• Our new ticketing site is now live! Using either this or the original site (both powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

Caledonian Sleeper

6Z09

Member
Joined
19 Nov 2009
Messages
499
A “hotel on wheels” with a pre-8am checkout makes for a poor hotel in my opinion. They really need to think about what level of service (and price) their customers will expect if they’re marketing their product in that way
Surely the "Hotel on Wheels " marketing must be one of the biggest blunders ever made!
Two years down the line still plagued by snagging issues.
 
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

Blindtraveler

Established Member
Joined
28 Feb 2011
Messages
10,509
Location
Nowhere near enough to a Pacer :(
And at what sort of hotel would you pay over £100 or sometimes even substantially more for a standard room with shared toilet facilities? This sort of accommodation now is reserved mainly for the likes of budget travelers or long staying contractors or stupid train enthusiasts that require a bed for the night in in insert name of silly random location here at a cheap as chips price
 

JamesT

Established Member
Joined
25 Feb 2015
Messages
3,613
And at what sort of hotel would you pay over £100 or sometimes even substantially more for a standard room with shared toilet facilities? This sort of accommodation now is reserved mainly for the likes of budget travelers or long staying contractors or stupid train enthusiasts that require a bed for the night in in insert name of silly random location here at a cheap as chips price

Aren't they pretty much stuck where they are? If they lower the advertised quality people will expect lower fares, or if they reduce the fares to match the perceived quality then that would require even more subsidy of an already heavily subsidised service. Trying to raise the quality presumably requires either higher fares or again higher subsidy, neither of which are going to be welcome.
 

35B

Established Member
Joined
19 Dec 2011
Messages
2,685
Aren't they pretty much stuck where they are? If they lower the advertised quality people will expect lower fares, or if they reduce the fares to match the perceived quality then that would require even more subsidy of an already heavily subsidised service. Trying to raise the quality presumably requires either higher fares or again higher subsidy, neither of which are going to be welcome.
Not just that, but the standard I expect from a hotel has risen. Bluntly, the Scotrail offering didn't deliver what I'd expect when paying for overnight accommodation and, when it works, the CS offering does.
 

gallafent

Member
Joined
23 Dec 2010
Messages
527
A “hotel on wheels” with a pre-8am checkout makes for a poor hotel in my opinion. They really need to think about what level of service (and price) their customers will expect if they’re marketing their product in that way
It's really interesting to think about this branding. Many years ago I travelled from Paris to Madrid (and back) on the “trenhotel” which sadly no longer runs (a victim of improved high speed day services serving the route). That was part of a longer journey between south east England and Andalusia. That included both a restaurant car and a cafe-bar car, and the rooms were of good quality (with three price tiers). Given the distance, and the cost and time of using a day train for the same journey back then (with an extra night spent somewhere en route in a hotel), it was a good option.

It sounds as if there are quite a lot of ways in which the CS would need to change, in order to provide even that level of “hotel” service, which was decent enough, but only arguably “luxury”. And given that the length of the route won't change, …

There's an article at https://www.acprail.com/blog/2013/07/a-guide-to-the-elipsos-trenhotel/ which gives some more information about these services, including images of cabins with floorplans (4-berth / 2-berth / 2-berth + ensuite WC+shower), and mention of the restaurant and bar services.
 

jumble

Established Member
Joined
1 Jul 2011
Messages
1,264
It's really interesting to think about this branding. Many years ago I travelled from Paris to Madrid (and back) on the “trenhotel” which sadly no longer runs (a victim of improved high speed day services serving the route). That was part of a longer journey between south east England and Andalusia. That included both a restaurant car and a cafe-bar car, and the rooms were of good quality (with three price tiers). Given the distance, and the cost and time of using a day train for the same journey back then (with an extra night spent somewhere en route in a hotel), it was a good option.

