• Our new ticketing site is now live! Using either this or the original site (both powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

TFGM press release: Mayor Andy Burnham reveals plans for Bee Network rail to boost passenger numbers and drive Greater Manchester’s growth

Joined
26 Jun 2019
Messages
130
A proper boundaries redraw would likely help to fix these issues as many of these boundaries were made pre-industrialisation when many cities weren't as significant or developed as they are now.

What would that achieve with respect to transport? A few stations at the edges of the network not being inside greater Manchester is really not an issue. Happens on London Underground and buses and there are no calls for those areas to become part of Greater London.
 
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

daodao

Established Member
Joined
6 Feb 2016
Messages
3,334
Location
Dunham/Bowdon
A proper boundaries redraw would likely help to fix these issues as many of these boundaries were made pre-industrialisation when many cities weren't as significant or developed as they are now. Perhaps a change in name from 'Greater Manchester' would help this be more popular, much like how Ile de France is used for the region surrounding and including Paris.
In the early 1970s when English local government structures were radically revised, there was an attempt to redraw boundaries to create a Greater Manchester County based on its economic/geographical hinterland to incorporate neighbouring areas of Cheshire, Lancashire and Yorkshire. In some places, particularly in North-Eastern Cheshire, there was great resistance to these changes, and successful lobbying led to the exclusion of Alderley Edge, Wilmslow, Handforth, Poynton and Disley from the Greater Manchester County created in 1974.

There never was a contiguous boundary between Lancashire and Derbyshire, but I don't recall specific proposals to extend Manchester's borders to the east into Derbyshire beyond incorporating the NE corner of Cheshire. The furthermost NE corner of Cheshire north of the River Etherow up the Longdendale Valley (Tintwistle, Crowden and Woodhead) was actually transferred from Cheshire to Derbyshire in 1974.

I suspect that there would be strong resistance to any formal incorporation of more of NE Cheshire or NW Derbyshire into Greater Manchester. However, there clearly need to be sensible arrangements for public transport that recognise the economic geography of the area. Adverse changes on creation of the Bee Network for buses in other boundary areas does not augur well for TfGM not taking a high-handed approach in its attempt to extend the Bee Network to include cross-boundary rail services.
 

mangad

Member
Joined
20 Jun 2014
Messages
385
Location
Stockport
I suspect that there would be strong resistance to any formal incorporation of more of NE Cheshire or NW Derbyshire into Greater Manchester. However, there clearly need to be sensible arrangements for public transport that recognise the economic geography of the area. Adverse changes on creation of the Bee Network for buses in other boundary areas does not augur well for TfGM not taking a high-handed approach in its attempt to extend the Bee Network to include cross-boundary rail services.
Fun fact. If you go back to the legalisation from 1969 that created the SELNEC PTE the Borough of Glossop and Disley were both included in it's remit. And probably some other areas not in Greater Manchester too.
 

Xenophon PCDGS

Veteran Member
Joined
17 Apr 2011
Messages
34,067
Location
A typical commuter-belt part of north-west England
Fun fact. If you go back to the legalisation from 1969 that created the SELNEC PTE the Borough of Glossop and Disley were both included in it's remit. And probably some other areas not in Greater Manchester too.
Can anyone confirm that at this moment in time, whether TfGM issued ENCTS passes upon which the annual £10.00 surcharge for tram and train free travel are valid for such free rail travel to Disley. I assumed that Middlewood was the furthest station from Manchester where such validity existed.
 

daodao

Established Member
Joined
6 Feb 2016
Messages
3,334
Location
Dunham/Bowdon
If you go back to the legalisation from 1969 that created the SELNEC PTE the Borough of Glossop and Disley were both included in it's remit. And probably some other areas not in Greater Manchester too.
SELNEC was created in 1969, pre-dating the formation of Greater Manchester County. When the latter was set up, the GMPTE boundaries were revised to be essentially co-terminus with it, in particular by incorporation of the Wigan area that had not been included within SELNEC.

