• Our new ticketing site is now live! Using either this or the original site (both powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

London Crosslink

Status
Not open for further replies.

AndyMike

Member
Joined
12 Oct 2020
Messages
53
Location
Sheffield
I was wondering whether somebody could clarify my memory of something. I only travelled once on Anglia Railways’ London Crosslink service, using it to go from Norwich to Highbury & Islington. My recollection is that this was a loco-hauled service with Mark 2 carriages, but all online references state this can’t be right, and that Crosslink only employed Class 170s. I assume the latter is correct?
 
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

JonathanH

Veteran Member
Joined
29 May 2011
Messages
21,349
My recollection is that this was a loco-hauled service with Mark 2 carriages, but all online references state this can’t be right, and that Crosslink only employed Class 170s. I assume the latter is correct?
It definitely only used Class 170s. Clearly the primary intercity operation from Norwich did use hauled mark 2s at the same time.
 

dk1

Veteran Member
Joined
2 Oct 2009
Messages
18,052
Location
East Anglia
It was only ever 3-car 170201-208 & 2-car 170399. The latter usually had its own daily diagram starting/ending at Norwich so as not to get involved in Hull Trains workings.

There where tentative plans to use mk2s & 73s on a Waterloo-Southampton Terminus by Anglia Railways but these never came to anything.
 

CarltonA

Member
Joined
22 Apr 2012
Messages
773
Location
Thames Valley
I recall a 170 operated service passing through Staines with a green Anglia livery bound for Basingstoke. That was in the late '90s if I'm not mistaken.
 

AndyMike

Member
Joined
12 Oct 2020
Messages
53
Location
Sheffield
I recall a 170 operated service passing through Staines with a green Anglia livery bound for Basingstoke. That was in the late '90s if I'm not mistaken.
It operated from 2000 to 2002.

So, my memory was wrong, it seems - as, from various searches, I’d expected. It was an interesting service, but I doubt it got me home to north London any quicker than going to Liverpool Street and getting the underground would have done!
 

TheBigD

Established Member
Joined
19 Nov 2008
Messages
2,042

nw1

Established Member
Joined
9 Aug 2013
Messages
8,505
It operated from 2000 to 2002.

So, my memory was wrong, it seems - as, from various searches, I’d expected. It was an interesting service, but I doubt it got me home to north London any quicker than going to Liverpool Street and getting the underground would have done!

I remember seeing one on a rainy day in Basingstoke, but can't recall the exact date. However the years (2000-2) accord with what I remember.

FWIW I actually could have used it because I did travel to Colchester one day in April 2001. However I'd never done the GEML out of Liverpool St at all, and so going the 'usual' way was enough novelty in itself.

== Doublepost prevention - post automatically merged: ==

It was only ever 3-car 170201-208 & 2-car 170399. The latter usually had its own daily diagram starting/ending at Norwich so as not to get involved in Hull Trains workings.

There where tentative plans to use mk2s & 73s on a Waterloo-Southampton Terminus by Anglia Railways but these never came to anything.
I do remember this - it would have been presumably very expensive to implement (reopening Terminus) with little profit - most people would I suspect continue to use the standard SWT service.
 

dk1

Veteran Member
Joined
2 Oct 2009
Messages
18,052
Location
East Anglia
I remember seeing one on a rainy day in Basingstoke, but can't recall the exact date. However the years (2000-2) accord with what I remember.

FWIW I actually could have used it because I did travel to Colchester one day in April 2001. However I'd never done the GEML out of Liverpool St at all, and so going the 'usual' way was enough novelty in itself.

