• Our new ticketing site is now live! Using either this or the original site (both powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

Potential Grand Union stock?

Status
Not open for further replies.

TT-ONR-NRN

Veteran Member
Joined
30 Dec 2016
Messages
11,749
Location
Salford Quays, Manchester
I remember reading somewhere that Class 88 locomotives were favoured by Grand Union (which CAF could provide MK5 coaches for, or TPE could give them the ones they've completely wasted their money on) but this would limit services to 100mph and therefore be unfeasible on the GWML.
 
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

Bletchleyite

Veteran Member
Joined
20 Oct 2014
Messages
105,221
Location
"Marston Vale mafia"
I remember reading somewhere that Class 88 locomotives were favoured by Grand Union (which CAF could provide MK5 coaches for, or TPE could give them the ones they've completely wasted their money on) but this would limit services to 100mph and therefore be unfeasible on the GWML.

It may well be easier to uprate the Mk5 design to 125mph than to do a bimode unit. CAF after all already does have a 125mph EMU, the Class 397, just not a bi-mode, thus it has 125mph bogies etc.
 

Mitchell Hurd

On Moderation
Joined
28 Oct 2017
Messages
1,709
Carmarthen cannot accommodate a 9 car 900/802, therefore it would have to be shorter than that. I think more than a 5-car 80x will be needed for the GWML corridor, so maybe a bi-mode 7 or 8 car train? That would make the most sense to me especially as if I remember correctly there were going to be 3 classes of travel on these trains? It might just be the two but can't quite remember.

GU said they will be 9-car Bi-mode trains. Don't forget the 8-coach GWR HST's were used to Carmarthen before.
 

HamworthyGoods

Established Member
Joined
15 Jan 2019
Messages
4,255
Just to add that Grand Union intended to have three classes of travel - Standard Economy, Standard and First Class, so I'm not sure how feasible a train of only 5 carriages would be. 3 coaches of standard class on a GWML express service will be swamped.

They say this about 3 classes then say on the form P; “Trains will also have a fixed buffet/kitchen serving both classes of passengers” as far as I know both only is two?

A very poorly proof read application, there again this is from the same person who was involved in the start of Grand Central and wanted to do a restaurant type service on their HSTs till they discovered there were different HST catering cars and they had leased TRSBs with insufficient power for a kitchen… End result was a buffet car which has been replicated on the 180s offering nothing over what a trolley can provide.
 

TT-ONR-NRN

Veteran Member
Joined
30 Dec 2016
Messages
11,749
Location
Salford Quays, Manchester
They say this about 3 classes then say on the form P; “Trains will also have a fixed buffet/kitchen serving both classes of passengers” as far as I know both only is two?

A very poorly proof read application, there again this is from the same person who was involved in the start of Grand Central and wanted to do a restaurant type service on their HSTs till they discovered there were different HST catering cars and they had leased TRSBs with insufficient power for a kitchen… End result was a buffet car which has been replicated on the 180s offering nothing over what a trolley can provide.
Hmm, somewhat concerning. Either way, it'll be good if they specify trains longer than five carriages in anticipation for future growth. Lumo have achieved good loadings and will probably require longer trains at some point.
 

HamworthyGoods

Established Member
Joined
15 Jan 2019
Messages
4,255
GU said they will be 9-car Bi-mode trains. Don't forget the 8-coach GWR HST's were used to Carmarthen before.

8 car HST ~ 210m
9 car 810 ~ 216m
9 car 800/802 ~ 234m

Currently a 9 car GWR 80x doesn’t fit however they may choose to go for 24m vehicles as per the EMR 810s.

There may also be changes as part of the Carmarthen resignalling.

== Doublepost prevention - post automatically merged: ==

Well that will be interesting seeing as GWRs 9 cars are barred west of Swansea as they cannot fit in Carmarthen.

Yes but it they get 24m vehicles as per the EMR 810s that’s only 6 metres longer than a 2+8 HST.
 

jackot

Member
Joined
1 Aug 2021
Messages
343
Location
38,000ft
8 car HST ~ 210m
9 car 810 ~ 216m
9 car 800/802 ~ 234m

Currently a 9 car GWR 80x doesn’t fit however they may choose to go for 24m vehicles as per the EMR 810s.

There may also be changes as part of the Carmarthen resignalling.


Yes but it they get 24m vehicles as per the EMR 810s that’s only 6 metres longer than a 2+8 HST.
24 metre vehicles would make a lot of sense in that case, I can definitely see that happening. I feel the 4 power packs of the 810s might be a bit overpowered for their operations though, so maybe a similar engine configuration to the 802s or even the downrated 805s might make a better business case. If we're lucky we might even get an eighth type of IET, as it seems that every single 8xx needs a different TOPS number, even if a lot of the IETs are practically the same.
 

