• Our booking engine at tickets.railforums.co.uk (powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

WCRC loses judicial review in High Court

Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

Bertie the bus

Established Member
Joined
15 Aug 2014
Messages
2,791
Ive seen the same hearsay but am skeptical. I was there. 86259 first ran southbound at preston to try and cross the line and couple, but was instead sent back to platform 3 due to a points issue. Then it went northbound, back and passed us on the road to the left of us where we were waiting , then was stopped for a very long time for another points failure to be resolved.

This more suggests some problem with the electronics or the signaller for preston.

Note that once the issue was resolved we was allowed to go, which doesnt seem likely if the crew of 86259 had SPADed and destroyed 2 sets of points.
Out of interest, what did it do when it ran into platform 3? Did it stop at the south end or towards the middle of the platform at any point or just continue to the north?
 

Wuggie Norple

Member
Joined
9 Sep 2021
Messages
8
Location
Cardiff
Joined
22 Jun 2023
Messages
811
Location
Croydon
Out of interest, what did it do when it ran into platform 3? Did it stop at the south end or towards the middle of the platform at any point or just continue to the north?
It stopped at the south end . What happened excatly in the 2nd movement im not really sure since i went back in the train. All i saw was it passing on the road to the left (facing southbound), then it sitting a few hundred meters north of the loco on the same road as before when i got out about 10 minutes later.
 

Bertie the bus

Established Member
Joined
15 Aug 2014
Messages
2,791
Thanks. I had a suspicion it might have done. I'm not going to speculate on something when I wasn't even there but stopping at the south end of P3 is an unusual thing to do if they had intended to run it to the north of the station due to a points failure.
 

paul1609

Established Member
Joined
28 Jan 2006
Messages
7,246
Location
Wittersham Kent
At the moment, this is correct. However, this report implies that these Mk2a vehicles will be fitted with dual-braking, possibly a first for Mk2 stock:

The VT Mk2s are plain Mk2s sometimes referred to as Mk2z now I believe. Some Mk2 (z)s have already been converted to disc braked air stock for Glasgow push pull services. Mk2a to f were built as new with air clasp brakes.
 

12LDA28C

Established Member
Joined
14 Oct 2022
Messages
3,225
Location
The back of beyond

paul1609

Established Member
Joined
28 Jan 2006
Messages
7,246
Location
Wittersham Kent
Yes indeed, although it is possible to fit CDL to vac-only stock as some operators have proved.
I dont think that its Vac Only thats the sticking point. Its Vac and steam heat only thats the problem because the electrical systems and batteries you get on those coaches are so weak.
 
Joined
22 Jun 2023
Messages
811
Location
Croydon
Thanks. I had a suspicion it might have done. I'm not going to speculate on something when I wasn't even there but stopping at the south end of P3 is an unusual thing to do if they had intended to run it to the north of the station due to a points failure.
That run didnt happen until an hour after, i doubt it was decided immediately after the abortive initial attempt
 

Bletchleyite

Veteran Member
Joined
20 Oct 2014
Messages
97,913
Location
"Marston Vale mafia"
See @1Q18 's reply and also the ex-Chiltern Bubble Cars had CDL, as does LSL's 'FLORA' Bubble Car.

Those all have the "Chiltern" electromagnetic system which would physically fit fine to the WCRC Mk1s (they're the same doors) but the question exists of how to power it - DMU batteries are kept charged properly by the engines. They use an electromagnet fitted to the underframe under the door which connects to a piece of steel on the bottom of the door itself (I think it's that way round anyway) - you can see the extra bit of metal at the bottom of the door.

It might also need some changes in terms of how to deal with vehicles that presumably aren't in fixed formations.
 

12LDA28C

Established Member
Joined
14 Oct 2022
Messages
3,225
Location
The back of beyond
Those all have the "Chiltern" electromagnetic system which would physically fit fine to the WCRC Mk1s (they're the same doors) but the question exists of how to power it - DMU batteries are kept charged properly by the engines.

'FLORA' doesn't have electromagnets at the bottom of the doors like the Chiltern units, it has a bolt system.
 

62484GlenLyon

Member
Joined
30 May 2021
Messages
178
Location
Royston
To pick up from Saturday's RTC train, RTC have sent out a letter saying that they are paying a full refund plus a £30.00 discount on a future tour. This offer is valid for 12 months.
 

mpthomson

Member
Joined
18 Feb 2016
Messages
970
The Mk2s used on the Cumbrian coast a few years ago all had window bars. I did a fair few miles travelling on those.
That's because of the very tight clearances between Workington and Carlisle. The 108s used on the line prior to the Sprinters and Pacers all had window bars as well, at least from the mid 70s.
 

david1212

Established Member
Joined
9 Apr 2020
Messages
1,481
Location
Midlands
Those all have the "Chiltern" electromagnetic system which would physically fit fine to the WCRC Mk1s (they're the same doors) but the question exists of how to power it - DMU batteries are kept charged properly by the engines. They use an electromagnet fitted to the underframe under the door which connects to a piece of steel on the bottom of the door itself (I think it's that way round anyway) - you can see the extra bit of metal at the bottom of the door.

