• Our booking engine at tickets.railforums.co.uk (powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

TPE Nova 3 (Class 68 + Mk5s) updates and withdrawal from service

TT-ONR-NRN

Established Member
Joined
30 Dec 2016
Messages
10,551
Location
Farnham
This fleet must win First Prize for biggest white elephant order in recent history (assuming that the Arterios eventually make it into service one day) Ridiculous how underused they’ve been for the past two and a half years.
 
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

Mzzzs

Member
Joined
14 May 2022
Messages
240
Location
London<->Nottingham
This fleet must win First Prize for biggest white elephant order in recent history (assuming that the Arterios eventually make it into service one day) Ridiculous how underused they’ve been for the past two and a half years.
biggest white elephant they are very much. Consider that the original plan was for 22(I think) 185 to be returned to the leasing company makes this feel more like a odd decision they would have been better to keep the 185 than get a new fleet of trains which they are now doing. They now are keeping the whole 185 fleet.
 

Peter Sarf

Established Member
Joined
12 Oct 2010
Messages
5,801
Location
Croydon
This fleet must win First Prize for biggest white elephant order in recent history (assuming that the Arterios eventually make it into service one day) Ridiculous how underused they’ve been for the past two and a half years.

biggest white elephant they are very much. Consider that the original plan was for 22(I think) 185 to be returned to the leasing company makes this feel more like a odd decision they would have been better to keep the 185 than get a new fleet of trains which they are now doing. They now are keeping the whole 185 fleet.
Yes. I do find myself puzzling this. On the bright side TPE do seem to use some Mk5s despite, on the face of it, having enough 185s to completely replace the Mk5s. Hoping this is just due to a training backlog. But it begs the question - when does the contract for the 68s and/or Mk5s come up for renewal ?.

I need to search out the future diagrams for the Mk5s.
Looking at RTT, some changes to the 68 Cleethorpes diagrams in Dec.

A set comes off Longsight at 0432 as 5B64 then operates:

1B64 0543 Manchester Airport to Cleethorpes
5B73 0926 Cleethorpes to Liverpool Lime Street
5B80 1319 Liverpool Lime Street to Cleethorpes
1B89 1724 Cleethorpes to Liverpool Lime Street
1B96 2119 Liverpool Lime Street to Doncaster

Then goes onto Europort at 0006 as 5B96 for fuelling.

The set comes off Europort at 0511 as 5B60 next morning then operates:

1B60 0537 Doncaster to Cleethorpes
1B69 0727 Cleethorpes to Liverpool Lime Street
1B76 1119 Liverpool Lime Street to Cleethorpes
1B85 1524 Cleethorpes to Liverpool Lime Street

The goes back onto Longsight at 1927 as 5H85.

Still pathed as 185s currently.

5B73 and 5B80 were previously Class 1 trains, so looks like they're keeping a training run in beyond December which makes sense as plenty still need training.
Any advance on these for the ones via York ?.
 
Last edited:

DannyMich2018

Member
Joined
19 Dec 2018
Messages
749
This fleet must win First Prize for biggest white elephant order in recent history (assuming that the Arterios eventually make it into service one day) Ridiculous how underused they’ve been for the past two and a half years.
Couldn't agree more! I think it's like been five years since the first set arrived. We've never had more than 4 diagrams. Biggest waste of money with most sets sitting around doing nothing and 68s on freight. Would have been better to have ordered another 13 802s and have only 3 train types (185, 397, 802)
 

Watershed

Veteran Member
Associate Staff
Senior Fares Advisor
Joined
26 Sep 2020
Messages
12,239
Location
UK
Couldn't agree more! I think it's like been five years since the first set arrived. We've never had more than 4 diagrams. Biggest waste of money with most sets sitting around doing nothing and 68s on freight. Would have been better to have ordered another 13 802s and have only 3 train types (185, 397, 802)
Hindsight is 20/20... Whilst in retrospect that would clearly have been the most sensible option (or arguably even having an all-802 order), at the time of the franchise bids, the DfT wanted new stock as soon as possible.

There's a delicious irony in the 68s still being a long way off entering full squadron service...
 

PennineSuperb

Member
Joined
8 Jun 2018
Messages
95
Couldn't agree more! I think it's like been five years since the first set arrived. We've never had more than 4 diagrams. Biggest waste of money with most sets sitting around doing nothing and 68s on freight. Would have been better to have ordered another 13 802s and have only 3 train types (185, 397, 802)
4 diagrams in passenger service, which ultimately is what the ‘customer’ wants to see, but behind that there is a lot more going on.
I agree with you about the MK5A sets, but all the leased 68’s (that are not on maintenance) are being used.
Any 68’s that have appeared on freight work are generally under mutual agreement/swap. For example, TPE had 68006 when the majority of the HEP module repair programme was underway.

