Exactly my point…Well some stations are not built with a "side gate" or are subject to anti-social behaviour / vandalism issues.
Exactly my point…Well some stations are not built with a "side gate" or are subject to anti-social behaviour / vandalism issues.
That's a great idea and not one I'd thought of.In this type of situation just text 61016. It goes straight into BTP’s control room which is manned 24/7. They have direct contacts into Network Rail and TOC controls, as well as the ability to despatch officers who have copies of most relevant access keys required for the railway.
As it can be “intentionally or recklessly” then presumably yes - “by accident” would be a lot more doubtful.Can one falsely imprison someone by negligence?
But in this case I doubt it was intentional.As it can be “intentionally or recklessly” then presumably yes - “by accident” would be a lot more doubtful.
That reminds me, actually. Leamington Spa actually has a post box on one of the platforms.
For the criminal offence: no. For the civil wrong: yes.Can one falsely imprison someone by negligence?
Intention and recklessness do not include negligence.As it can be “intentionally or recklessly” then presumably yes - “by accident” would be a lot more doubtful.
Recklessness would be sufficient to make out both the offence and civil wrong of false imprisonment.But in this case I doubt it was intentional.
If it's recklessness I still doubt it's false imprisonment. It maybe something else, but I doubt it would be that.
A flawless planAnd there lies the solution to the problem if it happens again at Leamington: Write your address somewhere on your clothing. Post yourself into the post box. And wait for the postal service to deliver you to your home the next morning.
Looks like the closest is Slough (GWR)Slightly off topic but Geoff Marshall has posted within the last couple of days a You Tube video about a day he spent with Network Rails Emergency Intervention Unit. Although focusing on Sussex no doubt they have a base in the Leamington area although may take a while to get to you. If a call to 101 could be passed through to these people it could have been your salvation and has the benefit that because they are aligned with Network Rail they could follow up with the station on locking up procedures and emergency evacuation routes.
That shows a remarkable level of faith in the Royal Mail!And there lies the solution to the problem if it happens again at Leamington: Write your address somewhere on your clothing. Post yourself into the post box. And wait for the postal service to deliver you to your home the next morning.
Ony flaw I can see is always having enough stamps for 80+ kg of me on my person at 0100... i hate to think of being retained in the sorting centre for payment of excess postage. Would my wife pay up?And there lies the solution to the problem if it happens again at Leamington: Write your address somewhere on your clothing. Post yourself into the post box. And wait for the postal service to deliver you to your home the next morning.
Unfortunately it would appear that there is a trade off between the average house prices and the likelihood of being locked into the local Chiltern station!plenty of houses being built here
Ony flaw I can see is always having enough stamps for 80+ kg of me on my person at 0100... i hate to think of being retained in the sorting centre for payment of excess postage. Would my wife pay up?
Yes, and they stable some units at the station. However they would long have signed off duty by the time the late-running Chiltern services arrived.Do West Mids have train crew based at Leamington overnight?
112 (the European standard one) also works.
That shows a remarkable level of faith in the Royal Mail!
But if in this case if the staff member incorectly had no reason believe there might be someone at the station.....For the criminal offence: no. For the civil wrong: yes.
Intention and recklessness do not include negligence.
Recklessness would be sufficient to make out both the offence and civil wrong of false imprisonment.
An example would be a school janitor locking up the building without checking whether anyone is still inside where there is reason to believe that there might be.
WMT have fitters and cleaners at Leamington for at least part of the night.Do West Mids have train crew based at Leamington overnigh?t
Yes, in those circumstances a civil wrong of false imprisonment could be committed even if the member of staff is acting completely innocently.But if in this case if the staff member incorectly had no reason believe there might be someone at the station.....
Surely it is much simpler than that? A scan of any trains which are running more than 30 or 60 minutes late would quickly narrow down which services to review and check that the stations they serve will still be open, or arrange for this to take place, or contact the train and advise of it not stopping at that station together with the alternative arrangements for passengers.Chiltern is NRE so the chances of them passing on the message in a timely manner is slim...
== Doublepost prevention - post automatically merged: ==
After around 9pm, desks in most TOC controls start being uncovered and by 0124 I'd expect the office to be on a skelton staff (which would be small number of controllers given that Chiltern is a small TOC and wouldn't have many even during the day). This skeleton staff would be sorting out the ramifications of the earlier major disruption, as well as allocating the units for the start of traffic (a more difficult task if units are displaced).
