• Our new ticketing site is now live! Using either this or the original site (both powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

Midlands Rail Hub 20m extra seats

Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

Snow1964

Established Member
Joined
7 Oct 2019
Messages
8,313
Location
West Wiltshire
The constraint is more the length of tbe block sections around Droitwich and Worcester. Midlands rail hub won't redouble it all. It will be small extensions.
Although standard equipment to add an intermediate block with 2 aspect signals (stop signal and its associated distant signal) have been around for decades.

The idea that one long block is a long term restriction that can never be changed until full resignalling is a myth.

I would not be surprised if there are a few intermediate units not really being used these days (somewhere like an old MGR coal route) somewhere on the network that could be moved if there was enough motivation.
 

Nottingham59

Established Member
Joined
10 Dec 2019
Messages
2,741
Location
Nottingham
For one who does not know the area, where is the chord likely to be situated?
And any other notable sites.
See the map here:

Bordesley_Chords_indicative_layout_2023.png

Picture credit: Wikimedia user Oldhamtw
 

Palmerston

Member
Joined
4 Oct 2024
Messages
71
Location
Hampshire
For one who does not know the area, where is the chord likely to be situated?
And any other notable sites.
To add to the map above, I'd say this area is post-industrial. Quite close to the city centre, but not close enough to have been gentrified or become fully residential.
 

The Planner

Veteran Member
Joined
15 Apr 2008
Messages
17,856
Although standard equipment to add an intermediate block with 2 aspect signals (stop signal and its associated distant signal) have been around for decades.

The idea that one long block is a long term restriction that can never be changed until full resignalling is a myth.

I would not be surprised if there are a few intermediate units not really being used these days (somewhere like an old MGR coal route) somewhere on the network that could be moved if there was enough motivation.
That depends on if people want to add it as a temporary measure to lever frames when the plans are to re-signal the area at some point in the medium term and the associated abortive cost. They would be new installations, I'm not aware of places that get 2nd hand LED units installed.
To add to the map above, I'd say this area is post-industrial. Quite close to the city centre, but not close enough to have been gentrified or become fully residential.
Digbeth etc is getting a lot of redevelopment already on the basis of HS2.

== Doublepost prevention - post automatically merged: ==

With the down line heading towards London?
Small Heath is the Chiltern Mainline. The right turning arrow to "the midlands" is a bit odd as it should really be more of a straight arrow like the Kings Norton one.
 

Pokelet

Member
Joined
5 Sep 2017
Messages
156
The constraint is more the length of tbe block sections around Droitwich and Worcester. Midlands rail hub won't redouble it all. It will be small extensions.
There's possibly not the space between Malvern and Ledbury? So with some shorter sections, when the Worcester area resignalling eventually happens are we more likely get an additional BHM each hour but only run as far as Great Malvern not Hereford?
 

The Planner

Veteran Member
Joined
15 Apr 2008
Messages
17,856
There's possibly not the space between Malvern and Ledbury? So with some shorter sections, when the Worcester area resignalling eventually happens are we more likely get an additional BHM each hour but only run as far as Great Malvern not Hereford?
Eventually being the key word.
 

Fidelis

Member
Joined
27 Aug 2020
Messages
71
Location
Worcester
Eventually being the key word.
There's possibly not the space between Malvern and Ledbury? So with some shorter sections, when the Worcester area resignalling eventually happens are we more likely get an additional BHM each hour but only run as far as Great Malvern not Hereford?
To provide the capacity for two trains per hour to Hereford the MRH proposes some double tracking between Ledbury and Shelwick Junction. The other concern is that the current 1tph via University may be move to the Camphill Line breaking the direct travel to the QE Regional Hospital from Worcester, Droitwich etc for staff and patients.
 

