I'm not a fan of rampant commercialism in general, but a few colourful advertising posters would brighten it up no end. I suppose advertisers won't bother with it because it's not very well-used; on the other hand, maybe it's not well-used partly because it's so grotty.It is indeed quite grim. Has a feel a bit like London Underground in the 80s.
I'm not a fan of rampant commercialism in general, but a few colourful advertising posters would brighten it up no end. I suppose advertisers won't bother with it because it's not very well-used; on the other hand, maybe it's not well-used partly because it's so grotty.
It can't be any worse than platform 4 when they swapped over male & female toilets (reducing the male from one bog & 2 urinals to a single bog). Or the style over substance taps in the toilets on P2/3Big Basingstoke News! Amazingly, the scruffy and cold Network SouthEast / SWT toilets on Platform 1 are FINALLY, I repeat, FINALLY, being refurbished as we speak!
It's just a shame that the rest of the recently repainted parts across the station are already looking scruffy already - it seems to be a symptom of the repainting program across the SWR network, it's either poor prep or poor paint application or both. Mind you, they've finally settled on the location of the PA screens on the country end of Platform 2/3 and have since demolished the planter down there too.
I read somewhere that the Pumpkin was damaged in a ram raid incident… welcome to classy Cheltenham. It has been replaced now with a Starbucks which nobody can afford to use!I don't think there's that much wrong with Cheltenham station. The platforms and waiting rooms are nothing glamorous but fit for purpose. My main criticism would be having only one set of toilets which is very pokey and stuck out at the southern end of the platform 1 building, as well as lacking anywhere to buy refreshments now the Pumpkin Cafe is gone, but what they do have seems to be maintained and cleaned reasonably well.
Well I hope the females made good use of their 2 urinalsIt can't be any worse than platform 4 when they swapped over male & female toilets (reducing the male from one bog & 2 urinals to a single bog).
Another example has to be Cholsey. The entire station is falling apart. Pretty much any repairs have been done by the Cholsey and Wallingford railway.Yeovil Pen Mill is another that looks a bit dilapidated, lots of things boarded up, cracked glass on the canopy, with wood rotting too, and cobwebs over everything too. (Phots attached) The toilets were like stepping back into a time warp of 2-3 decades, but they were at least clean!
Seems a lot of GWR stations need smartening up. The island platforms at Swindon and Chippenham could also do with a repaint and some repairs to the canopy.
Now that is astonishing, how is nobody accountable for this type of bone idle dumb f******The car park also has a hole in it where it was resurfaced but they went round a car which someone had left, and never can back to fix.
Yep, they put up signs saying the car park would be closed about 3 days before, which anyone with an ounce of common sense can tell you isn’t long enough for a long stay car park, and presumably therefore couldn’t legally move the car.Now that is astonishing, how is nobody accountable for this type of bone idle dumb f******
I don’t know about that. Starbucks at most stations I see are usually doing a good trade often with quite a queue.I read somewhere that the Pumpkin was damaged in a ram raid incident… welcome to classy Cheltenham. It has been replaced now with a Starbucks which nobody can afford to use!
I remember taking photos at Clifton Down some years ago, and being jeered at by some idiots who had been patronising the pub on the up platform.Vastly improved now (so not in the running) but before they moved the access to the down platform at Clifton Down, the stairs used to emerge under the shops. Now that really was grotty and run down (not to mention pretty frightening later on on the evening).
Very true. British stations are generally grotty, reflecting the state of a country where public space is not respected, unless someone can make a fast buck out of it. Britain compares badly with other countries which have more self respect.Perhaps a shorter list would be: “which stations are not dilapidated?”
I honestly think this is true. I look back at photos from the 60s or 70s at how well maintained public parks and municipal gardens were compared to today. Now there’s no planting unless backed up with a sign saying this bunch of daffodil bulbs is sponsored by your local solicitor, garage or butcher. I think you’re right, there’s no pride left in the uk, just hunger for cash.I remember taking photos at Clifton Down some years ago, and being jeered at by some idiots who had been patronising the pub on the up platform.
== Doublepost prevention - post automatically merged: ==
Very true. British stations are generally grotty, reflecting the state of a country where public space is not respected, unless someone can make a fast buck out of it. Britain compares badly with other countries which have more self respect.
