Mordac
Established Member
He might wanna come "oop North" where we all talk to strangers![]()
St. Albans is north of Watford, that's The North, right?

He might wanna come "oop North" where we all talk to strangers![]()
No need to go to Manchester, you can do the same by a short walk down Euston road!![]()
Meanwhile, 319424 has been moved to Brush to join 434/456.
A post in the Northern unit livery thread says testing on the Great Central is now Feb 18 not Nov 17.Do we have any updates on progress?
Will we see the first unit released from Brush for testing in November?
The IMechE do railway lectures too? That’s only another website I have to keep an eye on...
Anyone know if this is still the plan?A post in the Northern unit livery thread says testing on the Great Central is now Feb 18 not Nov 17.
As the Institution of Mechanical Engineers was created because the 'Civils' turned down George Stephenson's membership application, it would be surprising if it didn't!The IMechE do railway lectures too? That’s only another website I have to keep an eye on...
Interesting to note that the naysayers oft seen when it came to discussion of the Vivarail project, have seemingly taken to a staunch silence here regarding the "319 Flex"...
Probably because the 796 will be a better train when finished (assuming it works) but December timetable seems realistic for in service in any number. It is supposed to perform well on diesel, comparable with some sprinters, it could save the day in a lot of places. It will be proof of concept, actually a lot more than proof of concept.
Even though there has been a Vivarail prototype (albeit an incendiary one), and we have heard what about the 769.....?
(I do think it'll be a good conversion though)
Even though there has been a Vivarail prototype (albeit an incendiary one), and we have heard what about the 769.....?
(I do think it'll be a good conversion though)
Probably because the 796 will be a better train when finished (assuming it works) but December timetable seems realistic for in service in any number. It is supposed to perform well on diesel, comparable with some sprinters, it could save the day in a lot of places. It will be proof of concept, actually a lot more than proof of concept.
Whilst the 769s will serve a useful purpose, from what I have read about their specification, they will struggle to match Class 150 or 156 timings.
I think the 769s will be good trains too, and they work, will open the door for other large fleets of off-lease EMUs such as the 321s and 455s to be converted into bi-mode stock. I support both the D-Train and Flex projects, but I think the Flex is more likely to succeed.
If I remember rightly, isn't the first Class 769 unit due to begin testing at the Great Central Railway next month?
Yes, even if the engines were more powerful than the usual sprinter engines (300-350bhp?), I can't see how it could be possible to match sprinter timings with 2 engines for 4 coaches, versus an engine per coach.
Anyone know the spec of the engines going under the 319s?
Yes, even if the engines were more powerful than the usual sprinter engines (300-350bhp?), I can't see how it could be possible to match sprinter timings with 2 engines for 4 coaches, versus an engine per coach.
Anyone know the spec of the engines going under the 319s?
And you'll get faster low-down acceleration from electric transmission, as you're not wasting power as heat and noise in the hydraulic transmission fitted to regular Sprinters.
Exactly that - the diesel mode effectively replaces DC on the Northern/ATW units.Is the idea that the diesel engines power the existing traction motors?
They should be pretty useful bits of kit if they turn out to be reliable. Good for passengers too, two unpowered trailer cars to choose from!
Is the idea that the diesel engines power the existing traction motors?
They should be pretty useful bits of kit if they turn out to be reliable. Good for passengers too, two unpowered trailer cars to choose from!