• Our new ticketing site is now live! Using either this or the original site (both powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

Southeastern metro fleet replacement/improvement

brad465

Established Member
Joined
11 Aug 2010
Messages
8,806
Location
Taunton or Kent
More than likely will be /2s but it won’t be 241, 242 or 247 since these 3 are strangely still on lease.
We can also rule out 237 as ROMIC still have this, and even if they end up scrapping it, this is at Great Yarmouth.

As for those 3, maybe they are being kept behind as possible parts' donors? 235 is already half-scrapped as a result of being a donor, so SE may need more in future. If they're still on lease, does this mean those 3 are still stored at Worksop? I can't find out on Rail log as this site doesn't seem to exist anymore.
 
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

D365

Veteran Member
Joined
29 Jun 2012
Messages
12,207
It does seem weird that they chose a /9 to get the NSE livery. Yes, they have the original traction motors, but the subclass didn't even exist at the time. Granted, they're nowhere near as different to how they were off the production line compared to the Hitachi-motored Networker, so if they were going for an NSE 465 in as close to original condition as possible I guess a /9 would be the best option.
Chiming in here for the obligatory ”all Networkers have the original spec traction motors”… it’s only the traction inverters that were changed on the BREL/ABB units to Hitachi. The Brush motors are retained.
 

SEtrains

Member
Joined
29 Jan 2024
Messages
449
Location
Greater London
We can also rule out 237 as ROMIC still have this, and even if they end up scrapping it, this is at Great Yarmouth.

As for those 3, maybe they are being kept behind as possible parts' donors? 235 is already half-scrapped as a result of being a donor, so SE may need more in future. If they're still on lease, does this mean those 3 are still stored at Worksop? I can't find out on Rail log as this site doesn't seem to exist anymore.
Yep more than likely donors. 235 has already been stripped of all useable parts. Last 2 carriages will be disposed of soon. There’s also an anonymous 466 at Doncaster that is currently being used as a donor. 236, 238, 239, 240, 243, 244, 245, 246, 248, 249 and 250 are the ones currently confirmed for scrap.

Edit: I’ve just realised that since Doncaster works is closing where will the /9s go for overhaul.
 
Last edited:

networkersonno

New Member
Joined
7 Feb 2025
Messages
1
Location
orpington
personally i love the metcams over the brels and am extremly glad i will get a chance to see an nse livery 465 irl, its a shame about the doors but ohwell what can we do lol
 

Mikey C

Established Member
Joined
11 Feb 2013
Messages
7,589
Will some of the Met Camms will have to stay in service though until the whole fleet is replaced? I didn't think enough 377s would be transferred over to replace all the 465/9s.
 

brad465

Established Member
Joined
11 Aug 2010
Messages
8,806
Location
Taunton or Kent
Will some of the Met Camms will have to stay in service though until the whole fleet is replaced? I didn't think enough 377s would be transferred over to replace all the 465/9s.
13x 377s are coming over, while 24x 465/9s and circa 28x 466s remain in service, so I presume that side of the fleet can't be completely withdrawn. I'm wondering if the 377s actually see off some BREL units, given a) their reliability has been going downhill rapidly of late, b) the MetCams are still too numerous to completely withdraw, and c) While the 707s and MetCam units have a common owner in Angel Trains, the 377s (Porterbrook) and BREL units don't (Eversholt), so efficiency/commonality will be weaker anyway.
 

Peter Mugridge

Veteran Member
Joined
8 Apr 2010
Messages
16,271
Location
Epsom
Edit: I’ve just realised that since Doncaster works is closing where will the /9s go for overhaul.
The Wabtec press release states that existing contracts will be completed - they just aren't tendering for any new UK jobs.

How long is there left on the overhaul program?
 

SolomonSouth

Member
Joined
25 Feb 2021
Messages
386
Location
Gravesend
13x 377s are coming over, while 24x 465/9s and circa 28x 466s remain in service, so I presume that side of the fleet can't be completely withdrawn. I'm wondering if the 377s actually see off some BREL units, given a) their reliability has been going downhill rapidly of late, b) the MetCams are still too numerous to completely withdraw, and c) While the 707s and MetCam units have a common owner in Angel Trains, the 377s (Porterbrook) and BREL units don't (Eversholt), so efficiency/commonality will be weaker anyway.
I believe it’s actually slightly more than you say - 25X 465/9 (Wikipedia incorrectly lists 465930 as stored) and 31X 466 left.

Also 2 of the 377s have already come - 121 and 122. Not sure on when the other 377s will come.
 

