• Our new ticketing site is now live! Using either this or the original site (both powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

Porterbrook Cl.769 'Flex' trains from 319s, initially for Northern

Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

DimTim

Member
Joined
11 Aug 2013
Messages
192
Do we have any updates on progress?
Will we see the first unit released from Brush for testing in November?
 

mwmbwls

Member
Joined
14 Dec 2009
Messages
678
The Institute of Mechanical Engineers has announced that Porterbrook and Wabtec will present a technical lecture on the 11th April 2018 from 17:15 to 19:30 on the Class 769 Flex 'tri-mode' train.

Carriage Shop – Derby

Derby Roundhouse

Roundhouse Road

Pride Park

Derby

DE24 8JE

United Kingdom


https://nearyou.imeche.org/eventdetail?id=13878
 

D365

Veteran Member
Joined
29 Jun 2012
Messages
12,283
The IMechE do railway lectures too? That’s only another website I have to keep an eye on...
 

SansHache

Member
Joined
31 Mar 2015
Messages
161
Location
Manchester

coppercapped

Established Member
Joined
13 Sep 2015
Messages
3,221
Location
Reading
The IMechE do railway lectures too? That’s only another website I have to keep an eye on...
As the Institution of Mechanical Engineers was created because the 'Civils' turned down George Stephenson's membership application, it would be surprising if it didn't!

George became the IMechE's first president...

(The IMechE has a Railway Division; I attend the South Eastern group's meeting quite regularly as a guest, there are also meetings at Headquarters in Birdcage Walk).
 

Chester1

Established Member
Joined
25 Aug 2014
Messages
4,276
Is there any news on progress? The delay of Manchester to Preston electrification makes there introduction even more important for Northern.
 

a_c_skinner

Established Member
Joined
21 Jun 2013
Messages
1,624
Or the delay on the 769s makes Manchester - Preston wiring even more important. I assume nothing more is known as IIRC testing is scheduled for Loughborough or somewhere equally public, he said putting his combined volume back in his duffle bag.
 

50032

Member
Joined
3 Mar 2016
Messages
158
It's all very quiet... and the chances of them being ready for May is slipping away fast...
 

gazthomas

Established Member
Joined
5 Jun 2011
Messages
3,122
Location
St. Albans
You wonder why the industy can’t give realistic delivery dates. Time and time again there are delays, surely better planning and risk assessment would flag potential pitfalls up earlier?
 

D365

Veteran Member
Joined
29 Jun 2012
Messages
12,283
Interesting to note that the naysayers oft seen when it came to discussion of the Vivarail project, have seemingly taken to a staunch silence here regarding the "319 Flex"...
 

a_c_skinner

Established Member
Joined
21 Jun 2013
Messages
1,624
Probably because the 796 will be a better train when finished (assuming it works) but December timetable seems realistic for in service in any number. It is supposed to perform well on diesel, comparable with some sprinters, it could save the day in a lot of places. It will be proof of concept, actually a lot more than proof of concept.
 

Bletchleyite

Veteran Member
Joined
20 Oct 2014
Messages
105,279
Location
"Marston Vale mafia"
Interesting to note that the naysayers oft seen when it came to discussion of the Vivarail project, have seemingly taken to a staunch silence here regarding the "319 Flex"...

Even though there has been a Vivarail prototype (albeit an incendiary one), and we have heard what about the 769.....? :)

(I do think it'll be a good conversion though)
 

Chester1

Established Member
Joined
25 Aug 2014
Messages
4,276
Probably because the 796 will be a better train when finished (assuming it works) but December timetable seems realistic for in service in any number. It is supposed to perform well on diesel, comparable with some sprinters, it could save the day in a lot of places. It will be proof of concept, actually a lot more than proof of concept.

Frankly even one unit entering service will help Northern. One 769 will free up 2 x 2 coach 150s. Whatever timetable Northern cobbles together for the May timetable change will most likely involve the fleet being stretched to its limits until more cascaded stock arrives.

Even though there has been a Vivarail prototype (albeit an incendiary one), and we have heard what about the 769.....? :)

(I do think it'll be a good conversion though)

Its not really a conversion project, its basically just sticking two diesel engines underneath 319s which are proven on the national network. Vivarail's basically building new trains from the shell of underground stock. Hopefully the 769 tests go ahead next month and they can somehow enter service in May or shortly after.
 

507021

Established Member
Joined
19 Feb 2015
Messages
4,759
Location
Chester
Even though there has been a Vivarail prototype (albeit an incendiary one), and we have heard what about the 769.....? :)

(I do think it'll be a good conversion though)

I think the 769s will be good trains too, and they work, will open the door for other large fleets of off-lease EMUs such as the 321s and 455s to be converted into bi-mode stock. I support both the D-Train and Flex projects, but I think the Flex is more likely to succeed.

