• Our booking engine at tickets.railforums.co.uk (powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

Thameslink Services/Timetable from May 20th 2018

Status
Not open for further replies.

jon0844

Veteran Member
Joined
1 Feb 2009
Messages
28,058
Location
UK
I doubt whether GTR would risk opening the flood gates of claims without mentioning the DfT's role in the debacle, (and you taking on the crown in small claims court is a whole new challenge).

I can't see GTR blaming the DfT over this at all.
 
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

ijmad

Established Member
Joined
7 Jan 2016
Messages
1,810
Location
UK
Interestingly there are a considerable number of services today, especially the Luton-Rainhams, today coming through the core from the north and terminating in Platform 1 at Blackfriars.

Is this a new tactic by GTR to run more trains on the routes the drivers know?
 

Teflon Lettuce

Established Member
Joined
22 Aug 2013
Messages
1,750
Still no improvement with no northbound TL Bedfords from 1508 until 1626 just now.

A Luton skip-stop left STP 5 late at 1548 absolutely rammed, interestingly it arrived at Radlett 4 early despite heaving with passengers. But looking at RTT, the timetable has so much padding - 7 mins to do Borehamwood>Radlett?!

I question if this ongoing misery will be prolonged as the few trains that do run will seem to run to time and reflect well on TL as opposed to the actual, currently dire situation (1h15 min gap, airport pax on stoppers, over 30 mins to St Albans, 45 to Luton on a weekday at school time/shoulder peak)
how on earth have TL services become so bad that there are huge gaps on the BedPan section? there's no way that can be due to lack of route knowledge surely?
 

ChiefPlanner

Established Member
Joined
6 Sep 2011
Messages
7,787
Location
Herts
how on earth have TL services become so bad that there are huge gaps on the BedPan section? there's no way that can be due to lack of route knowledge surely?

An incredibly good question - living in SAC , and dropped daughter to LAP by car (for the bus) , as the service just does not look like you can rely on it at the moment , even for a simple midday journey. Must be some issues with the driver relocation trek from Bedford to Luton and SAC.
 

JaJaWa

Established Member
Joined
14 Feb 2013
Messages
1,705
Location
Be interested on

1. How much we have lost because of this in terms of revenue? No-one uses the service anymore unless they have no choice preferring to drive to north London at weekends. (How we will look back at struggling to get onto a 4 Car 387 with happiness)

2. How much GTR have lost.

I suspect as it is a management contract 2 is around £0. In fact wouldn’t surprise me if GTR are making a profit out of this.

£10 million, paid in advance

10million.jpg

Source: https://www.londonreconnections.com/2018/the-timetable-change-accepting-the-blame/
 
Last edited:

Bishopstone

Established Member
Joined
24 Jun 2010
Messages
1,478
Location
Seaford
I’ve noticed a number of ex-Rainham services, running to time, lose 10-15 minutes at or around the Dartford station call. Is this a driver change location where (per Finsbury Park) the relief is sometimes not ready to take over the train?
 

Chris999999

Member
Joined
22 Jun 2010
Messages
238
Thanks for this. Agree best £10M ever. Also backs up my view they have no incentive to fix this mess. It will be a long summer.
So by accepting £10M the Dft have given Govia Thameslink an incentive to run as few trains as possible before October. This can be classed as a complete success. Bonuses and awards will no doubt be given to senior management in both the Dft and Govia for their achievements.
 

hwl

Established Member
Joined
5 Feb 2012
Messages
7,398
Thanks for this. Agree best £10M ever. Also backs up my view they have no incentive to fix this mess. It will be a long summer.
The £10m was for 2 years (16-17 and 17-18) so £5m p.a.
£5m very well spent for the current year to September and virtually zero incentive to worry about the short term but to sort everything for September when they get hit...
 

Failed Unit

Established Member
Joined
26 Jan 2009
Messages
8,881
Location
Central Belt
The £10m was for 2 years (16-17 and 17-18) so £5m p.a.
£5m very well spent for the current year to September and virtually zero incentive to worry about the short term but to sort everything for September when they get hit...

I hope this comes back to haunt DFT. GTR had no incentive to make sure this worked. They knew no matter how bad it was they were untouchable.

They are yet again basically sticking 2 fingers up at us passengers.
 

MrCub

Member
Joined
23 May 2009
Messages
260
Location
SE England
I have to go to an event in London tomorrow. I will be travelling from Luton and I want to get to the event in west London at 0930ish. When do you think I should set off?
 

Failed Unit

Established Member
Joined
26 Jan 2009
Messages
8,881
Location
Central Belt
I have to go to an event in London tomorrow. I will be travelling from Luton and I want to get to the event in west London at 0930ish. When do you think I should set off?