Can anyone confirm that at this moment in time, whether TfGM issued ENCTS passes upon which the annual £10.00 surcharge for tram and train free travel are valid for such free rail travel to Disley. I assumed that Middlewood was the furthest station from Manchester where such validity existed.
Disley is considered outwith the TfGM area for rail travel, but adult (16+) travelcards (day/season) are valid on buses as far as New Mills and Hayfield.
 

mangad

Member
Joined
20 Jun 2014
Messages
385
Location
Stockport
Can anyone confirm that at this moment in time, whether TfGM issued ENCTS passes upon which the annual £10.00 surcharge for tram and train free travel are valid for such free rail travel to Disley. I assumed that Middlewood was the furthest station from Manchester where such validity existed.
Middlewood station is within Greater Manchester. According to maps on the Stockport council website, and similarly shown on the Ordnance Survey map of the area, the county boundary is to the south of the platforms.

Disley is outside the Greater Manchester fare zone and the TfGM website says the pass can only be used it.
 

Snow1964

Established Member
Joined
7 Oct 2019
Messages
8,174
Location
West Wiltshire
The Government announcement this morning includes Manchester, so linking it here as relevant to direction of thinking.

The Chancellor also revealed today that she is championing a regeneration project around Old Trafford in Manchester that will see new housing, commercial and public space as a shining example of the bold pro-development model that will drive growth across the region, with authorities exploring setting up a mayoral development corporation body to redevelop the area.

The government is also working with Greater Manchester to release growth-generating land around transport hubs through local development orders, such as around Castleton Station, with the potential for this innovative use of existing powers to kickstart building in these sites to be a blueprint for the rest of the country so that every corner of the UK benefits from growth.

 

AlastairFraser

Established Member
Joined
12 Aug 2018
Messages
3,384
There's already a wide range of discounted multimodal fares out there. Pushing these harder might be a good start. However worthwhile bearing in mind the market for multimodal is low with only 1 in 10 journeys on public transport using more than one mode in England outside of London. That's not due to price, which is already relatively low in the PTE areas. It's due to quality
There are a wide range, but people don't really want ranger and rover type day tickets, or formal cards you have to apply for. They want a reasonable automatic capping system for using different modes.
 

317 forever

Established Member
Joined
21 Aug 2010
Messages
2,914
Location
North West
The important parts are the integrated ticketing and fare caps, not the livery. But none of that's much use if Northern are still in charge, the Piccadilly - Glossop line is just about one of the worst for cancellations, even by Northern's atrocious standards. On 28 Dec for example, 40% of the services were cancelled. Yes, you read that right, 40%.
Yesterday, the Saturday Stalybridge - Stockport return shuttle was cancelled.

This means that all the services were cancelled for the whole week. :'(

I can't help wondering whether, unless there is a track blockage, they cannot try to prioritise running infrequent service and cancelling a train from a more frequent service.
 

Meerkat

Established Member
Joined
14 Jul 2018
Messages
9,276
How does Merseyrail deal with out of area travel - does Ormskirk get the same cheap fares as places inside?


That's not correct, Matlock was the county town of Derbyshire well before Derby became a unitary authority (1977 Vs 1997)
Pedantry but Derby was effectively a unitary from 1889 to 1974 as it was a county Borough separate from Derbyshire County Council.
Anyway I was thinking of Derby being relevant as the city based economic centre of gravity compared to Manchester
 

slipdigby

Member
Joined
24 Feb 2011
Messages
90
There are a wide range, but people don't really want ranger and rover type day tickets, or formal cards you have to apply for. They want a reasonable automatic capping system for using different modes.
These point to point by on the day multimodal fares already exist.
 

Bletchleyite

Veteran Member
Joined
20 Oct 2014
Messages
104,508
Location
"Marston Vale mafia"
How does Merseyrail deal with out of area travel - does Ormskirk get the same cheap fares as places inside?

Once upon a time Saveaways weren't valid past Maghull but they have been for some time now. The outer reaches are in a different area/zone so day tickets are slightly more expensive than closer to Liverpool, but this is also true of outer-reaches places in Merseyside like Newton-le-Willows so there's no specific "Lancashire and Cheshire tax" on the fares.
 

