• Our booking engine at tickets.railforums.co.uk (powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

P&O Ferries to permanently stop accepting foot passengers on their Dover to Calais route.

Status
Not open for further replies.

paul1609

Established Member
Joined
28 Jan 2006
Messages
7,368
Location
Wittersham Kent
I'm not surprised to find that companies offer this, but am surprised it's that popular!
I was surprised but I suppose if its say a 9 seater minibus for a journey like Ashford to Lillie short notice it quite possibly undercuts Eurostar. Even like 4 travellers in a Mercedes saloon wouldn't be too expensive and Lille is only about the same distance from Folkestone as Luton Airport. If you have a business flexiplus account with Eurotunnel its a turn up and go on next available train service.
 
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

zwk500

Veteran Member
Joined
20 Jan 2020
Messages
13,617
Location
Bristol
They have legs. They can walk to and from the trains.
But Le Shuttle is aimed entirely at the Vehicle market. When it was planned, passengers were expected to take the train or ferry. Now they're expected to take the train or fly.

Having people wandering around the vehicle terminals would be an operational pain in the neck from a safety and security point of view, as well as a big risk to prompt departures. In theory they could have a minibus shuttle (either travelling on the train or dropping people on the platform to be met at the other end) but the number of people who'd want to do that from the motorway terminals is going to be fairly low.
 

StephenHunter

Established Member
Joined
22 Jul 2017
Messages
2,175
Location
London
It's a vehicle service. There is absolutely no reason why it would or should carry foot passengers. They aren't what it's for.

Bicycles are road vehicles.
As a regular long-distance walker, I can tell you they're often pavement vehicles.

Sticking a pedestrian carriage on each rake when Le Shuttle replace their current stock would allow them to offer something new for day trippers.

Just an idea at the end of the day.
 

RT4038

Established Member
Joined
22 Feb 2014
Messages
4,309
Why can't pedestrians use Le Shuttle outside a vehicle?
No infrastructure for check in of pedestrians and no safe walking route from terminal to Le Shuttle or v.v., ( which is quite a distance) and no economical way of providing it either. They couldn't travel on the car carrying trains because they have no passenger accommodation apart from inside customers vehicles.
 

StephenHunter

Established Member
Joined
22 Jul 2017
Messages
2,175
Location
London
No infrastructure for check in of pedestrians and no safe walking route from terminal to Le Shuttle or v.v., ( which is quite a distance) and no economical way of providing it either. They couldn't travel on the car carrying trains because they have no passenger accommodation apart from inside customers vehicles.
The car carrying trains will need replacing at some point. Also, they use minibuses for the lorry services to get the drivers to the Club Car.
 

RT4038

Established Member
Joined
22 Feb 2014
Messages
4,309
Sticking a pedestrian carriage on each rake when Le Shuttle replace their current stock would allow them to offer something new for day trippers.

Just an idea at the end of the day.
Why would they want to replace a revenue generating car carrying vehicle with a carriage carrying hardly anyone, plus having to spend money getting the passengers to & from that carriage - passengers that would have had difficulty getting to the terminal via Motorway access anyway.

I think the idea should be left at the end of the day. Not going to happen.

The car carrying trains will need replacing at some point. Also, they use minibuses for the lorry services to get the drivers to the Club Car.
The potential market is far too small to be economically catered for. At £1m for a carriage, how many foot passenger tickets would they have to sell for that?......
 

zwk500

Veteran Member
Joined
20 Jan 2020
Messages
13,617
Location
Bristol
Sticking a pedestrian carriage on each rake when Le Shuttle replace their current stock would allow them to offer something new for day trippers.
It's not as simple as just sticking a carriage on the end, because of the arrangements for evacuating the tunnel in the event of a fire. And also for day trippers, being dumped at the Sangatte terminal is not very useful. If you want to do something like that, you'd do as described upthread and just arrange for a taxi to take you all the way to a suitable point in France.
Just an idea at the end of the day.
Fair enough.
The car carrying trains will need replacing at some point.
They will need replacing, but not for some time.
Also, they use minibuses for the lorry services to get the drivers to the Club Car.
If there was a market for Le Shuttle offering it, the way to run it would be to have a minibus just travel through the tunnel, shuttling between the Duty-free building at each end. The fact that they don't do it indicates the economic prospects.
 

