• Our new ticketing site is now live! Using either this or the original site (both powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

Grand Union Trains bought by First Group?

Wymondham

Member
Joined
14 Apr 2023
Messages
12
Location
Coventry
Previous company names
Name
GRAND UNION TRAINS LIMITED
Period 11 Jun 2018 - 20 Aug 2024

Judging by this companies house name change Grand Union, or at least the portion which was due to operate the Stirling to London service, has been brought by First Group. Does anyone know anything about this?
 
Last edited:
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

JonathanH

Veteran Member
Joined
29 May 2011
Messages
21,131
If true, won't this mean First competing with...themself? Over the West Coast
First won't be running the West Coast once the Avanti operation is nationalised. Nationalisation would appear likely to happen before any open access operation starts.
 

Wymondham

Member
Joined
14 Apr 2023
Messages
12
Location
Coventry
If true, won't this mean First competing with...themself? Over the West Coast
Not with full operator nationalisation around the corner, they might be preparing to offload Avanti/GWR onto the government when the provisions of the Passenger Railway Services Bill start being used and then use the new operator as a open access competitor to the former TOCs they just stopped running
 

HST43257

Established Member
Joined
10 Apr 2020
Messages
1,644
Location
York
So this is First keeping a foot in the WCML operation after losing the Avanti franchise?
 
Joined
3 May 2023
Messages
370
Location
Too far from an HST...
This is a bit of a far out one, but isn't this almost a tad monopolistic?

With First (I suppose Avanti isn't 100% first) controlling 2 different WCML operators?

Apologies if a silly question, haven't the slightest clue what I'm on about in all honesty :D
 

dk1

Veteran Member
Joined
2 Oct 2009
Messages
17,810
Location
East Anglia
This is a bit of a far out one, but isn't this almost a tad monopolistic? With First (I suppose Avanti isn't 100% first) controlling 2 different WCML operators? Apologies if a silly question, haven't the slightest clue what I'm on about in all honesty :D

Not really. First own both routes from London to Exeter but that’s obviously not OA on either. They do however have Lumo & Hull Trains on the ECML. Lumo have also applied for rights to operate on the northern part of the WCML into Glasgow Central.

Some of us are also old enough to remember when Virgin operated two out of the three direct routes between London and Birmingham and both of those served New Street.
 
Last edited:

brad465

Established Member
Joined
11 Aug 2010
Messages
8,614
Location
Taunton or Kent
Let's stop arguing over the presence of an R. I think the situation OP is describing is far more interesting.
This is a bit of a far out one, but isn't this almost a tad monopolistic? With First (I suppose Avanti isn't 100% first) controlling 2 different WCML operators? Apologies if a silly question, haven't the slightest clue what I'm on about in all honesty :D
Well if it's not First, it's either a company run by a foreign state, an OLR, or worst of all, Govia.
 

Efini92

Established Member
Joined
14 Dec 2016
Messages
1,982
Yes it’s something I see quite prolifically on social media. Not sure why.
Since you mentioned that I’ve seen it twice. Not sure how the past tense of bring can be the same as the past tense of buy. Funny old thing the English language.
 
Joined
3 May 2023
Messages
370
Location
Too far from an HST...
Not really. First own both routes from London to Exeter but that’s obviously not OA on either. They do however have Lumo & Hull Trains on the ECML. Lumo have also applied for rights to operate on the northern part of the WCML into Glasgow Central.

Some of us are also old enough to remember when Virgin operated two out of the three direct routes between London and Birmingham and both of those served New Street.
Ah okay. Thanks for the clarification, they seem to have amassed quite the empire.
Well if it's not First, it's either a company run by a foreign state, an OLR, or worst of all, Govia.
I shudder when you utter the name :lol:
 

NSEWonderer

Established Member
Joined
5 Dec 2020
Messages
2,011
Location
London
This is a bit of a far out one, but isn't this almost a tad monopolistic?

With First (I suppose Avanti isn't 100% first) controlling 2 different WCML operators?

Apologies if a silly question, haven't the slightest clue what I'm on about in all honesty :D
Well talking about monopolies they'd have had one over the GWML up to Reading if GWR & SWR weren't bound for GBR, that's assuming they win the Elizabeth line concession with Keolis.
 

Clarence Yard

Established Member
Joined
18 Dec 2014
Messages
2,915
The monopoly position doesn’t arise on the WCML because FG just run Avanti on behalf of Government these days - the key competitive decisions will be made by DfT and handed down to the Avanti management to implement.

