• Our new ticketing site is now live! Using either this or the original site (both powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

Class 810 for East Midlands Railway Construction/Introduction Updates

Trainbike46

Established Member
Joined
18 Sep 2021
Messages
3,375
Location
belfast
Remember there also used to be the HST fleet operating alongside the 222's. Even with the additional six units and additional coach length, there will still be an overall reduction in the number of seats available to Sheffield / Nottingham compared to when the HST's were in use. EMR themselves realised belatedly this was likely to be an issue with them then attempting to supplement the fleet long-term with 180's, but that experiment died a while ago, so we're stuck with their back-of-an-envelope calculations they did when placing their bid for the franchise.
realistically, the best solution would be to see if a few extra 810s could be ordered and added to the back of the build queue

However, it is important to remember that some of the former IC fleet's usage was replaced by the 360s, and the 360s+810s offer far more capacity than HSTs+222s ever did
 
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

Trainman40083

Established Member
Joined
29 Jan 2024
Messages
2,500
Location
Derby
Remember there also used to be the HST fleet operating alongside the 222's. Even with the additional six units and additional coach length, there will still be an overall reduction in the number of seats available to Sheffield / Nottingham compared to when the HST's were in use. EMR themselves realised belatedly this was likely to be an issue with them then attempting to supplement the fleet long-term with 180's, but that experiment died a while ago, so we're stuck with their back-of-an-envelope calculations they did when placing their bid for the franchise.
Yes, but when the HSTs ran, 222s still ran to Corby (now Class 360 emus) That freed up some units. Much of the time it was lucky of two of the Class 180 units were in service.. Add in, in the later times, HSTs probably worked a peak hour diagram each way and parked up at Cricklewood...I would think that more reliable 222s stepped up..Add in, less peak time demand post COVID, and on normal days, they cope....Of course when there is disruption on other lines, it gets rather cosy.
 

Trainbike46

Established Member
Joined
18 Sep 2021
Messages
3,375
Location
belfast
On the other hand, the plan and intention should very much be for growth in passenger numbers, so the capacity should exist to allow that - the 810s were ordered before COVID, so that's not really an excuse
 

Nottingham59

Established Member
Joined
10 Dec 2019
Messages
2,699
Location
Nottingham
On the other hand, the plan and intention should very much be for growth in passenger numbers, so the capacity should exist to allow that - the 810s were ordered before COVID, so that's not really an excuse
The plan was to provide for such growth. It was called HS2...
 

Roast Veg

Established Member
Joined
28 Oct 2016
Messages
2,263
The HST fleet spent most of the day working half empty on Nottingham fasts.

Where they *did* come into their own was in the peaks and at weekends where they were excellent people and luggage movers with the cost of slower running times - same as during disruption. The 222s are nowhere near as capable at simply absorbing crowds.
They were also useful for their through running to Leeds, before EMT gave Neville Hill up.
 

Bald Rick

Veteran Member
Joined
28 Sep 2010
Messages
32,318
Yes, but when the HSTs ran, 222s still ran to Corby (now Class 360 emus) That freed up some units.

And the service pattern had 222s serving Kettering, Wellingborough twice a hour, plus Bedford, Luton and Luton airport parkway at least hourly. So, they had plenty of passengers on them back then that they do not have on them now. When you take that into account, what appears to be a reduction in capacity actually isn’t, in the big picture. Also, EMR is one of the few TOCs that has passenger numbers above 2019 levels…

(And I will say that when I use the London services, it’s rare that I see first class any more than 20% occupied).
 

170UTD

Member
Joined
14 Mar 2022
Messages
271
Location
Lincolnshire
Remember there also used to be the HST fleet operating alongside the 222's. Even with the additional six units and additional coach length, there will still be an overall reduction in the number of seats available to Sheffield / Nottingham compared to when the HST's were in use. EMR themselves realised belatedly this was likely to be an issue with them then attempting to supplement the fleet long-term with 180's, but that experiment died a while ago, so we're stuck with their back-of-an-envelope calculations they did when placing their bid for the franchise.
Could some 222s not be retained to combat this, say for example, the 4 x 7 coach sets for use on peak time services? Although I suppose the leasing company would probably say no.
 

JonathanH

Veteran Member
Joined
29 May 2011
Messages
21,333
Could some 222s not be retained to combat this, say for example, the 4 x 7 coach sets for use on peak time services? Although I suppose the leasing company would probably say no.
Why would the 7 car sets be retained for peak hour services when a pair of 810s offers more capacity? The clear intention is that pairs of 810s will be used on the busiest services.
 

