For the avoidance of doubt, I was speaking from the position of "if some form of extra charge is considered necessary", like Heathrow with its access fees for the heavy rail tunnels. I'm not necessarily advocating for it at Gatwick, but either way I definitely agree that Gatwick Express as it works now is a joke.
Agree, it's easy to say go with the cheapest option, but that would never get the green light in this cash strapped treasury run railway.
I don't think Gatwick needs an explicitly stated supplement, the network if full of inconsistent ticket pricing quirks, just a consistent price, which may be higher than stations around it.
As others have said, even if GatEx service arguably had features that warranted a higher price up until the mid2000s, now it is just a half hourly train to Brighton with a lot of confusion and needless effort to push people towards particular trains and fares.
I would advocate:
- A consistent price between Vic/London Bridge/St Pancras (and other Thameslink core) to/from Gatwick, which is a little more than current Southern and Thameslink fares (but less than Gatex). Tap in and tap out would be the same amount. Removal of Gatwick Express brand.
- A slightly higher amount for 'London Terminals' to/from Gatwick (flexibility = premium - and this helps keep the above fare slightly lower)
- Regular commuters/ airport staff can save using season tickets, perhaps a carnet with a decent discount, and using tickets to three bridges, for cheaper tickets.
This would stop the confusing and unhelpful messaging and also make the options at ticket machines much simpler (as someone who has arrived at many a European airport, gone to a ticket machine selected 'central station' and been given a list of lines and 'via this or via that' options which I have no idea about).