It sounds as if there are quite a lot of ways in which the CS would need to change, in order to provide even that level of “hotel” service, which was decent enough, but only arguably “luxury”. And given that the length of the route won't change, …

There's an article at https://www.acprail.com/blog/2013/07/a-guide-to-the-elipsos-trenhotel/ which gives some more information about these services, including images of cabins with floorplans (4-berth / 2-berth / 2-berth + ensuite WC+shower), and mention of the restaurant and bar services.
This prompted me to check on a trip at Todays prices for a trip I did pre covid on Amtrak which is directly comparable to London Aberdeen
22 March 2022 Eugene to Oakland 530 Miles ish 2 People in a Roomette £277
Bedroom £462
Includes decent Dinner and Breakfast worth probably around £60.00

22 March 2022 Euston to Aberdeen 530 Miles ish 2 People in Fixed Classic £175
Twin Suite £250

I conclude that Caledonian are not outrageous in their pricing
 

Ken_Ilworth

Member
Joined
10 Feb 2010
Messages
88
This prompted me to check on a trip at Todays prices for a trip I did pre covid on Amtrak which is directly comparable to London Aberdeen
22 March 2022 Eugene to Oakland 530 Miles ish 2 People in a Roomette £277
Bedroom £462
Includes decent Dinner and Breakfast worth probably around £60.00

22 March 2022 Euston to Aberdeen 530 Miles ish 2 People in Fixed Classic £175
Twin Suite £250

I conclude that Caledonian are not outrageous in their pricing
Is that a totally fair comparison? (converting Amtrak's fares into sterling). Would those fares "feel" as expensive to an average American, earning and paying in dollars, I wonder
 

paul1609

Established Member
Joined
28 Jan 2006
Messages
7,992
Location
K
This prompted me to check on a trip at Todays prices for a trip I did pre covid on Amtrak which is directly comparable to London Aberdeen
22 March 2022 Eugene to Oakland 530 Miles ish 2 People in a Roomette £277
Bedroom £462
Includes decent Dinner and Breakfast worth probably around £60.00

22 March 2022 Euston to Aberdeen 530 Miles ish 2 People in Fixed Classic £175
Twin Suite £250

I conclude that Caledonian are not outrageous in their pricing
I agree, especially when you consider that the seated advance is £53, which in itself is competitive with all but the very lowest daytime advances.
 

miami

Established Member
Joined
3 Oct 2015
Messages
3,257
Location
UK
Is that a totally fair comparison? (converting Amtrak's fares into sterling). Would those fares "feel" as expensive to an average American, earning and paying in dollars, I wonder

UK £175 / £250. UK median wage £30,420, so cost is 0.6% / 0.8% of median wage.

US £277 / £462, median wage in Oregon $60,306 dollars, £43344, so cost is 0.6% / 1.1% of median wage

So similar. How much subsidy does the Amtrack service get?
 

gallafent

Member
Joined
23 Dec 2010
Messages
527
UK £175 / £250. UK median wage £30,420, so cost is 0.6% / 0.8% of median wage.

US £277 / £462, median wage in Oregon $60,306 dollars, £43344, so cost is 0.6% / 1.1% of median wage

So similar. How much subsidy does the Amtrack service get?
That's definitely interesting. Unfortunately I can't remember what the trenhotel fares were, because that too would be an interesting comparison!

Interesting as always to compare flight prices + hotel prices too (and that's the worst case of course, often the outbound flight will mean that one could stay at home instead of an extra night in the hotel …) — Luton to Aberdeen return can be had for £75 at best, with many options below £100, and the Premier Inn in Aberdeen seems to cost a very reasonable £209.50 for 7 nights (less than £30 a night), for two people in a double room.

Which makes me think: if the Caledonian Sleeper is supposed to be a hotel, why is there anything other than a completely marginal increase in price for a cabin, i.e. a few quid, when there are two people in that cabin, instead of one? That's how it works with hotels (indeed, sometimes there's no difference in price at all between single and double occupancy of a double room — as is the case with the Aberdeen City Centre Premier Inn …).
 

