• Our booking engine at tickets.railforums.co.uk (powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

Caledonian Sleeper during HS2 construction: Will it need to move, if so where?

Status
Not open for further replies.

LNW-GW Joint

Veteran Member
Joined
22 Feb 2011
Messages
19,741
Location
Mold, Clwyd
Mod Note: Posts #1 - #18 originally in this thread.

There is some talk of diverting the sleepers as a result of fewer long platforms being available.
 
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

The Planner

Veteran Member
Joined
15 Apr 2008
Messages
16,038
The sleeper talk has been going on for ages, they will still end up on the Euston Road somewhere.
 

Chester1

Established Member
Joined
25 Aug 2014
Messages
4,024
The sleeper talk has been going on for ages, they will still end up on the Euston Road somewhere.

Id bet the sleeper moves to St Pancras because Euston will be disrupted until after the end of the franchise in 2030. Its a simple change to make that would avoid multiple risks. Kings Cross would require more changes to the route and stops.
 

MCR247

Established Member
Joined
7 Nov 2008
Messages
9,618
Id bet the sleeper moves to St Pancras because Euston will be disrupted until after the end of the franchise in 2030. Its a simple change to make that would avoid multiple risks. Kings Cross would require more changes to the route and stops.

Using what platforms at St Pancras?
 

The Planner

Veteran Member
Joined
15 Apr 2008
Messages
16,038
International platforms. Yes, there is the issue of the passport controls etc... but if they are serious about it they would find a way.
 

Chester1

Established Member
Joined
25 Aug 2014
Messages
4,024
International platforms. Yes, there is the issue of the passport controls etc... but if they are serious about it they would find a way.

There would be timing issues in the morning but the last Eurostar arrivals and departures are considerably before first boarding on the sleeper. Moving to a new station would create costs but could provide certainty for the rest of the franchise.
 

DarloRich

Veteran Member
Joined
12 Oct 2010
Messages
29,333
Location
Fenny Stratford
Id bet the sleeper moves to St Pancras because Euston will be disrupted until after the end of the franchise in 2030. Its a simple change to make that would avoid multiple risks. Kings Cross would require more changes to the route and stops.

I doubt it would fit in the EMT platforms at St Pancras. Perhaps the international platforms could be used but that would take some major thinking. Is Kings Cross not a more obvious destination?
 

Bletchleyite

Veteran Member
Joined
20 Oct 2014
Messages
98,090
Location
"Marston Vale mafia"
Perfect for when Scotland becomes independent :D

:D

I'd imagine it wouldn't be an issue if CS paid for a full security and immigration search of the secure area each night after their trains had departed. I'd venture that that would probably be cheaper than running a third train all the way to Scotland[1].

And wouldn't arriving/departing from the grandeur of St Pancras be that bit better, particularly for tourists, than the armpit of the Euston platforms?

The interesting question though is which way would it go? Would it switch to diesel throughout and go up the MML and then S&C (or across somehow else to the WCML), or use the NLL somehow?

[1] If a third train was economic, I reckon they may have considered fixed-formation EMUs or bi-modes rather than LHCS.
 

LNW-GW Joint

Veteran Member
Joined
22 Feb 2011
Messages
19,741
Location
Mold, Clwyd
Forgive my ignorance but how are the international platforms at St Pancras accessed from anywhere other than HS1??? Can you get to them easily from either the ECML or the MML or does it involve a bit of shunting or ground frames etc etc???

According to Trackmaps, there is a direct electrified connection (single track) from the international platforms towards the ECML and WCML via the North London Incline.
The eastward connection to the ECML is called, reasonably enough, the ECML Connection, while the westward one towards the NLL/WCML is called the Silo Curve.
There is also a single track connection to the MML but it is unelectrified and called the Maintenance Siding, so hardly main line.
As far as I can see, these connections have been never been used by passenger trains.
 

Ianno87

Veteran Member
Joined
3 May 2015
Messages
15,215
If the CS out of Euston is an issue, what other terminus' are there that they could use? Is Liverpool Street one?

Liverpool St doesn't have any platforms longer than 240m (and capacity there is pretty 'subscribed' already)
 

87015

Established Member
Joined
3 Mar 2006
Messages
4,908
Location
GEML/WCML/SR
Liverpool St doesn't have any platforms longer than 240m (and capacity there is pretty 'subscribed' already)
That won't stop the err, inventive ideas, that come out of HS2. They have already proposed sending limited Pendos to Liverpool St as one of their 'solutions' for getting all the access they want at Euston. Thankfully some realism seems to have batted back most of the Euston plans hence why now far less is coming out of use than HS2 want.
 

NSEFAN

Established Member
Joined
17 Jun 2007
Messages
3,504
Location
Southampton
The sleepers could be split into seperate trains, so that they'll fit at Kings Cross but still have capacity. Glasgow, Edinburgh, Inverness and Fort William+Aberdeen workings, or something like that?
 

JonathanH

Veteran Member
Joined
29 May 2011
Messages
18,938
Running the trains to anywhere other than Kings Cross or Euston does make the services rather more uncompetitive, especially in the morning. 0747 is a reasonable arrival time for a 0900 start for work. How are loadings on the Highland sleeper affected when the services use the East Coast and trundle round north London reaching Euston after 0900?
 

alex17595

Member
Joined
15 Mar 2013
Messages
1,090
Location
Burton on Trent
Could you not just split the Highland in 2 and reassemble it into one at Wembly and vice versa on the return. How much time would something like this add on to travel times?
 

route:oxford

Established Member
Joined
1 Nov 2008
Messages
4,949
Kensington Olympia?

Alternatively, given that it will be at least 10 years of disruption... Are there carriage sidings, handy for an underground station, that could be rebuilt/re-engineered into a temporary station for the sleeper and/or local services?
 

London Trains

Member
Joined
9 Oct 2017
Messages
912
Victoria?
WCML > WLL > SE Lines into VIC.

VIC Platform 3 - 188m
VIC Platform 4 - 201m
VIC Platform 8 - 221m
VIC Platform 6 - 245m
VIC Platform 5 - 247m
VIC Platform 1 - 270m
VIC Platform 7 - 286m
VIC Platform 2 - 359m - Suitable for the Sleeper?

Probably a 30 - 45 minute delay than if it went to Euston.
 

Bald Rick

Veteran Member
Joined
28 Sep 2010
Messages
29,236
That won't stop the err, inventive ideas, that come out of HS2. They have already proposed sending limited Pendos to Liverpool St as one of their 'solutions' for getting all the access they want at Euston. Thankfully some realism seems to have batted back most of the Euston plans hence why now far less is coming out of use than HS2 want.

That idea was squashed very very quickly.


Could Liverpool Street work if the Platforms were extended once the Shenfield local trains move?

No, because the platforms for the Shenfield 'locals' are half the length of the sleeper trains. You'd have to take out about half the entire service at Liverpool Street to get 350m platforms in.

As The Planner says, it will be St P (International) with special arrangements for the platform gaps, or Kings Cross with 3 trains. Or Euston off 1 platform, as was done for most of 2000.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top