Pokelet

Member
Joined
5 Sep 2017
Messages
156
To provide the capacity for two trains per hour to Hereford the MRH proposes some double tracking between Ledbury and Shelwick Junction. The other concern is that the current 1tph via University may be move to the Camphill Line breaking the direct travel to the QE Regional Hospital from Worcester, Droitwich etc for staff and patients.
There's already some scope for 2TPH to Hereford with the 4 Paddington services that arrive daily.

2TPH on the Worcester to Birmingham could be 1 via university and one via Camp Hill, retaining the direct train to UNI or a change at Bromsgrove or possibly Kings Norton (if that service then becomes a stopper along Camp Hill).
 

Fidelis

Member
Joined
27 Aug 2020
Messages
71
Location
Worcester
There's already some scope for 2TPH to Hereford with the 4 Paddington services that arrive daily.

2TPH on the Worcester to Birmingham could be 1 via university and one via Camp Hill, retaining the direct train to UNI or a change at Bromsgrove or possibly Kings Norton (if that service then becomes a stopper along Camp Hill).
Re the GWR services there is only a single line from West Malvern to Shelwick Junction just before Hereford. The current passing point is at Ledbury station which has two platforms. So a late running GWR train to Hereford is usually terminated at Great Malvern or Worcester Shrub Hill. The addition of a passing loop will provide a second passing point giving flexibility.
I and other regular users of this service are lobbying for 1tph via University and second via Camphill.
The proposal to run both BHM to HFD trains via the Camphill Line was made by the new CEO of WMRE in an interview with Modern Railways in March 2024. What a backward step you are suggesting to change trains mid-journey and wait in a wheel chair or a child's buggy on an uncovered platform at Bromsgrove. So much for enhancing the passenger experience.
 

Bald Rick

Veteran Member
Joined
28 Sep 2010
Messages
32,378
I and other regular users of this service are lobbying for 1tph via University and second via Camphill.
The proposal to run both BHM to HFD trains via the Camphill Line was made by the new CEO of WMRE in an interview with Modern Railways in March 2024. What a backward step you are suggesting to change trains mid-journey and wait in a wheel chair or a child's buggy on an uncovered platform at Bromsgrove. So much for enhancing the passenger experience.

If it’s a straight choice of two via Camp Hill or one via University, which would you choose?
 

Fidelis

Member
Joined
27 Aug 2020
Messages
71
Location
Worcester
If it’s a straight choice of two via Camp Hill or one via University, which would you choose?
Currently the 1 tph takes 27 minutes from Droitwich Spa to University. The proposed Camphill route requires a journey of 10 minutes to Bromsgrove then a wait of of 20 minutes for a 24 minute journey on the Cross City Line to University.
Total time for the journey 54 minutes almost twice as long. Which journey would you prefer?
 

Sonik

Member
Joined
7 Jun 2022
Messages
349
Location
WCML South
Currently the 1 tph takes 27 minutes from Droitwich Spa to University. The proposed Camphill route requires a journey of 10 minutes to Bromsgrove then a wait of of 20 minutes for a 24 minute journey on the Cross City Line to University.
Total time for the journey 54 minutes almost twice as long. Which journey would you prefer?
IIRC the intention is to put platforms to allow change at Kings Norton, and as the station will be refurbished, it will no doubt include proper facilities (i.e. full accessibility and covered waiting areas)

The new trains are also very quick of the mark, which may allow for better (i.e. faster) timetabling when it's all changed.

So it may end up being a slightly longer journey, but certainly not double, as it's only a couple of extra stops.
 
Last edited:

Bald Rick

Veteran Member
Joined
28 Sep 2010
Messages
32,378
Currently the 1 tph takes 27 minutes from Droitwich Spa to University. The proposed Camphill route requires a journey of 10 minutes to Bromsgrove then a wait of of 20 minutes for a 24 minute journey on the Cross City Line to University.
Total time for the journey 54 minutes almost twice as long. Which journey would you prefer?

That doesn‘t answer the question.

My answer is 2 x via Camp Hill.Although though I totslly understand if your preference is just one train, and that is via University
 

Top