Peter Sarf

Established Member
Joined
12 Oct 2010
Messages
7,767
Location
Croydon
That's definitely interesting. Unfortunately I can't remember what the trenhotel fares were, because that too would be an interesting comparison!

Interesting as always to compare flight prices + hotel prices too (and that's the worst case of course, often the outbound flight will mean that one could stay at home instead of an extra night in the hotel …) — Luton to Aberdeen return can be had for £75 at best, with many options below £100, and the Premier Inn in Aberdeen seems to cost a very reasonable £209.50 for 7 nights (less than £30 a night), for two people in a double room.

Which makes me think: if the Caledonian Sleeper is supposed to be a hotel, why is there anything other than a completely marginal increase in price for a cabin, i.e. a few quid, when there are two people in that cabin, instead of one? That's how it works with hotels (indeed, sometimes there's no difference in price at all between single and double occupancy of a double room — as is the case with the Aberdeen City Centre Premier Inn …).
And CS now really rub it in by showing you that your single room is indeed just a double, well two single bunks !.
 

edi_local

New Member
Joined
18 Jun 2021
Messages
2
Location
Edinburgh
I think it's strange to call out CS for calling itself a "Hotel on wheels". It's not even their official tagline which is "Journey of a Nightime" if the website is anything to go by.
 
Last edited:

RT4038

Established Member
Joined
22 Feb 2014
Messages
4,871
That's definitely interesting. Unfortunately I can't remember what the trenhotel fares were, because that too would be an interesting comparison!

Interesting as always to compare flight prices + hotel prices too (and that's the worst case of course, often the outbound flight will mean that one could stay at home instead of an extra night in the hotel …) — Luton to Aberdeen return can be had for £75 at best, with many options below £100, and the Premier Inn in Aberdeen seems to cost a very reasonable £209.50 for 7 nights (less than £30 a night), for two people in a double room.

Which makes me think: if the Caledonian Sleeper is supposed to be a hotel, why is there anything other than a completely marginal increase in price for a cabin, i.e. a few quid, when there are two people in that cabin, instead of one? That's how it works with hotels (indeed, sometimes there's no difference in price at all between single and double occupancy of a double room — as is the case with the Aberdeen City Centre Premier Inn …).

Because otherwise it would make Single occupancy even more expensive .......
 

miami

Established Member
Joined
3 Oct 2015
Messages
3,257
Location
UK
Because otherwise it would make Single occupancy even more expensive .......

Fares are presumably pitched at a level to take the maximum amount of money. If they could charge more for single occupancy they would, regardless of the cost of double occupancy.

The railway doesn't generally cope well for groups though.

Hire a car to go from Crewe to Norwich for 3 days, £200 return by car assuming you're hiring from outside Crewe station (car hire prices are really high at the moment, probably because people are still avoiding the train), but by train it's £110. But if there's two people the car is still £200 but the train is now £220. For 3 people the train is £330.
 

gallafent

Member
Joined
23 Dec 2010
Messages
527
I think it's strange to call out CS for calling itself a "Hotel on wheels".
Given the many different news outlets which used that phrase, strongly suggesting that it was used as part of its press releases on launch, rather than independently chosen by all those organisations, I don't think it's strange at all …

Given how often the phrase is placed in quotation marks, that really reinforces the likelihood that it is a key phrase from the press releases, for me at least.

Caledonian Sleeper's new 'hotel on wheels'​

[…]
The 'hotel on wheels' is to be in service from June.

New £150m Caledonian Sleeper trains 'are hotels on wheels'​

The service boasted a "hotel on wheels" experience [video caption]
The new £150m fleet of Caledonian Sleeper trains has been unveiled - with travellers being promised an overnight stay in "a hotel on wheels".

New Caledonian Sleeper trains like 'hotels on wheels' arrive in UK​

[…]
[…]a hotel-style keycard system and onboard WiFi.
[…]
[…]all the things modern travellers like when they are having a hotel-style experience as they travel on the train.

