• Our booking engine at tickets.railforums.co.uk (powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

Number of coaches on UK mainline rail tours.

Status
Not open for further replies.
Joined
18 Aug 2018
Messages
704
Does anyone know why many rail tours seem to be limited to 13 coaches. I know the number of coaches depends on the number of tickets as there's no point in running 12 if you can only fill 9. However, the Flying Scotsman trip to Devon and Cornwall in 2018 was extremely popular and sold out and still only had 12 or 13. Why didn't they just add more coaches to make more money? The most I have ever seen, at least in Devon and Cornwall is 13 coaches.

I may be missing something but surely they can go more than 13 (12 + support), or are they limited?

Does anyone know if they are allowed more and if they're not then why?
 
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

Jedipickles

Member
Joined
18 Oct 2011
Messages
173
Location
Perth, Scotland
It would be limited by weight of the train - as the consist would have to transverse gradients etc
Plus there's platforms lengths and signals to consider as well
 

AM9

Veteran Member
Joined
13 May 2014
Messages
14,272
Location
St Albans
It would be limited by weight of the train - as the consist would have to transverse gradients etc
Plus there's platforms lengths and signals to consider as well
Apart from the tours using preserved Stanier 8Fs, I doubt that most of the other locos could keep to the available paths with much more than 400t trailing loads, which might have to include a 100t diesel as backup on the prime routes.
 

ac6000cw

Established Member
Joined
10 May 2014
Messages
3,157
Location
Cambridge, UK
as the consist would have to transverse gradients etc
...especially in relation to the Devon banks, as mentioned by the OP, which are both steeply graded and twisty. Much more territory for 2-8-0 8F than 'racehorse' Pacific haulage, more so if it's raining...

which might have to include a 100t diesel as backup on the prime routes.
...but that can haul itself (and provide banking assistance as needed on the hills), so it should be a help not hindrance.
 

UP13

Member
Joined
27 Jul 2018
Messages
373
...but that can haul itself (and provide banking assistance as needed on the hills), so it should be a help not hindrance.

Diesels are switched off where possible - people tend to complain about hearing a diesel growling instead of a steam engine puffing.

It is pretty much impossible for a driver yo only apply the exact amount of power just to haul itself. In reality the diesel will be assisting the train or will be a burden on the steam engine.
 
Joined
9 Apr 2016
Messages
1,909
If it is not possible to add extra coaches then i think the busy popular railtours should be standard class only in order to give them more capacity. The first class carriages have a much lower capacity and so carry less people.
 

Peter Mugridge

Veteran Member
Joined
8 Apr 2010
Messages
14,830
Location
Epsom
If it is not possible to add extra coaches then i think the busy popular railtours should be standard class only in order to give them more capacity. The first class carriages have a much lower capacity and so carry less people.

The premium on the first class tickets, though, outweighs the extra capacity in terms of income - and it's the income which is the important bit for the operator...
 

Cowley

Forum Staff
Staff Member
Global Moderator
Joined
15 Apr 2016
Messages
15,787
Location
Devon
The premium on the first class tickets, though, outweighs the extra capacity in terms of income - and it's the income which is the important bit for the operator...
Absolutely. Hence the continuing success of trains like The Belmond British Pullman etc.
 
Joined
18 Aug 2018
Messages
704
If it is not possible to add extra coaches then i think the busy popular railtours should be standard class only in order to give them more capacity. The first class carriages have a much lower capacity and so carry less people.

Unlike the scheduled services run by the likes of GWR, XC, Virgin trains etc. capacity on rail tours is not a concern. Companies like path finder tours don't care if they're carrying 150 passengers paying 300 pounds each, or 300 passengers paying 150. The revenue will be the same no matter what.
 

hooverboy

On Moderation
Joined
12 Oct 2017
Messages
1,372
Does anyone know why many rail tours seem to be limited to 13 coaches. I know the number of coaches depends on the number of tickets as there's no point in running 12 if you can only fill 9. However, the Flying Scotsman trip to Devon and Cornwall in 2018 was extremely popular and sold out and still only had 12 or 13. Why didn't they just add more coaches to make more money? The most I have ever seen, at least in Devon and Cornwall is 13 coaches.

I may be missing something but surely they can go more than 13 (12 + support), or are they limited?