LO - Longsight Diesel Depot (Loco Allocation)
MA - Longsight Carriage Maintenance Depot (Carriage Allocation)

• LO601 (coupled to) MA701: Longsight – Scarborough Station
• LO602 (coupled to) MA702: Scarborough Station – Longsight
• LO604 (coupled to) MA704: Scarborough Station – Longsight
• LO605 (coupled to) MA705: Longsight – Scarborough Station
• LO603 (coupled to) MA703: Longsight – Longsight (Driver Training)
• LO608 (coupled to) MA708: Cleethorpes – Cleethorpes (Driver Training)
• LO609 (coupled to) MA709: Gascoigne Wood (Static Training)
• LO610 (coupled to) MA710: Warrington Manchester Ship Canal Sidings (Static Training)
• LO611 (coupled to) MA711: Gascoigne Wood (Static Training)
• LO612 (Loco Only): Cleethorpes (Light Loco Training)
• LO615 (Loco Only): Gascoigne Wood (Static Training)
• LO616 (Loco Only): Warrington Manchester Ship Canal Sidings (Static Training)
 

VauxhallNova

Member
Joined
15 Jan 2021
Messages
186
Location
UK
Hindsight is 20/20... Whilst in retrospect that would clearly have been the most sensible option (or arguably even having an all-802 order), at the time of the franchise bids, the DfT wanted new stock as soon as possible.

The DfT didn't specifically require new stock for the TPE franchise, it specified a capacity increase by the Dec 2018 timetable change. With a shortage of diesel stock, new build was one of the only options, though Mk4s and HSTs were also due to be off leased in time to meet that requirement. One of the ideas DfT suggested was to loco haul 442s as a short term measure.

Considering the cost difference between Mk5s and the Hitachi fleet, it would be interesting to see (in a franchise bidding scenario) whether First would have also chosen Hitachis for routes that didn't need 125mph running, such as Scarborough and Middlesbrough. The use of 3 fleets on the north route has certainly led to a huge increase in complexity for crew diagrams, becoming basically impossible to manage ever since the new fleets came in.

An alternative could have been no Hitachi trains using all CAF stock, but then TPE would have been very unlikely to be able to gain paths for the (non-specified and revenue generating) extensions to Newcastle and Edinburgh. Even with 125mph Hitachi stock they never secured firm track access rights due to the additional performance risk.

One of the reasons for the delay in TPEs fleets was the delayed signing of the contracts. Northern signed their CAF deals just after they signed the franchise contract in December 2015. TPE only signed the CAF deals 6 months later in May 2016.

The name Nova 3 gives away that the plan was to ditch them and buy more Hitachis once the TRU franchise change happened, as others on here have mentioned.
 
Last edited:

Killingworth

Established Member
Joined
30 May 2018
Messages
4,963
Location
Sheffield
Looking back I see I pictured an early 68 training run at Dore on South Pennine in November 2020. They've been using previously scheduled paths ever since out of service. It must be costing a significant amount to keep that training valid and frustrating users to see empty trains run while others are cancelled.

As the Cleethorpes-Liverpool route is now bookable on the TPE site from 11th December it will be interesting to see how it all works.
 

TT-ONR-NRN

Established Member
Joined
30 Dec 2016
Messages
10,551
Location
Farnham
Couldn't agree more! I think it's like been five years since the first set arrived. We've never had more than 4 diagrams. Biggest waste of money with most sets sitting around doing nothing and 68s on freight. Would have been better to have ordered another 13 802s and have only 3 train types (185, 397, 802)
I mean technically there’s little difference between a 397 and an 802 running on electricity, so potentially a fleet of just 185s and 802s would have been ideal. Not that I’m advocating that, as I believe the 397 interior to be far nicer than the 802 one.
 

37201xoIM

Member
Joined
29 Apr 2016
Messages
344
...
Considering the cost difference between Mk5s and the Hitachi fleet, it would be interesting to see (in a franchise bidding scenario) whether First would have also chosen Hitachis for routes that didn't need 125mph running, such as Scarborough and Middlesbrough.
...
Worth flagging that both are designed for 125mph - the Mk5s would need minor adjustments and obviously you need a different loco.
 

