Banham7
Member
Bradford International? Didn't know Leeds Bradford had a train stationNorthern's list appears to be:
![]()
Severe weather warning
Northern | Buy Cheap Train Tickets and Check Train Timeswww.northernrailway.co.uk

Bradford International? Didn't know Leeds Bradford had a train stationNorthern's list appears to be:
![]()
Severe weather warning
Northern | Buy Cheap Train Tickets and Check Train Timeswww.northernrailway.co.uk
Indeed. Doesn't look promising. What would be a worse outcome? Maybe being delayed arriving into Glasgow until Saturday or later, or travelling Friday and getting diverted to somewhere else?I’m flying away for work tomorrow, due to land back in Glasgow at 1915 on Friday. I don’t rate my chances of getting home on time very highly…
And how exactly do you suggest they do that when NR have shut the route themselves due to risk of loss of life?As with previous so-called storms, it's very disappointing that TOCs seem to issue "DO NOT TRAVEL" warnings at the drop of a hat when it would be far more sensible to say "travel if you like, we'll run the best service we can but be prepared for some disruption".
Also NR defer to experts from the Met Office themselves to help them make these assessments.According to the largely reliable Met Office website, the forecast for Newcastle is for light winds Thursday and Saturday, either side of a brief period of stronger winds on Friday which, even at their height, should average no more than 35 mph.
Thank you for sharing.Northern's list appears to be:
![]()
Severe weather warning
Northern | Buy Cheap Train Tickets and Check Train Timeswww.northernrailway.co.uk
If it's really Network Rail shutting the lines then why, as yet, have Cross Country not said "do not travel" north of Newcastle?And how exactly do you suggest they do that when NR have shut the route themselves due to risk of loss of life?
Also NR defer to experts from the Met Office themselves to help them make these assessments.
It’s is the high speed gusts that cause the issues, Darlingtons forecast for 60mph gusts!According to the largely reliable Met Office website, the forecast for Newcastle is for light winds Thursday and Saturday, either side of a brief period of stronger winds on Friday which, even at their height, should average no more than 35 mph.
![]()
Newcastle Upon Tyne (Newcastle upon Tyne) weather
Newcastle Upon Tyne 7 day weather forecast including weather warnings, temperature, rain, wind, visibility, humidity and UVweather.metoffice.gov.uk
I wonder why news channels are so fixated on gust speed rather than average speed, perhaps because it allows them to publish more hysterical weather stories?
As with previous so-called storms, it's very disappointing that TOCs seem to issue "DO NOT TRAVEL" warnings at the drop of a hat when it would be far more sensible to say "travel if you like, we'll run the best service we can but be prepared for some disruption".
The point in the do not travel is to avoid people getting stuck on services with wires down around the train, or trees blocking the route.If it's really Network Rail shutting the lines then why, as yet, have Cross Country not said "do not travel" north of Newcastle?
Either way, my point still stands. If the wires come down or a tree blocks the line then yes, issue a "DO NOT TRAVEL" warning. But don't issue one two days in advance based upon what's only a prediction which may turn out to be a lot less disruptive than forecast?
But it may turn out to be a lot MORE disruptive than forecast. Daresay we'll have found out, one way or the other, in around 48 hours' time. I'm o.k. with being advised not to travel this Friday.But don't issue one two days in advance based upon what's only a prediction which may turn out to be a lot less disruptive than forecast?
Because they're acting on the instructions of NR who are closing the route as are TPE?If it's really Network Rail shutting the lines then why, as yet, have Cross Country not said "do not travel" north of Newcastle?
Why? If the modelling falls within a certain level of confidence, you basically already know what the situation will be like. The sooner that information gets out to customers, the better as it allows them to amend their plans.But don't issue one two days in advance based upon what's only a prediction which may turn out to be a lot less disruptive than forecast?
That is a strange omission from that list. Blackpool and the route through Lancashire are expected to be very heavily impacted.Thank you for sharing.
It looks as though there won't be any disruption on the Blackpool North - Manchester Airport route then which is a relief!
They just haven't got their Comms out yet. They absolutely will come out with a "do not travel" north of Newcastle in line with the rest of the industryIf it's really Network Rail shutting the lines then why, as yet, have Cross Country not said "do not travel" north of Newcastle?