== Doublepost prevention - post automatically merged: ==


I do remember this - it would have been presumably very expensive to implement (reopening Terminus) with little profit - most people would I suspect continue to use the standard SWT service.
Yes and I seem to recall SWT upped the frequency of their Waterloo services on the route to eat up paths makingbitveven more unviable. Gatwick's Express stock was likely to be used as had been made available by the new 460s.
 

nw1

Established Member
Joined
9 Aug 2013
Messages
8,505
Yes and I seem to recall SWT upped the frequency of their Waterloo services on the route to eat up paths makingbitveven more unviable. Gatwick's Express stock was likely to be used as had been made available by the new 460s.

Ah so that's why they did that (May 1999 was the time of this change). The non-cynical view would be that they wanted to provide an even-interval 15-min service to Southampton Central, which may have been the case, but the issue there was that the slower services (xx15 and xx45 out of Waterloo) were caught up by the following fasts (xx30 and xx00) so would presumably not have been used for Waterloo-Southampton journeys. That said, these services did, for the first time, provide even-interval 30-min services to intermediate stations such as Eastleigh, so did serve a genuine purpose. However it would have been better to divert one of them to Portsmouth via Fareham, as they indeed did a little later, to restore a semi-fast service on that route.
 

dk1

Veteran Member
Joined
2 Oct 2009
Messages
18,052
Location
East Anglia
Ah so that's why they did that (May 1999 was the time of this change). The non-cynical view would be that they wanted to provide an even-interval 15-min service to Southampton Central, which may have been the case, but the issue there was that the slower services (xx15 and xx45 out of Waterloo) were caught up by the following fasts (xx30 and xx00) so would presumably not have been used for Waterloo-Southampton journeys. That said, these services did, for the first time, provide even-interval 30-min services to intermediate stations such as Eastleigh, so did serve a genuine purpose. However it would have been better to divert one of them to Portsmouth via Fareham, as they indeed did a little later, to restore a semi-fast service on that route.
Thanks for that. I also had 15min interval in the back of my mind concerning this subject.
 

High Dyke

Established Member
Joined
1 Jan 2013
Messages
4,646
Location
Yellabelly Country
Mark 2s hauled by 86s with a DBSO on the country end. They went past my school.
Would that have been working the 'European' from Harwich to Glasgow (and vice-versa)? During the late 1980s the service operated via the GEML & NLL. I'm not certain it called at Highbury and Islington though. I travelled on it from Shenfield to Watford Junction.

Found this photo link: https://www.flickr.com/groups/4463329@N21/pool/
 

dk1

Veteran Member
Joined
2 Oct 2009
Messages
18,052
Location
East Anglia
Would that have been working the 'European' from Harwich to Glasgow (and vice-versa)? During the late 1980s the service operated via the GEML & NLL. I'm not certain it called at Highbury and Islington though. I travelled on it from Shenfield to Watford Junction.

Found this photo link: https://www.flickr.com/groups/4463329@N21/pool/
It was a very very temporary flop via the NLL.
 

Sprinter107

Member
Joined
26 Mar 2019
Messages
992
I caught it a few times. 170399 had branding for that service at that particular time.
 

ChiefPlanner

Established Member
Joined
6 Sep 2011
Messages
8,090
Location
Herts
Would that have been working the 'European' from Harwich to Glasgow (and vice-versa)? During the late 1980s the service operated via the GEML & NLL. I'm not certain it called at Highbury and Islington though. I travelled on it from Shenfield to Watford Junction.

Found this photo link: https://www.flickr.com/groups/4463329@N21/pool/

No doubt along with a few passengers intending to get to Liverpool Street..... :D
 

Taunton

Established Member
Joined
1 Aug 2013
Messages
11,206
Was its primary purpose not an Orcats raid by Anglia on London-Basingstoke revenue? It would have been profitable if empty.
 

dk1

Veteran Member
Joined
2 Oct 2009
Messages
18,052
Location
East Anglia
Doesn't matter, there's enough other stuff along the way.
Not with anywhere near the same revenue generation or abstraction though.

== Doublepost prevention - post automatically merged: ==

Anglia built up quite a bit of additional intermediate traffic though, particularly at Brentford.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top