The two FG directors named on the Companies House filing do not play any part in Avanti.

If Avanti had still been a franchise, the monopoly position would have been different and the CMA would not have been happy.
 

Wymondham

Member
Joined
14 Apr 2023
Messages
12
Location
Coventry
The monopoly position doesn’t arise on the WCML because FG just run Avanti on behalf of Government these days - the key competitive decisions will be made by DfT and handed down to the Avanti management to implement.

The two FG directors named on the Companies House filing do not play any part in Avanti.

If Avanti had still been a franchise, the monopoly position would have been different and the CMA would not have been happy.
It does however create quite a concerning conflict of interest in that First will be running Avanti for the DfT under full nationalisation kicks in, whilst simultaneously setting up a competitor Open Access service who will start running not long after Avanti is handed over to OLR/GBR.
 

Moonshot

Established Member
Joined
10 Nov 2013
Messages
3,763
It does however create quite a concerning conflict of interest in that First will be running Avanti for the DfT under full nationalisation kicks in, whilst simultaneously setting up a competitor Open Access service who will start running not long after Avanti is handed over to OLR/GBR.
Not sure why it's concerning.....it seems to me as if open access is the way to go for long distance travel.
 

Blindtraveler

Established Member
Joined
28 Feb 2011
Messages
10,408
Location
Nowhere near enough to a Pacer :(
I would agree with this, I make very few long distance trips within the UK now as I simply am sick of high fairs and low reliability and quality for long distance travel. But when I do make such trips, my money is far more likely to be spent with an Open Access operator and as more of them appear this spend will only become higher. Assuming of course their service is better value for money and particularly in my case. Better quality than the franchised or going forward nationalised option. I can't help but wonder if part of this purchase is connected to possible negotiations on rolling stock for other first group Open Access operations. But this is for another thread in the speculative department which I will will maybe get around to starting at a later stage
 
Joined
9 Dec 2012
Messages
715
What's to stop the government doing away with open access as well by just not renewing the permits as they expire?
 

Chester1

Established Member
Joined
25 Aug 2014
Messages
4,262
What's to stop the government doing away with open access as well by just not renewing the permits as they expire?

It would just require legislation but retaining open access operators is Labour Party policy. The rationale appears to be that a little bit of competition for GBR will be good for passengers. A national operator with open access operators is the norm in Europe.
 

Russel

Established Member
Joined
30 Jun 2022
Messages
2,342
Location
Whittington
Some of us are also old enough to remember when Virgin operated two out of the three direct routes between London and Birmingham and both of those served New Street.

2 Out of 3? West coast and what else?

All I can think of is the infrequent VXC South coast to the North via Kensington Olympia... If that counts!
 

alistairlees

Established Member
Joined
29 Dec 2016
Messages
4,047
If true, won't this mean First competing with...themself? Over the West Coast
FirstGroup doesn't run Avanti, GWR or SWR. The DfT does, and has done (with increasing levels of control) since March 2020. FirstGroup is just the name on the door.
 

12LDA28C

Established Member
Joined
14 Oct 2022
Messages
5,058
Location
The back of beyond
2 Out of 3? West coast and what else?

All I can think of is the infrequent VXC South coast to the North via Kensington Olympia... If that counts!

Virgin CrossCountry ran several direct trains per day between London Paddington and Birmingham New Street and vice versa.
 

Tazi Hupefi

Established Member
Joined
1 Apr 2018
Messages
1,573
Location
Nottinghamshire
What's to stop the government doing away with open access as well by just not renewing the permits as they expire?
Lots of the regulations around this came in via the EU. Since Brexit, it is possible to create new legislation, but, especially for the Labour party, is politically difficult and could potentially be challenged in court by potential operators as an unlawful , anti competitive state monopoly.
 

pokemonsuper9

Established Member
Joined
20 Dec 2022
Messages
2,666
Location
Greater Manchester
Why on earth would they bring Virgin into the mix?
First would probably rather they didn't, but they've put in an application for the South WCML, just as First have with Lumo.
 

D365

Veteran Member
Joined
29 Jun 2012
Messages
12,148
FirstGroup doesn't run Avanti, GWR or SWR. The DfT does, and has done (with increasing levels of control) since March 2020. FirstGroup is just the name on the door.
Does DfT employ the staff?
 

Top