It might also need some changes in terms of how to deal with vehicles that presumably aren't in fixed formations.
I dont think that its Vac Only thats the sticking point. Its Vac and steam heat only thats the problem because the electrical systems and batteries you get on those coaches are so weak.

How practical / difficult would it be to drive a modern alternator from another axle per coach and install a set of modern deep-cycle electric wheelchair type lead-batteries to power the electromagnets? Overnight the batteries could be connected to a 'shore' charger so every day is started fully charged.
 

JonathanH

Veteran Member
Joined
29 May 2011
Messages
18,841
To pick up from Saturday's RTC train, RTC have sent out a letter saying that they are paying a full refund plus a £30.00 discount on a future tour. This offer is valid for 12 months.
That is because of the delay, not because it was formed of CDL fitted Mark 2s.
 

paul1609

Established Member
Joined
28 Jan 2006
Messages
7,246
Location
Wittersham Kent
How practical / difficult would it be to drive a modern alternator from another axle per coach and install a set of modern deep-cycle electric wheelchair type lead-batteries to power the electromagnets? Overnight the batteries could be connected to a 'shore' charger so every day is started fully charged.
I dont think that its technically very difficult to fit cdl to the mk1 stock, the issue is getting the safety approval for acceptance on the mainline. This is tied in with the financial cost given that the Mk1s are also operating on a derogation on crash worthyness. Personally I think that most of the MK1 stock will be retired from the mainline with CDL fitted to some catering vehicles, Pullman Vehicles and possibly some brakes.
 

1Q18

Member
Joined
7 May 2022
Messages
373
Location
Earth
I dont think that its technically very difficult to fit cdl to the mk1 stock, the issue is getting the safety approval for acceptance on the mainline. This is tied in with the financial cost given that the Mk1s are also operating on a derogation on crash worthyness. Personally I think that most of the MK1 stock will be retired from the mainline with CDL fitted to some catering vehicles, Pullman Vehicles and possibly some brakes.
There’s no need to fit CDL to the catering vehicles. Non-passenger vehicles are outside the scope of the regulations.
 

paul1609

Established Member
Joined
28 Jan 2006
Messages
7,246
Location
Wittersham Kent
There’s no need to fit CDL to the catering vehicles. Non-passenger vehicles are outside the scope of the regulations.
My experience is with heritage raiways, dont the railtour companies have kitchen/ buffet vehicles that convey passengers?
 

Bill57p9

Member
Joined
1 Dec 2019
Messages
489
Location
Ayrshire
Presumably use can be switched around to designate any seats in kitchen/buffet vehicles for crew use only. Similarly support coaches fall outside the CDL regulation.
 

1Q18

Member
Joined
7 May 2022
Messages
373
Location
Earth
My experience is with heritage raiways, dont the railtour companies have kitchen/ buffet vehicles that convey passengers?
Kitchen cars (usually converted from the Mk1 RU [Restaurant Unclassified] type) tend to have no passenger accommodation. WCRC do also have several Mk1 RMB (Restaurant Miniature Buffet) vehicles which do, of course, have passenger accomodation and would need CDL fitting.
 

railfan99

Established Member
Joined
14 Jun 2020
Messages
1,325
Location
Victoria, Australia
Or simply have no operable doors in those vehicles (assuming that is allowed, if there are doors immediately available in adjacent coaches?)

Not trying to go OT, but wouldn't that be viewed as problematic given if coaches derailed and (partly?) tipped over, evacuation from such a kitchen car might be even more difficult?
 

12LDA28C

Established Member
Joined
14 Oct 2022
Messages
3,225
Location
The back of beyond
I dont think that its technically very difficult to fit cdl to the mk1 stock, the issue is getting the safety approval for acceptance on the mainline. This is tied in with the financial cost given that the Mk1s are also operating on a derogation on crash worthyness. Personally I think that most of the MK1 stock will be retired from the mainline with CDL fitted to some catering vehicles, Pullman Vehicles and possibly some brakes.

As has been previously mentioned, other TOCs have successfully fitted CDL to Mk1 stock and also significantly improved the crashworthiness of that stock so I don't see why Mk1s should be retired as you suggest.
 

Top