• Our booking engine at tickets.railforums.co.uk (powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

Transpennine woes and a moan...

Status
Not open for further replies.

HSTEd

Veteran Member
Joined
14 Jul 2011
Messages
16,793
Does seem daft why TPE have to use their basically inter-city trains to stop at Marsden/Greenfield etc when Northern could do the job perfectly well? In fact, if Northern had the stock and staff available, that could free up a unit/staff to allow TPE to plug their gaps a bit.
It would likely cause their carefully tuned timetable to fall to pieces.

The TPE train would just have to wait somewhere for the time the stop takes to ensure they can slot into their arrival path at the next major station.

This is what happens when you run such a highly optimised timetable.
 
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

nr758123

Member
Joined
3 Jun 2014
Messages
486
Location
West Yorkshire
Does seem daft why TPE have to use their basically inter-city trains to stop at Marsden/Greenfield etc when Northern could do the job perfectly well? In fact, if Northern had the stock and staff available, that could free up a unit/staff to allow TPE to plug their gaps a bit.
At the time the stopping service was transferred to TPE, Northern didn't have anything which could match the timings of a class 185. I don't know whether or not that is still the case.
 

Eeveevolve

Member
Joined
3 Sep 2011
Messages
121
At the time the stopping service was transferred to TPE, Northern didn't have anything which could match the timings of a class 185. I don't know whether or not that is still the case.
A quick Wikipedia check, a Northern Class 195 can accelerate at 0.83 m/s(Squared) and a TPE 185 is 0.49 m/s(Squared) so the 195s accelerate 40% faster.
 

D6130

Established Member
Joined
12 Jan 2021
Messages
5,839
Location
West Yorkshire/Tuscany
At the time the stopping service was transferred to TPE, Northern didn't have anything which could match the timings of a class 185. I don't know whether or not that is still the case.
I suspect that the 195s could equal - if not better - the performance of the 185s.
 

Bletchleyite

Veteran Member
Joined
20 Oct 2014
Messages
98,104
Location
"Marston Vale mafia"
Does seem daft why TPE have to use their basically inter-city trains to stop at Marsden/Greenfield etc when Northern could do the job perfectly well? In fact, if Northern had the stock and staff available, that could free up a unit/staff to allow TPE to plug their gaps a bit.

TPE have units coming out of their ears. A ridiculous surplus. If they can't manage 6-car on all Class 185 services (bar the "Northern" stoppers that have to be 3s) then it's just gross incompetence.
 

Msq71423

Member
Joined
30 Jun 2022
Messages
54
Location
North West
Liverpool to Hull is awful

05:30 Man Vic - Hull CANCELLED
06:54 Liverpool – Hull CANCELLED
07:54 Liverpool - Hull Starts Man Vic
09:54 Liverpool – Hull CANCELLED
10:54 Liverpool – Hull CANCELLED
13:54 Liverpool - Hull Terminates Man Vic
14:54 Liverpool – Hull CANCELLED
15:54 Liverpool – Hull CANCELLED
16:54 Liverpool – Hull CANCELLED
17:54 Liverpool - Hull Terminates Leeds

06:55 Hull – Liverpool CANCELLED
07:55 Hull – Liverpool CANCELLED
12:03 Hull – Liverpool CANCELLED
13:03 Hull – Liverpool CANCELLED
14:03 Hull – Liverpool CANCELLED
18:04 Hull – Liverpool CANCELLED
19:03 Hull - Man Vic CANCELLED

Add to that the 1503 Hull - Liverpool.

I think what we are seeing from today are the effects of the new RMT overtime and RDW ban adding to the existing issues. Northern look to have been badly affected today also, much worse than usual, which I would assume is the RDW/Overtime ban. So with regards the new timetable we won't really know if it works or not yet until the 9th January, when the RMT strikes/overtime/RDW ban is lifted (assuming it doesn't get extended).
 

BoroAndy

Member
Joined
11 Jan 2020
Messages
223
Location
Scarborough
A quick Wikipedia check, a Northern Class 195 can accelerate at 0.83 m/s(Squared) and a TPE 185 is 0.49 m/s(Squared) so the 195s accelerate 40% faster.
Interesting that 195s accelerate quicker, as the 185s are known to be over powered and high on diesel9 consumption. And.... Not relevant, but.... 195s feel cramped and uncomfortable compared to 185s and even 170s.
 

Bletchleyite

Veteran Member
Joined
20 Oct 2014
Messages
98,104
Location
"Marston Vale mafia"
Interesting that 195s accelerate quicker, as the 185s are known to be over powered and high on diesel9 consumption.