I tend to use as a rule. 1 hour before I would set off pre new timetable.
 

RichJF

Member
Joined
2 Nov 2012
Messages
1,100
Location
Sussex
Very very effective journey on TL today. Got to East Croydon on time & there was a Peterborough service on Pl 1 running late. TL train left and flew through to London Bridge then swiftly into the core and up to St Pancras early. TL train then quickly dispatched into the Canal Tunnels. I had time for a tea before I checked into Eurostar.

Credit where credit is due.
 

Bornin1980s

Member
Joined
4 Apr 2017
Messages
491
It's far too early to predict what will be happening at the end of July. But yes, your ticket will be valid via Victoria and the tube unless it says Not Underground.

I know quite a few drivers who religiously check departure boards as a primary source of info for calling patterns. Rather worrying really. But often a good idea.



A lot of people are just aiming for any available parallel service (eg. using Victoria vice London Bridge) and seem to have worked out some sort of approximate alternative which avoids TL at least in Central London. It’s definitely noticeable when passengers are working around cancelled TL services at places like London Bridge. Often, regulars are just completely discounting TL platforms and even trains which are running. It will be ages, if ever, before trust is regained.



Definitely a spiral of doom. More services need more drivers who can’t train on fewer services...



Some are. I’ve attempted to catch a couple today (without success) - but it seemed most of them ran between mid morning and early afternoon.

Some are running but unpredictable. As I understand it, if your ticket is a walk up or advance ticket routed any permitted with the Maltese cross symbol it includes cross London LUL travel.

Beaten to it by MikeWh

90% of them were cancelled this afternoon.

Staff at Finsbury Park (where a Horsham bound train gave up this morning for lack of a driver) were telling people their tickets were valid whatever reasonable route they choose to use to get to their destination (although the test would be whether the tube staff would really accept "not valid on the underground" tickets).

The Thameslink disruptions page explicitly states that you may travel by

Peterborough to Horsham services are certainly a bit flaky at the moment. I wouldn't be putting my trust in a direct service at the moment. Today, a Horsham to Peterborough service was non-operational from Horsham. It crawled out of the sidings at Gatwick Airport heading northbound about 20 minutes late. On reaching Finsbury Park, the delay grew to 50 minutes so my guess is this was awaiting a driver to take the train north to Peterborough.

Things may improve by July, but I would suggest catching the first available services from STP to Gatwick Airport and change there for Horsham. Southern are still operating Bognor Regis and Portsmouth services via Horsham from Victoria which stop at Gatwick.

Sorry about the late reply, but thank you all. I haven't actually booked my ticket yet (I know, I am running dangerously late). Looks like I would have to book to take the tube to Victoria. After that, the final leg of the journey will actually be on Southern, a notorious franchise in itself. Does anyone know if that service is reliable?

Also, would a ticket for the tube plus Southern journey also be valid on Thameslink, should that service improve?
 

otomous

Member
Joined
5 Oct 2011
Messages
444
N
how on earth have TL services become so bad that there are huge gaps on the BedPan section? there's no way that can be due to lack of route knowledge surely?

No. It’s because the new roster will have been done on the basis that all drivers signed the required routes, and so drivers with BedPan knowledge may now not be rostered on, or rostered to a different route, whilst no driver is available for the BedPan work.
 

mugam4

Member
Joined
24 Feb 2016
Messages
135
After that, the final leg of the journey will actually be on Southern, a notorious franchise in itself. Does anyone know if that service is reliable?
Quietly brilliant. The new timetable was delivered smoothly, has improved things and is broadly positive.
 

tsr

Established Member
Joined
15 Nov 2011
Messages
7,400
Location
Between the parallel lines
Quietly brilliant. The new timetable was delivered smoothly, has improved things and is broadly positive.

Broadly speaking, I think the lack of publicity compared with Thameslink says a lot.

Generally, it's working, with only the overcrowding spilling over from other routes causing major discomfort. As, if and when TL settles down and takes its fair share of passengers, a lot of the delays caused by special stop orders should decrease too.

There are some tweaks which need to be made - I sense more trains from East Croydon need to call at Balham, for example - but this can always be looked at in future, provided enough people are proven to want this sort of thing (nb. that is obviously not the only issue arising!).
 

Bedpan

Established Member
Joined
4 Feb 2010
Messages
1,287
Location
Harpenden
It's my first post in this forum in about a decade, so I'll have a nice rant.

They've spent countless years giving Thameslink stations longer platforms, to allow them in turn to have longer newer trains that even tell you which toilet is available. The Moorgate branch was closed and we got a nice new Farringdon. They've turned London Bridge from one of the biggest bottlenecks in the country into a properly laid out bit of railway, consining long waits on the infamous platform 6 to the bins of history. They built tunnels linking the ECML to St Pancras. They've built a station with entrances both sides of the Thames!