Bald Rick

Veteran Member
Joined
28 Sep 2010
Messages
32,318
Can we, please, put this one to bed. When the 810s are all in service there will be more seats leaving St Pancras on EMR services each day than now, and more than there were when the HSTs were around too. Much more.
 

MCR247

Established Member
Joined
7 Nov 2008
Messages
9,978
Could some 222s not be retained to combat this, say for example, the 4 x 7 coach sets for use on peak time services? Although I suppose the leasing company would probably say no.
The DfT would likely say no before it even got to the stage of being discussed with the ROSCO.

I would imagine it much more likely that the DfT would rather wait and see what happens with capacity and any overcrowding for a couple of years (assuming that was the case) before deciding to look at options to deal with it. The 222s will likely have a new operator by then.
 

liamf656

Member
Joined
2 Aug 2020
Messages
926
Location
Derby
Could some 222s not be retained to combat this, say for example, the 4 x 7 coach sets for use on peak time services? Although I suppose the leasing company would probably say no.
It's been done to death, a microfleet of 222s simply won't happen. A 7 car 222 is unnecessary even today, let alone once we have 810s. They're a waste of platform space at St Pancras as you can't stack another service upon a 7 car train.
 

LowLevel

Established Member
Joined
26 Oct 2013
Messages
8,237
Can we, please, put this one to bed. When the 810s are all in service there will be more seats leaving St Pancras on EMR services each day than now, and more than there were when the HSTs were around too. Much more.
One thing that is lacking though to a degree is the Northern end commutes. Leicester - Derby/Nottingham and vice versa has gone from pretty civilised in the days of HSTs and long peak trains for St Pancras to being horrible, especially trains like the 1712 up from Nottingham. This of course knocks on to long distance travellers who also find themselves jammed into doorways and bunfighting for seats vs more seasoned commuters. Not unusual for it to be wedged from Nottingham long before it has to deal with another pick up from Loughborough.

A side effect of hiving off the capacity on to the Corbys.
 

Bald Rick

Veteran Member
Joined
28 Sep 2010
Messages
32,318
One thing that is lacking though to a degree is the Northern end commutes. Leicester - Derby/Nottingham and vice versa has gone from pretty civilised in the days of HSTs and long peak trains for St Pancras to being horrible, especially trains like the 1712 up from Nottingham. This of course knocks on to long distance travellers who also find themselves jammed into doorways and bunfighting for seats vs more seasoned commuters. Not unusual for it to be wedged from Nottingham long before it has to deal with another pick up from Loughborough.

A side effect of hiving off the capacity on to the Corbys.

Agreed, but that will definitely be better with the 810s, with a third more standard class seats on a single unit. Can‘t imagine there are many (paying) first class commuters Nottingham to Leicester!
 

Trainman40083

Established Member
Joined
29 Jan 2024
Messages
2,500
Location
Derby
And the service pattern had 222s serving Kettering, Wellingborough twice a hour, plus Bedford, Luton and Luton airport parkway at least hourly. So, they had plenty of passengers on them back then that they do not have on them now. When you take that into account, what appears to be a reduction in capacity actually isn’t, in the big picture. Also, EMR is one of the few TOCs that has passenger numbers above 2019 levels…

(And I will say that when I use the London services, it’s rare that I see first class any more than 20% occupied).
Ah yes, first class. You have to wonder why it is so empty. When I get to London, Thameslink and Cross rail seem at crush capacity. That makes me think it is something that EMR has done. There were complaints about the lack of open first class lounges (shut to save money?) , indifferent or unusable Wi-fi, poor food and drink offering etc.. Some say that if you can't work on the train, or get a decent breakfast on the train, the passengers might as well drive, and park up outside London... I guess you throw in overcrowding where standard class passengers are allowed to sit in first class and the cost of a first class ticket looks very expensive for the offering.

== Doublepost prevention - post automatically merged: ==

I'm sure they'll just hike the prices up if they ever reach capacity, it's the most economic way to manage it.
And indeed, exactly what British Rail.did. Demand rises, against constrained supply and price rises.
 