185s have Sprinter style hydraulic transmissions, so at low speeds waste a load of that extra power on stirring the transmission oil, wasted as heat. 195s have mechanical gearboxes which are much more efficient at getting the power down to the rail at low speeds.

This does make some sense - 185s have powerful engines not for acceleration (which is barely better than any Sprinter) but rather to allow them to maintain high(ish) speeds on the steep Pennine routes.

And.... Not relevant, but.... 195s feel cramped and uncomfortable compared to 185s and even 170s.

Which is odd, because the 185 is both narrower (2.673m vs. 2.712m) and lower (3.710 vs 3.850m) than a 195. 185s are however a very square box with massive windows, which means they feel bigger, just like 444s do despite being the same dimensions. However I personally find 170s feel narrow and cramped, probably due to the very thick sidewalls and intruding window frame.

I suspect part of the 195 feeling small is its very dark colour scheme, with black seat backs, dark blue vehicle ends and mid-blue moquette. The identical (other than the gangway and seats pretty much) Class 197 feels much more spacious to me due to the lighter colours used.

Comfort...well, it depends what seats you like! :)
 

Killingworth

Established Member
Joined
30 May 2018
Messages
4,921
Location
Sheffield
60 years ago when a rail service was totally withdrawn bus routes were supposed to compensate. It was rare for them to fully do so and many of those routes were cut back and then withdrawn. Life continued. Towns and villages adapted to the lack of public transport.

That's what's happening now in TPE territory. Their previously regular users are giving up in droves and becoming increasingly used to making alternative arrangements. Day by day a few more are making them permanent.

Passengers don't have the luxury of deciding who's to blame, TPE, DfT, the unions, H M Treasury. As far as they are concerned it's 'the railway' which doesn't work, so they'll not use it.

No matter how much we call for someone, anyone, everyone, to get a grip it's crystal clear that nobody has an adequate grip just now. The longer it's left the less there'll be to get a grip on!

80 cancellations currently showing for the rest of today and tomorrow!
 

gimmea50anyday

Established Member
Joined
8 Jan 2013
Messages
3,456
Location
Back Cab
185s acceleration is fast enough to outperform Voyagers all the way up to 100mph, although voyagers have a smooth acceleration curve and a higher top end speed so will eventually catch up with and overtake a 185
 

daodao

Established Member
Joined
6 Feb 2016
Messages
2,976
Location
Dunham/Bowdon
I think what we are seeing from today are the effects of the new RMT overtime and RDW ban adding to the existing issues. Northern look to have been badly affected today also, much worse than usual, which I would assume is the RDW/Overtime ban. So with regards the new timetable we won't really know if it works or not yet until the 9th January, when the RMT strikes/overtime/RDW ban is lifted (assuming it doesn't get extended).

I make no comment on the current disputes, but surely it would be preferable if TPE and other TOCs planned slimmed-down timetables based on the premise of no rest day working or overtime required to run them. Trains could be lengthened where possible to minimise any reduction in capacity due to less frequent services. Rest day working and overtime should only be used temporarily if at all to cover unexpected gaps in the roster, e.g. due to excess levels of sickness. If the service continues to be unreliable with frequent unplanned cancellations, passengers (customers) will desert in droves and many will not return even if the service improves in the longer term.
 

MarinerOne

Member
Joined
2 Apr 2017
Messages
5
A Cleethorpes to Liverpool was terminated at Manchester "due to the planned train being replaced with a slower train"

Utter expletive

I was on the 0727 Cleethorpes to Liverpool Lime Street yesterday when we ended up sitting at Manchester Oxford Road for 32 minutes to wait for a driver turn up to take us to Liverpool. I felt for the exasperated train manager who kept announcing “I’m really sorry, but we’re going to have to wait here as we don’t have a driver for our train. The control room keep telling me that he’s in a taxi in the other side of Manchester, but I’ve got no idea when he’ll get here.”

I was just about to abandon ship and get out to pick up the East Midlands service to Liverpool, which was just about to arrive on platform three, but then the driver turned up and I stuck with it.

 

mike57

Established Member
Joined
13 Mar 2015
Messages
1,707
Location
East coast of Yorkshire
Day by day a few more are making them permanent.
passengers (customers) will desert in droves
I am one of those.

