Intercity110
On Moderation
well, i'll take anything at this stage
An expert on the TV news said there was a convention in these situations of tapping on the every hour and half hour, so the regularity distinguishes it from whale clicks etc. Tapping is common sense, but I had never heard of the half-hour convention, which sounds an awful long time apart to me, and an interval hard to judge in the dark. Tapping SOS in morse and counting to say 100 between would be more effective*. I believe morse tapping communication was used during the HMS Thetis disaster - a submarine that sank in shallow water off the North Wales coast in 1939.Apparently tapping has been heard and has been interpreted as signs of life.
What are the chances of the people on board being saved?
In terms of time interval and light, you’d just use mobile phones one after the other until all batteries expire.An expert on the TV news said there was a convention in these situations of tapping on the every hour and half hour, so the regularity distinguishes it from whale clicks etc. Tapping is common sense, but I had never heard of the half-hour convention, which sounds an awful long time apart to me, and an interval hard to judge in the dark. Tapping SOS in morse and counting to say 100 between would be more effective*. I believe morse tapping communication was used during the HMS Thetis disaster - a submarine that sank in shallow water off the North Wales coast in 1939.
The pictures I have seen of the Titan seem to show it has no lifting eyes on the top for crane hooks. That will make recovery far more difficult - who designed this stuff? So even after they find the sub it will be a major operation in itself to get it up, possibly requiring slings to be passed underneath - I have experience at sea and of operating cranes and I know the issues. I'm sure they will find and recover it eventually, but it will not be a quick job.
* I understand that signal professionals are not taught morse these days, being considered old-fashioned. I guess SOS would be recognised though.
Very slimWhat are the chances of the people on board being saved?
There's nothing wrong with using controllers, the US military uses Xbox controllers for various bits of kit due to their familiarity and Windows compatibility, but a wireless one just adds so much more unneeded risk. What happens if the controller just refuses to sync? What happens if the batteries die or leak? Do they keep a spare controller in a locker if a button stops working?The capsule’s controller is an off the shelf Logitech handheld console controller from 2005, which runs on AA batteries…
Also check out the ballast arrangement. https://twitter.com/birdtickler/status/1671002901064425472?s=46&t=C95SbugdUjpqXvyxmN2jvA
That there were no submarine experts on staff and the emphasis on hiring young people is quite shocking. I have no doubt that's nothing to do with enthusiasm and potential or whatever nonsense he spouted, and instead everything to do with paying them peanuts.This video popped up in my YouTube feed:
It's not a channel I'm familiar with, but if accurate it doesn't sound good for those on board. Key points being the lack of emergency oxygen supply in the event of things going wrong, and the inability to vent any toxic gases which may accumulate within the submersible. Meanwhile as of a few hours ago the US Coastguard are (at least publicly) slightly more optimistic, suggesting that the occupants have around 40 hours of oxygen remaining... that sounds a lot considering the number of occupants on board and the relatively small size of the hull. My suspicion though is that the submersible has suffered some sort of catastrophic failure.
There's nothing wrong with using controllers, the US military uses Xbox controllers for various bits of kit due to their familiarity and Windows compatibility, but a wireless one just adds so much more unneeded risk. What happens if the controller just refuses to sync? What happens if the batteries die or leak? Do they keep a spare controller in a locker if a button stops working?
Are you sure ? In the video linked by other posts, the one thing the presenter is complimentary about is the navigation system (at 3:20).As the submersible had no navigation equipment
In my defence, I was listening to it whilst I was writing a report in my lunch break.Three, I believe, watch the video you attached!![]()
Are you sure ? In the video linked by other posts, the one thing the presenter is complimentary about is the navigation system (at 3:20).
True. But if you know the absolute position of the starting point (which you do), the INS can incorporate that information and show absolute position. The INS does not require ongoing communication with the mothership.I am not an expert (I failed physics O-Level), but an I think that an Inertial Navigation System can only plot your position in relation to your starting point:
They still do.Yes, an INS just works out what movement your vehicle has made in relation to where it was. Aircraft used to have it
Summary
- The US Coast Guard commander leading the search for the missing Titanic sub tells the BBC the crew may have around 20 hours of oxygen left
- Rear Admiral John Mauger says it's a very complex and difficult mission, with people working around the clock
- Earlier, the US Coast Guard said a noise heard in the search had given them "a target, a focus"
- Mauger says they are working closely with leading acoustic experts to make sure they understand what that noise signature is
- More vessels are being sent to the search site, off the North American coast
- Contact with the sub - which has five people on board - was lost on Sunday as it made a 3,800m descent to the Titanic wreck
It certainly seems like all equipment is now on site or at least very close to it. The French ROV can potentially locate the submersible and the US Navy deep salvage system has the capability to lift it. Both systems have operated some way deeper than where the Titanic wreck is and equipment much heavier than the submersible has been recovered from much deeper waters. It's just the time issue. Even if they do miraculously locate it in the next few hours and it is free of obstruction even the process of hooking up to it isn't a job measured in minutes. Ascent takes time too.
Because it's at the same pressure inside as at the surface there isn't a risk of "the bends" so it can be brought up as quickly as the kit they have permits.
G.B. News are giving it plenty of coverage.is there a more focused stream or tv channel which will slot focus on the search giving live updates, other than bbc news etc? I’m really intrigued by this
Agreed. and same for me. The litmus test for a true Titanic enthusiast was whether they’d heard of it before the 1997 film release (at least for those of us old enough).
Thank youG.B. News are giving it plenty of coverage.
is there a more focused stream or tv channel which will slot focus on the search giving live updates, other than bbc news etc? I’m really intrigued by this
You wanna risk whatever attachments are used to get it off the seabed breaking halfway up and the thing tumbling back into the deep? They're going to bring it up as slowly as they can without running out of oxygen for the crew to survive in my book. At least until they can get it shallow enough to potentially get divers to it to attach more lines (which basically means just below the surface). Ain't nobody going to be bringing this thing up quickly unless it's a "we either get them up in the next hour or they die" situation.Because it's at the same pressure inside as at the surface there isn't a risk of "the bends" so it can be brought up as quickly as the kit they have permits.
Didn’t think it would take long for this comment to crop upSo we have the worlds best resources to hunt for a few super rich people who knew what risks they were taking yet when a boat load of immigrants sinks in Greek waters nobody is interested.
So we have the worlds best resources to hunt for a few super rich people who knew what risks they were taking yet when a boat load of immigrants sinks in Greek waters nobody is interested.
when a boat load of immigrants sinks in Greek waters nobody is interested.
Absolute nonsense, that tragedy received huge coverage here in the UK.
Even the worlds best resources probably won’t be enough.So we have the worlds best resources to hunt for a few super rich people who knew what risks they were taking yet when a boat load of immigrants sinks in Greek waters nobody is interested.
The difference is that unfortunately that occurs with depressing regularity, and is not "news" any more. A missing submarine doesn't happen every week, and therefore gets attention.So we have the worlds best resources to hunt for a few super rich people who knew what risks they were taking yet when a boat load of immigrants sinks in Greek waters nobody is interested.