Yet, somehow, over the many many years this other work has been going on, someone forgot that they've needed to get drivers trained up to actually drive the trains. It beggars belief that all this time, effort, money (and disruption to the public) has given us some great infrastructure, but nobody has bothered to invest in the manpower to use it.

The people responsible need to be publicly buggered with a fish, on prime time TV (right after Love Island) each and every day until a proper timetable is delivered.

Yes I was beginning to wonder where you had got to Table 52!

Frankly I'm not convinced that the infrastructure is that wonderful. The article on Thameslink 2000 in the January 1992 issue of the Railway magazine, which I happened to come across when clearing out the loft (a long ongoing job but I am up to September 1994 as I read and then box up my collection of RM's) told of four platforms under Kings Cross (but we only got two at St Pancras), four through platforms at Blackfriars, but we only got two through platforms there, wonderful new trains with trolley service, grouped into Flyer Metro for longer/shorter distance, etc etc. i.e infrastructure which would help to provide some resilience. Whether or not it will all work as it is, we will have to wait and see. But the fact that the bay platforms at Blackfriars aren't accessible from London Bridge is already casing a problem with the Horsham to Blackfriarses which are having to be diverted via Tulse Hill. Then there's the no tables/no armrests class 700 units where yes, they tell you when there is a free toilet, but you dare not use it for fear that your haemorrhoids will explode after being bounced around whilst sitting on a concrete seat for God knows how long. How much extra would it have cost to provide full access to the bay platforms at Blackfriars, or better still four through platforms accessible from all lines, and maybe a third platform at St Pancras, based as an additional percentage of the total £6.5 billion cost of the upgrade? And maybe providing 4 car units as rolling stock so that they can better be accommodated in sidings which aren't long enough for 12 car trains, and so that a complete train doesn't have to be taken out of service when a few carriages are covered in graffiti (not that that matters too much at the moment as there isn't anybody available to drive them.

Mind you, my bet is that all this is going to pale into insignificance in a year or two if/when we come out of the EU and have to set up border controls.
 

talldave

Established Member
Joined
24 Jan 2013
Messages
2,184
The £10m was for 2 years (16-17 and 17-18) so £5m p.a.
£5m very well spent for the current year to September and virtually zero incentive to worry about the short term but to sort everything for September when they get hit...
Does "until September 2018" mean to the end of September? In which case we can be sure that 1st October will be GTR's target date to get the timetable running.
 

Failed Unit

Established Member
Joined
26 Jan 2009
Messages
8,881
Location
Central Belt
Is the revised timetable (which GTR refuse to publish) actually real now

For example
0657 and 0727 Cambridge- London haven’t ran at all this week. Are the formally withdrawn.

Leave a nice big rush hour gap for many people on a route all drivers will know. (So I assume it is lack of traction knowledge cancelling them)
 

philjo

Established Member
Joined
9 Jun 2009
Messages
2,892
Is the revised timetable (which GTR refuse to publish) actually real now

For example
0657 and 0727 Cambridge- London haven’t ran at all this week. Are the formally withdrawn.

Leave a nice big rush hour gap for many people on a route all drivers will know. (So I assume it is lack of traction knowledge cancelling them)

The 0727 ran today and I think on Monday as well, though they were not advertised until a few minutes before the train left Cambridge.

http://www.realtimetrains.co.uk/train/O08445/2018/06/13/advanced

http://www.realtimetrains.co.uk/train/O07570/2018/06/11/advanced
 

Failed Unit

Established Member
Joined
26 Jan 2009
Messages
8,881
Location
Central Belt
The 0727 ran today and I think on Monday as well, though they were not advertised until a few minutes before the train left Cambridge.

http://www.realtimetrains.co.uk/train/O08445/2018/06/13/advanced

http://www.realtimetrains.co.uk/train/O07570/2018/06/11/advanced

That is good for planning ahead.

Speaking to others that use the line that is their biggest frustration with this whole shambles you just don’t know. You leave home and check on the journey planner. Then half way to the station they cancel the train you were walking to get. Or like in these examples. You check and they are not running so you go for a slow train instead. Only to find out later it ran.

We are simple creatures- tell us what is running or not the day before. Then keep it the same. This last minute addition is as bad to be honest as the cancellations. “Look at what you could have won” you drove because you expected the train to be cancelled- it wasn’t.
 

jon0844

Veteran Member
Joined
1 Feb 2009
Messages
28,058
Location
UK
WGC has had a shocking service this morning. Everything advertised has run! This must be the first reliable morning since the new timetable came in.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top