They'd then have to be aware of any stations on their patch which are in the overlap of a Venn diagram of 'stations fully locked after the last train' and 'stations not manned 24/7'. In my area, I cannot think of a single station like that. And trains running set down only late at night is unusual. So much so that I'd posit that many controllers would not encounter a train which is both unadvertised and setting down at stations which at the time are both fully locked and unstaffed. Therefore, they're not going to be aware of the need to contact station staff to keep them on. I'd expect that if Chiltern follow this up properly, they'll create a contingency plan for said stations and brief controllers accordingly.
Surely that doesn't stop Chiltern advising of the outcome in terms of the arrangements to prevent such issues arising in the future?Chiltern have replied to my report, saying that the station management team apologise and are investigating.
They also say they won't be able to inform me of the outcome of the investigation due to employee confidentiality, which I do understand.
Yeah, it feels like a bit of a cop-out answer really. Nobody is expecting to get detailed information about e.g. disciplinary processes or about individual employees from a customer service rep, that'd be grossly inappropriate. But what is important is exactly what you refer to: how a re-occurence is going to be prevented, ideally with a process that isn't reliant on one single member of staff.Surely that doesn't stop Chiltern advising of the outcome in terms of the arrangements to prevent such issues arising in the future?
Surely it is much simpler than that? A scan of any trains which are running more than 30 or 60 minutes late would quickly narrow down which services to review and check that the stations they serve will still be open, or arrange for this to take place, or contact the train and advise of it not stopping at that station together with the alternative arrangements for passengers.
Yeah, it feels like a bit of a cop-out answer really. Nobody is expecting to get detailed information about e.g. disciplinary processes or about individual employees from a customer service rep, that'd be grossly inappropriate. But what is important is exactly what you refer to: how a re-occurence is going to be prevented, ideally with a process that isn't reliant on one single member of staff.
Maybe it could never work in practice but you could imagine a technological solution here which looks at the TD feed for passenger trains stopping at stations that you know are locked up (would require the automatic doors are 'smart' and can report their status) and creates an alert which can be double checked with CCTV remotely.
I take the last / one of the last trains from Marylebone to Leam pretty often.. I'm not sure I find the whole debacle and now this response very reassuring. Luckily I've yet to have to deal with disruption on the scale that OP experienced (not Chiltern's fault in this case, obviously) and things have generally run reasonably smoothly.
No organisation is going to give details of internal investigations or processes. Especially in situations where nobody was actually inconvenienced, and the complaint is about a hypothetical situation.
On the contrary, you could classify this as a “near miss” - a situation which could have been worse had the circumstances been only slightly different (I.e. no contractors on site).
I know this seems to be the attitude of some train operating companies, but back in the real world it's .. actually pretty normal to be reasonably transparent about processes and policies, particularly those with a health and safety purpose that there will be public interest in. There will obviously be exceptions if there are commercial sensitivities or national security concerns, but at a previous employer their SOPs for lone workers, for conducting risk assessments, working at heights / in confined spaces / doing other risky things were all made public and free to access online. That made sense because the site was accessible to the public.No organisation is going to give details of internal investigations or processes.
I know this seems to be the attitude of some train operating companies, but back in the real world it's .. actually pretty normal to be reasonably transparent about processes and policies, particularly those with a health and safety purpose that there will be public interest in. There will obviously be exceptions if there are commercial sensitivities or national security concerns, but at a previous employer their SOPs for lone workers, for conducting risk assessments, working at heights / in confined spaces / doing other risky things were all made public and free to access online. That made sense because the site was accessible to the public.
TfL have released standard operating procedures in the past as well as their staff-facing materials for ensuring passenger safety in different scenarios and the world didn't implode. It's really not that deep.
Am apology without any context on how they're going to try and put things right is just an empty platitude.
Assuming that all the passengers could fit on the 2307, it seems odd that you weren't all transferred on to that train with your train being terminated at Banbury and eventually running forward empty.The train staff didn't suggest it, or even mention it.
I saw the train arrive 2 platforms over, but assumed it would be queued behind us and we'd leave first - last announcement was that the new train crew were due very soon (it wasn't soon). It wasn't until it left ahead of us that the possibility occurred to me.
I would still expect them to say what procedures or measures they've taken to prevent a repeat occurrence.Chiltern have replied to my report, saying that the station management team apologise and are investigating.
They also say they won't be able to inform me of the outcome of the investigation due to employee confidentiality, which I do understand.
What concern could there possibly be about a TOC publishing the procedure they use to avoid passengers from becoming stranded?There is also clearly a legitimate security concern around this type of information in the context of public transport. The response is indeed a platitude, but it just isn’t realistic for members of the public to complain about hypothetical situations and then expect chapter and verse on internal investigations.