• Our booking engine at tickets.railforums.co.uk (powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

EMR derailed train in Thetford area (06/02)

trebor79

Established Member
Joined
8 Mar 2018
Messages
4,452
quite, and its reminded me actually last year around this time, coming back from Nottingham on a 158, on that exact same line coming back to Norwich, and I was convinced we'd hit a branch or some bit of tree that had dropped near trackside. as there was an almighty bang, followed by what sounded like ballast hitting metal bits as maybe we dragged it along for a few seconds.

so maybe it happens more often than we think if the train doesnt derail.
That was likely a deer. I've had that exact experience a couple of times on that stretch of line. Both times I mentioned to the guard that I'd heard a bang and something under the train, and both times I was told it was "just a deer, I did check from the rear cab".
 
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

dk1

Veteran Member
Joined
2 Oct 2009
Messages
15,983
Location
East Anglia
Considering EMR cancelled the last 2 services Wednesday evening from Nottingham which could have run to Ely (and line was planned to reopen around 2000 so seems odd decision) plus they had the 158 which moved collision unit to Brandon ? There also appears to be a 156 stabled at Norwich so 2 units at eastern end of the route.

No 156s at Norwich but there are two ex-EMR 153s on the test train. One of the 158s was used to drag the unit involved to Brandon & was left with it when I passed around 22:00 last night. The line was supposed to reopen at 20:00 but further complications saw that become 21:30. I was sent in a taxi from Norwich to restart the 20:20 ex-Cambridge from Ely with a 755 dumped there the previous night & after a tedious trip of delays & cautions finally got back to Norwich at 22:57 81mins late. To add insult to injury we had just a couple of passengers as nobody could estimate when we might leave so they were all sent on a RR bus. Another crew was taxied to Cambridge for the 21:15 but I can’t see if that even ran in the end.

Also of note is 6L81 Tunstead-Brandon stone train has now been cancelled today as those 158s are blocking the sidings.

That was likely a deer. I've had that exact experience a couple of times on that stretch of line. Both times I mentioned to the guard that I'd heard a bang and something under the train, and both times I was told it was "just a deer, I did check from the rear cab".

Yes loads of dead dear in the 4ft & sometimes some of the wild sheep. Rather a bang then you’ll hear them going round the wheels &/or hitting all the underframe equipment as the pass down.
 
Last edited:

transportphoto

Established Member
Associate Staff
Quizmaster
Joined
21 Jan 2010
Messages
4,585
158s get fuelled and basic maintenance on Crown Point every night. It'd have meant driving from the damaged cab though.
Fuel, yes. Basic maintenance, no. In any case, what is required here is beyond basic maintenance.

From the grapevine (believe of it what you will) the unit involved in this incident will eventually be taken to Potters at Ely to then be taken by road to wherever.

The unit is on wheel skates so this move to Ely will be at no more than 5mph.
 

trebor79

Established Member
Joined
8 Mar 2018
Messages
4,452
A bit surprised it wasn't dragged to the Richard Johnston siding at Eccles - closer to the incident site, not as heavily used as the stone terminal at Brandon which it's now blocking and looks to be room to get it on a low loader there.
 

Tomnick

Established Member
Joined
10 Jun 2005
Messages
5,840
Fuel, yes. Basic maintenance, no. In any case, what is required here is beyond basic maintenance.

From the grapevine (believe of it what you will) the unit involved in this incident will eventually be taken to Potters at Ely to then be taken by road to wherever.

The unit is on wheel skates so this move to Ely will be at no more than 5mph.
What's required is road transport, wherever's most suitable for that. I understand that Crown Point wouldn't be suitable, but that's because of poor road access rather than it being a Stadler depot. Wymondham would probably have been a better option! The actual reason is that it couldn't be driven from that cab, so wherever it went, it had to be west.

It's off to Ely tonight. No idea why it's 5mph though – skates are usually good for 15mph or so on plain line?
 

dk1

Veteran Member
Joined
2 Oct 2009
Messages
15,983
Location
East Anglia
A bit surprised it wasn't dragged to the Richard Johnston siding at Eccles - closer to the incident site, not as heavily used as the stone terminal at Brandon which it's now blocking and looks to be room to get it on a low loader there.

That surprised me too but must be a good reason. Private siding maybe?
 