From a hospitality recruiter: https://www.berkeley-scott.co.uk/caledonian-sleepers-new-hotel-on-wheels/

Caledonian Sleeper’s new ‘hotel on wheels’​

[…]
The “hotel on wheels” will be in service from June.

A DREAM OF A JOURNEY AWAITS YOU IN YOUR RAILWAY HOTEL ON WHEELS​

[…]

… and many many more similar press and other articles.

Looks as if they operators wanted to present it as such to me, at least a couple of years ago when it was launched.

And, in a sense, given the pricing, it's implicitly being pitched as such … in fact, as discussed a lot in this thread, it's way more expensive than the combination of a travel ticket and a perfectly decent hotel.

== Doublepost prevention - post automatically merged: ==

The railway doesn't generally cope well for groups though.
No indeed, which is understandable when you're selling seat-by-seat, … but not so much when it's room-by-room.
 

andbrads

Member
Joined
12 May 2021
Messages
43
Location
London
I think that the comment about ‘entitled 1970s militant staff’ is completely OTT and actually quite unfair - there are some excellent and very committed staff who work for CS. One or two, perhaps, are average or even poor, but that is the same with every TOC in the UK. Remember that the media narrative that we are being fed is shaped to an extent by Serco’s PR department and they are desperate to present the poor staff who’ve gone to hell in a handcart several times throughout this franchise as militant trade unionists (which they absolutely are not) to disguise their own catalogue of failings as an operator, of which the pay freeze is merely the last straw. It’s hardly as though the poor staff are millionaires. The night shifts are quite long and arduous (and very repetitive) by railway standards, and the pay is not exactly brilliant given the unsociable working hours and their implications for family life. There’s nothing ‘entitled’ about asking for a pay rise in line with inflation given the escalation of living costs (when these staff are hardly living in luxury)- it’s hardly asking for a mansion and a Ming vase!

Remember that the poor staff are very often forced to apply ridiculous company policy which is not of their choosing- like the nonsensical ’no sharing with strangers’ rule in the lounge car back in 2018/19, or that utterly woeful boarding system around the same time, which the staff hardly wanted to enforce and indeed dreaded enforcing. Management at CS is quite top-down and dictatorial, with little room for discretion on the part of staff. It may be that CS staff are under pressure to clear the train on arrival at Euston for operational reasons. I don’t think that the trains are understaffed, or overstaffed for that matter. I am not excusing the incident involving the depot which you mention, but it strikes me as a one-off. Euston is fully open at 6.30am so there’s no issue with passengers disembarking at that time.

If you think that CS is run for the benefit of railway staff, I wonder why they bother doing a gruelling 13-14-hour shift on the Fort William run? Surely, by your logic, they’d just want to leave everyone at Waverley and be done with it!

The sleeper is a somewhat flawed operation in its present form, but the on-train staff are its best assets. I have always maintained that CS’ weaknesses lie in its management and policy which too often seem hare-brained. The current CS management are the sleeper’s worst enemy, and many users of the service will be very relieved to see them go.
I find it interesting that this post refers to the 'poor staff' three times. I'm not sure if it's intentional but the impression that is given is that the staff are being held in these jobs against their will and are the put-upon victims of evil management with no hope for an alternative future. Being on the passenger side, it may sound harsh but I don't expect to have to think about such things when coughing up almost £500 one-way to Aberdeen. It's not that I don't care on a human level, but I perhaps erroneously thought that such a price tag would buy me at least a little distance from the IR fallout.

It's also interesting regarding what you say about the staff seeing the Club Car as a nuisance, this would explain relatively minor transgressions such as being turned away for being 5 minutes late to breakfast, but with ample time remaining, and sticking to the original cut off times even when the train is delayed. It also explains why the car remains closed, for months after eating places reopened, rather more convincingly than the social distancing argument trotted out by CS. If the staff expect empathy from passengers and managers, are they willing to give this in return? I don't see much of that. I have read about staff asking passengers to not even look into the Club Car, through the locked doors! I wonder why that would be.

Overall, perhaps a case of golden handcuffs and the customer being the collateral damage?
 

