification.
Another large factor is the reclassification of NR's debt as belonging to the public sector, which means it cannot borrow its way out of the budget problem as it has done in the past.

1. EGIP (includes via Shotts)
2. Manchester - Blackpool
3. GWML
4. Kettering - Corby
5. GOBLIN
6. Bromsgrove and Walsall - Rugely

Are these the 6 you mean
 

jimm

Established Member
Joined
6 Apr 2012
Messages
5,235
So, does anybody know whether the overhead was energised over the weekend?

(You can't tell by just looking and I don't intend to go and touch it with a wet finger... :D )

Yes - two tweets from the weekend. One already noted up the thread from Noel Dolphin, plus one he retweeted

@NoelDolphin
Maidenhead to Reading is currently live and testing electric trains ��

Garry Keenor‏
@25kV
More GW progress... continuous live OLE from Paddington buffer stops to Didcot. Yass!

But which electric trains. If only 387s that doesn't count

Why not?

If the weekend's work only called for operation of 387s, that's all that was needed at this stage - operation on 25kv in passenger service is not projected until the end of the year anyway, so there's a week or two to send out some 800s... the fundamental aim was to test the overhead system itself, not instantly prove that you can run an IET off it.
 
Last edited:

JN114

Established Member
Joined
28 Jun 2005
Messages
3,360
Yes - two tweets from the weekend. One already noted up the thread from Noel Dolphin, plus one he retweeted







Why not?

If the weekend's work only called for operation of 387s, that's all that was needed at this stage - operation on 25kv in passenger service is not projected until the end of the year anyway, so there's a week or two to send out some 800s... the fundamental aim was to test the overhead system itself, not instantly prove that you can run an IET off it.

Was Noel Dolphin actually on site/involved? I know he's quite senior on F&F but they've only designed the system - they're not installing it or operating it.

I only ask as while his tweets match the timeline of what was meant to happen, reality seems somewhat different. From what I've been able to see at work no trains ran within the possession whatsoever- electric or otherwise. Similarly news coming out of the worksite into our office that work required to be completed before it going live hadn't been done, and thus the go live wasn't happening and will be rescheduled. They were also angling to give up the possession nearly 24 hours early on Sunday morning and run a "normal" train service on Sunday. As it was other works (not electrification) still needed until around 2100 but the last few trains that were meant to divert via the Chiltern went via Reading which reopened Sunday evening vice early hours of Monday.

The go live of Maidenhead had 387s running to Maidenhead on test from the word go; with NR PR machine in full force. Funny that there hasn't been any coverage this time around.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top