Does anyone know if they are allowed more and if they're not then why?

certainly depends on tractive effort vs trailing weight/gradients etc.

also depends what type of carriage and time of year.

for winter/early spring railtours adequate heating is required,then you are limited by ETH index of the loco.
from memory 1 carriage = 4ETH.

so as a rough calculation a class 37/47/50(eth index 66) can haul 16 carriages max.

likely similar with steam+mk1 rake steam heating.
 
Last edited:

43096

On Moderation
Joined
23 Nov 2015
Messages
15,302
so as a rough calculation a class 37/47/50(eth index 66) can haul 16 carriages max.
Class 37/4 is not ETH index 66 - something around 30 I believe. The story at the time was that they were spec’d like that as it was adequate for Provincial services use and would prevent InterCity borrowing them as they did with 31/4s when they were short of an ETH Duff.
 

Don Steedy

Member
Joined
28 Jul 2018
Messages
55
Class 37/4 is not ETH index 66 - something around 30 I believe. The story at the time was that they were spec’d like that as it was adequate for Provincial services use and would prevent InterCity borrowing them as they did with 31/4s when they were short of an ETH Duff.

The ETH capability of a 37/4 is rubbish. A bit like the rest of the loco really
 

43096

On Moderation
Joined
23 Nov 2015
Messages
15,302
The ETH capability of a 37/4 is rubbish. A bit like the rest of the loco really
As stated above the low ETH output was for a reason. The second part of your statement is just laughable: given that even the newest 37s are well over 50 years old and some are still in mainline use, to describe them as “rubbish” is patently wrong.
 
Joined
18 Aug 2018
Messages
704
The ETH capability of a 37/4 is rubbish. A bit like the rest of the loco really
Whats wrong with 37's? Lasted for over half a century, make a mega sound, fairly powerful and a low RA rating makes them a very good loco. If not, why do Colas and DRS still use them so much?
 

Journeyman

Established Member
Joined
16 Apr 2014
Messages
6,295
Whats wrong with 37's? Lasted for over half a century, make a mega sound, fairly powerful and a low RA rating makes them a very good loco. If not, why do Colas and DRS still use them so much?

I'd say the 37 is one of the most successful and flexible locos ever to run in this country.
 

6Gman

Established Member
Joined
1 May 2012
Messages
8,432
In the old days (1960s to 1990s) D455 was a standard timing load based on 13 coaches. May be relevant?
 

jopsuk

Veteran Member
Joined
13 May 2008
Messages
12,773
13 carriages of Mark 1 or Mark 2, at ~19.7m each*, is 256m. That's without another 20-25m of steam loco, and ~20m of diesel loco.

There's not many platforms available that can accommodate that, especially at terminals where an over-length train means other platforms are blocked.
 

Spartacus

Established Member
Joined
25 Aug 2009
Messages
2,928
Incidentally, back to railtour lengths, certain operators were for a long time prone to overselling compared to their bid and running with a few extra carriages on the day, so the timings would be out, but then in the railway press it was always blamed on NR for offering unrealistic timings!
 

stuartl

Member
Joined
10 Aug 2014
Messages
167
In the case of the flying scotsman, I seem to remember that the consultants brought in to supervise the restoration said that 11(?) coaches should be the maximum to minimise wear on the engine.
 

tiptoptaff

Established Member
Joined
15 Feb 2013
Messages
3,029
In the case of the flying scotsman, I seem to remember that the consultants brought in to supervise the restoration said that 11(?) coaches should be the maximum to minimise wear on the engine.
I'd hardly call Rielly and Sons "consultants"

They overhauled it on their own. 11 is a reasonable load for an A3
 

STEVIEBOY1

Established Member
Joined
31 Jul 2010
Messages
4,001
Does anyone know why many rail tours seem to be limited to 13 coaches. I know the number of coaches depends on the number of tickets as there's no point in running 12 if you can only fill 9. However, the Flying Scotsman trip to Devon and Cornwall in 2018 was extremely popular and sold out and still only had 12 or 13. Why didn't they just add more coaches to make more money? The most I have ever seen, at least in Devon and Cornwall is 13 coaches.

I may be missing something but surely they can go more than 13 (12 + support), or are they limited?

Does anyone know if they are allowed more and if they're not then why?

I was on a trip yesterday to Cranmore, there were 13 carriages; 11 passenger coaches, a kitchen car and a support coach, plus 2 large diesel locomotives.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top