175001
Established Member
Agreed. Definitely won't be open again on May 5th as stated on NRE
High Peak's service buses cope with these road features without problem.I don't know if you're local, but a lot of the roads are horrifically narrow, and plenty of turns too tight for buses too (as well as low bridges to consider near Chinley/Buxworth).
For example, look at this turn at Bridgemont (between Furness Vale and Whaley Bridge), on one of the routes between Chinley and New Mills Central:
A6/B6062 junction Bridgemont
Or this turn coming onto the A6 from the centre of New Mills:
A6 New Mills Newtown
Low bridge on the north side of Chinley (on the A624 route Google has given you): A624 New Smithy/Chinley
The return empties use the shorter ex-LNWR route from Hazel Grove to Buxton via New Mills Newtown. I believe the gradient up to Dove Holes is too steep for the loaded train to use this line in the other direction, hence the loop around on the ex-Midland route from Buxton to Hazel Grove via Chinley.Seen yesterday , was the Dow Low to Ashburys aggregates train , diverted via Hazel Grove, Stockport and Denton instead of New Mills , Guide Bridge ,Ashburys.
This had the train top and tailed with 66s presume because no easy run round at Ashburys as the train arrives there from the opposite direction to normal? The return empties normally run this route, so no change, except for being T &T.
Is that route only allowed for goods since they rebuilt the brige over the (old) A6 at Whaley Bridge?The return empties use the shorter ex-LNWR route from Hazel Grove to Buxton via New Mills Newtown. I believe the gradient up to Dove Holes is too steep for the loaded train to use this line in the other direction, hence the loop around on the ex-Midland route from Buxton to Hazel Grove via Chinley.
No, Whaley Bridge is on the passenger route to Buxton.Is that route only allowed for goods since they rebuilt the brige over the (old) A6 at Whaley Bridge?
Unfortunately, Northern's RRB contractor don't use High Peak, it's often a contractor from elsewhere, who may not be aware of the local restrictions.High Peak's service buses cope with these road features without problem.
Even before the Whaley Bridge bridge was rebuilt, the empties returning from Ashburys used to go that way. I think there might have been a prohibition on regular use by loaded freights, but in any case the FOCs only use that line for loaded trains if the Peak Forest line is blocked.Is that route only allowed for goods since they rebuilt the brige over the (old) A6 at Whaley Bridge?
I think that there was a severe speed restriction for loaded trains over the bridge before it was upgraded. I remember watching freight trains trundling through at walking pace.Even before the Whaley Bridge bridge was rebuilt, the empties returning from Ashburys used to go that way. I think there might have been a prohibition on regular use by loaded freights, but in any case the FOCs only use that line for loaded trains if the Peak Forest line is blocked.
I don’t sign HG to Buxton direct but I’m sure on the 3973 it was something minimal like 5mph. The freight speed the whole way is not much more than 25 or 30, although it’s still quicker than going via Chinley/Peak.I think that there was a severe speed restriction for loaded trains over the bridge before it was upgraded. I remember watching freight trains trundling through at walking pace.
the only reason you don’t often see loaded coming out that way is because you can’t do it without shunting. To get from Dowlow or Peak, you have to go into the URS, then set back all the way into the station, then head out towards Furness Vale, starting off from the base of a steep gradient.Even before the Whaley Bridge bridge was rebuilt, the empties returning from Ashburys used to go that way. I think there might have been a prohibition on regular use by loaded freights, but in any case the FOCs only use that line for loaded trains if the Peak Forest line is blocked.
Do temporary diversions like this have to be fully compliant with the normal timetable planning rules?There were allegedly no available fast paths into Manchester via Stockport for a 3rd fast service after the Hope Valley Capacity work was completed but they seem to have found one for this diversion. Of course it's at the expense of the second hourly stopping service from New Mills Central, but these temporary diversions sometimes find a life of their own!
All that’s happened since the closure, is monitoring equipment has been placed at the location. There is no resolution on the horizon (that’s from a Network Rail MOM this morning!) this closure is going to last way longer that predicted!Any news on progress to resolve this?
National Rail website implies reopening no earlier than Tuesday 7th May, and possibly much later. Previous comments suggest that is indeed optimistic, see; https://www.nationalrail.co.uk/service-disruptions/romiley-20240325/
There were allegedly no available fast paths into Manchester via Stockport for a 3rd fast service after the Hope Valley Capacity work was completed but they seem to have found one for this diversion. Of course it's at the expense of the second hourly stopping service from New Mills Central, but these temporary diversions sometimes find a life of their own!
Yes on paper, but in practice non-compliance can sometimes slip through the net.Do temporary diversions like this have to be fully compliant with the normal timetable planning rules?
I took the HP 190 yesterday, a small bus It just managed to squeeze through station road in Chinley. Coming the other way was a huge Andrews coach doing the RRB job. How it dealt with the narrow road don't knowSure, the issue with Northern RRBs is that often they just get what they're given. I used to commute on the Buxton line and there was a proper motley collection that turned out whenever the line was shut.
We nearly got stuck on a lane near Dove Holes station with a bus that was significantly oversized for the job.
The problem they have firstly is staff. No where near enough staff on the ground.Boots on the ground and heavy equipment is nearby. But no sign of any resolution.
I wonder if they'll get passenger trains running over it but keep the heavy freight away.
It's not a great situation at all for passengers at the moment.
This mornings 0729 New Mills Central - Piccadilly was 2 vice 4 car and was leaving folk behind at Marple!
Andrews are relatively local, so would have been familiar with the backroads used to avoid it, I'm just worried a more distant operator may end up in a difficult position!I took the HP 190 yesterday, a small bus It just managed to squeeze through station road in Chinley. Coming the other way was a huge Andrews coach doing the RRB job. How it dealt with the narrow road don't know
I had a fun journey with the hope valley rail replacement from Sheffield. The driver got to Hope then panicked about the Chinley low bridges. After much cursing we went on an hour long diversion around Snake Pass, then down to Chinley through the bridges he was trying to avoid anyway!Andrews are relatively local, so would have been familiar with the backroads used to avoid it, I'm just worried a more distant operator may end up in a difficult position!
Northern are better off speaking to High Peak and getting them to run it lolI had a fun journey with the hope valley rail replacement from Sheffield. The driver got to Hope then panicked about the Chinley low bridges. After much cursing we went on an hour long diversion around Snake Pass, then down to Chinley through the bridges he was trying to avoid anyway!
The PIS on my Northern train says that a temporary service is in place ‘until further notice’.Any news on progress to resolve this?
National Rail website implies reopening no earlier than Tuesday 7th May, and possibly much later. Previous comments suggest that is indeed optimistic, see; https://www.nationalrail.co.uk/service-disruptions/romiley-20240325/
So, continuing slippage with both the landslip itself and the likely re-opening date? Wonder just when the line will be fully re-open? Even end May is sounding optimistic.The timescales on the Northern disruptions page has changed from the 6th May to "disruption is expected until further notice" and "the line is not expected to reopen before the end of May 2024".
I've been told that the land around the landslip is still moving, so until the movement stops, work cannot start to rectify the issue. I can't see the line fully re-opening any time soon.
By way of comparison, the Eden Brows landslip caused the S+C to be closed for just over a year back in 2016,So, continuing slippage with both the landslip itself and the likely re-opening date? Wonder just when the line will be fully re-open? Even end May is sounding optimistic.
Presumably because it can get a fairly clear non-stop path?Good news for Hazel Grove passengers with the extra service an hour, though strangely the morning service from Sheffield stops neither there nor at Stockport. Midweek that would be a welcome capacity boost for those starting work at 08:30 or 09:00 in Manchester.