Bikeman78

Established Member
Joined
26 Apr 2018
Messages
4,564
quite, and its reminded me actually last year around this time, coming back from Nottingham on a 158, on that exact same line coming back to Norwich, and I was convinced we'd hit a branch or some bit of tree that had dropped near trackside. as there was an almighty bang, followed by what sounded like ballast hitting metal bits as maybe we dragged it along for a few seconds.

so maybe it happens more often than we think if the train doesnt derail.
I've been on a few trains over the years that have run over things. Usually quite trivial with a rattling sound under the train. The most serious was on a sleeper which hit a tree at Pewsey. The front coach was bouncing up and down somewhat as it ran over the debris. Quite impressive given the 120 ton class 47 in front of us. Luckily driver was okay and only minor damage to the loco.
 

driverd

Member
Joined
29 Mar 2021
Messages
550
Location
UK
As other have said, the most sensible recovery would be by road, given the extremely long journey that would need to be undertaken at 5mph on skates. It may also be the case that the damage is beyond the capabilities of Eastcroft (likely, I'd suggest) - I expect the vehicle will probably end up at Doncaster, Crewe, Eastleigh (or similar) for repairs (no idea who EMR generally contract to).

Of consideration here is how this absence will leave the EMR fleet - it's well known to be stretched reasonably thin currently.
 

Anonymous10

Established Member
Joined
19 Dec 2019
Messages
2,080
Location
wales
As other have said, the most sensible recovery would be by road, given the extremely long journey that would need to be undertaken at 5mph on skates. It may also be the case that the damage is beyond the capabilities of Eastcroft (likely, I'd suggest) - I expect the vehicle will probably end up at Doncaster, Crewe, Eastleigh (or similar) for repairs (no idea who EMR generally contract to).

Of consideration here is how this absence will leave the EMR fleet - it's well known to be stretched reasonably thin currently.
I did wonder that, of course its not like there aren't other 158 operators - namely GWR, SWR, Scotrail, Northern and tfw so I suppose a loan in is possible but TFW I doubt due to their additional systems and GWR due to their shortage of stock.
 

6Gman

Established Member
Joined
1 May 2012
Messages
8,432
What's required is road transport, wherever's most suitable for that. I understand that Crown Point wouldn't be suitable, but that's because of poor road access rather than it being a Stadler depot. Wymondham would probably have been a better option! The actual reason is that it couldn't be driven from that cab, so wherever it went, it had to be west.

It's off to Ely tonight. No idea why it's 5mph though – skates are usually good for 15mph or so on plain line?
Used to be 15/20 on plain track, 5 over points and crossings. Had to move a loco on skates from Preston to Crewe once - took several hours and either 2 or (possibly) 3 traincrew!
 

43055

Established Member
Joined
8 Mar 2018
Messages
2,903
As other have said, the most sensible recovery would be by road, given the extremely long journey that would need to be undertaken at 5mph on skates. It may also be the case that the damage is beyond the capabilities of Eastcroft (likely, I'd suggest) - I expect the vehicle will probably end up at Doncaster, Crewe, Eastleigh (or similar) for repairs (no idea who EMR generally contract to).

Of consideration here is how this absence will leave the EMR fleet - it's well known to be stretched reasonably thin currently.

I did wonder that, of course its not like there aren't other 158 operators - namely GWR, SWR, Scotrail, Northern and tfw so I suppose a loan in is possible but TFW I doubt due to their additional systems and GWR due to their shortage of stock.
There was around 5 or so units sat on Etches Park today. Of course these could be waiting to have work done on them.
 

Failed Unit

Established Member
Joined
26 Jan 2009
Messages
8,881
Location
Central Belt
As other have said, the most sensible recovery would be by road, given the extremely long journey that would need to be undertaken at 5mph on skates. It may also be the case that the damage is beyond the capabilities of Eastcroft (likely, I'd suggest) - I expect the vehicle will probably end up at Doncaster, Crewe, Eastleigh (or similar) for repairs (no idea who EMR generally contract to).

Of consideration here is how this absence will leave the EMR fleet - it's well known to be stretched reasonably thin currently.
Could the form the good end into 3 car unit?
 

Failed Unit

Established Member
Joined
26 Jan 2009
Messages
8,881
Location
Central Belt
Probably if they are interested in such a micro-fleet of one. Operationaly it might be easier to store it.
In the past when the 153s were about they did have 153+158, 153+156 and 158+156 combos due to various collision. But see your point a 2 car is easier to diagram then a 3 car. Although now EMR have 3 cars in the fleet, Norwich - Liverpool 3 car is better then 2 with EMRs current lack of stock.
 

TPO

Member
Joined
7 Jun 2018
Messages
348
quite, and its reminded me actually last year around this time, coming back from Nottingham on a 158, on that exact same line coming back to Norwich, and I was convinced we'd hit a branch or some bit of tree that had dropped near trackside. as there was an almighty bang, followed by what sounded like ballast hitting metal bits as maybe we dragged it along for a few seconds.

so maybe it happens more often than we think if the train doesnt derail.

