MrEd
Member
- Joined
- 13 Jan 2019
- Messages
- 592
I would say that it’s a mixture of personal observation and speaking to staff. Of course, the staff aren’t themselves bothered about fare increases but seemed to be the favoured punchbag of irate passengers bemoaning them, particularly if other aspects of the service were below par. This contributed to a lot of staff stress.Thanks for this @MrEd ; is this from your personal observation or is it what you have learned from the CS team?
My view of the above:
1) did seem a little odd, more staff intensive, but I can see why it was done (to help new / infrequent travellers know where their coach was).
2) agreed not a good thing to try
3) again I can see why that was done, to get maximum use out of the club car. But I can see both sides.
4) not really an issue for the onboard staff, surely?
5) I preferred the card system. I imagine that some passengers didn’t like needing to decide on the point of boarding, and some passengers (me!) didn’t like it when waiting to board when the couple in front are taking an age to decide! Also I guess the card system worked better on the southbound for the Scotland stops.
6) I wonder if that was because the sleeper became a lot more popular with the new stock, and CS had based their orders on historical data? Nevertheless, inexcusable.
Re the more complex ‘fiddly’ dishes, I agree that it is more work for the on board team, and one hopes that suitable training was given. And I also hope that some consideration was given to the time taken to prep different dishes. But if there’s demand for it, then it comes down to delivering what the customer wants.
I think you’re right about running out of food: I don’t think CS ever correctly estimated how popular the club/lounge car was on the Highlander.