JamesRowden
Established Member
Why is Ashford 'Ashford International' when there's no other station in Ashford to differentiate it from and Eurostar are doing everything they can to avoid stopping there?
'Ashford (Surrey)' station.
Why is Ashford 'Ashford International' when there's no other station in Ashford to differentiate it from and Eurostar are doing everything they can to avoid stopping there?
'Ashford (Surrey)' station.
Similarly Newton (Lanark) as it is, is somewhat misleading depending where you read it. I've seen it described as that or Newton (LanarkSHIRE) which is more accurate. The town of Lanark is about 20 miles away.
Stratford International isn't too bad I guess as there's an existing Stratford station 500m away, and the alternative name could have been far worse. 'Lea Valley Parkway' or something like that.
What about 'Stratford High Speed'
Whoa there, you saying the High Speed line isn't Main?Perhaps 'Birmingham International' station should be renamed 'Birmingham Airport Mainline' and the HS2 station named 'Birmingham Airport High Speed.'
Whoa there, you saying the High Speed line isn't Main?
What about the local service to Curzon Street then? :P
Have you a suggestion then for Syon Lane ?
Most passengers, staff, CIS and on board PIS just call it 'Newton' so its already pretty much redundant suffixing Lanark(shire) in the station name.
As others have said, I think there need to be more guidelines with regard to station names to give them a bit more clarity.
'International' is just so clumsy, seemingly used to simply lend a locale a greater proportion of recognition than it has. It doesn't necessarily mean a station has international rail services (ie. Stratford Intl), but means it could also be attached to an airport or in the case of Harwich has international ferry services.
Why is Ashford 'Ashford International' when there's no other station in Ashford to differentiate it from and Eurostar are doing everything they can to avoid stopping there?
Stratford International isn't too bad I guess as there's an existing Stratford station 500m away, and the alternative name could have been far worse. 'Lea Valley Parkway' or something like that.
Ebbsfleet International is just all-round appalling
Birmingham International should either be left as it is or renamed Birmingham Airport.
If the problem is tourists getting off at International when they want the city centre, then they could rename New Street to 'Birmingham Central' or 'Birmingham City Centre'
What about the local service to Curzon Street then? :P
Doesn't stop at any intermediate stations.
As my father likes to point out, it will still be quicker to go from Birmingham International to New Street by Pendolino than from Birmingham Interchange to Curzon Street on HS2, eg if arriving at the Airport and going to the city centre.
Are there any trains that go "international"? Why not just leave it at Birmingham Airport with the appropriate sinage to go with it. It will cause less confusion for those who don't speak or read English.
As my father likes to point out, it will still be quicker to go from Birmingham International to New Street by Pendolino than from Birmingham Interchange to Curzon Street on HS2, eg if arriving at the Airport and going to the city centre.
I don't get that - how does that work out?
Howard, because the Interchange HS2 station is about 1.5 miles from the airport as the crow flies, but 2.1 miles away by the route of the proposed transfer system (Rapid Transit / people mover or whatever).
It'll take another 5-10 minutes to get there compared with getting to the current "International" station.
Also consider that not all London - Birmingham HS trains will be stopping at the Interchange. The other stoppers will be some of the trains heading north to Leeds and Manchester etc, which will bypass Curzon Street.
It will therefore be much quicker to catch one of the many, frequent trains from the "International" station to New Street, than spend the extra time getting to the HS2 Interchange and then probably having to wait a relatively long time for a train to Curzon St. to arrive.
Who knows, Interchange to Curzon St. may be as little as 1 tph and the private operator may decide not to sell tickets for that route?
Judging by the use of the car park whenever I have been by it is a massive hub for London commuters.
I doubt there are many if any "London commuters", there may be many commuters TO London however.
Slightly OT, but isn't it about time that stations like "British Steel Redcar" and "IBM" be renamed too, as they bear no relevance to the sites they serve today?
'Severn Tunnel Junction'
What's wrong with that? Severn Tunnel Junction station is located at a junction which is called Severn Tunnel Junction, which is the junction for the Severn Tunnel.
What's wrong with that? Severn Tunnel Junction station is located at a junction which is called Severn Tunnel Junction, which is the junction for the Severn Tunnel.