• Our new ticketing site is now live! Using either this or the original site (both powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

Controversial railway opinions (without a firm foundation in logic..)

Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

156421

On Moderation
Joined
23 Aug 2022
Messages
334
Location
Weſtmorland 'n' Furneß
Ever been on a 195? They seem to be driven in a much more Continental fashion of running in fast then braking positively to a stand.
Yes they are used for BIF-MIA services in this locality. Much better than the 156s they seem to be replacing (156s still used for some BIF-LAN and all (with one trivial weekly exception) BIF-CAR/MLM services). My only criticism is the trashcans are minuscule. Also when 2 off 195s are joined together it's great for capacity but not for revenue enforcement.

There is little more frustrating on a tight connection time than the incoming train (which I need to get out of ASAP) crawling in without a care in the world.
 

renegademaster

Established Member
Joined
22 Jun 2023
Messages
1,738
Location
Croydon
I would go the other way, all trains have toilets. Hertford - London can be a long journey without a toilet for some people, and the frequency isn't there to step off the train then back onto the next one with minimal delay.
One of the upsides of Southern getting rid of their 455s is now every train has a toilet
 

Bishopstone

Established Member
Joined
24 Jun 2010
Messages
1,573
Location
Seaford
Most of the people who say the Government should stop interfering with railway operations would - if the Government sat on the sidelines - demand to know what the Government was doing about the lack of gluten-free options in LNER first class (etc), and accuse them of not having a grip on the situation, and complete lack of interest.

They would continue to write to their MPs, rather than the CEO of LNER/GBR etc.
 

HSTEd

Veteran Member
Joined
14 Jul 2011
Messages
18,636
Ever been on a 195? They seem to be driven in a much more Continental fashion of running in fast then braking positively to a stand.
Ultimately it is the risk assesment led safety culture in the UK that led to "defensive driving".

Perhaps it will change with ETCS, but somehow i doubt it.
 

PGAT

Established Member
Joined
13 Apr 2022
Messages
1,811
Location
Selhurst
Go one step further. Service pattern should be 1tph LIT - VIC and 1tph LIT - BDM throughout the day, with an earlier start.
A big issue with that is in the Up direction the ex-Bedford paths are 5 minutes before the Victoria trains meaning it is practically 1tph
 

HSTEd

Veteran Member
Joined
14 Jul 2011
Messages
18,636
The underground still seems to work that way
The London Underground has automatic train protection (in the form of tripcocks) and has had it since long before risk assesments existed as a formal practice.
 

Clansman

Established Member
Joined
4 Jan 2016
Messages
2,601
Location
Scotland and Hong Kong
  • The UK should follow the lead of continental Europe when it comes to door operation, where guards release the doors immediatley after stopping, rather than having to faff about for 30 seconds on a curved platform just to check that all coaches are over a platform that's 3 times longer than the train itself! Obviously not reasonable on notoriously short platforms, but termini and large stations... come on!

  • All trains should be built to maximum width and height as the GB loading gauage is a disgrace and needs to be sweated as much as possible, and manufacturers should be forced to do this even if there's a trade-off in having to shorten or untaper carriages. All efforts should be made during works to renew, electrify, or even building new lines to increase the loading gauge as much as possible, but in the meantime the industry needs to adapt (a 170 is appalling compared to what was possible with Mk2s, and the BREL MUs proves that housing the traction equipment is not the whole story).
 

LYuen

Member
Joined
20 Jun 2022
Messages
161
Location
Manchester
The biggest 'winner' under privatisation over the past 3 decades, although not the intention, are railway workers.
By winner I mean they are the least exploited in comparison with other public services workers, e.g. NHS.
 

12LDA28C

Established Member
Joined
14 Oct 2022
Messages
5,058
Location
The back of beyond
The biggest 'winner' under privatisation over the past 3 decades, although not the intention, are railway workers.
By winner I mean they are the least exploited in comparison with other public services workers, e.g. NHS.

Of course railway workers have not really been public services (public sector) workers for the vast majority of the last 3 decades unlike NHS staff.
 

JD2168

Established Member
Joined
11 Jul 2022
Messages
1,370
Location
Sheffield
All Train lines should be electric with overhead wires or third rail as an immediate priority.
 

eldomtom2

On Moderation
Joined
6 Oct 2018
Messages
1,926
That is neither illogical nor, I hope, controversial. (though maybe an exception for very lightly used rural lines)
It's a very controversial statement in places like America, and even here the government has frequently tried to avoid electrification. Not to mention all the times people argue electrification is a distraction and the focus should be on increasing ridership...
 

12LDA28C

Established Member
Joined
14 Oct 2022
Messages
5,058
Location
The back of beyond
All Train lines should be electric with overhead wires or third rail as an immediate priority.

Excellent. I look forward to seeing the West Highland extension with OHLE. The masts should do the aesthetics of Glenfinnan viaduct a world of good.
 

Krokodil

Established Member
Joined
23 Jan 2023
Messages
4,469
Location
Wales
Excellent. I look forward to seeing the West Highland extension with OHLE. The masts should do the aesthetics of Glenfinnan viaduct a world of good.
Presumably he isn't suggesting GWML F&F kit. The Landwasser Viaduct seems to be fine even though it's electrified.
 

Attachments

  • landwasserviadukt_s0025523_2005_09_19.jpg
    landwasserviadukt_s0025523_2005_09_19.jpg
    316.2 KB · Views: 98

Magdalia

Established Member
Joined
1 Jan 2022
Messages
4,851
Location
The Fens
Thameslink not introducing the Cambridge to Maidstone East service is a mistake and should be added in some way even if not to Cambridge but to Lechworth.