SuperLuke2334

Established Member
Joined
23 Oct 2021
Messages
1,884
Location
Welsh Marches
8 car HST ~ 210m
9 car 810 ~ 216m
9 car 800/802 ~ 234m

Currently a 9 car GWR 80x doesn’t fit however they may choose to go for 24m vehicles as per the EMR 810s.

There may also be changes as part of the Carmarthen resignalling.

== Doublepost prevention - post automatically merged: ==



Yes but it they get 24m vehicles as per the EMR 810s that’s only 6 metres longer than a 2+8 HST.
I think I remember seeing that the 2+8 HSTs only just fitted so I don't know whether there is a 6m leeway.
 

D365

Veteran Member
Joined
29 Jun 2012
Messages
12,272
I do not see Grand Union needing the entire fleet of class 222 trains. So I can see the 4 class 222/0 which are 7 cars per set going to Grand Union, with the 23 5 car sets being used to replace class 156/158 units at EMR. Which would mean that the AWC 221's going to XC.

The 4 class 222/0 would be used until a dedicated fleet of 8XX could be brought into the GU fleet.

If GWR still require, some units I can see the class 158 units from EMR at this point possibly joining their fleet.
EMR is retaining the 158s - using a Voyager on Sprinter services would be entirely unsuitable.
 

The Planner

Veteran Member
Joined
15 Apr 2008
Messages
17,885
Correct. I was suggesting the loan of one of the completed 805s for training purposes once it's completed testing.

I do think there's a chance the 807 services will never launch, though (these are all additional), i.e. that Avanti won't ever introduce the second Liverpool or the Birmingham semifast. If that's the case their existing fleet plus the 805s replacing the Voyagers will suffice. That's why I've suggested in the past that Lumo might be interested in taking those instead. They wouldn't suit GU as they appear to want/need bi-modes.
You won't see the second Liverpool before P15 comes back into use at Euston after HS2 hand it back.
 

popeter45

Established Member
Joined
7 Dec 2019
Messages
1,296
Location
london
as mark 4's were the original plan and only just as a temp solution till 80X could be built i wonder if similar is still a plan if 80X's backorders take too long
either mark 4's, castle set HST's, 222's or even Chiltern Mark 3 sets are all possible if just as a temp solution
more crazy crayon solutions for rented stock are spare TPE sets or even leasing GWR 800/802's or LNER 800's if they have any spare? (i dont think so thou)

100/110mph may be viable as they plan on non-stop on the 125 sections so could keep time with stopping 125 services
 

dgl

Established Member
Joined
5 Oct 2014
Messages
2,633
As I understand it to do 125mph the trains will have to have GW-ATP fitted, the only trains to ever have it fitted, I understand, are the HST's, 180's and 80x's, and as such really 80x's are the only easy option, hence why that's what they specified in their application.
As, unlike the Chiltern ATP, GW ATP is still supported, so as it'll probably be around for a while yet there is no reason to treat GUT as a special case and allow 125mph operation without ATP.
 

Energy

Established Member
Joined
29 Dec 2018
Messages
4,994
either mark 4's
Most have been scrapped or gone to TfW now.
castle set HST's
Unlikely, the paths provided are for IETs, HSTs would be slow and expensive. They'd also need somewhere to be maintained now Old Oak Common is demolished and Landore no longer does HST maintenance.
Not impossible but by the time they have been released from EMR and had ATP fitted Hitachi would be nearly done on some new AT300s.
or even Chiltern Mark 3
Only 4 sets and it will be some time before they are released.

If they need trains very quickly then the off lease Avanti 221s would make the most sense.
 

43102EMR

Established Member
Joined
28 Mar 2021
Messages
1,265
Location
UK
If they need trains very quickly then the off lease Avanti 221s would make the most sense.
In the short-term yes - long-term I believe they’re aiming to acquire a variant of the 80X fleet.
 

Chester1

Established Member
Joined
25 Aug 2014
Messages
4,276
In the decision and related correspondence, Grand Union have ruled out using existing stock, and will be using new-build bi-mode trains from the start (so presumably 80x)

Correct. I was suggesting the loan of one of the completed 805s for training purposes once it's completed testing.