To be fair, I could point to several stations in Italy or France which are similarly neglected. I've only used a couple of trains in Poland but the smaller stations there were abysmal.I remember taking photos at Clifton Down some years ago, and being jeered at by some idiots who had been patronising the pub on the up platform.
== Doublepost prevention - post automatically merged: ==
Very true. British stations are generally grotty, reflecting the state of a country where public space is not respected, unless someone can make a fast buck out of it. Britain compares badly with other countries which have more self respect.
I found Portuguese (my favourite destination) stations well kept.To be fair, I could point to several stations in Italy or France which are similarly neglected. I've only used a couple of trains in Poland but the smaller stations there were abysmal.
Fully agreeAs much as I love Crewe station, it's definitely a contender for grubbiest dilapidated station.
Platform 12 is really abandoned. On the plus side, there are the nicer toilets over there, mainly because the platform is so rarely used.Once you get on platform 12 and get to see all the long abandoned overgrown bay platforms looking unwanted and wasting away. Between the main platforms there are weeds and bits just left from however long ago.
I don't understand why they don't fill in the disused platforms and make that all into the bus replacement area. It could become a much higher quality facility then for those passengers rather than the horrible walk through what feels like areas of the station that the public aren't meant to be in. Especially when between the bus stop and that tunnel thing is also used as a stock room.Then there is the horses landing area which no-one really knows exactly what it is. Part staff car park, rail replacement buses area, deliveries, viewpoint over the freight avoiding lines, entrance to station if gates unlocked (via the long term temporary wooden tunnel onto platform 12) and even a waiting room although I've never been in. All looks so very tired as if time has stood still for a few decades.
Work is (very slowly) under way - though I’m not quite sure what the extent of that work is.Last time i passed through Bath it looked like it could do with a major spruce up for a touristy town.
Thought it was a 24?Plus the dmu that ended up on the platform.
Yes I remember now, I'd forgotten they'd put the Starbucks in.I read somewhere that the Pumpkin was damaged in a ram raid incident… welcome to classy Cheltenham. It has been replaced now with a Starbucks which nobody can afford to use!
That's a good point actually. I don't think removing the roof would go down well but they could at least give it a clean.It’s the dirty glass/plastic roof that gives Cheltenham that grubby feel, maybe it wouldn’t be so bad if that was cleaned up, or just removed/replaced. Oh, and the crumbling bridge that passengers are no longer allowed to use!
The runaway was a 24. It was the DMU that got flung onto the platform.Thought it was a 24?
The class 24 in the foreground of that photo is engaged in removing the undamaged - or slightly damaged - DMU vehicle to Chester Depot. The wreckage of the loco involved in the runaway collision (5028) is behind the badly-damaged DMU car in the background, which it pushed up over the buffers in bay platform 5 with such force that its fuel tank exploded, started a fire of such ferocity that it also engulfed the wrecked loco, part of the station buildings and brought down the (now missing) sections of the station roof.The runaway was a 24. It was the DMU that got flung onto the platform.
Accident report hereThe class 24 in the foreground of that photo is engaged in removing the undamaged - or slightly damaged - DMU vehicle to Chester Depot. The wreckage of the loco involved in the runaway collision (5028) is behind the badly-damaged DMU car in the background, which it pushed up over the buffers in bay platform 5 with such force that its fuel tank exploded, started a fire of such ferocity that it also engulfed the wrecked loco, part of the station buildings and brought down the (now missing) sections of the station roof.
Link goes to a PDF of the Railway Inspectorate report into the 1972 Chester Rail Crash.Locomotive 5028 was so extensively damaged first by the collision and then by the fire, that it was
subsequently written off as being beyond economic repair. The body of brake-van B.951200 was completely
demolished and the frame and running gear badly buckled. Whilst the tank of the 35 ton Esso tank wagon
No. 3390 was neither pierced nor ruptured, the frame and running gear were so badly buckled that it was
considered to be a complete write off...
It serves as a small Park and Ride as it has sixty free car park spaces and it is the nearest to the city centre to offer that.Plenty of Merseyrail stations are a bit grotty, to be fair. I think it's not well used just because it doesn't have a massive catchment (being only about 400m from Birkenhead Central), and the catchment it does have is low density housing and industry. It would not be hard to argue for its closure and relocation about 300m to the south and renaming to Tranmere or Mersey Park.