MadMac
Member
Derby still has a large “Derby Midland” lit sign outside. Does anyone still call Newcastle “Central”?
That wasn’t uncommon at the time though. Bradford Exchange just had external signage saying EXCHANGE STATION: http://www.disused-stations.org.uk/b/bradford_exchange/index3.shtml. It was still officially called Bradford Exchange.the large sign at the top of the vehicle and pedestrian access ramps boldly stated "Waverley Station", with the BR logo. No mention of Edinburgh at all.
Yes, most people in Newcastle still refer to it as Central. The Metro station is also known as Central Station.Does anyone still call Newcastle “Central”?
The Midland was added back onto Derby around the time of privatisation, possibly to give a free plug to the owning TOC who was Midland Mainline at the time.Derby still has a large “Derby Midland” lit sign outside. Does anyone still call Newcastle “Central”?
Does that include Manchester London Road?I generally tend to give stations their full historic names rather than curtail them. Chester will always be Chester General and Plymouth will always be Plymouth North Road and Barnstaple will always been Barnstaple Junction etc!!!
That's the way I think about it.I still think of Edinburgh as "Edinburgh Waverley", mainly to differentiate it from Haymarket.
In Swansea we often refer to the station as "High Street Station " even though that part of the name went many years ago.
When I lived in Cardiff, we often referred to Heath High Level as "Heath Halt".
There are a few examples of light rail systems having stations/stops that share names with distant national rail stations aren't there? Although now I say it I can't think of any examples off the top of my head.Especially since there's a Haymarket station in Newcastle, right in the city centre
Does anyone still call Newcastle “Central”?
When was 'Deansgate' station in Manchester last known (in whole or in part) as 'Knott Mill'? Got to be over fifty years ago!At least it's not Knott Mill!
Don't think anyone (other than rail enthusiasts) still refers to 'Manchester Piccadilly' station as 'Manchester London Road'. The name change has to be well over sixty years ago now!Does that include Manchester London Road?
Not light rail per se, but there's "Charing Cross (Glasgow)" on NR and "Charing Cross" on the tube.There are a few examples of light rail systems having stations/stops that share names with distant national rail stations aren't there? Although now I say it I can't think of any examples off the top of my head.
It isn’t uncommon for signage to show unofficial station names though - “Leeds” is actually properly known as Leeds City: https://www.networkrail.co.uk/communities/passengers/our-stations/leeds-station/
Ah, now. It was Leeds City, but became Leeds after Leeds 1st was completed, 20-odd years ago (Leeds Central having closed in 1967). The only place you'll see "Leeds City" is on the big sign outside the revamped entrance - all of the platform signs (including, I think, the recent P0 addition) say "Leeds".Although other Network Rail website pages just say "Leeds" e.g. https://www.networkrail.co.uk/runni...plan/key-projects/transpennine-route-upgrade/. Neetwork Rail themselves are not consistent.
My grandfather who passed away in 1975 always referred to it as 'Piccadilly' to me.Don't think anyone (other than rail enthusiasts) still refers to 'Manchester Piccadilly' station as 'Manchester London Road'. The name change has to be well over sixty years ago now!
Though real purists should call it "Kingston Paragon"In a case like Paragon, calling the station Hull Paragon gives some local character to the station name, rather than the plain Hull, even if it isn't strictly needed. Especially as the interchange is called Paragon anyway, so I can understand while locals use the old name.
Ditto the likes of Cheltenham Spa, where the station signs have kept the longer name.
Should change it back tbhI still occasionally hear Sandwell & Dudley referred to as Oldbury, it was rebuilt and renamed in 1984.
The 3 letter code for Harwich is HPQ - which stands for the obviousFor that, it isn't necessary to be local!
and the 3 letter code is LCNLincoln Central is still Lincoln Central. It might not appear on all signage as such, but it does appear like that in some information systems and also in the definitive document - the Sectional Appendix. It is therefore still officially named Lincoln Central.
You would hope that anyone approaching any station from the outside would know what town or city they were in!I'm afraid it has. I was living in Edinburgh in the 1970s-80s (long after Princes Street and other contenders had closed) and the large sign at the top of the vehicle and pedestrian access ramps boldly stated "Waverley Station", with the BR logo. No mention of Edinburgh at all.
Manchester London Road signal box lasted to 1988 I think; its signals including those at the end of the platforms at Piccadilly station had the prefix LR. Today they’re MP I think.Don't think anyone (other than rail enthusiasts) still refers to 'Manchester Piccadilly' station as 'Manchester London Road'. The name change has to be well over sixty years ago now!
Except the "longer name" of Cheltenham Spa was Cheltenham Spa Lansdown. OK - your point applies to Bath and Droitwich, neither of which have the "Spa" in the City / town name. Interestingly enough, in the case of Royal Leamington Spa, the railway eschews the "Royal".In a case like Paragon, calling the station Hull Paragon gives some local character to the station name, rather than the plain Hull, even if it isn't strictly needed. Especially as the interchange is called Paragon anyway, so I can understand while locals use the old name.
Ditto the likes of Cheltenham Spa, where the station signs have kept the longer name.
I think you meant to post this in the London's Worst Station thread?Harringay and Hornsey aren't the best they get my vote.