Peter Sarf

Established Member
Joined
12 Oct 2010
Messages
5,801
Location
Croydon
Worth flagging that both are designed for 125mph - the Mk5s would need minor adjustments and obviously you need a different loco.
And I suspect the option to replace the hired in 68 with an electric locomotive in the future was considered. Maybe even a Bi-Mode locomotive if the wires are extensive enough by then and coupled with enough diesel power becoming possible. But that is possibly just conjecture that explains the (pre Covid) plan.
 

37201xoIM

Member
Joined
29 Apr 2016
Messages
344
... Maybe even a Bi-Mode locomotive if the wires are extensive enough by then and coupled with enough diesel power becoming possible. ...
... which appears to be what's now under consideration indeed, albeit remaining only 100mph-capable AIUI.
 

coxxy

Member
Joined
16 Aug 2013
Messages
315
Worth flagging that both are designed for 125mph - the Mk5s would need minor adjustments and obviously you need a different loco.

The ride quality is awful at 100.. Dread to think how they would feel at 125
 

37201xoIM

Member
Joined
29 Apr 2016
Messages
344
The ride quality is awful at 100.. Dread to think how they would feel at 125
To be fair it's not great at 15mph... Though they might suffer from Mark IV syndrome: apparently they were more comfortable at 140mph than 125mph...

Though knowing CAF, I fear that might not be the issue.....!!
 

Philip

On Moderation
Joined
27 May 2007
Messages
3,655
Location
Manchester
Do we know yet which of the services out of Liverpool towards Sheffield are booked for 68 LHCS from next month?
 

TC60054

Member
Joined
3 Mar 2016
Messages
586
Location
South Sheffield
Do we know yet which of the services out of Liverpool towards Sheffield are booked for 68 LHCS from next month?

Looking at RTT, some changes to the 68 Cleethorpes diagrams in Dec.

A set comes off Longsight at 0432 as 5B64 then operates:

1B64 0543 Manchester Airport to Cleethorpes
5B73 0926 Cleethorpes to Liverpool Lime Street
5B80 1319 Liverpool Lime Street to Cleethorpes
1B89 1724 Cleethorpes to Liverpool Lime Street
1B96 2119 Liverpool Lime Street to Doncaster

Then goes onto Europort at 0006 as 5B96 for fuelling.

The set comes off Europort at 0511 as 5B60 next morning then operates:

1B60 0537 Doncaster to Cleethorpes
1B69 0727 Cleethorpes to Liverpool Lime Street
1B76 1119 Liverpool Lime Street to Cleethorpes
1B85 1524 Cleethorpes to Liverpool Lime Street

The goes back onto Longsight at 1927 as 5H85.

Still pathed as 185s currently.

5B73 and 5B80 were previously Class 1 trains, so looks like they're keeping a training run in beyond December which makes sense as plenty still need training.
This message posted in September may be of some help.
 

Peter Sarf

Established Member
Joined
12 Oct 2010
Messages
5,801
Location
Croydon
Is their any information on which North Trans Pennine services are to be operated by 68+Mk5s after the December 2022 timetable change ?. Is there any increase/change then ?.
 

sjpowermac

Established Member
Joined
26 May 2018
Messages
1,990
Is their any information on which North Trans Pennine services are to be operated by 68+Mk5s after the December 2022 timetable change ?. Is there any increase/change then ?.
Peter, broadly the info on RTT currently shows:
Class 68/Mk5a Scarborough-Manchester Piccadilly

running alternate hours with

Class 802 Newcastle-Manchester Piccadilly.

Scarborough depot is in the process of being recommissioned with staff appointed for a day shift. Two sets will work on and off the depot during the day, with two sets stabled and cleaned in the station overnight.

The locomotive diagrams would seem to work on a three day cycle before returning to Longsight (something that happened prior to the Scarborough depot being temporarily decommissioned).

I think this would give six diagrams per day on the north route, so a reasonable uplift and certainly a big improvement to services over the Pennines.

As to how deliverable that plan is from a staffing perspective, I’m not sure, since I don’t work for the company.
 

Peter Sarf

Established Member
Joined
12 Oct 2010
Messages
5,801
Location
Croydon
Peter, broadly the info on RTT currently shows:
Class 68/Mk5a Scarborough-Manchester Piccadilly

running alternate hours with

Class 802 Newcastle-Manchester Piccadilly.

Scarborough depot is in the process of being recommissioned with staff appointed for a day shift. Two sets will work on and off the depot during the day, with two sets stabled and cleaned in the station overnight.

The locomotive diagrams would seem to work on a three day cycle before returning to Longsight (something that happened prior to the Scarborough depot being temporarily decommissioned).

I think this would give six diagrams per day on the north route, so a reasonable uplift and certainly a big improvement to services over the Pennines.