SuspectUsual

Established Member
Joined
11 Jul 2018
Messages
5,140
Given the many different news outlets which used that phrase, strongly suggesting that it was used as part of its press releases on launch, rather than independently chosen by all those organisations

Indeed. And four of the five articles you used the phrase with quotation marks around it so clearly it was something they’d be given by CS or their PR company
 

MrEd

Member
Joined
13 Jan 2019
Messages
593
I find it interesting that this post refers to the 'poor staff' three times. I'm not sure if it's intentional but the impression that is given is that the staff are being held in these jobs against their will and are the put-upon victims of evil management with no hope for an alternative future. Being on the passenger side, it may sound harsh but I don't expect to have to think about such things when coughing up almost £500 one-way to Aberdeen. It's not that I don't care on a human level, but I perhaps erroneously thought that such a price tag would buy me at least a little distance from the IR fallout.

It's also interesting regarding what you say about the staff seeing the Club Car as a nuisance, this would explain relatively minor transgressions such as being turned away for being 5 minutes late to breakfast, but with ample time remaining, and sticking to the original cut off times even when the train is delayed. It also explains why the car remains closed, for months after eating places reopened, rather more convincingly than the social distancing argument trotted out by CS. If the staff expect empathy from passengers and managers, are they willing to give this in return? I don't see much of that. I have read about staff asking passengers to not even look into the Club Car, through the locked doors! I wonder why that would be.

Overall, perhaps a case of golden handcuffs and the customer being the collateral damage?
I’m not sure that the high fares charged by CS necessarily translate to good pay and conditions for staff, nor a great level of staff satisfaction. Just because it is a supposedly ‘high end’ business does not necessarily mean that the workforce are happy. Management are not ‘evil’ but are not always very kind to CS staff, and I don’t think they ever take their complaints especially seriously. The main problem is that CS management constantly think of operating practices (perhaps designed to reflect a ‘hotel on wheels’ and their exaggerated marketing claims) which do not work in practice (the boarding system used in 2018-19 is a prime example of this), and the staff are then harassed by constant complaints from the travelling public (paying very high fares, so their patience is already low) because the policies do not make sense.

I am not sure about why the lounge car remains closed - but I do agree that there’s not exactly much enthusiasm for reopening it. Perhaps the extensive risk assessments and reduction in capacity mean that it’s prohibitively difficult to open (or too difficult to be worth bothering with). Maybe the accountants are saying that it costs more to run than the revenue which it will bring with social distancing measures in place. The train can run with fewer staff each night if there is no lounge service. Again, I think that CS got carried away with this silly idea dreamt up by the PR people that it was some kind of exclusive ‘club’ car (resembling some kind of gentrified bar on rails) and wanted the staff to run it in that way (when the staff had no interest in doing so and many passengers were perfectly satisfied with what went before) the lounge car of First Group days (which was basically a glorified buffet car) was much easier for the staff to run and was still a nice place for passengers to sit.

Some of the staff who were familiar with the First Group business model (and even BR before that, in the case of the very senior staff) have found it quite hard to adapt to the Serco model. I’m not saying that this is right, but I wonder if CS have supported the staff as well as they could have done throughout the change from Mk3s to Mk5s and all the changes in operating practices that this has brought? Disillusioned staff are very unlikely to offer great customer service - perhaps because things are as alien to them as they are to the passenger.

The Mk2s and Mk3s were absolutely knackered and had to be replaced, but I can’t help thinking that many of the positive aspects of the old First Group business model could have been retained.
 

andbrads

Member
Joined
12 May 2021
Messages
43
Location
London
I’m not sure that the high fares charged by CS necessarily translate to good pay and conditions for staff, nor a great level of staff satisfaction. Just because it is a supposedly ‘high end’ business does not necessarily mean that the workforce are happy. Management are not ‘evil’ but are not always very kind to CS staff, and I don’t think they ever take their complaints especially seriously. The main problem is that CS management constantly think of operating practices (perhaps designed to reflect a ‘hotel on wheels’ and their exaggerated marketing claims) which do not work in practice (the boarding system used in 2018-19 is a prime example of this), and the staff are then harassed by constant complaints from the travelling public (paying very high fares, so their patience is already low) because the policies do not make sense.

