156421
On Moderation
Trains should suddenly stop in stations rather than takes ages gradually slowing down on the approach.
Trains should suddenly stop in stations rather than takes ages gradually slowing down on the approach.
Yes they are used for BIF-MIA services in this locality. Much better than the 156s they seem to be replacing (156s still used for some BIF-LAN and all (with one trivial weekly exception) BIF-CAR/MLM services). My only criticism is the trashcans are minuscule. Also when 2 off 195s are joined together it's great for capacity but not for revenue enforcement.Ever been on a 195? They seem to be driven in a much more Continental fashion of running in fast then braking positively to a stand.
One of the upsides of Southern getting rid of their 455s is now every train has a toiletI would go the other way, all trains have toilets. Hertford - London can be a long journey without a toilet for some people, and the frequency isn't there to step off the train then back onto the next one with minimal delay.
Caught short busy routes, more like.I'm thinking routes like say Lincoln-Leicester, short busy routes.
Ultimately it is the risk assesment led safety culture in the UK that led to "defensive driving".Ever been on a 195? They seem to be driven in a much more Continental fashion of running in fast then braking positively to a stand.
Go one step further. Service pattern should be 1tph LIT - VIC and 1tph LIT - BDM throughout the day, with an earlier start.The peak time Littlehampton Thameslink services should be reinstated.
The underground still seems to work that wayUltimately it is the risk assesment led safety culture in the UK that led to "defensive driving".
Perhaps it will change with ETCS, but somehow i doubt it.
A big issue with that is in the Up direction the ex-Bedford paths are 5 minutes before the Victoria trains meaning it is practically 1tphGo one step further. Service pattern should be 1tph LIT - VIC and 1tph LIT - BDM throughout the day, with an earlier start.
The London Underground has automatic train protection (in the form of tripcocks) and has had it since long before risk assesments existed as a formal practice.The underground still seems to work that way
The biggest 'winner' under privatisation over the past 3 decades, although not the intention, are railway workers.
By winner I mean they are the least exploited in comparison with other public services workers, e.g. NHS.
That is neither illogical nor, I hope, controversial. (though maybe an exception for very lightly used rural lines)All Train lines should be electric with overhead wires or third rail as an immediate priority.
It's a very controversial statement in places like America, and even here the government has frequently tried to avoid electrification. Not to mention all the times people argue electrification is a distraction and the focus should be on increasing ridership...That is neither illogical nor, I hope, controversial. (though maybe an exception for very lightly used rural lines)
All Train lines should be electric with overhead wires or third rail as an immediate priority.
Presumably he isn't suggesting GWML F&F kit. The Landwasser Viaduct seems to be fine even though it's electrified.Excellent. I look forward to seeing the West Highland extension with OHLE. The masts should do the aesthetics of Glenfinnan viaduct a world of good.
Excellent. I look forward to seeing the West Highland extension with OHLE. The masts should do the aesthetics of Glenfinnan viaduct a world of good.
Thameslink not introducing the Cambridge to Maidstone East service is a mistake and should be added in some way even if not to Cambridge but to Lechworth.
Thameslink not introducing the Cambridge-Maidstone East service was one of the few things it got right. Having late running trains from Maidstone East calling in the two track section at Welwyn would have wrecked punctuality all the way to Scotland.Agreed. Kent’s so called capital has embarrassing frequency and connectivity
Thameslink not introducing the Cambridge-Maidstone East service was one of the few things it got right. Having late running trains from Maidstone East calling in the two track section at Welwyn would have wrecked punctuality all the way to Scotland.
Thameslink is an opportunity missed; Instead of suburban EMUs there should be through services such as Edinburgh/Brighton and Leeds/Hastings. Not so much Levelling Up as Connecting Up!
The Elizabeth Line too; Cardiff/Norwich and Bristol/Southend through services (for example) should operate.
And the services could be distinguished by marketing. "Standard" and "Bog Standard" perhaps.Toilets should be removed from congested services to provide more passenger space, also cutting cleaning and maintanance costs.
On the subject of London through running, Crossrail 2 should be planned, built and opened ASAP.
Well the turbos are still a lot newer than the sprinters and pacers that used to operate down there.Third-rail-ifying the Severn Beach line would be sensible and safe considering its lack of level crossings. It would also completely avoid conflict with future GWML OHLE, cut noise pollution in Easton and air pollution everywhere, and allow the replacement of the utterly clapped-out Turbos (which could then reinforce the poor beleaguered Portsmouth-Cardiffs) with nice cascaded ex-Southern stock cut down a bit.
Hmm not sure I agree. Trains often have to stop in precise locations on the platform depending on number of carriages (there are usually signs up saying 2 car, 4 car etc) and trains are not cars - the risk of overrunning the platform increases (something I’ve done many times when playing train simulator). I don’t normally enter platforms faster than 30 mph. Also the standard driving procedure on most trains is usually use step 1 or step 2 braking normally, step 1 when coming to a stand for a smooth stop, full service only if they really need it. I prefer a smoother stop even if it’s slightly slower (except maybe for metro services where high stop frequency means more efficent driving is needed to keep to time).Trains should suddenly stop in stations rather than takes ages gradually slowing down on the approach.
I prefer a 156 to a 195. Much prefer a noisy old diesel.Yes they are used for BIF-MIA services in this locality. Much better than the 156s they seem to be replacing (156s still used for some BIF-LAN and all (with one trivial weekly exception) BIF-CAR/MLM services). My only criticism is the trashcans are minuscule. Also when 2 off 195s are joined together it's great for capacity but not for revenue enforcement.
There is little more frustrating on a tight connection time than the incoming train (which I need to get out of ASAP) crawling in without a care in the world.
Yes the speed the train comes into the station and the acceleration of some of the trains on the underground is pretty insane. I’ve not been on the underground but have watched YouTube videos and I would imagine people must fall over sometimes from the super fast acceleration when leaving stations.The underground still seems to work that way
No way! I love the pacers and rode one on a heritage railway recently. And those 1st gen DMU’s are great becuase passengers sat at the front can see out the front of the train. DMU’s, while not as popular as steam locomotives are also much cheaper to run.Heritage rail companies should only feature steam locos and not waste their resources on preserving any form of diesel traction.