• Our booking engine at tickets.railforums.co.uk (powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

"Homeless" person removed from Megabus in the middle of the night

Status
Not open for further replies.

extendedpaul

Member
Joined
11 Nov 2010
Messages
690
Location
Caerphilly and Kent
On the Megabus twitter page on Monday there's a lengthy multiple tweet account of a "homeless" man being made to leave an overnight service to Scotland following protests to the driver from other passengers about his strong body/urine odour. There is no allegation of antisocial behaviour, just the smell caused.

The (elderly) man was trying to get to Birmingham, the first stop. It is not clear whether he had purchased a ticket but I suspect he had sneaked on to the coach. The person tweeting is very critical of the complaining passengers and disagrees with the driver's decision to "de-coach" him somewhere north of London, presumably a Motorway services area, at about 1am. The brief "hope he was okay" reply on Megabus Twitter has caused further criticism.

There were clearly conflicting views as another passenger gave him money for food and a shower. The driver must have been in a difficult position faced with some passengers wanting him removed and others like the person complaining on twitter believing that was uncalled for. Personally I think he should have been allowed to stay on board to Birmingham even without a ticket.

What are other forum members' views ?

https://twitter.com/cmpunksnotdead/status/1051126287698407424
Conor McLeod said:
Humans can be the least compassionate creatures in existence. On a @megabusuk from London to Glasgow last night and a homeless, non-English man was on the bus going to Birmingham.

He did smell and had maybe peed himself, but instead of anyone offering support people on the bus were calling him names and telling him to **** off and sit elsewhere. He had the full back row to himself, there's a downstairs and an upstairs, he could have been sat away from everyone and the smell could have been masked, it wasn't unbearable and I was one of the closest to him yet passengers asked for him to be kicked off the bus which the driver did for hygiene reasons, fair enough a guy gave him £13 to get a shower and a coffee but who knows why that man had to be in Birmingham and now he's dropped off at 1 in the morning with nowhere to sleep except outside in the rain because people couldn't make half the journey holding their noses or moving down to the front of the coach.

Brain dead humans without a compassionate bone in their body. He was a older man, who knows what mental state he was in or if he was even homeless. He could have just been someone's grandparent who's had an accident, it's disgusting the way people treat other people sometimes.
Imagine someone treated someone in your family with that kind of disregard and disrespect. Asked the driver why can't the downstairs folk move upstairs and leave him downstairs as it was only a further 2 hour journey, you've already taken him an hour away from London Victoria without any complaints but he had to get off. Maybe it's policy, but ...
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

transportphoto

Established Member
Associate Staff
Quizmaster
Joined
21 Jan 2010
Messages
4,584
It’s going to be hard to hold an opinion given we don’t know so much - the exact chain of events is missing, and we’ll never know the Driver’s rationale for the decisions s/he made at the time.
 

AJW12

Member
Joined
20 Feb 2018
Messages
121
Location
Teddington
Would agree with the above. But since you asked, assuming that it was true he had no ticket and was making the journey unpleasant for dangerous passengers, I can see why they'd do it. It would have set a dangerous precedent that anyone can just jump on their services without a ticket....
 

yorkie

Forum Staff
Staff Member
Administrator
Joined
6 Jun 2005
Messages
67,840
Location
Yorkshire
Can you edit your post to include a link and quote please?

I don't see why someone should be conveyed if they have sneaked on with no intention to pay and are in a state that is inconveniencing other passengers; on the railway that would likely lead to prosecution.

Edit: I have edited the opening post to include a link and quote, in compliance with forum rules.

There doesn't appear to be a suggestion that no ticket was held. Conor McLeod says that no-one complained, though he does say people swore and called him names, which doesn't sound acceptable to me. That said, Conor McLeod also on record swearing and calling people names too...
 
Last edited:

goblinuser

Member
Joined
12 May 2017
Messages
292
No one wants someone who stinks the bus out, especially on a long overnight coach trip.
And if they haven't even bought a ticket... Well I don't know how they expect to remain on the coach.
 

gingerheid

Established Member
Joined
2 Apr 2006
Messages
1,498
I certainly wouldn't want to travel on an overnight coach with someone that stank, and who "maybe" (not being able to tell says a lot in itself...) peed himself - kudos to Megabus for doing the right thing.
 

Bletchleyite

Veteran Member
Joined
20 Oct 2014
Messages
97,895
Location
"Marston Vale mafia"
I certainly wouldn't want to travel on an overnight coach with someone that stank, and who "maybe" (not being able to tell says a lot in itself...) peed himself - kudos to Megabus for doing the right thing.

I would similarly expect that an adult who had urinated on himself (whatever the background) would be removed from the coach for reasons of hygiene. Obviously were it a serious medical condition e.g. epileptic fit that was the cause I'd expect an ambulance to be arranged to meet the coach, but otherwise it's not an acceptable condition in which to travel. Coaches don't allow hot food, and TBH I'd rather share a coach with 50 people eating Burger Stink or Kentucky Fried Rat (neither of which is actually allowed) than people stinking of a public lavatory.