I used to visit our office in the NW once a week using the train from Seamer, so a £60+ return fare even with 'old man' railcard discount, I have been working 'remotely' since 2016, pre covid I was working out of a Portakabin on a site near home, but it was just a desk and kit. When I first started the journey was fairly simple, 3hrs each way, one change at Manchester Oxford Road, Then came the 2018 meltdown, and cancellations and short running started, so I would miss a week now and then. Covid then proved I can lead the control systems engineering remotely using technology. When the journey was reliable I believe the face to face was beneficial, but given the current issues I cannot justify booking maybe 8-10 hours to travel as well as the fares, and getting home very late, the face to face is nice but the job still gets done. It was one of those journeys that started this thread.

We also used to visit friends that live near Stalybridge or they would visit us, using the train, now we meet up half way, and both drive, the last journey with my wife was one of those 'never again' moments.

Neither of us are particularly fond of driving, and the M62 with its smart motorway is one of the more unpleasant routes, so we will use the train if its reliable and comfortable. Leisure travel is usually first class, using advance tickets where possible.

Looking back to 2017, my TPE spend was around £2500 as well as some leisure travel, 2022 its around £300 and no leisure travel, and around a third of that has come back in delay repay.

All the participants in the current battles within the industry need realise that if it carries on there will nothing to argue over, and the TOCs need to realise if they keep making bad decisions there wont be a railway, the DfT will just wash their hands and say to the treasury 'there you are, just saved you a huge amount of money'

As I have said in another thread I would not want to be dependant on the railways for employment or flow down business at the moment, its not just the direct workforce, its all the other suppliers that make their living from the rail network.
 

Killingworth

Established Member
Joined
30 May 2018
Messages
4,921
Location
Sheffield
I am one of those.

I used to visit our office in the NW once a week using the train from Seamer, so a £60+ return fare even with 'old man' railcard discount, I have been working 'remotely' since 2016, pre covid I was working out of a Portakabin on a site near home, but it was just a desk and kit. When I first started the journey was fairly simple, 3hrs each way, one change at Manchester Oxford Road, Then came the 2018 meltdown, and cancellations and short running started, so I would miss a week now and then. Covid then proved I can lead the control systems engineering remotely using technology. When the journey was reliable I believe the face to face was beneficial, but given the current issues I cannot justify booking maybe 8-10 hours to travel as well as the fares, and getting home very late, the face to face is nice but the job still gets done. It was one of those journeys that started this thread.

We also used to visit friends that live near Stalybridge or they would visit us, using the train, now we meet up half way, and both drive, the last journey with my wife was one of those 'never again' moments.

Neither of us are particularly fond of driving, and the M62 with its smart motorway is one of the more unpleasant routes, so we will use the train if its reliable and comfortable. Leisure travel is usually first class, using advance tickets where possible.

Looking back to 2017, my TPE spend was around £2500 as well as some leisure travel, 2022 its around £300 and no leisure travel, and around a third of that has come back in delay repay.

All the participants in the current battles within the industry need realise that if it carries on there will nothing to argue over, and the TOCs need to realise if they keep making bad decisions there wont be a railway, the DfT will just wash their hands and say to the treasury 'there you are, just saved you a huge amount of money'

As I have said in another thread I would not want to be dependant on the railways for employment or flow down business at the moment, its not just the direct workforce, its all the other suppliers that make their living from the rail network.

That experience is typical of stories I hear in Sheffield. When the service was reilable it was worth paying for. Even before Covid it was flawed. At least on South Pennine there are rail alternatives.

TPE will need to prove they can provide a reliable service for months before they'll get significant passenger numbers back. Most are now settled in a new work/life pattern that does not require a daily train. For leisure it doesn't include an expensive fast train.

That doesn't auger well for TPE.
 

yorksrob

Veteran Member
Joined
6 Aug 2009
Messages
39,175
Location
Yorks
I wonder why TPE hasn't received the same ultimatum that Avanti has. Doesn't run to London perhaps.
 

Clarence Yard

Established Member
Joined
18 Dec 2014
Messages
2,509
No, as someone on the select committee told us last week, the DfT are quietly cooking up a 4+4 deal for TPE, superseding the TPE deal which could end in 2023 if they were deemed to have not performed - the 2 year extension to 2025 on that “original” deal would therefore not be enacted.

Whether the DfT can get away with this is up to the politicians. It could become political impossible to continue to negotiate such a deal, let alone being able to approve it. It all depends on how much fuss is made.
 

jfollows

Established Member
Joined
26 Feb 2011
Messages
5,892
Location
Wilmslow
I wonder why TPE hasn't received the same ultimatum that Avanti has. Doesn't run to London perhaps.
Given that the Avanti one is a non-ultimatum really, it wouldn't matter would it? I mean, Avanti is going to be given "ultimatums" which each time just defer the decision to a later date, and if they were serious they'd have terminated the contract already, it's just an exercise of kicking the can down the road whilst appearing to be doing something.
 

yorksrob

Veteran Member
Joined
6 Aug 2009
Messages
39,175
Location
Yorks
No, as someone on the select committee told us last week, the DfT are quietly cooking up a 4+4 deal for TPE, superseding the TPE deal which could end in 2023 if they were deemed to have not performed - the 2 year extension to 2025 on that “original” deal would therefore not be enacted.