I am not sure about why the lounge car remains closed - but I do agree that there’s not exactly much enthusiasm for reopening it. Perhaps the extensive risk assessments and reduction in capacity mean that it’s prohibitively difficult to open (or too difficult to be worth bothering with). Maybe the accountants are saying that it costs more to run than the revenue which it will bring with social distancing measures in place. The train can run with fewer staff each night if there is no lounge service. Again, I think that CS got carried away with this silly idea dreamt up by the PR people that it was some kind of exclusive ‘club’ car (resembling some kind of gentrified bar on rails) and wanted the staff to run it in that way (when the staff had no interest in doing so and many passengers were perfectly satisfied with what went before) the lounge car of First Group days (which was basically a glorified buffet car) was much easier for the staff to run and was still a nice place for passengers to sit.

Some of the staff who were familiar with the First Group business model (and even BR before that, in the case of the very senior staff) have found it quite hard to adapt to the Serco model. I’m not saying that this is right, but I wonder if CS have supported the staff as well as they could have done throughout the change from Mk3s to Mk5s and all the changes in operating practices that this has brought? Disillusioned staff are very unlikely to offer great customer service - perhaps because things are as alien to them as they are to the passenger.

The Mk2s and Mk3s were absolutely knackered and had to be replaced, but I can’t help thinking that many of the positive aspects of the old First Group business model could have been retained.

Realistically, how can the customer control how CS treats its staff? Are you suggesting that customers boycott the company because they supposedly treat their staff in a substandard way? I think this would be expecting an unrealistic level of interest and engagement from a consumer base who merely wishes to get from A to B in relative comfort and is paying a substantial cost to do so.

I find it amazing that there is an apparent issue with the managers not being 'very kind' to their teams. They are there to get the most out of their teams and on occasion, often more frequent than anyone would want, this involves asking people to do things they wouldn't do of their own volition. In no way am I excusing tactlessness or rudeness, but hand on heart I cannot say I am constantly 'very kind' to the people I manage. Equally, they are not always 'very kind' to me, and nor do I expect that, as that is what I get a salary for.

Re the Club Car, I'm staggered the concept is described as 'silly'. Having been on FGW's equivalent, what CS was attempting to do did not hold a candle on a culinary level, it was hardly the most ambitious food going and very clearly simplified for the benefit of the staff not the customer. But even that is apparently too much to bear.

I'm pretty new to this forum and know very little about the UK rail industry and I am not one for hyperbole. But reading the tone of the language that is applied to staff, I am taken aback at how slanted it is towards the staff and not the customer; 'poor staff', who need to be treated 'very kindly', 'supported' though changes and who have 'no interest' in doing the Club Car service (as prescribed and advertised) because it was 'easier' (for the staff) before.

Genuine question, is that truly meant to elicit some kind of sympathetic reaction, or expectation to change anything, from Mr or Mrs Miggins who has paid £££?
 

Bletchleyite

Veteran Member
Joined
20 Oct 2014
Messages
104,923
Location
"Marston Vale mafia"
Re the Club Car, I'm staggered the concept is described as 'silly'. Having been on FGW's equivalent, what CS was attempting to do did not hold a candle on a culinary level, it was hardly the most ambitious food going and very clearly simplified for the benefit of the staff not the customer. But even that is apparently too much to bear.

I'm not aware of it really being any different from ScotRail days other than the physical rolling stock and the menu being slightly but not massively different. As was said it's a glorified buffet car but with real crockery etc and table service. A DB Bistro on the UK rails, basically. Which is ideal for this sort of train.

But TBH I don't overly care for staff who might not want to do their job as per their contract, once COVID is over. They have two choices, do it as per their contract, or resign and let someone who wants to do it take it.
 

