Thanks Jacob...didnt think it looked to be a full unit...appreciate your replyHalf of 168001. It's been stood there for many weeks now.
Thanks Jacob...didnt think it looked to be a full unit...appreciate your replyHalf of 168001. It's been stood there for many weeks now.
I have to say I am agreement with you here. Plus they would likely all be in the Infrastructure forum, and this thread is in the Rolling Stock forum.Thanks for the clarification, but the dig in bold is just unnecessary. There’s thousands of threads on this forum. I can’t be expected to know all information in every one.
I have to say I am agreement with you here. Plus they would likely all be in the Infrastructure forum, and this thread is in the Rolling Stock forum.
Any idea which half?Half of 168001. It's been stood there for many weeks now.
Don't know by Carriage numbers unfortunately but it's the front half with the name plate on it if that helps.Any idea which half?
So I've got the carriage numbers for you. 58651 one of the middle cars and 58151 the front car with the nameplate on.Any idea which half?
ThanksSo I've got the carriage numbers for you. 58651 one of the middle cars and 58151 the front car with the nameplate on.
Yeah all new livery is being done at Crewe.5F68 is indeed 168329.
It has weirdly been put back into the Mainline livery rather than the new Blue livery, although I guess it would need to go to crewe for that?
Were they going up for the 165 refresh or just general stuff?5F65 is running and is 2 165s.
To me it looks like the hybrid stuff was just vinyl's over the mainline livery5F68 is indeed 168329.
It has weirdly been put back into the Mainline livery rather than the new Blue livery, although I guess it would need to go to crewe for that?
5F68 is indeed 168329.
It has weirdly been put back into the Mainline livery rather than the new Blue livery, although I guess it would need to go to crewe for that?
It was stripped down to just the White & Grey before the Hybrid livery was applied.To me it looks like the hybrid stuff was just vinyl's over the mainline livery
They went to assist 168329 back, the same thing was done when 165004 came back.Were they going up for the 165 refresh or just general stuff?
Given that a couple of 175s have just been sent to Wolverton for painting into GWR livery, I’m not sure that Wolverton ‘don’t do painting’. Plus the Freightliner 66s and 90s and Northern 323s also.It has not been 'put back' in mainline livery, it simply hasn't been painted yet. Wolverton don't do painting as far as I know.
Given that a couple of 175s have just been sent to Wolverton for painting into GWR livery, I’m not sure that Wolverton ‘don’t do painting’. Plus the Freightliner 66s and 90s and Northern 323s also.
Were they going up for the 165 refresh or just general stuff?
Wolverton do painting, they only a few units off completing the ex 17 WMR 323s for Northern.It has not been 'put back' in mainline livery, it simply hasn't been painted yet. Wolverton don't do painting as far as I know.
They're just not contracted to paint them.Ok, but they don't do painting for Chiltern.
Some images of 168329 sat in Aylesbury today.
Clearly plenty of work still to do before it can return to service.
== Doublepost prevention - post automatically merged: ==
There is a 5A68 in TRUST scheduled to run from Crewe to Aylesbury on Monday 17th March. Suspect this will be 168003.
Still in pieces at the moment. Half of it has been sitting outside for many weeks.Surely 001 must be near to completion by now? Hopefully anyway!
I understand it was found to have the same post-refurb teething issues as 003, hence the delay, which shouldn't trouble subsequent units.Surely 001 must be near to completion by now? Hopefully anyway!
I’m sure it probably says a few pages back, but i also feel like it doesn’t. What specifically were the “teething issues”? I know there were engine troubles but was there anything else as well?I understand it was found to have the same post-refurb teething issues as 003, hence the delay, which shouldn't trouble subsequent units.
I think the company would rather not go into specifics, and I'd like to keep my job.I’m sure it probably says a few pages back, but i also feel like it doesn’t. What specifically were the “teething issues”? I know there were engine troubles but was there anything else as well?
Yeah makes sense. Sorry!I think the company would rather not go into specifics, and I'd like to keep my job.
Will be 168003.There is a 168 just passing Banbury on a Crewe - Aylesbury working at the moment, 14:00, not sure which one though.
There is a 168 just passing Banbury on a Crewe - Aylesbury working at the moment, 14:00, not sure which one though.