AlastairFraser

Established Member
Joined
12 Aug 2018
Messages
3,384
These point to point by on the day multimodal fares already exist.
1) Not available using an easy contactless based system - some of them are hard to get hold of on a bus too, due to poor driver fares knowledge (understandable given how rarely some of the former System One/now Bee Network Any ticket series are issued)
2) They won't already cover areas on the periphery outside GM like Glossop IIRC. Again, guard knowledge of different ticketing products isn't perfect, so tap on tap off based capping makes a lot of sense.
 

alanbur

Member
Joined
20 Jan 2025
Messages
42
Location
Glossop
Anyway I was thinking of Derby being relevant as the city based economic centre of gravity compared to Manchester
I'm guessing you don't live in Derbyshire. Matlock is remote enough as it is from the north of Derbyshire, Derby might as well be a different country. The economy and most everything else in the north of Derbyshire is intimately entwined with the cities that surround it - Manchester, Halifax, Leeds, Sheffield and so on. Derby by rail transport is 3 hours and 3 trains run by 3 different TOCs away - oh, and you have to go via Manchester or Sheffield.
 

Meerkat

Established Member
Joined
14 Jul 2018
Messages
9,276
I'm guessing you don't live in Derbyshire. Matlock is remote enough as it is from the north of Derbyshire, Derby might as well be a different country. The economy and most everything else in the north of Derbyshire is intimately entwined with the cities that surround it - Manchester, Halifax, Leeds, Sheffield and so on. Derby by rail transport is 3 hours and 3 trains run by 3 different TOCs away - oh, and you have to go via Manchester or Sheffield.
Misunderstanding/poor phrasing - you are making the same point I was attempting.
 

Some guy

Member
Joined
6 Feb 2022
Messages
451
Location
Preston
Wigan is in (Greater) Manchester
Milton Keynes is in Buckinghamshire, far from London
Ormskirk is in Lancashire

Wigan is in Manchester just as much as Croydon, Romford, Kingston etc are in London.
Neither are in the "City of" but are in the "Greater [x]" county.

Wigan is very much part of "Manchester", even if it's just in "Greater Manchester".
Some people here are stuck pretending they're still in Lancashire when they haven't since 1974, 51 years ago.
Wigan is in 2 counties the metropolitan county of greater Manchester and the historic county of Lancashire both still exist. Same for Warrington, Bury, Bolton, Rochdale and even half of Todmordon is
 

Xenophon PCDGS

Veteran Member
Joined
17 Apr 2011
Messages
34,067
Location
A typical commuter-belt part of north-west England
My question is who will actually be delivering the service? If it's still Northern Fail, it will still be crap.
Did you think it might be Fianna Fail?

Wigan is in 2 counties the metropolitan county of greater Manchester and the historic county of Lancashire both still exist. Same for Warrington, Bury, Bolton, Rochdale and even half of Todmordon is
I think you are trying to convince someone with a completely fallaceous belief in their understanding of the city of Manchester against the aggregation of the ten local authorities that make up the entity known as Greater Manchester..
 
Last edited:

Some guy

Member
Joined
6 Feb 2022
Messages
451
Location
Preston
It’s
Did you think it might be Fianna Fail?


I think you are trying to convince someone with a completely fallaceous belief in their understanding of the city of Manchester against the aggregation of the ten local authorities that make up the entity known as Greater Manchester
There’s a reason when you do a search of all the greater Manchester towns including Warrington above the Mersey they all state they are within the historic county of Lancashire
 

Xenophon PCDGS

Veteran Member
Joined
17 Apr 2011
Messages
34,067
Location
A typical commuter-belt part of north-west England
There’s a reason when you do a search of all the greater Manchester towns including Warrington above the Mersey they all state they are within the historic county of Lancashire
The phrase "Greater Manchester towns including Warrington" confuses me not a little.

Towns south of the River Mersey now in Greater Manchester such as the examples of Hale, Altrincham, Timperley Sale, Cheadle, Northenden, etc were all once in the historic county of Cheshire.
 

