Reading the recent thread - https://www.railforums.co.uk/threads/rt-revd-eric-treacy-mbr-lld.285963/ I wonder why the clergy seem to be overly represented in the ranks of rail enthusiasts?
James
James
Anyone who thinks leading a church is only about a Sunday morning service has never led a church.Traditionally they had the free time to indulge their hobby in an era when many people worked 5½ days per week
Certainly true now, but less so in the past where clergymen were often the younger sons of landed families (so weren’t financially dependent on their stipend) and were much freer than most to determine when they did their work.Anyone who thinks leading a church is only about a Sunday morning service has never led a church.
In the days of steam the Church of England was very different from now. Even small villages would have their own parish priest, and didn't have to share with other villages nearby. Bigger parishes would also have a curate, a sort of apprentice vicar. There were a lot more vicars and curates to do the pastoral work, which tended to be intermittent, so vicars really did have a lot of spare time during the week to indulge their interests.Traditionally they had the free time to indulge their hobby in an era when many people worked 5½ days per week
O Jesu Christ, remember,
When Thou shall come again,
Upon the clouds of heaven,
With all thy shining train...
Lots of amateur naturalists, for example, were clergymen.
Well, there’s Parsons’ Pleasure in Oxford!!!I almost thought you said they were something else there.![]()
In the opening pages of The End of the Line (1955), Bryan Morgan suggests that the appeal of railways may be to do with the contrast between 'the romantic appeal of a moving train and the classic discipline which it observes', and that 'there is a tendency...for British railway enthusiasm to be strongest in those professions which themselves contain a balance of the formal and the emotional -- music, teaching, the church, the writing of detective stories'.BTW CofE clergy (I am one, but retired) officially work a 6-day week, but I'm not aware that interest in railways has diminished. It is common among musicians too - my teenage church organist of 30 years ago has had an interesting railway career and is now an LNER driver.
The railway, and each organised religion, are all certain that they are the best means of getting Man to his ultimate destination.
There were celerical railway enthusiasts long before he published his first book *80 years ago this month, as it happens, there was an item on the BBC news about it yesterday)Perhaps Reverend Awdry was an inspiration.
A guy whom, to be honest, I find rather unlikeable -- thanks largely, to things Christianity-related which come through in some of his writings. This, nothing to do with what brand of Christian he was: it's about his seeming personal approach to, and "take" on, the matter. He strikes me as a bad advertisement for his faith. More generally -- in my own personal experience, have encountered quite a number of railway enthusiasts who were active, often "civilian", Christians.Oh, and BTW Cecil J Allen of blessed memory was a devout (non-CofE) Christian.
(My bolding) -- this was, I gather, the "day job" of Morgan; who was a serious, though un-bigoted, (lay) Catholic. I have tried one of his detective novels. Whilst for me, his non-fiction-re-foreign-parts writings (especially The End of the Line) are totally magical: I found the 'tec novel -- not awful, but fairly humdrum; don't think that I even managed to finish it, and was not encouraged to try any more such by him.In the opening pages of The End of the Line (1955), Bryan Morgan suggests that the appeal of railways may be to do with the contrast between 'the romantic appeal of a moving train and the classic discipline which it observes', and that 'there is a tendency...for British railway enthusiasm to be strongest in those professions which themselves contain a balance of the formal and the emotional -- music, teaching, the church, the writing of detective stories'.
Yes, I agree - his writing style and 'views' are very jarring to the modern reader. I remember reading an article of his about train performance in Belgium, complaining bitterly about some sloppy running he'd encountered and laced with some unpleasant xenophobic remarks. Poor running in Britain was, of course, unheard of.A guy whom, to be honest, I find rather unlikeable -- thanks largely, to things Christianity-related which come through in some of his writings. This, nothing to do with what brand of Christian he was: it's about his seeming personal approach to, and "take" on, the matter. He strikes me as a bad advertisement for his faith..