HSTEd

Veteran Member
Joined
14 Jul 2011
Messages
16,982
I assume the operationally easiest way to carry foot passengers on Eurotunnel would be to operate a minibus that ran loops between the entrances.
 

busestrains

On Moderation
Joined
9 Sep 2022
Messages
788
Location
Salisbury
The big mistake they made when building the Channel Tunnel was making it a railway only tunnel. Ideally they should have built a road tunnel too so cars could drive through. Ideally a dual carriageway with at least four lanes for each direction plus a hard shoulder. Additionally they should have built a bike tunnel and pedestrian tunnel so that cyclists could cycle through and pedestrians could walk through. This would enable trains and cars and cyclists and pedestrians to all easily travel across the channel easily.

As this does not exist ideally it would be good if a local bus operator should introduced a local bus service (not a coach but just a simple local bus service) between Kent and France using the ferry. Maybe a couple of journeys a day in each direction. Maybe something like this route:

Ashford - Sellindge - Hythe - Folkestone - Dover - Ferry - Calais - Gravelines - Dunkirk

I imagine this could be quite popular now that the ferries no longer take foot passengers (and even when they did it was only on limited sailings) and that the Ashford and Ebbsfleet stops on Eurostar look to be permanently withdrawn.
 

StephenHunter

Established Member
Joined
22 Jul 2017
Messages
2,175
Location
London
P&O say they are still taking foot passengers though; Mark Smith withdrew the report after they responded.
 

zwk500

Veteran Member
Joined
20 Jan 2020
Messages
13,617
Location
Bristol
The big mistake they made when building the Channel Tunnel was making it a railway only tunnel. Ideally they should have built a road tunnel too so cars could drive through. Ideally a dual carriageway with at least four lanes for each direction plus a hard shoulder. Additionally they should have built a bike tunnel and pedestrian tunnel so that cyclists could cycle through and pedestrians could walk through. This would enable trains and cars and cyclists and pedestrians to all easily travel across the channel easily.
It's 20 miles. Even for fit walkers, that's a full day's walk. Allowing cycles through a service tunnel might have had some consideration, but the ferries are still carrying cycles. As it happens a Road link was considered, but venitilation concerns, driver fatigue and costs put paid to it. The page on what used to be CBRD https://www.roads.org.uk/articles/euroroute is well worth checking out.
As this does not exist ideally it would be good if a local bus operator should introduced a local bus service (not a coach but just a simple local bus service) between Kent and France using the ferry. Maybe a couple of journeys a day in each direction. Maybe something like this route:

Ashford - Sellindge - Hythe - Folkestone - Dover - Ferry - Calais - Gravelines - Dunkirk

I imagine this could be quite popular now that the ferries no longer take foot passengers (and even when they did it was only on limited sailings) and that the Ashford and Ebbsfleet stops on Eurostar look to be permanently withdrawn.
The economics of this would be absurd. I can just, just, see a potential local transport option of Ashford (centre) - Ashford Designer Outlet - Le Shuttle - Calais (Theatre, Gare-Ville then wherever the long-distance bus stop is). But even then the costs will be huge and patronage limited.
 

RT4038

Established Member
Joined
22 Feb 2014
Messages
4,309
As this does not exist ideally it would be good if a local bus operator should introduced a local bus service (not a coach but just a simple local bus service) between Kent and France using the ferry. Maybe a couple of journeys a day in each direction. Maybe something like this route:

Ashford - Sellindge - Hythe - Folkestone - Dover - Ferry - Calais - Gravelines - Dunkirk

I imagine this could be quite popular now that the ferries no longer take foot passengers (and even when they did it was only on limited sailings) and that the Ashford and Ebbsfleet stops on Eurostar look to be permanently withdrawn.
I don't think it would be a good idea as a local bus - it would have to be a coach to cope with the possible luggage. With the check in times, the immigration and customs formalities etc and a suitable buffer for delays, a round trip would take about 7-8 hours to complete and start again. 15 hours overall for two journeys. The trips would be something like 08h00 and 16h00 from Ashford, 12 noon and 20h00 from Dunkirk. Two drivers, hopeless times at Ashford and Calais if you are connecting to/from anywhere else (except the 12 noon from Dunkirk). (Using the tunnel would be slightly better, say 10h00 and 16h00 from Ashford / 13h00 and 19h00 from Dunkirk, but still far from ideal. Might get all of this in one long driver duty, ?).

The economics of this would be absurd.
Quite! Apart from who would use it, the advertising costs of getting such a niche thing known would be absurd too!
 

Ediswan

Established Member
Joined
15 Nov 2012
Messages
2,878
Location
Stevenage
As it happens a Road link was considered, but venitilation concerns, driver fatigue and costs put paid to it.
The longest tunnel I have driven through is the Fréjus Road Tunnel. That is a mere 8 miles long. It was mind-numbingly tedious. This was mid-morning, well rested.
 

zwk500

Veteran Member
Joined
20 Jan 2020
Messages
13,617
Location
Bristol
The longest tunnel I have driven through is the Fréjus Road Tunnel. That is a mere 8 miles long. It was mind-numbingly tedious. This was mid-morning, well rested.
I've linked the presentation above, but I think it was a 10-12 mile tunnel, but with a giant spiral ramp at either end transitioning to a bridge to reduce the tunnel distance. Even so, doing that in a car of that 80s/early 90s era isn't something I'd have looked forward to.
 