Merle Haggard

Established Member
Joined
20 Oct 2019
Messages
2,770
Location
Northampton
Ah yes, first class. You have to wonder why it is so empty. When I get to London, Thameslink and Cross rail seem at crush capacity. That makes me think it is something that EMR has done. There were complaints about the lack of open first class lounges (shut to save money?) , indifferent or unusable Wi-fi, poor food and drink offering etc.. Some say that if you can't work on the train, or get a decent breakfast on the train, the passengers might as well drive, and park up outside London... I guess you throw in overcrowding where standard class passengers are allowed to sit in first class and the cost of a first class ticket looks very expensive for the offering.

== Doublepost prevention - post automatically merged: ==


And indeed, exactly what British Rail.did. Demand rises, against constrained supply and price rises.

I only travel off peak from Kettering northwards but the DMF is usually reasonably full, the MC in the first, not so much.

Even when crowded the TMs are generally insistent that second class ticket holders do not occupy first class seats on an ad hoc basis.When there are planned diversions via Manton I have encountered the MC being formally declassified (which makes the DMF cosy).

What may be confusing is that two of the ex H.T. 222/1s have been extended to 5 car with an ex-7 car MF next to the DMF. This coach is declassified to reduce the first seating to that in a 222/0 5 car; the former MC (with its previously reduced first class) being declassified completely. Similarly, the two 7 cars after reduction to 5 cars (222005/6) have the retained MF declassified to MC. This may give the impression that de-classification is due to overcrowding, but it's just to standardise the accommodation (though 222101/1 still have reduced first in their MCs).
 

InTheEastMids

Member
Joined
31 Jan 2016
Messages
1,013
Back on topic, there's a set of planned workings 5Q43/44/45 Old Dalby - Sheffield - St Pancras - Old Dalby that have been set up for today and tomorrow (although don't appear to be running today).
 

QSK19

Member
Joined
29 Dec 2020
Messages
877
Location
Leicestershire
I guess you throw in overcrowding where standard class passengers are allowed to sit in first class and the cost of a first class ticket looks very expensive for the offering.
To be fair to EMR, I’ve had this happen 3 times when I’ve had first class tickets. On 2 of those occasions, EMR refunded the cost difference between first and standard class; and on the other occasion, I received a full refund (even when I asked only for the cost difference).

Nevertheless, back OT, does anybody know unit number they’re up to in terms of construction?
 

800001

Established Member
Joined
24 Oct 2015
Messages
5,442
To be fair to EMR, I’ve had this happen 3 times when I’ve had first class tickets. On 2 of those occasions, EMR refunded the cost difference between first and standard class; and on the other occasion, I received a full refund (even when I asked only for the cost difference).

Nevertheless, back OT, does anybody know unit number they’re up to in terms of construction?
Seen outside completed at Factory are 810005 and 810007.
4 carriages of 810009 also seen outside.
001, 003 and 004 at Old Dalby.
part of 002 in Italy for climate testing.
 

Jozhua

Established Member
Joined
6 Jan 2019
Messages
1,890
Remember there also used to be the HST fleet operating alongside the 222's. Even with the additional six units and additional coach length, there will still be an overall reduction in the number of seats available to Sheffield / Nottingham compared to when the HST's were in use. EMR themselves realised belatedly this was likely to be an issue with them then attempting to supplement the fleet long-term with 180's, but that experiment died a while ago, so we're stuck with their back-of-an-envelope calculations they did when placing their bid for the franchise.
I'm guessing this is why advance tickets seem a lot less forthcoming than they used to be, especially on weekends...

Hopefully there will be at least marginal improvement on this front once 810s are in, so I don't need to drive most of the way down the M1 for a cheap trip into London.
Can we, please, put this one to bed. When the 810s are all in service there will be more seats leaving St Pancras on EMR services each day than now, and more than there were when the HSTs were around too. Much more.
100% agreed.
 

tram21

Member
Joined
29 Dec 2022
Messages
860
Location
Nottingham
Hopefully there will be at least marginal improvement on this front once 810s are in, so I don't need to drive most of the way down the M1 for a cheap trip into London.
I'm looking at a trip to London next Thursday from Nottingham. It's so expensive for two (admittedly it's summer holifays) I've had to compromise with using Flixbus to get back to compensate the extortionate price to get there. That's even with split ticketing, which luckily I know how to do.
 

Mikw

Member
Joined
20 Apr 2022
Messages
470
Location
Leicester
I'm guessing this is why advance tickets seem a lot less forthcoming than they used to be, especially on weekends...

Hopefully there will be at least marginal improvement on this front once 810s are in, so I don't need to drive most of the way down the M1 for a cheap trip into London.