JonathanH

Veteran Member
Joined
29 May 2011
Messages
21,279
Why have 466s been taken out of traffic? 10 coach trains are very much needed in the peak!
The 10-coach 465-465-466 formations were replaced by 10-coach 707 formations. I think it has been noted before here are only so many 10-coach berthing spaces on the Southeastern network to stable 10-coach trains.
 

pieswick

Member
Joined
3 Apr 2023
Messages
16
Location
London
The 10-coach 465-465-466 formations were replaced by 10-coach 707 formations. I think it has been noted before here are only so many 10-coach berthing spaces on the Southeastern network to stable 10-coach trains.
What about the 10 coach CHX-TBW peak terminators that require a toilet and have now gone back to 8 car?
 

brad465

Established Member
Joined
11 Aug 2010
Messages
8,806
Location
Taunton or Kent
What about the 10 coach CHX-TBW peak terminators that require a toilet and have now gone back to 8 car?
Not all of them have gone back to 8-car; there are at least 2 out of 5 allocations that Tue-Thu are 10-car, and are rammed at least between Orpington and London Bridge (as the only fast services for the former station). 707s don't do these as they (currently) don't have toilets, and I wouldn't be surprised if they are not yet cleared to Tunbridge Wells. This might change when the 707s do get toilets, but 5 and 10-carriage formations are not as flexible as 6/8/10 carriage formations and are more useful on the metro routes with the higher standing capacity.
 

bramling

Veteran Member
Joined
5 Mar 2012
Messages
18,784
Location
Hertfordshire / Teesdale
Not all of them have gone back to 8-car; there are at least 2 out of 5 allocations that Tue-Thu are 10-car, and are rammed at least between Orpington and London Bridge (as the only fast services for the former station). 707s don't do these as they (currently) don't have toilets, and I wouldn't be surprised if they are not yet cleared to Tunbridge Wells. This might change when the 707s do get toilets, but 5 and 10-carriage formations are not as flexible as 6/8/10 carriage formations and are more useful on the metro routes with the higher standing capacity.

This is a lot of the problem with the way Southeastern has ended up taking units which weren’t ordered with Southeastern in mind. What is the point in Southeastern getting new trains if they’re just going to be left to total rot like the Networkers have been.
 

Stephen42

Member
Joined
6 Aug 2020
Messages
423
Location
London
Why have 466s been taken out of traffic? 10 coach trains are very much needed in the peak!
The 466s that have been withdrawn they would struggle to use. Southeastern doesn't have lots of stabling space for units so need to be sent elsewhere. Relatively few of the 8 car diagrams could be extended to ten, either due to stabling or the diagram going to 8-car platform stations.

Separately the 466s that remain in service are diagrammed sparingly. Only 14 out of the 29 are diagrammed mid week, 3 on Monday and Friday, 1 on Saturday and 0 on Sunday. There would be the option to lengthen some services mid week if the diagrams worked out and the demand justified it. The 466s need to last until their replacements come in, that could easily be 5 years for the last one to go and part of the strategy looks to be to use them only when necessary.
 

brad465

Established Member
Joined
11 Aug 2010
Messages
8,806
Location
Taunton or Kent
Separately the 466s that remain in service are diagrammed sparingly. Only 14 out of the 29 are diagrammed mid week, 3 on Monday and Friday, 1 on Saturday and 0 on Sunday. There would be the option to lengthen some services mid week if the diagrams worked out and the demand justified it. The 466s need to last until their replacements come in, that could easily be 5 years for the last one to go and part of the strategy looks to be to use them only when necessary.
That might what they're booked to do, but it's not uncommon for the odd 8-car diagram to include 2x466s. There appear to be 2 allocations today with this, plus 2x 10-car Networker allocations, which means an extra 5x 466s are running today compared to what you describe.
 

Mikey C

Established Member
Joined
11 Feb 2013
Messages
7,589
13x 377s are coming over, while 24x 465/9s and circa 28x 466s remain in service, so I presume that side of the fleet can't be completely withdrawn. I'm wondering if the 377s actually see off some BREL units, given a) their reliability has been going downhill rapidly of late, b) the MetCams are still too numerous to completely withdraw, and c) While the 707s and MetCam units have a common owner in Angel Trains, the 377s (Porterbrook) and BREL units don't (Eversholt), so efficiency/commonality will be weaker anyway.
So as many of the Met Cams will be there to the end, presumably the NSE 465/9 should be one of them!
 

ScotGG

Established Member
Joined
3 Apr 2013
Messages
1,501
Have SE reduced lengths of trains on weekday off peaks?

Some have been ever more cosy recently.
 
Joined
28 Mar 2024
Messages
40
Location
N/A
So annoying that they’ve gone for a /9 though! The one subclass that didn’t exist in NSE days! I’m assuming that they picked a /9 because they’re being overhauled at the minute?
Well no, its because the /9s are basically the only remnants of the /2. They are essentially the same. /9s are very much a favourite because of the classic GTO vvvf sounds and motor noise overall. Most 465 fans like myself tend to preffer the met cams.