Whether the DfT can get away with this is up to the politicians. It could become political impossible to continue to negotiate such a deal, let alone being able to approve it. It all depends on how much fuss is made.

Well, that would be surprising, but then again, TPE are good at price gouging (as the £19 single fare from Manchester to Dewsbury will attest).
 

Clarence Yard

Established Member
Joined
18 Dec 2014
Messages
2,509
Given that the Avanti one is a non-ultimatum really, it wouldn't matter would it? I mean, Avanti is going to be given "ultimatums" which each time just defer the decision to a later date, and if they were serious they'd have terminated the contract already, it's just an exercise of kicking the can down the road whilst appearing to be doing something.

The DfT tend to prefer TOCs work to contract ends or break points. It saves them the legal hassle, which would be massive.

So it should be relatively easy to take West Coast back at the end of March and, if they wanted, TPE in May 2023. The question is, do they really want to?
 

td97

Established Member
Joined
26 Jul 2017
Messages
1,306
TPE causing mayhem at Victoria this morning with a unit sat in P5 since 0815 and P3 since 0900
 

Frankfurt

Member
Joined
23 Jan 2010
Messages
124
Try working for them!

The only thing I console myself with is the fact I'm not a fare paying passenger.
 

Bletchleyite

Veteran Member
Joined
20 Oct 2014
Messages
98,104
Location
"Marston Vale mafia"
I was on the 0727 Cleethorpes to Liverpool Lime Street yesterday when we ended up sitting at Manchester Oxford Road for 32 minutes to wait for a driver turn up to take us to Liverpool. I felt for the exasperated train manager who kept announcing “I’m really sorry, but we’re going to have to wait here as we don’t have a driver for our train. The control room keep telling me that he’s in a taxi in the other side of Manchester, but I’ve got no idea when he’ll get here.”

I was just about to abandon ship and get out to pick up the East Midlands service to Liverpool, which was just about to arrive on platform three, but then the driver turned up and I stuck with it.


There needs to be an outright ban on crew changes in central Manchester. This is yet another case of this causing utter chaos. In South TPE's case Stockport would be a better location.
 

Greybeard33

Established Member
Joined
18 Feb 2012
Messages
4,300
Location
Greater Manchester
There needs to be an outright ban on crew changes in central Manchester. This is yet another case of this causing utter chaos. In South TPE's case Stockport would be a better location.
No, just no! Stockport has only two Down platforms and a blockage of one of them causes even more chaos than at Oxford Road (where P2 or P3 can be used bidirectionally).

TPE needs to stop crew changes on through services anywhere in the Manchester area. See also the chaos at Victoria this morning due to abandoned trains:
TPE causing mayhem at Victoria this morning with a unit sat in P5 since 0815 and P3 since 0900
 

Furrball

Member
Joined
9 May 2011
Messages
564

Attachments

  • Screenshot_20221220-110629_Twitter.jpg
    Screenshot_20221220-110629_Twitter.jpg
    780.5 KB · Views: 51

Moonshot

Established Member
Joined
10 Nov 2013
Messages
3,660
No, just no! Stockport has only two Down platforms and a blockage of one of them causes even more chaos than at Oxford Road (where P2 or P3 can be used bidirectionally).

TPE needs to stop crew changes on through services anywhere in the Manchester area. See also the chaos at Victoria this morning due to abandoned trains:
Should that apply to Northern crew as well then?
 

Greybeard33

Established Member
Joined
18 Feb 2012
Messages
4,300
Location
Greater Manchester
Should that apply to Northern crew as well then?
I believe the new timetable has reduced Northern crew changes in Manchester (no more through Southport to Alderley Edge, Blackpool to Hazel Grove or Liverpool to Crewe services). Whereas TPE crew changes have increased.

"If you find yourself in a hole, stop digging."
 

Moonshot

Established Member
Joined
10 Nov 2013
Messages
3,660
I believe the new timetable has reduced Northern crew changes in Manchester (no more through Southport to Alderley Edge, Blackpool to Hazel Grove or Liverpool to Crewe services). Whereas TPE crew changes have increased.

"If you find yourself in a hole, stop digging."
I can assure you it hasn't..... because I am one.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top