• Our booking engine at tickets.railforums.co.uk (powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

Xc voyager going through edinburgh park on the Edinburgh Glasgow

Status
Not open for further replies.
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

PHILIPE

Veteran Member
Joined
14 Nov 2011
Messages
13,472
Location
Caerphilly
Thish was around half 9 - half 10 is this a service or does this just go to polmadie via the city of Glasgow line via springburn


Completely untraceable via this route. XC do'nt use Polmadie in any case. there were Voyagers running via Slateford but not Edinburgh Park
 

Clansman

Established Member
Joined
4 Jan 2016
Messages
2,573
Location
Hong Kong
It's a weekly diagram that's been running for years. A double Virgin Voyager runs empty from Waverley to Polmadie via Falkirk Grahamston, Cumbernauld, and Coatbridge. If I remember rightly there was also a Polmadie to Edinburgh one which stopped not too long ago.
 

CBPolmont

New Member
Joined
15 Jul 2019
Messages
3
Just about every Monday and Tuesday morning at about 7.20am whilst i’m waiting at Polmont, a VTWC double Super Voyager Unit passes through towards Edinburgh. I’m presuming it comes from Polmadie via Falkirk Grahamston, to operate the 8.52 Edinburgh/ London Euston service?

I’m curious what the reasoning is for this route? and does this happen every morning, just at different times so I don’t see it?
 

Highlandspring

Established Member
Joined
14 Oct 2017
Messages
2,777
It’s 5M52 0623 Polmadie - Edinburgh Waverley which runs that way Mondays, Tuesdays and Wednesdays for diversionary route knowledge retention. There’s a corresponding back working at night, 5S93 2238 Edinburgh Waverley - Polmadie.
 

CBPolmont

New Member
Joined
15 Jul 2019
Messages
3
Interesting. So if a train from the London wasn't able to go across to Edinburgh at Carstairs, the service could potentially go via Cumbernauld and Falkirk? How often has that happened? Would they ever use a class 390 now that the route is entirely electrified?
 

PHILIPE

Veteran Member
Joined
14 Nov 2011
Messages
13,472
Location
Caerphilly

221129

Established Member
Joined
21 Mar 2011
Messages
6,520
Location
Sunny Scotland
Welcome to the Forum and hope that you will enjoy some good discussion. Actually somebody asked the same question a few weeks ago so you might find some interesting reading here:-

www.railforums.co.uk/threads/xc-voyager-going-through-edinburgh-park-on-the-edinburgh-glasgow.182561/

Regarding a 390 working it, I can't see anything to prevent it but it would depend on what stock would be moved and how it would fit in the overall orkings (diagrams)
You'll struggle to get a Pendolino around the Edinburgh Suburban line.
 

Highlandspring

Established Member
Joined
14 Oct 2017
Messages
2,777
Not sure 390s are allowed via Kirkwood and/or Whifflet.
Class 390s aren’t route cleared north of Mossend South Junction towards Whifflet, Carmyle and Coatbridge due to dynamic gauge restrictions at a bridge. That means you can’t divert a 390 via the R&C; they have recently been cleared to operate over the Benhar though which I’m sure will come in handy at some point.
 

route:oxford

Established Member
Joined
1 Nov 2008
Messages
4,949
Interesting. So if a train from the London wasn't able to go across to Edinburgh at Carstairs, the service could potentially go via Cumbernauld and Falkirk? How often has that happened? Would they ever use a class 390 now that the route is entirely electrified?

Back in 2012, TPE services were routed that way during engineering works (diesel operations). They called at Falkirk Grahamson.
 

route101

Established Member
Joined
16 May 2010
Messages
10,634
Back in 2012, TPE services were routed that way during engineering works (diesel operations). They called at Falkirk Grahamson.

March 2013 i took TPE from Edinburgh to Glasgow Central via Falkirk , im sure it didnt call at Falkirk .

Wouldnt 390s go via Shotts now its wired?
 

LNW-GW Joint

Veteran Member
Joined
22 Feb 2011
Messages
19,711
Location
Mold, Clwyd
Not if the blockage is between Haymarket East Jn and Midcalder Jn, for example.... In any case it's moot because Pendolinos aren't route cleared.

If ever ICWC offers a service to Stirling (promised in 2012 for after electrification), 390s will need to be cleared via Coatbridge.
TPE's 397s, and maybe 802s, will also need to be route cleared that way if they are to use the Falkirk route for diversions.
 

diffident

Member
Joined
19 Feb 2018
Messages
307
Location
West Midlands
This whole debate brings us back to rail nationalisation. Wouldn't it be better that the drivers were civil servants, trained to drive trains over a range of routes???

That way, drivers aren't restricted by employer and their routes, but by the area they serve????
 

Clip

Established Member
Joined
28 Jun 2010
Messages
10,822
This whole debate brings us back to rail nationalisation. Wouldn't it be better that the drivers were civil servants, trained to drive trains over a range of routes???

Its just a debate about trains going via certain route and nothing to do with nationalisation

That way, drivers aren't restricted by employer and their routes, but by the area they serve????

So a Preston driver only serves the preston area and so on and so forth which means lots of crew changeovers and if the incoming driver is delayed then massive knock on delays everywhere else - Brilliant plan
 

Highlandspring

Established Member
Joined
14 Oct 2017
Messages
2,777
This whole debate brings us back to rail nationalisation.
No it appears you have contorted the thread to the subject of nationalisation. It really has nothing to do with the topic in hand, perhaps the speculation forum would be a better place for the debate you are hoping to kick off..?
 
Last edited:

diffident

Member
Joined
19 Feb 2018
Messages
307
Location
West Midlands
No it appears you have contorted the thread to the subject of nationalisation. It really has nothing to do with the topic in hand, perhaps the speculation forum would be a better place for the debate you are hoping to kick off..?

If you'd cared to include the rest of my statement in your quote, you'd note that I'm talking about driver coverage, not privatisation per se. But I'll leave that to you're own @Highlandspring
 

xtradj

Member
Joined
24 Jul 2006
Messages
542
Yes it’s diversionary route knowledge. I’ve seen it at carmuirs west junction many a time in the morning
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top