6Z09

Member
Joined
19 Nov 2009
Messages
499
I'm not aware of it really being any different from ScotRail days other than the physical rolling stock and the menu being slightly but not massively different. As was said it's a glorified buffet car but with real crockery etc and table service. A DB Bistro on the UK rails, basically. Which is ideal for this sort of train.

But TBH I don't overly care for staff who might not want to do their job as per their contract, once COVID is over. They have two choices, do it as per their contract, or resign and let someone who wants to do it take it.
What makes you think staff don't want to do their jobs as per their contracts?
A Company that has had industrial action every year for the past few years clearly is not addressing the many issues that exist !
 

tspaul26

Established Member
Joined
9 Jun 2016
Messages
1,829
What makes you think staff don't want to do their jobs as per their contracts?
From earlier in this thread:
I think that CS got carried away with this silly idea dreamt up by the PR people that it was some kind of exclusive ‘club’ car (resembling some kind of gentrified bar on rails) and wanted the staff to run it in that way (when the staff had no interest in doing so

Yes, there are some good staff and the catering offer is also decent in normal times, but there are some who take a bare minimum approach and act hassled when they have the inconvenience of 3 customers to attend to in the lounge on a Tuesday in January.

there are some who aren’t particularly motivated when it comes to the lounge car (not that this matters any more), perhaps because they don’t really see it as the main purpose of their job (whether rightly or wrongly), and in fact regard the catering side of the operation as a nuisance (a minority of sleeper staff do think this, whether rightly or wrongly).

I also note that the “important duties” referred to below remain to be particularised by anyone:
Just because the staff are not visible does not mean that they don’t have important duties to attend to.
 

35B

Established Member
Joined
19 Dec 2011
Messages
2,685
Realistically, how can the customer control how CS treats its staff? Are you suggesting that customers boycott the company because they supposedly treat their staff in a substandard way? I think this would be expecting an unrealistic level of interest and engagement from a consumer base who merely wishes to get from A to B in relative comfort and is paying a substantial cost to do so.

I find it amazing that there is an apparent issue with the managers not being 'very kind' to their teams. They are there to get the most out of their teams and on occasion, often more frequent than anyone would want, this involves asking people to do things they wouldn't do of their own volition. In no way am I excusing tactlessness or rudeness, but hand on heart I cannot say I am constantly 'very kind' to the people I manage. Equally, they are not always 'very kind' to me, and nor do I expect that, as that is what I get a salary for.

Re the Club Car, I'm staggered the concept is described as 'silly'. Having been on FGW's equivalent, what CS was attempting to do did not hold a candle on a culinary level, it was hardly the most ambitious food going and very clearly simplified for the benefit of the staff not the customer. But even that is apparently too much to bear.

I'm pretty new to this forum and know very little about the UK rail industry and I am not one for hyperbole. But reading the tone of the language that is applied to staff, I am taken aback at how slanted it is towards the staff and not the customer; 'poor staff', who need to be treated 'very kindly', 'supported' though changes and who have 'no interest' in doing the Club Car service (as prescribed and advertised) because it was 'easier' (for the staff) before.

Genuine question, is that truly meant to elicit some kind of sympathetic reaction, or expectation to change anything, from Mr or Mrs Miggins who has paid £££?
My few journeys on the sleepers in the last 10 years have seen very mixed quality of service by the staff, varying between the excellent and the diabolical. There has been no correlation with ownership of the business.

That tells me that the challenge of delivering consistent quality of service runs a lot deeper than who the operator is, and that the management of change has not been good.

At that point, the language of "support" and "kindness" does matter - if a company wants to achieve change, it needs to do so by bringing staff with them. Otherwise, all the PR in the world can't mask a different reality. And on that, it's clear from what's been said that Serco bear responsibility. It is their decisions that have left staff with worse facilities than on the Mk3 pantries, it is their decisions that have left staff feeling alienated. While there may well be other factors in the mix - it does after all take two to tango - the prime responsibility lies with the operator.