100% agreed.
You're not wrong! I used to drive down to Kettering, and park there, instead of going from Leicester as it's hard to get a return for less than £100.
Even Kettering advances (with splits) seem to hard to get for less than £35. I've been forced to get National Express more recently, can usually get £18 return from Leicester. To be honest, it's not that bad, and the savings are immense.
 

Nym

Established Member
Joined
2 Mar 2007
Messages
9,472
Location
Somewhere, not in London
From slightly further up the line, even with single vehicle occupancy it’s cheaper to drive and park in central London than it is to get the train to St Pancras…(!)

So given it’s usually two to four of us, the choice is pretty simple really.
 

Trainman40083

Established Member
Joined
29 Jan 2024
Messages
2,500
Location
Derby
From slightly further up the line, even with single vehicle occupancy it’s cheaper to drive and park in central London than it is to get the train to St Pancras…(!)

So given it’s usually two to four of us, the choice is pretty simple really.
When you say Central London, I guess Congestion Charging and ULEZ within the M25 may influence that choice.

== Doublepost prevention - post automatically merged: ==

I'm looking at a trip to London next Thursday from Nottingham. It's so expensive for two (admittedly it's summer holifays) I've had to compromise with using Flixbus to get back to compensate the extortionate price to get there. That's even with split ticketing, which luckily I know how to do.
As a matter of interest, did you just look at East Midlands Railway or also the option via Grantham?

== Doublepost prevention - post automatically merged: ==

I'm guessing this is why advance tickets seem a lot less forthcoming than they used to be, especially on weekends...

Hopefully there will be at least marginal improvement on this front once 810s are in, so I don't need to drive most of the way down the M1 for a cheap trip into London.

100% agreed.
Advance tickets at weekends may be influenced by demand -more people travelling prepared to pay higher fares or expected engineering work in connection with OHLE upgrades south of Bedford for the new 810 units, thereby restricting capacity.
 

InTheEastMids

Member
Joined
31 Jan 2016
Messages
1,013
Back on topic, there's a set of planned workings 5Q43/44/45 Old Dalby - Sheffield - St Pancras - Old Dalby that have been set up for today and tomorrow (although don't appear to be running today).
On topic, doesn't look like these are running today either.

Re: alternatives & split tickets. I've used all of the below:
1. There is a cheap travelcard from Kettering at weekends only (£36-ish) so worth checking on splits there; can be used on both Connect and Nottingham IC services (although the popular IC services are often very busy by this point).
2. Luton Airport Parkway is easy from the M1 and obviously very frequent trains into London
3. Stanmore (Jubilee Line) has a decent car park, and if some of your party are children then can be cheaper as kids are free on TfL, but timewise it's 40 mins from Bond Street so Parkway is no slower.
 

Nym

Established Member
Joined
2 Mar 2007
Messages
9,472
Location
Somewhere, not in London
When you say Central London, I guess Congestion Charging and ULEZ within the M25 may influence that choice.

Yes, I’m including congestion charge, car is ULEZ compliant, fuel, wear and tear, lease cost, parking (in Farringdon area or the west end) in the calculation, and single occupancy driving breaks even!
 

Bald Rick

Veteran Member
Joined
28 Sep 2010
Messages
32,318
I'm looking at a trip to London next Thursday from Nottingham. It's so expensive for two (admittedly it's summer holifays) I've had to compromise with using Flixbus to get back to compensate the extortionate price to get there. That's even with split ticketing, which luckily I know how to do.

Im confused by this. Just had a look on EMR website and you can do it for £116.70 for the pair of you with a two together railcard. That doesnt seem “so expensive” for a return for two people.
 

Nym

Established Member
Joined
2 Mar 2007
Messages
9,472
Location
Somewhere, not in London
Im confused by this. Just had a look on EMR website and you can do it for £116.70 for the pair of you with a two together railcard. That doesnt seem “so expensive” for a return for two people.

When the opportunity cost of driving is around half of that, it does seem like a fair amount.
 

JonathanH

Veteran Member
Joined
29 May 2011
Messages
21,333
Im confused by this. Just had a look on EMR website and you can do it for £116.70 for the pair of you with a two together railcard. That doesnt seem “so expensive” for a return for two people.
The usual thing about the different value people place on travel. I suspect they would be thinking of a fare closer to £50 for the two of them. As we see in numerous other threads, people haven't accepted the higher prices now being charged after the era of 'cheap advances'.
 

Top