Djgr

Established Member
Joined
30 Jul 2018
Messages
2,124
The phrase "Greater Manchester towns including Warrington" confuses me not a little.

Towns south of the River Mersey now in Greater Manchester such as the examples of Hale, Altrincham, Timperley Sale, Cheadle, Northenden, etc were all once in the historic county of Cheshire.
Warrington is not Manchester or Greater Manchester, whatever definition you choose.
 

The exile

Established Member
Joined
31 Mar 2010
Messages
4,866
Location
Somerset
So you arte saying they dont run stopping services in amongst fast services just on this route alone then? The data would suggest otherwise, maybe go and revise that data.
And this was one example of a route wher they do this - can you explain how they do this over a two track railway like the welwyn viadact please?
Thanks
The Welwyn Viaduct is a massive bottleneck and there have been repeated calls for the closure of Welwyn North station to alleviate the problem. The GNR took the easy option by extending the Hertford branch to Langley Junction - these were effectively the ECML slow lines as coal trains didn’t mind how they got to London. It is, however, a very short section where flighting of fast services doesn’t affect passengers that much - very different from the WCML north of Preston/ ECML north of Peterborough /GWML west of Didcot, where the problem of stopping trains getting in the way of intercity services has been solved by closing all/most of the stations that would require a true “stopping service”.
 

Mag_seven

Forum Staff
Staff Member
Global Moderator
Joined
1 Sep 2014
Messages
10,891
Location
here to eternity
Just a gentle reminder that this thread is to discuss the TfGM press release about the Bee Network.

If anyone wants to discuss anything else then they are welcome to start a new thread elsewhere.
 

The Ham

Established Member
Joined
6 Jul 2012
Messages
11,021
Why is that?

The reason (as I understand it) the cost per passenger km is so high is that there was (less of an issue more recently) a lot of one and two coach trains.

If you've got to pay a driver for 70 passengers or 210 passengers, the cost between each passenger is going to be a lot more for those 70 passengers.

In addition, average speeds come to play, an electric train which can max out at 100mph is going to need a driver for less time than a diesel train which can only reach 80mph.

If you assume a 50kph average speed for the slower trains and an average of 75kph for the electric trains you've just added 50% driving time by using the slower trains (whilst that may not mean you need 50% more drivers, it does illustrate that costs are going to be higher).

If there's scope for some journey time improvements (even if that's getting some trains which have better acceleration and/or better loading/unloading times) on the Bee Network rail services, then there's potential for that to also aid with staff numbers.

I don't know the area, but if you have a service which takes 68 minutes and has 22 minute turn around at each end, if that service is currently averaging 51kph then by improving that average speed to 75kph the journey time reduces 47 minutes, if you then had the turn around as 13 minutes then you'd only need 2 diagrams rather than 3 to run an hourly service.

Whilst that's probably too much of an uplift in average journey speed, if you could improve the frequency from 2tph (requires 6 diagrams) to run 3tph at an average speed of 65kph with a 16 minute turn around at each end you'd only need 7 diagrams.

That's quite an uplift in capacity and frequency (+50%) for not a lot of extra rolling stock or staff (+17%).
 

Howardh

Established Member
Joined
17 May 2011
Messages
9,156
The phrase "Greater Manchester towns including Warrington" confuses me not a little.

Towns south of the River Mersey now in Greater Manchester such as the examples of Hale, Altrincham, Timperley Sale, Cheadle, Northenden, etc were all once in the historic county of Cheshire.
R/e boundaries - Think it means they aren't putting Warrington inside Greater Manchester, but meaning Greater Manchester towns plus Warrington. Example - Adlington is in Lancashire but is covered by the Greater Manchester bus travelcards - here's a map showing that and other destinations outside GM that are covered;


As an aside, it looks like to get to Adlington from Horwich you have to travel outside the area then back in!!

Confusingly the train + tram validity map is a little different, eg Adlington is outside the area. Would help co-ordination under Bee Network plans if zones were combined into one bee Network (rather than Greater Manchester) zone/area.

