• Our booking engine at tickets.railforums.co.uk (powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

Is It Time To Lock People On Trains?

Status
Not open for further replies.

whhistle

On Moderation
Joined
30 Dec 2010
Messages
2,636
Yet another story of people releasing doors and walking down the tracks.

Is it time to stop the ability to open doors like this from the inside so this can't happen?
Yes, I understand fire, this and that, but it's almost becoming normal for people to do this.
Perhaps needs a couple of people to die right there on the tracks before the public realise this isn't a good idea - no matter what the customer thinks.
 
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

richa2002

Established Member
Joined
8 Jun 2005
Messages
2,275
No, of course not. They simply take their choice and accept the consequences.
 

farleigh

Member
Joined
1 Nov 2016
Messages
1,148
Of course that is not a good idea. As above, adults should make correct choices. If not, there is a consequence.
 

Gemz91

Member
Joined
1 Feb 2013
Messages
678
Location
Garden Shed
Yet another story of people releasing doors and walking down the tracks.

Is it time to stop the ability to open doors like this from the inside so this can't happen?
Yes, I understand fire, this and that, but it's almost becoming normal for people to do this.
Perhaps needs a couple of people to die right there on the tracks before the public realise this isn't a good idea - no matter what the customer thinks.

Almost becoming normal? How many examples of this do you know of where it has happened this year?
 

416GSi

Member
Joined
4 Feb 2015
Messages
68
Location
Usk, Monmouthshire
No. A few reasons,

  • Issues of this kind are rare, why make the procedures even more complicated than they are all ready.
  • People need release the emergency exit mechanism to release the doors anyway. If there was an accident and someone got killed because they had no exit the railways would be in real trouble from a legal health and safety perspective and the press would have a field day.
In my view the railways have got it about right, that said sometimes there is nothing to be done about the stupidity of a small minority of people.
 
Last edited:

Skymonster

Established Member
Joined
7 Feb 2012
Messages
1,742
Perhaps needs a couple of people to die right there on the tracks before the public realise this isn't a good idea - no matter what the customer thinks.

Perhaps needs a couple customers to die while confined on a train before the industry really attempts to understand what drives people to such desperate measures as getting off a train between stations and actually does more to rescue them?
 

MP33

Member
Joined
19 Jun 2011
Messages
414
The RAIB report into the Abergele accident in the 1840's gives reasons why it is not a good idea to lock passengers in. Although wooden rolling stock and steam traction played its part.
 

Via Bank

Member
Joined
28 Mar 2010
Messages
672
Location
London
Yet another story of people releasing doors and walking down the tracks.

Is it time to stop the ability to open doors like this from the inside so this can't happen?
Yes, I understand fire, this and that, but it's almost becoming normal for people to do this.
Perhaps needs a couple of people to die right there on the tracks before the public realise this isn't a good idea - no matter what the customer thinks.
No.

These are human beings and paying customers.

If you don’t want people to self-evacuate, don’t keep a crowded train stopped for three hours with no toilets or heating - ESPECIALLY not in an urban area within a few yards of a station.

This forum never ceases to amaze me.
 

Daz28

Member
Joined
11 Feb 2010
Messages
310
Location
Elmstead Woods
No.

These are human beings and paying customers.

If you don’t want people to self-evacuate, don’t keep a crowded train stopped for three hours with no toilets or heating - ESPECIALLY not in an urban area within a few yards of a station.

This forum never ceases to amaze me.

The first person to self-evacuate didn’t wait an hour.
 

amcluesent

Member
Joined
19 Dec 2010
Messages
877
Why not release clouds of sedative gas in the carriages just to be sure that pax won't interfere with the smooth running of the railways?
 

ComUtoR

Established Member
Joined
13 Dec 2013
Messages
9,455
Location
UK
No.

These are human beings and paying customers.

If you don’t want people to self-evacuate, don’t keep a crowded train stopped for three hours with no toilets or heating - ESPECIALLY not in an urban area within a few yards of a station.

This forum never ceases to amaze me.

When you self evacuate. Don't then blame the TOC for the problems that then arise. Which came first. The evacuation or the three hour wait. It was already highlighted in a different thread which came first.
 

Ash Bridge

Established Member
Joined
17 Mar 2014
Messages
4,074
Location
Stockport
Perhaps it's time to make an example with some of these selfish irresponsible idiots, after all there is plenty of footage readily available to recognise who they are?
 

Dhassell

Member
Joined
22 Mar 2015
Messages
1,011
Perhaps it's time to make an example with some of these selfish irresponsible idiots, after all there is plenty of footage readily available to recognise who they are?
I read a news article earlier with BTP stating that some of those who bailed could be facing criminal procedures, but even then, I expect they will be let off lightly.
 

GatwickDepress

Established Member
Joined
14 Jan 2013
Messages
2,288
Location
Leeds
Why not release clouds of sedative gas in the carriages just to be sure that pax won't interfere with the smooth running of the railways?
Reminds me of the opening scenes to Battle Royale. Perhaps we should sedate one trainload of passengers a year and have them fight to the death on a tropical island somewhere in Berkshire. Winner gets a free Network Railcard.
 

Ash Bridge

Established Member
Joined
17 Mar 2014
Messages
4,074
Location
Stockport
I read a news article earlier with BTP stating that some of those who bailed could be facing criminal procedures, but even then, I expect they will be let off lightly.

Sadly I too wouldn't be at all surprised if that turned out to be the case.
 

yorkie

Forum Staff
Staff Member
Administrator
Joined
6 Jun 2005
Messages
67,830
Location
Yorkshire
No it is clearly not a good idea. It's not going to happen.