The difficulty it presents, though, is where to remove him - a motorway service station is not a suitable place to leave a pedestrian. If someone is removed from a long distance train it will typically be at a major station with staff (or BTP if relevant) on hand.
 

Journeyman

Established Member
Joined
16 Apr 2014
Messages
6,295
While I'd like to think I'm a decent human being, I think it was right to eject someone from the bus who was clearly - whether intentionally or not - causing distress to other passengers. It could have been handled better, but ultimately the driver is responsible to his employers and for the safety of his passengers, and I don't see what else he could have done.
 

richw

Veteran Member
Joined
10 Jun 2010
Messages
11,234
Location
Liskeard
Perfectly reasonable to eject a passenger who is creating an unpleasant atmosphere for everyone else.
There is possibly a duty of care regarding where you eject someone. Not in a lay-by in the middle of nowhere for example.
 

Mwanesh

Member
Joined
14 May 2016
Messages
792
I also think it should just have been worded as a man not homeless non English man.Drivers are in a difficult job with social media these days.
 

Ginge_dave

Member
Joined
26 Oct 2014
Messages
8
I think it’s incredibly sad that so many think that to reject someone is right. However unconfortable it is for others, just stop and consider how uncomfortable it is for him! Kick him while he’s down....
...or show some compassion!
 

Ginge_dave

Member
Joined
26 Oct 2014
Messages
8
Speak to him. Treat him as a human, not a inconvenience. Well done to the person who gave him help to shower and eat. Maybe if more people selflessly gave than scorned and judged, then he’d be in a better place. I’d hope someone was there to help me rather than eject me
 

James101

Member
Joined
11 Oct 2017
Messages
142
I wonder if the original poster, so keen to seem compassionate on Twitter, stayed behind at the services to ensure the wellbeing and safe onward journey of the man? :rolleyes:
 

Astradyne

On Moderation
Joined
14 Mar 2015
Messages
350
And to think we had a user say that he would rather soil himself than disembark from a stuck train in another thread .... Yep this would be a person of similar disposition! Nice people!
 

Baxenden Bank

Established Member
Joined
23 Oct 2013
Messages
4,017
Wasn't there, can't comment on the individual, his circumstances, the other passengers or the driver.
But:
The Public Service Vehicles (Conduct of Drivers, Inspectors, Conductors and Passengers) Regulations 1990
The conduct of passengers
6.—(1) No passenger on a vehicle shall–
<snip>
(k)remain on the vehicle, when directed to leave by the driver, inspector or conductor on the following grounds–
(i)that his remaining would result in the number of passengers exceeding the maximum seating capacity or the maximum standing capacity marked on the vehicle in accordance with the Public Service Vehicles (Carrying Capacity) Regulations 1984(1);
(ii)that he has been causing a nuisance; or
(iii)that his condition is such as would be likely to cause offence to a reasonable passenger or that the condition of his clothing is such that his remaining would be reasonably expected to soil the fittings of the vehicle or the clothing of other passengers;​

link:
https://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/1990/1020/regulation/6/made

I have made the mistake of sitting in a seat recently vacated by someone with a hygiene / bodily fluids problem (for whatever reason).

I would not wish others to have to suffer the same fate. Spend the rest of your day stinking of long-term non-washed sweat or stale p**s.

Would you want to?
 

philthetube

Established Member
Joined
5 Jan 2016
Messages
3,762
I think it’s incredibly sad that so many think that to reject someone is right. However unconfortable it is for others, just stop and consider how uncomfortable it is for him! Kick him while he’s down....
...or show some compassion!
And tomorrow night he thinks, "that was a nice place to sleep, I will return tomorrow" In the meantime other passengers thinlk,"not doing that again, can't put up with that smell". Very soon no megabus and many of the less financially well off members of the community can't afford to travel.

He decided to get on the bus, whether or not he had a ticet is important, if he had one then I feel that Megabus, moraly, though not legally had obligations to get him to where he was going, though they could have pointed out that he would not be allowed to travel again. If no ticket then not their problem, social services or police to sort.
 

richw

Veteran Member
Joined
10 Jun 2010
Messages
11,234
Location
Liskeard
I had a “soap dodger” sit in the so called suicide seat on my E400 on Saturday. He then had the cheek to ask me to shut my cab window which I’d opened to ventilate my cab to reduce the odour... I couldn’t hold my breath for 2 hours!!! He was politely told my window would be remaining open as it’s my space and suggested he may like to move to a seat further back.

On a similar subject albeit non transport, a stinky person was in front of me in a coffee shop queue last week. As the man turned around to walk away the coffee shop worker febreezed his back! I tried to hold my giggle whilst stinky man was still in front of me!
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top