Because when wires come down or a tree comes onto line, hundreds or thousands of people are then already travelling and need dealing with!If it's really Network Rail shutting the lines then why, as yet, have Cross Country not said "do not travel" north of Newcastle?
Either way, my point still stands. If the wires come down or a tree blocks the line then yes, issue a "DO NOT TRAVEL" warning. But don't issue one two days in advance based upon what's only a prediction which may turn out to be a lot less disruptive than forecast?
LNER won’t have updated the individual journeys on the system as yet. The Chat is just a chatbot, you’d be better off asking them via twitter (a real person).I mentioned upthread for my train on Friday, on the app tickets aren’t available for that train, Cross Country is running in between (for now), I just asked the LNER chat if my train is running it said yes?
I would understand if line was closed earlier than 11am but I’m genuinely lost now as what to do, as if my 0845 is still running that’s fine I’ll get up to Scotland (as mentioned previously I don’t mind if it’s speed restricted).
If the wires come down or a tree blocks the line then yes, issue a "DO NOT TRAVEL" warning.
Either way, my point still stands. If the wires come down or a tree blocks the line then yes, issue a "DO NOT TRAVEL" warning. But don't issue one two days in advance based upon what's only a prediction which may turn out to be a lot less disruptive than forecast?
Yes, I agree. Warn people now. Tell them that they can travel but if they do they run through risk of getting stranded with no alternative means of transport. That's entirely fair and reasonable.Because when wires come down or a tree comes onto line, hundreds or thousands of people are then already travelling and need dealing with!
There will be next to no coaches for replacement services, so warn people now!
I’ll refer you to post #47.Yes, I agree. Warn people now. Tell them that they can travel but if they do they run through risk of getting stranded with no alternative means of transport. That's entirely fair and reasonable.
My bugbear is that so many TOCs are not saying that, they're saying "DO NOT TRAVEL". Which to me suggests that, even if the storm isn't as bad as forecast, they've already given up attempting to provide a service.
Yes, I agree. Warn people now. Tell them that they can travel but if they do they run through risk of getting stranded with no alternative means of transport. That's entirely fair and reasonable.
My bugbear is that so many TOCs are not saying that, they're saying "DO NOT TRAVEL". Which to me suggests that, even if the storm isn't as bad as forecast, they've already given up attempting to provide a service.
LNER won’t have updated the individual journeys on the system as yet. The Chat is just a chatbot, you’d be better off asking them via twitter (a real person).
If you decide to get a service tomorrow, make a new seat reservation via the app or website, when it asks for ticket number just put 4 random numbers in.That was what I thought to do, I was told to check tomorrow via their website/app as they are amending timetables, the only thing I don’t understand is the instruction from LNER saying hop on the same service tomorrow at no extra cost? (ie 0845, I’m sure someone would be sitting in that seat identical to me for Friday! lol)
Its an if and a big if I do go home tomorrow than Friday it’ll be later than planned as booked into hotel til Friday (but train I could get tomorrow would be at least 1255), but will see tomorrow (still hope it just runs as planned).
Maybe I’m cynical, but I can’t help but notice Northern’s notices very closely correlate with the routes that they struggle to operate due to staffing issues.TOCS do not issue these notices at the drop of a hat. They do it for safety.
Yes, I've spotted that too. I'm planning to travel from Elsecar to Huddersfield to visit a friend on Friday but Northern have issued a "DO NOT TRAVEL" notice for this route. The majority of the line isn't even in the amber weather warning area and the forecast is for a mild, sunny and blustery day. Severe weather; really?Maybe I’m cynical, but I can’t help but notice Northern’s notices very closely correlate with the routes that they struggle to operate due to staffing issues.
You must be new to this. Mr Haddock always questions the weather around stormy situations. Sometimes he’s right too. Experts and their models hardly live up to scrutiny. Just a guessing game.Because they're acting on the instructions of NR who are closing the route as are TPE?
Why? If the modelling falls within a certain level of confidence, you basically already know what the situation will be like. The sooner that information gets out to customers, the better as it allows them to amend their plans.