And self-evacuations are not that common either.
 

robbeech

Established Member
Joined
11 Nov 2015
Messages
4,657
When you self evacuate. Don't then blame the TOC for the problems that then arise. Which came first. The evacuation or the three hour wait. It was already highlighted in a different thread which came first.
The almost an hour wait in a cramped heating stuck on full environment with zero communication from the driver not far from a station came first.
Then the self evacuation.
Then the 3 (actually 5) hour wait.
Then the egg.
Then the chicken.
 

theironroad

Established Member
Joined
21 Nov 2014
Messages
3,697
Location
London
People need release the emergency exit mechanism to release the doors anyway. If there was an accident and someone got killed because they had no exit the railways would be in real trouble from a legal health and safety perspective and the press would have afield day.

In my view the railways have got it about right, that said sometimes there is nothing to be done about the stupidity of a small minority of people.

Well they better not use most London tube trains as they have no ability to open the doors from inside in an emergency.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Bromley boy

Established Member
Joined
18 Jun 2015
Messages
4,611
The almost an hour wait in a cramped heating stuck on full environment with zero communication from the driver not far from a station came first.
Then the self evacuation.
Then the 3 (actually 5) hour wait.
Then the egg.
Then the chicken.

Unfortunately the first egress was after more like one hour. This then led to the switch off and the resulting 3-5 hour wait, with the knock on of further egresses.

EDIT - sorry re-reading, you’ve acknowledged that. I would still say the first egress was unreasonable, after an hour stuck on a heated, lit train with driver able to make announcements.

I can understand people exiting cold/dark trains when incommunicado much more.
 

Antman

Established Member
Joined
3 May 2013
Messages
6,842
Perhaps it's time to make an example with some of these selfish irresponsible idiots, after all there is plenty of footage readily available to recognise who they are?

How selfish irresponsible and idiotic was it not to want to be stuck in a train going nowhere in the freezing cold? Think again!
 

GW43125

Established Member
Joined
8 Dec 2014
Messages
2,049
Well they better not use most London tube trains as they have no ability to open the doors from inside in an emergency.

You can climb out of the “door of death” or where the stock doesn’t have one, you can get out through the cab.

If you’re going to hold people in a sealed, cramped metal box without aircon for any length of time, you deserve it when they bail on you.

Has anyone ever passed out on a train stuck somewhere?
 

TheEdge

Established Member
Joined
29 Nov 2012
Messages
4,489
Location
Norwich
Why not release clouds of sedative gas in the carriages just to be sure that pax won't interfere with the smooth running of the railways?

I've been suggesting that for years. Sounds like the perfect solution. My TOC don't agree for some bizarre reason.
 

Via Bank

Member
Joined
28 Mar 2010
Messages
672
Location
London
The first person to self-evacuate didn’t wait an hour.
Well, an hour on a packed train with no toilets is still not really acceptable. Especially so close to the station.

If you're at a stage where your customers want to self evacuate, you're letting them down. End of. Sorry.
 

robbeech

Established Member
Joined
11 Nov 2015
Messages
4,657
I appreciate that the PA system needs electricity and after the batteries run out this will not work but on at least one of the trains (and if we believe people on Twitter some others too) there were no announcements in the first hour or so whilst power was still on. Whether this is the driver not making them or a faulty pa* we do not know but either way passengers like to be informed.


*i’ve said it on here before that many units leave the depot with faulty pa systems. I’ve been told that this is NEVER possible as it is not allowed and I must be wrong, by people who do not seem to travel on those trains.
 

Lucan

Established Member
Joined
21 Feb 2018
Messages
1,211
Location
Wales
The RAIB report into the Abergele accident in the 1840's gives reasons why it is not a good idea to lock passengers in.
I immediately thought of the Armagh disaster of 1889 https://everipedia.org/wiki/Armagh_rail_disaster/ in which there would have been time to evacuate the passengers if it were not for the fact there was only one key (and no staff to spare) to open all the doors. I understood that in the light of disasters such as these it was made illegal to lock passengers in with no means of escape, and IMHO it would be insane otherwise.
 

Antman

Established Member
Joined
3 May 2013
Messages
6,842
I read a news article earlier with BTP stating that some of those who bailed could be facing criminal procedures, but even then, I expect they will be let off lightly.

Do you really think anybody is going to be prosecuted?
 

Harbornite

Established Member
Joined
7 May 2016
Messages
3,634
A better idea would be to lock the trains BEFORE any passengers board. All passengers seem to do is cause trouble...
 

ianBR

Member
Joined
4 Jan 2015
Messages
98
It should not take three hours to evacuate trains that are within walking distance of station platforms. Some of the reports are truly shocking. A 75 year old woman being forced to urinate in front of everyone on a packed train with no toilets.

If passengers were given regular updates of what was happening and could see that action was being taken I doubt they would find it so necessary to self-evacuate. Surely after one hour of a train being stuck in central london it should be possible to line up an evacuation with local station staff.
Clearly things would happen more quickly if the train was filling with smoke and the industry clearly doesn't appreciate how horrific conditions are onboard packed commuter trains when things go wrong.
 

pemma

Veteran Member
Joined
23 Jan 2009
Messages
31,474
Location
Knutsford
Is it time to stop the ability to open doors like this from the inside so this can't happen?
Yes, I understand fire

Do you? As you realise fire can prevent staff from reaching a certain part of the train or making announcements which are heard by passengers in that part, you seem to be suggesting it's OK for passengers in that part of a train to suffer serious consequences including death because in some rare instances passengers have self evacuated when it's not appropriate to do so. Would you think it's OK for a member of on board staff to put in a situation where they might die just to make an example if one or two guards hadn't been following safety procedures correctly?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top