As to how deliverable that plan is from a staffing perspective, I’m not sure, since I don’t work for the company.
Thank you. So Scarborough depot will be back in use. I agree, of course, we will have to see if the resources support 6 diagrams per day.
 

SuperNova

Member
Joined
12 Dec 2019
Messages
960
Location
The North
The name Nova 3 gives away that the plan was to ditch them and buy more Hitachis once the TRU franchise change happened, as others on here have mentioned.
Actually, and I kid you not, it was supposed to be a countdown to the new trains coming in. 3 first, then 2, finally 1. No plan to 'ditch them' in the beginning and they can still be utilised with a different loco. But the fact that they are being moved over to the South route is an indication.
As to how deliverable that plan is from a staffing perspective, I’m not sure, since I don’t work for the company.
Unlikely.
 

gimmea50anyday

Established Member
Joined
8 Jan 2013
Messages
3,456
Location
Back Cab
Well Newcastle is losing all 185 work in december, so thats another avoidable risk of traction competence lapsing to add to the loss of route competency between Leeds and Huddersfield....

Certainly thinking this one through..... Not.......
 

TT-ONR-NRN

Established Member
Joined
30 Dec 2016
Messages
10,551
Location
Farnham
Well Newcastle is losing all 185 work in december, so thats another avoidable risk of traction competence lapsing to add to the loss of route competency between Leeds and Huddersfield....

Certainly thinking this one through..... Not.......
I didn’t think 185s went there anymore anyway?
 

Watershed

Veteran Member
Associate Staff
Senior Fares Advisor
Joined
26 Sep 2020
Messages
12,239
Location
UK
I didn’t think 185s went there anymore anyway?
Not anymore, no (IIRC the last service from Newcastle on a Saturday was one briefly booked for one). But the point is that Newcastle conductors are losing Huddersfield-Leeds, as well as the ability to step in to cover between Leeds and York. These sorts of retrograde changes unfortunately seem to be the direction of travel at the moment.
 

BoroAndy

Member
Joined
11 Jan 2020
Messages
223
Location
Scarborough
Peter, broadly the info on RTT currently shows:
Class 68/Mk5a Scarborough-Manchester Piccadilly

running alternate hours with

Class 802 Newcastle-Manchester Piccadilly.

Scarborough depot is in the process of being recommissioned with staff appointed for a day shift. Two sets will work on and off the depot during the day, with two sets stabled and cleaned in the station overnight.

The locomotive diagrams would seem to work on a three day cycle before returning to Longsight (something that happened prior to the Scarborough depot being temporarily decommissioned).

I think this would give six diagrams per day on the north route, so a reasonable uplift and certainly a big improvement to services over the Pennines.

As to how deliverable that plan is from a staffing perspective, I’m not sure, since I don’t work for the company.
You say 2 sets stabled and cleaned overnight. Isn't the overnight cleaning the problem with this depot, due to loco engines running and insufficient (south side) noise insulation?
 

Peter Sarf

Established Member
Joined
12 Oct 2010
Messages
5,801
Location
Croydon
You say 2 sets stabled and cleaned overnight. Isn't the overnight cleaning the problem with this depot, due to loco engines running and insufficient (south side) noise insulation?
This does make me wonder if these will be stock other than Mk5s+68s serviced overnight at Scarborough.

All in all I am getting desperate to see the Mk5s before they disappear into store. I think whatever Austerity the DfT come along with will be the telling time. They are very likely the bottom of the pecking order at TPE unless another TOC wants lots of 185s ?.
 

Halish Railway

Established Member
Joined
26 Apr 2017
Messages
1,738
Location
West Yorkshire / Birmingham
Wait I’m confused - RTT shows all Scarborough services as being pathed as DMUs. Is this the case?

I get that the timing load on RTT means nothing, but it’s impossible to tell whether the Scarborough services will be a mix of 185s and 68/MK5s or if all services will be 68/MK5 worked.
 

Watershed

Veteran Member
Associate Staff
Senior Fares Advisor
Joined
26 Sep 2020
Messages
12,239
Location
UK
Wait I’m confused - RTT shows all Scarborough services as being pathed as DMUs. Is this the case?

I get that the timing load on RTT means nothing, but it’s impossible to tell whether the Scarborough services will be a mix of 185s and 68/MK5s or if all services will be 68/MK5 worked.
You can get some idea by tracing the trains from the depot at the start of the day and vice versa in the evening. The 185s don't outstable on the Scarborough route, they all go to/from a depot, so that's a bit of a clue.
 

Top