Ediswan

Established Member
Joined
15 Nov 2012
Messages
2,878
Location
Stevenage
I've linked the presentation above, but I think it was a 10-12 mile tunnel, but with a giant spiral ramp at either end transitioning to a bridge to reduce the tunnel distance. Even so, doing that in a car of that 80s/early 90s era isn't something I'd have looked forward to.
9.5 miles of bridges exposed to channel weather, which includes thick fog and howling gales. It was never a great plan.
 

HSTEd

Veteran Member
Joined
14 Jul 2011
Messages
16,982
9.5 miles of bridges exposed to channel weather, which includes thick fog and howling gales. It was never a great plan.
Those conditions are not particularly bad compared to other road bridges constructed in the 1990s and since.

For example one of the bridges in Hong Kong has a fully enclosed pair of traffic lanes to be used during the build up to a Typhoon.

But the hybrid bridge-tunnel system was only one of the proposals, there was an entirely bridge one as well.
 

AdamWW

Established Member
Joined
6 Nov 2012
Messages
3,768
Those conditions are not particularly bad compared to other road bridges constructed in the 1990s and since.

For example one of the bridges in Hong Kong has a fully enclosed pair of traffic lanes to be used during the build up to a Typhoon.

But the hybrid bridge-tunnel system was only one of the proposals, there was an entirely bridge one as well.

All this does show, however, that it wasn't the case that the governments just decided to build a rail tunnel.

Various schemes which would have permitted vehicles to drive across were considered and rejected (rightly or wrongly).

If I recall correctly, there was even a provision that a certain number of years after the tunnel was built the operator had to consider the feasibility of building a parallel road crossing. It was considered unfeasable but of course that's in the context of already having a rail tunnel.

I find it hard to see though how any of these schemes could have come close to the extremely high safety standards required of the channel tunnel - but maybe as road schemes they wouldn't have been expected to.
 

TT-ONR-NRN

Established Member
Joined
30 Dec 2016
Messages
10,565
Location
Farnham
Are services solely in the hands of the lovely Spirit vessels at the moment, or are the dated Pride ferries still in daily use now that COVID is over and the fire-and-rehire hoo-ha seems to have died down?
 

Ediswan

Established Member
Joined
15 Nov 2012
Messages
2,878
Location
Stevenage
Are services solely in the hands of the lovely Spirit vessels at the moment, or are the dated Pride ferries still in daily use now that COVID is over and the fire-and-rehire hoo-ha seems to have died down?
Pride of Kent crossed earlier today. I recall spotting Pride of Canterbury over the summer. Not sure about Pride of Burgundy.
 

TT-ONR-NRN

Established Member
Joined
30 Dec 2016
Messages
10,565
Location
Farnham
Pride of Kent crossed earlier today. I recall spotting Pride of Canterbury over the summer. Not sure about Pride of Burgundy.
I'm aware Pride of Burgundy was stood down a long time ago, I wasn't sure if the other two followed. I don't like Pride of Canterbury. Haven't been on Pride of Kent.
 

paul1609

Established Member
Joined
28 Jan 2006
Messages
7,368
Location
Wittersham Kent
Are services solely in the hands of the lovely Spirit vessels at the moment, or are the dated Pride ferries still in daily use now that COVID is over and the fire-and-rehire hoo-ha seems to have died down?
According to Vessel finder Spirit of Britain, Spirt of France and Pride of Kent are in use today.
 

TT-ONR-NRN

Established Member
Joined
30 Dec 2016
Messages
10,565
Location
Farnham
According to Vessel finder Spirit of Britain, Spirt of France and Pride of Kent are in use today.
Many thanks. I believe the Spirit of France to be a considerably more pleasant environment than the Pride of Canterbury & Burgundy. I believe Spirit of Britain is identical.
 

Ediswan

Established Member
Joined
15 Nov 2012
Messages
2,878
Location
Stevenage
There is not long left for the Pride twins anyway, the first of their double-ended replacements is due to be in service next year.


One interesting snippet in that article:
Provision has been made for future upgrading to “carbon neutral” battery only operation should shoreside facilities capable of charging sufficient batteries during the short turnaround period become available at Dover and Calais.
I have not seen any details of how likely that is to happen.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top