Recent content by najaB

Neither the Republic of the Congo nor the Democratic Republic of the Congo are, in fact, Rwanda.

I have watched the video and, unsurprisingly, I disagree with your characterisation of it. The fact that his initial answer was "There's an exclusion on people from Rwanda being sent to Rwanda" makes it clear that he had no idea what the questioner meant by "Congo". You can tell by the...

Both.

Because FPTP has delivered such good results in Westminster.

Thing is, that already applies to the presidency as far as civil liability is concerned - you can't sue the President personally for actions that form part of the job. What he is attempting to do is expand this doctrine to cover criminal liability.

Doesn't matter what the "court of public opinion" thinks, all that matters is the law. I honestly can't see the Supreme Court arguing that anyone is above the law, if only because what's goes for Republicans also goes for Democrats.

28(?) days to find a replacement that the majority of MSPs can agree on, or early elections.

I would be surprised if they rule that the President is above the law.

The logic as to why the Supreme Court is hearing the case? Because the trial court rejected it, so he appealed to the DC Circuit Court which also threw it out, so he appealed to the Supreme Court. They were originally expected to decline to hear the case, but in a bit of a surprise they agreed...

The documentation that they would have needed to make an application, since the point was about people whose applications were denied crossing the channel anyway.

Having a direct vote for PM makes the role too presidential for my liking. I do support the idea that all MPs should have a vote since that's the whole idea of what a Prime Minister is supposed to be: the person who commands the respect of the largest body of MPs. Ideally it shouldn't be a...

As far as I know, you should be fine since a camera is a personal belonging that a tourist would be reasonably expected to take on holiday with them. If you want to do belts and braces, take some photos on your way out of the country!

Given the fact that the majority of the population now lives in urban areas, that's entirely possible!

And when they're discovered they can - quite legally and morally - be immediately put on a plane/boat to where they came from since they would have bypassed a safe route to claim asylum in the UK.

No, of course not. But far too many people blame the housing, healthcare, education, etc. crises on "the immigrants" instead of looking closer to home. They expected that the "£350 million a week" would mean that they wouldn't have to wait for an appointment, and the other empty promises.