If I remember rightly, isn't the first Class 769 unit due to begin testing at the Great Central Railway next month?
 

Bevan Price

Established Member
Joined
22 Apr 2010
Messages
7,861
Probably because the 796 will be a better train when finished (assuming it works) but December timetable seems realistic for in service in any number. It is supposed to perform well on diesel, comparable with some sprinters, it could save the day in a lot of places. It will be proof of concept, actually a lot more than proof of concept.

Whilst the 769s will serve a useful purpose, from what I have read about their specification, they will struggle to match Class 150 or 156 timings.
 

ash39

Established Member
Joined
8 Feb 2012
Messages
1,508
Whilst the 769s will serve a useful purpose, from what I have read about their specification, they will struggle to match Class 150 or 156 timings.

Yes, even if the engines were more powerful than the usual sprinter engines (300-350bhp?), I can't see how it could be possible to match sprinter timings with 2 engines for 4 coaches, versus an engine per coach.

Anyone know the spec of the engines going under the 319s?
 

47802

Established Member
Joined
6 Mar 2010
Messages
3,454
I think the 769s will be good trains too, and they work, will open the door for other large fleets of off-lease EMUs such as the 321s and 455s to be converted into bi-mode stock. I support both the D-Train and Flex projects, but I think the Flex is more likely to succeed.

If I remember rightly, isn't the first Class 769 unit due to begin testing at the Great Central Railway next month?

I don't think they will be opening any doors, the key advantage was potentially getting them in service before the 2020 deadline which any further new builds will now struggle to do, but as that advantage starts to recede I expect new build CAF/Stadler etc. Units may become a better bet for TOC's.

I've seen another comment from a good source that says that the biggest proponent of these trains in Porterbrook no longer works for the company!
 

47802

Established Member
Joined
6 Mar 2010
Messages
3,454
x
Yes, even if the engines were more powerful than the usual sprinter engines (300-350bhp?), I can't see how it could be possible to match sprinter timings with 2 engines for 4 coaches, versus an engine per coach.

Anyone know the spec of the engines going under the 319s?

The Man engines they supposed to be using are around 530hp x 2 while 150 engines are around 280hp x 4 so hp wise they shouldn't be that different overall, obviously the transmission is different.
 
Last edited:

samuelmorris

Established Member
Joined
18 Jul 2013
Messages
5,121
Location
Brentwood, Essex
Yes, even if the engines were more powerful than the usual sprinter engines (300-350bhp?), I can't see how it could be possible to match sprinter timings with 2 engines for 4 coaches, versus an engine per coach.

Anyone know the spec of the engines going under the 319s?

MAN D2876 according to the wiki page, but it cites no source for that. If it's true (and it would make sense to), it's double the power of a Sprinter engine.
 

Bletchleyite

Veteran Member
Joined
20 Oct 2014
Messages
105,279
Location
"Marston Vale mafia"
And you'll get faster low-down acceleration from electric transmission, as you're not wasting power as heat and noise in the hydraulic transmission fitted to regular Sprinters.
 

gareth950

Member
Joined
3 Nov 2013
Messages
1,009
Not forgetting of course 5 x 769s have been ordered for Wales to allow Sprinters to be sent away for PRM mods. If the 769s don't arrive in Wales by mid-summer, having even half of Wales' current Sprinter fleet 2020 compliant will be impossible.
 

ash39

Established Member
Joined
8 Feb 2012
Messages
1,508
And you'll get faster low-down acceleration from electric transmission, as you're not wasting power as heat and noise in the hydraulic transmission fitted to regular Sprinters.

Is the idea that the diesel engines power the existing traction motors?

They should be pretty useful bits of kit if they turn out to be reliable. Good for passengers too, two unpowered trailer cars to choose from!
 

Agent_Squash

Established Member
Joined
22 Jul 2016
Messages
1,245
Is the idea that the diesel engines power the existing traction motors?

They should be pretty useful bits of kit if they turn out to be reliable. Good for passengers too, two unpowered trailer cars to choose from!
Exactly that - the diesel mode effectively replaces DC on the Northern/ATW units.
 

D365

Veteran Member
Joined
29 Jun 2012
Messages
12,283
Is the idea that the diesel engines power the existing traction motors?

They should be pretty useful bits of kit if they turn out to be reliable. Good for passengers too, two unpowered trailer cars to choose from!

What do you mean? One diesel engine for each "Driving Trailer", with alternators feeding the existing 750V DC bus line.

321s (or 317s) would be more difficult to convert as they do not share this feature. Hence the suggestion of a 455 conversion.
 

Top