Ploughman
Established Member
For one who does not know the area, where is the chord likely to be situated?
And any other notable sites.
And any other notable sites.
Although standard equipment to add an intermediate block with 2 aspect signals (stop signal and its associated distant signal) have been around for decades.The constraint is more the length of tbe block sections around Droitwich and Worcester. Midlands rail hub won't redouble it all. It will be small extensions.
See the map here:For one who does not know the area, where is the chord likely to be situated?
And any other notable sites.
To add to the map above, I'd say this area is post-industrial. Quite close to the city centre, but not close enough to have been gentrified or become fully residential.For one who does not know the area, where is the chord likely to be situated?
And any other notable sites.
With the down line heading towards London?See the map here:
![]()
Camp Hill line - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org
![]()
Picture credit: Wikimedia user Oldhamtw
Thanks for providing this image. More-or-less explains the key deliverables of this project.See the map here:
![]()
Camp Hill line - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org
![]()
Picture credit: Wikimedia user Oldhamtw
That depends on if people want to add it as a temporary measure to lever frames when the plans are to re-signal the area at some point in the medium term and the associated abortive cost. They would be new installations, I'm not aware of places that get 2nd hand LED units installed.Although standard equipment to add an intermediate block with 2 aspect signals (stop signal and its associated distant signal) have been around for decades.
The idea that one long block is a long term restriction that can never be changed until full resignalling is a myth.
I would not be surprised if there are a few intermediate units not really being used these days (somewhere like an old MGR coal route) somewhere on the network that could be moved if there was enough motivation.
Digbeth etc is getting a lot of redevelopment already on the basis of HS2.To add to the map above, I'd say this area is post-industrial. Quite close to the city centre, but not close enough to have been gentrified or become fully residential.
Small Heath is the Chiltern Mainline. The right turning arrow to "the midlands" is a bit odd as it should really be more of a straight arrow like the Kings Norton one.With the down line heading towards London?
Any increase to Leicester or the Tamworth directions.What services are planned to use the curve to the north?
There's possibly not the space between Malvern and Ledbury? So with some shorter sections, when the Worcester area resignalling eventually happens are we more likely get an additional BHM each hour but only run as far as Great Malvern not Hereford?The constraint is more the length of tbe block sections around Droitwich and Worcester. Midlands rail hub won't redouble it all. It will be small extensions.
Eventually being the key word.There's possibly not the space between Malvern and Ledbury? So with some shorter sections, when the Worcester area resignalling eventually happens are we more likely get an additional BHM each hour but only run as far as Great Malvern not Hereford?
Eventually being the key word.
To provide the capacity for two trains per hour to Hereford the MRH proposes some double tracking between Ledbury and Shelwick Junction. The other concern is that the current 1tph via University may be move to the Camphill Line breaking the direct travel to the QE Regional Hospital from Worcester, Droitwich etc for staff and patients.There's possibly not the space between Malvern and Ledbury? So with some shorter sections, when the Worcester area resignalling eventually happens are we more likely get an additional BHM each hour but only run as far as Great Malvern not Hereford?
There's already some scope for 2TPH to Hereford with the 4 Paddington services that arrive daily.To provide the capacity for two trains per hour to Hereford the MRH proposes some double tracking between Ledbury and Shelwick Junction. The other concern is that the current 1tph via University may be move to the Camphill Line breaking the direct travel to the QE Regional Hospital from Worcester, Droitwich etc for staff and patients.
Re the GWR services there is only a single line from West Malvern to Shelwick Junction just before Hereford. The current passing point is at Ledbury station which has two platforms. So a late running GWR train to Hereford is usually terminated at Great Malvern or Worcester Shrub Hill. The addition of a passing loop will provide a second passing point giving flexibility.There's already some scope for 2TPH to Hereford with the 4 Paddington services that arrive daily.
2TPH on the Worcester to Birmingham could be 1 via university and one via Camp Hill, retaining the direct train to UNI or a change at Bromsgrove or possibly Kings Norton (if that service then becomes a stopper along Camp Hill).
I and other regular users of this service are lobbying for 1tph via University and second via Camphill.
The proposal to run both BHM to HFD trains via the Camphill Line was made by the new CEO of WMRE in an interview with Modern Railways in March 2024. What a backward step you are suggesting to change trains mid-journey and wait in a wheel chair or a child's buggy on an uncovered platform at Bromsgrove. So much for enhancing the passenger experience.
Currently the 1 tph takes 27 minutes from Droitwich Spa to University. The proposed Camphill route requires a journey of 10 minutes to Bromsgrove then a wait of of 20 minutes for a 24 minute journey on the Cross City Line to University.If it’s a straight choice of two via Camp Hill or one via University, which would you choose?
IIRC the intention is to put platforms to allow change at Kings Norton, and as the station will be refurbished, it will no doubt include proper facilities (i.e. full accessibility and covered waiting areas)Currently the 1 tph takes 27 minutes from Droitwich Spa to University. The proposed Camphill route requires a journey of 10 minutes to Bromsgrove then a wait of of 20 minutes for a 24 minute journey on the Cross City Line to University.
Total time for the journey 54 minutes almost twice as long. Which journey would you prefer?
Currently the 1 tph takes 27 minutes from Droitwich Spa to University. The proposed Camphill route requires a journey of 10 minutes to Bromsgrove then a wait of of 20 minutes for a 24 minute journey on the Cross City Line to University.
Total time for the journey 54 minutes almost twice as long. Which journey would you prefer?