Maybe theyll do BREL 465 blue/ yellow connex livery soon? Who knows

== Doublepost prevention - post automatically merged: ==

It does seem weird that they chose a /9 to get the NSE livery. Yes, they have the original traction motors, but the subclass didn't even exist at the time. Granted, they're nowhere near as different to how they were off the production line compared to the Hitachi-motored Networker, so if they were going for an NSE 465 in as close to original condition as possible I guess a /9 would be the best option. However, I think they should have gone with a different subclass because the /9s won't be around for as long as the other Networkers. They could have got their money's worth more if they went for a Hitachi unit.
Well theres a good bit of met cams remaining and 13 ,377s arent gonna replace them all. They could get shifted around as they usually do. They get put on metro services and do semi fasts all the time.

Id wager the nostalgia of the GTO is why they used the Met-cam. And something about that Met-cam body shell that probably stuck better with the nostalgia as well.

Maybe the Met-cams will be taken off and this may be a fair well? Who knows. All I know is the Class 465s overall probably have until 2028/2030 since this entire new fleet arrangement has taken over 2 years.
 
Last edited:

TRAX

Established Member
Joined
2 Dec 2015
Messages
1,716
Location
France
Wasn’t the choice of the NSE unit more or less random ?
Not sure the suits up there would’ve had the same pedantic conversations that have been going on here…
 

brad465

Established Member
Joined
11 Aug 2010
Messages
8,806
Location
Taunton or Kent
Have SE reduced lengths of trains on weekday off peaks?

Some have been ever more cosy recently.
Cannon St and Victoria services tend to be shorter in the off peak periods: 8-10 car trains typically go down to 4-5 car. There are also some 12-car Charing X-Dartford via Bexleyheath and Sevenoaks' diagrams in the peak that are reduced to 8-car off peak. However, most Charing X metro diagrams remain 8-10 car all day, either because the demand is there, and/or there is nowhere they can easily chop and change length en route.
Maybe the Met-cams will be taken off and this may be a fair well? Who knows. All I know is the Class 465s overall probably have until 2028/2030 since this entire new fleet arrangement has taken over 2 years.
Which would give the oldest units a lifespan of 36-38 years, broadly in line with other EMU fleets.
 

MrB

Member
Joined
3 Jan 2016
Messages
388
Location
London
Not all of them have gone back to 8-car; there are at least 2 out of 5 allocations that Tue-Thu are 10-car, and are rammed at least between Orpington and London Bridge (as the only fast services for the former station). 707s don't do these as they (currently) don't have toilets, and I wouldn't be surprised if they are not yet cleared to Tunbridge Wells. This might change when the 707s do get toilets, but 5 and 10-carriage formations are not as flexible as 6/8/10 carriage formations and are more useful on the metro routes with the higher standing capacity.
The NR sectional appendix shows that 707s are NOT cleared to Tunbridge Wells, and that they're cleared beyond Sevenoaks to Tonbridge/Ashford Int'l as ECS only.
 

43066

On Moderation
Joined
24 Nov 2019
Messages
11,712
Location
London
Victoria-Orpington is now 4tph off peak so it makes sense to shorten those. Cannon St is not exactly a hub of activity outside the peak.

Although Cannon St. services are also used by London Bridge passengers, of course. The four cars Networkers on the off peak CST - Orpington services often feel pretty cosy.
 
Last edited:

Geogregor

Member
Joined
16 Sep 2016
Messages
347
Location
London
Have SE reduced lengths of trains on weekday off peaks?

Some have been ever more cosy recently.

Orpington - Victoria services are reduced from 8 to 4 coaches off peak. But they finally increased frequency from 2TPH to 4TPH. So they use the same number of units.

Anything on the grapevine how the procurement of the new trains is going? It got all quiet in the subject on the official channels.
 

A60stock

Member
Joined
26 Aug 2019
Messages
135
Location
London
Apologies. I am very behind with this thread.

Since when was it announced 377s would be replacing networkers? Where are the 377s coming from? What will in turn fill in for the 377s from where they are coming from?
 

brad465

Established Member
Joined
11 Aug 2010
Messages
8,806
Location
Taunton or Kent
Apologies. I am very behind with this thread.

Since when was it announced 377s would be replacing networkers? Where are the 377s coming from? What will in turn fill in for the 377s from where they are coming from?
The following cascade is happening:

30x 379s return to service with Great Northern, this displaces 25x 387s to Southern. Then Southern give 13x 377s to Southeastern, which can be used to see off more Networker units.

If you ask me it's a rather shambolic state of affairs that Southeastern are having to resort to this while a full replacement fleet order drags its heels, and Southern likewise can only increase their fleet in this manner.
 

A60stock

Member
Joined
26 Aug 2019
Messages
135
Location
London
Agreed, although the 377s will be a huge step up. However, I do question their suitability on metro services. SE will also have 4 different metro fleets!

Will SE receive more 377s after this and would there be enough to get rid of all networkers?
 

Top