 
Last edited:

mangad

Member
Joined
20 Jun 2014
Messages
385
Location
Stockport
R/e boundaries - Think it means they aren't putting Warrington inside Greater Manchester, but meaning Greater Manchester towns plus Warrington. Example - Adlington is in Lancashire but is covered by the Greater Manchester bus travelcards - here's a map showing that and other destinations outside GM that are covered;


The map appears to be following the county border and Adlington is basically right next to the border. The map says says Adlington Pincroft Mill/A6, which is the first/last bus stop on the Lancashire side of the border on the A6. So if you were at Adlington railway station you would be outside the zone.

I assume the yellow circles align with the entry/exit points of bus routes in the Greater Manchester area. And it looks like in a couple of them at least are on the other side of the boundary for whatever reason, but only just.

As an aside, it looks like to get to Adlington from Horwich you have to travel outside the area then back in!!
Doesn't look to be a problem if you look at the way the bus goes. The 125 goes to Horwich but uses the A673 so would be outside the zone until it gets to the edge of Horwich.
 

Howardh

Established Member
Joined
17 May 2011
Messages
9,156
I assume the yellow circles align with the entry/exit points of bus routes in the Greater Manchester area. And it looks like in a couple of them at least are on the other side of the boundary for whatever reason, but only just.
As you allude to, there are some parts of the Greater Manchester bus boundary well outside in the south-east of the region, I imagine many in and around Wilmslow or Glossop do, indeed, use GM passes yet don't enter the county at all!

I noted a while ago that some rail Ranger or Rover tickets leave "gaps" between two area/zones (if I remember correctly - Greater Manchester on one side, West Yorks on the other and can't be used together as there's a "gap" between Greenfield and Marsden which isn't covered by either!) so it's better if all zones take in at least a station outside to correct this anomaly and it's good that the bus boundary map does this.

Point being that Warrington can hardly be described as "only just outside the boundary" and if Warrington were included in the Bee Network area, then there must be an argument for other towns, such as aforementioned Adlington/Chorley, Skelmersdale etc - and if so, where does it stop? In my view it should be Greater Manchester + 1 (station/stop).
 

mangad

Member
Joined
20 Jun 2014
Messages
385
Location
Stockport
As you allude to, there are some parts of the Greater Manchester bus boundary well outside in the south-east of the region, I imagine many in and around Wilmslow or Glossop do, indeed, use GM passes yet don't enter the county at all!
For the record (as I didn't specify), in my reply I was referring to the black area on the map which is the GM county area. The pink area is the area outside Greater Manchester which is in the wider zone which adult tickets can be used in.

The pink zones in the south probably relate to the depots/services of North Western that SELNEC bought in the 1970s. It's a historical quirk kept alive by the System One scheme. I doubt the System One zone is going to change any time soon.
 

Killingworth

Established Member
Joined
30 May 2018
Messages
5,715
Location
Sheffield
As you allude to, there are some parts of the Greater Manchester bus boundary well outside in the south-east of the region, I imagine many in and around Wilmslow or Glossop do, indeed, use GM passes yet don't enter the county at all!

I noted a while ago that some rail Ranger or Rover tickets leave "gaps" between two area/zones (if I remember correctly - Greater Manchester on one side, West Yorks on the other and can't be used together as there's a "gap" between Greenfield and Marsden which isn't covered by either!) so it's better if all zones take in at least a station outside to correct this anomaly and it's good that the bus boundary map does this.

Point being that Warrington can hardly be described as "only just outside the boundary" and if Warrington were included in the Bee Network area, then there must be an argument for other towns, such as aforementioned Adlington/Chorley, Skelmersdale etc - and if so, where does it stop? In my view it should be Greater Manchester + 1 (station/stop).
The Manchester Wayfarer's rail validity extends to Grindleford, only 2 miles away from the Sheffield boundary, 2/3 of the way through Totley Tunnel! On buses it can get you as far as Crich and Ashbourne.

South Yorkshire don't go beyond the county boundary, not even that 2 miles underground to Grindleford.
 

Top