When I travel with CS, I buy the ticket from CS based on the offer that CS make me. It is up to CS to deliver on that offer, and up to CS to find the right way to deliver on that offer. If individual staff members let the side down, then it is open to me to raise a complaint about their actions, or to pass feedback. But the accountability for delivery is always with CS.
 

miami

Established Member
Joined
3 Oct 2015
Messages
3,257
Location
UK
At that point, the language of "support" and "kindness" does matter - if a company wants to achieve change, it needs to do so by bringing staff with them. Otherwise, all the PR in the world can't mask a different reality.

And if the staff fail to go with the company, regardless of how kind managers are, the company goes bust, and the staff are out of a job.
 

35B

Established Member
Joined
19 Dec 2011
Messages
2,685
And if the staff fail to go with the company, regardless of how kind managers are, the company goes bust, and the staff are out of a job.
Agreed. But that doesn't absolve the employer of it's responsibility to manage change effectively.
 

al78

Established Member
Joined
7 Jan 2013
Messages
2,550
Surely the "Hotel on Wheels " marketing must be one of the biggest blunders ever made!
Two years down the line still plagued by snagging issues.
Hotel on wheels? That is dangerously close to the wrong side of the trade descriptions act. I've had more space and a better nights sleep in a Scottish bothy than on the sleeper. I have only used the classic rooms, which when I first used the sleeper were the only cabins available (was either 1st class, single occupancy, or standard class, you might have to share), so maybe the twin and double room with en-suite facilities on offer now are a closer approximation to a hotel. I doubt they will be as comfortable and/or spacious as a hotel room, simply because space is very restricted in a train carriage, coimpared to a purpose built building.
 

andbrads

Member
Joined
12 May 2021
Messages
43
Location
London
My few journeys on the sleepers in the last 10 years have seen very mixed quality of service by the staff, varying between the excellent and the diabolical. There has been no correlation with ownership of the business.

That tells me that the challenge of delivering consistent quality of service runs a lot deeper than who the operator is, and that the management of change has not been good.

At that point, the language of "support" and "kindness" does matter - if a company wants to achieve change, it needs to do so by bringing staff with them. Otherwise, all the PR in the world can't mask a different reality. And on that, it's clear from what's been said that Serco bear responsibility. It is their decisions that have left staff with worse facilities than on the Mk3 pantries, it is their decisions that have left staff feeling alienated. While there may well be other factors in the mix - it does after all take two to tango - the prime responsibility lies with the operator.

When I travel with CS, I buy the ticket from CS based on the offer that CS make me. It is up to CS to deliver on that offer, and up to CS to find the right way to deliver on that offer. If individual staff members let the side down, then it is open to me to raise a complaint about their actions, or to pass feedback. But the accountability for delivery is always with CS.
That's one take, granted. Another would be that effective change management also needs vision and drive, in fairness to Serco they have done that with the new hardware and much-maligned marketing. Be kind to the staff and support them through the changes, of course, but not to the extent that the strategic aims of upping the standard and thus the fares, are lost.

Regarding the worse staff rest areas, is this what the IR malaise boils down to? Were the MK5 cars not run past the union at all? In any case, what does the law say with regards to rest areas, surely what CS is providing must be legal?
 

Journeyman

Established Member
Joined
16 Apr 2014
Messages
6,295
That's one take, granted. Another would be that effective change management also needs vision and drive, in fairness to Serco they have done that with the new hardware and much-maligned marketing. Be kind to the staff and support them through the changes, of course, but not to the extent that the strategic aims of upping the standard and thus the fares, are lost.

Regarding the worse staff rest areas, is this what the IR malaise boils down to? Were the MK5 cars not run past the union at all? In any case, what does the law say with regards to rest areas, surely what CS is providing must be legal?
It is legal - of course it is. And yes, there was full consultation at the design stage.

The pantries were design features from a bygone era, dating back to a very different sleeper product, i.e. the traditional BR one.
 

Top