Agreed. Kent’s so called capital has embarrassing frequency and connectivity
Thameslink not introducing the Cambridge-Maidstone East service was one of the few things it got right. Having late running trains from Maidstone East calling in the two track section at Welwyn would have wrecked punctuality all the way to Scotland.

Maidstone may have poor frequency and connectivity but trains to Cambridge were never a sensible answer for that.
 

Falcon1200

Established Member
Joined
14 Jun 2021
Messages
4,864
Location
Neilston, East Renfrewshire
Thameslink is an opportunity missed; Instead of suburban EMUs there should be through services such as Edinburgh/Brighton and Leeds/Hastings. Not so much Levelling Up as Connecting Up!

The Elizabeth Line too; Cardiff/Norwich and Bristol/Southend through services (for example) should operate.
 

nlogax

Established Member
Joined
29 May 2011
Messages
5,690
Location
Mostly Glasgow-ish. Mostly.
Thameslink not introducing the Cambridge-Maidstone East service was one of the few things it got right. Having late running trains from Maidstone East calling in the two track section at Welwyn would have wrecked punctuality all the way to Scotland.

On that note, use the money 'saved' from truncating HS2 to finally address the Welwyn bottleneck with new bridges and tunnels twenty something years after it was initially teased.

In reality that's more lacking a firm foundation in finances.
 

Bletchleyite

Veteran Member
Joined
20 Oct 2014
Messages
104,206
Location
"Marston Vale mafia"
Thameslink is an opportunity missed; Instead of suburban EMUs there should be through services such as Edinburgh/Brighton and Leeds/Hastings. Not so much Levelling Up as Connecting Up!

The Elizabeth Line too; Cardiff/Norwich and Bristol/Southend through services (for example) should operate.

Absolutely not. As XC demonstrated, demand for that sort of cross London travel is fairly low and is not justified even by running "round the side".

It's all about getting TO London. The through nature of these two services is just because for local journeys a selection of different London stations is valuable as it saves time connecting to the Tube - for a long journey this is less important.

Were Birmingham the capital, things might be different, though, as demand would be roughly even both sides.
 

jfowkes

Member
Joined
20 Jul 2017
Messages
1,118
On the subject of London through running, Crossrail 2 should be planned, built and opened ASAP.
 

The Ham

Established Member
Joined
6 Jul 2012
Messages
11,001
On the subject of London through running, Crossrail 2 should be planned, built and opened ASAP.

Indeed, the thing which is often overlooked with this is that it would free up a decent amount of capacity across the SWML too so isn't really only a London project.

In theory it could allow more services to Salisbury (or even Exeter with redoubling of the WofE line).
 

PacerTrain142

On Moderation
Joined
23 Aug 2016
Messages
211
Location
Next to the Railway
Third-rail-ifying the Severn Beach line would be sensible and safe considering its lack of level crossings. It would also completely avoid conflict with future GWML OHLE, cut noise pollution in Easton and air pollution everywhere, and allow the replacement of the utterly clapped-out Turbos (which could then reinforce the poor beleaguered Portsmouth-Cardiffs) with nice cascaded ex-Southern stock cut down a bit.
Well the turbos are still a lot newer than the sprinters and pacers that used to operate down there.
Trains should suddenly stop in stations rather than takes ages gradually slowing down on the approach.
Hmm not sure I agree. Trains often have to stop in precise locations on the platform depending on number of carriages (there are usually signs up saying 2 car, 4 car etc) and trains are not cars - the risk of overrunning the platform increases (something I’ve done many times when playing train simulator). I don’t normally enter platforms faster than 30 mph. Also the standard driving procedure on most trains is usually use step 1 or step 2 braking normally, step 1 when coming to a stand for a smooth stop, full service only if they really need it. I prefer a smoother stop even if it’s slightly slower (except maybe for metro services where high stop frequency means more efficent driving is needed to keep to time).
Yes they are used for BIF-MIA services in this locality. Much better than the 156s they seem to be replacing (156s still used for some BIF-LAN and all (with one trivial weekly exception) BIF-CAR/MLM services). My only criticism is the trashcans are minuscule. Also when 2 off 195s are joined together it's great for capacity but not for revenue enforcement.

There is little more frustrating on a tight connection time than the incoming train (which I need to get out of ASAP) crawling in without a care in the world.
I prefer a 156 to a 195. Much prefer a noisy old diesel.
The underground still seems to work that way
Yes the speed the train comes into the station and the acceleration of some of the trains on the underground is pretty insane. I’ve not been on the underground but have watched YouTube videos and I would imagine people must fall over sometimes from the super fast acceleration when leaving stations.
 

CaptainHaddock

Established Member
Joined
10 Feb 2011
Messages
2,470
Heritage rail companies should only feature steam locos and not waste their resources on preserving any form of diesel traction.
 

PacerTrain142

On Moderation
Joined
23 Aug 2016
Messages
211
Location
Next to the Railway
Heritage rail companies should only feature steam locos and not waste their resources on preserving any form of diesel traction.
No way! I love the pacers and rode one on a heritage railway recently. And those 1st gen DMU’s are great becuase passengers sat at the front can see out the front of the train. DMU’s, while not as popular as steam locomotives are also much cheaper to run.

Also, they should put the pacers back on the railways and have them as 3rd class travel (cheaper fare if you get the pacer).
 

Top