I do think there's a chance the 807 services will never launch, though (these are all additional), i.e. that Avanti won't ever introduce the second Liverpool or the Birmingham semifast. If that's the case their existing fleet plus the 805s replacing the Voyagers will suffice. That's why I've suggested in the past that Lumo might be interested in taking those instead. They wouldn't suit GU as they appear to want/need bi-modes.

The 807 construction appears to be too far advanced to modify into bi mode and its definitely necessary for GU opperation. LNER would be the best alternative if DfT decides to drop the second Liverpool service and reduce other services. They aren't exactly what LNER are looking for to replace the 225s but they could shuffle around unit allocations to make it work.

There is no guarantee Hitachi will build all or any of the GU fleet in UK. Unless GU has been reckless they will have received assurances from Hitachi that the 80X will be ready for service in 2 years. Hitachi have probably assessed their production capacity in UK and overseas and decided they can meet the deadline.
 

class 9

Member
Joined
18 Nov 2010
Messages
1,014
XC have been publicly given the option to use the 222s by the DfT, whereas nothing has been said about the Avanti 221s, so I’d say GU are more likely to take on the latter.
Do you have a link for the 222 info?
All heresay and rumours I thought.
 

43102EMR

Established Member
Joined
28 Mar 2021
Messages
1,265
Location
UK

Chester1

Established Member
Joined
25 Aug 2014
Messages
4,276
Grand Union has not indicated that they will use exisiting stock in the interim. I don't understand why so many people are sure they will. Hitachi have probably made reassurances. Five sets in 18 months should be doable for such a large business with factories in Japan, Italy and the UK. Newton Aycliffe probably won't be able to make many coaches in that period but what about their other sites? Whats the penalty for Grand Union if the units are a bit late? Is the DfT really going to cancel the paths a few weeks or months before December 2024, against opposition of the Welsh Government?
 

RobShipway

Established Member
Joined
20 Sep 2009
Messages
3,337
Grand Union has not indicated that they will use exisiting stock in the interim. I don't understand why so many people are sure they will. Hitachi have probably made reassurances. Five sets in 18 months should be doable for such a large business with factories in Japan, Italy and the UK. Newton Aycliffe probably won't be able to make many coaches in that period but what about their other sites? Whats the penalty for Grand Union if the units are a bit late? Is the DfT really going to cancel the paths a few weeks or months before December 2024, against opposition of the Welsh Government?
True, but it is still possible in the short term in case of any delays that GU will be using existing stock like the class 222 units on possibly existing services and moving their class 180's over to do the services to Wales.
 

RobShipway

Established Member
Joined
20 Sep 2009
Messages
3,337
EMR is retaining the 158s - using a Voyager on Sprinter services would be entirely unsuitable.
But they have/are getting class 170 units which where previously class 171 units from Southern which are replacing class 158/156 units?
 

Bob Price

Member
Joined
8 Aug 2019
Messages
1,176
Grand Union has not indicated that they will use exisiting stock in the interim. I don't understand why so many people are sure they will. Hitachi have probably made reassurances. Five sets in 18 months should be doable for such a large business with factories in Japan, Italy and the UK. Newton Aycliffe probably won't be able to make many coaches in that period but what about their other sites? Whats the penalty for Grand Union if the units are a bit late? Is the DfT really going to cancel the paths a few weeks or months before December 2024, against opposition of the Welsh Government?
But that is the joy of the speculation thread. If they are buying off the shelf 802's then even then it will be a push to get them made, but as you say, Hitachi seem to think they can do it.

However if this slips I can see something in place for a Cardiff London interim service, possibly using spare EMUs just to use the paths and drive some revenue.

More importantly will they be red, white and green with a huge dragon on them
 

JonathanH

Veteran Member
Joined
29 May 2011
Messages
21,383
However if this slips I can see something in place for a Cardiff London interim service, possibly using spare EMUs just to use the paths and drive some revenue.
I think the issue with that is finding somewhere to service them. Where is there a depot with capacity on the electrified route between London and Cardiff that could maintain electric units for a short period?

Canton isn't accessible to electric trains, Stoke Gifford and North Pole only do Hitachi work, Reading is GWR, Old Oak Common seems unlikely.
 

swt_passenger

Veteran Member
Joined
7 Apr 2010
Messages
33,061
But that is the joy of the speculation thread. If they are buying off the shelf 802's then even then it will be a push to get them made, but as you say, Hitachi seem to think they can do it.

However if this slips I can see something in place for a Cardiff London interim service, possibly using spare EMUs just to use the paths and drive some revenue.

More importantly will they be red, white and green with a huge dragon on them
A Cardiff - London “interim service” would be nothing but a straightforward revenue grab off GWR. Why would it ever be approved by ORR?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top