Beech trees are notorious for shedding branches. Never, ever camp under one. And with Ash die-back, the tree becomes very brittle and doesn't take much to snap in. Most conifers are shallow rooted too.

Woodland is a dynamic environment.

TPO
 

liamf656

Member
Joined
2 Aug 2020
Messages
575
Location
Derby
Last edited:

Tomnick

Established Member
Joined
10 Jun 2005
Messages
5,840
I believe this 5Z99 path is the culprit train, it'll be moved from the stone terminal at Brandon to Ely Papworth Sidings

In the middle of the day, taking 4½ hours to get to Ely? Good luck trying to find a margin for that
 

LowLevel

Established Member
Joined
26 Oct 2013
Messages
7,606
In the middle of the day, taking 4½ hours to get to Ely? Good luck trying to find a margin for that
No margin, line is being blocked intentionally with buses provided and trains spinning at Ely.
 

trebor79

Established Member
Joined
8 Mar 2018
Messages
4,452
Why on earth is that being done in the middle of the day rather than at night which would have zero impact on passengers and avoid all of the bus hire, delay repay costs etc?
 

Anonymous10

Established Member
Joined
19 Dec 2019
Messages
2,080
Location
wales
Why on earth is that being done in the middle of the day rather than at night which would have zero impact on passengers and avoid all of the bus hire, delay repay costs etc?
Possibly it's for visibility so it can be monitored for damage?
 

MikeWM

Established Member
Joined
26 Mar 2010
Messages
4,411
Location
Ely
Why on earth is that being done in the middle of the day rather than at night which would have zero impact on passengers and avoid all of the bus hire, delay repay costs etc?

It does feel rather unfortunate for the users of the line who have had a miserable week - with this disruption on Tuesday night and most of Wednesday, then the total signal failure at Ely on Friday afternoon/evening/Saturday morning, only half the timetabled service running all weekend as the EMR Ely-Norwich shuttles didn't run, and now this added weekday closure.
 

Crossover

Established Member
Joined
4 Jun 2009
Messages
9,253
Location
Yorkshire
It looks like the Stansted GA services are being spun at Thetford, too, to work back to Norwich
 

86246

Member
Joined
18 Sep 2013
Messages
326
Why on earth is that being done in the middle of the day rather than at night which would have zero impact on passengers and avoid all of the bus hire, delay repay costs etc?
There were a couple of overnight paths last week but they ended up being cancelled.
 

Crossover

Established Member
Joined
4 Jun 2009
Messages
9,253
Location
Yorkshire
It looks like the train has reached Ely and normal services have resumed on the line through Thetford
 

YorkRailFan

On Moderation
Joined
6 Sep 2023
Messages
1,246
Location
York

dk1

Veteran Member
Joined
2 Oct 2009
Messages
15,983
Location
East Anglia
I would imagine it’s being done for visual checks as on skates for quite a journey. Also EMR drivers at Norwich do not work nights.

Will finally release the other 158 to bolster the depleted 158 fleet. Also allows freight traffic to resume at Brandon.

It looks like the Stansted GA services are being spun at Thetford, too, to work back to Norwich

Wonder if it was talked passed as the signal has been removed from Thetfords up platform in the wrong direction for quite a while as has the one in the up siding.
 

YorkRailFan

On Moderation
Joined
6 Sep 2023
Messages
1,246
Location
York
At around 20:53 hrs on 6 February 2024, a passenger train travelling between Liverpool Lime Street and Norwich derailed after striking trees that had fallen across the track from outside the railway boundary. The train was travelling at 83 mph (134 km/h) when the collision occurred.

The impact with the trees caused the leading wheelset to derail. It subsequently ran on the sleepers and ballast for around 680 metres before the train came to a stop, as a result of the driver’s emergency brake application. There were 31 passengers and 2 staff on the train. One passenger reported suffering a minor injury.

Our investigation will seek to identify the sequence of events that led to the accident. It will also consider:

  • the arrangements in place to manage and control the risks from trees falling on to the railway from outside the railway boundary
  • the structural crashworthiness performance of the cab during the collision
  • the performance of the train in remaining aligned with the track while running derailed
  • any underlying management factors.

I do love some crashworthiness tests of cabs, and I always find it really interesting to watch and look at the results of course. The management factors part will be particularly interesting, I am skeptical anything will happen because of it, but it will be interesting to see what the RAIB says on that front.
 

Nicholas Lewis

Established Member
Joined
9 Aug 2019
Messages
6,129
Location
Surrey

I do love some crashworthiness tests of cabs, and I always find it really interesting to watch and look at the results of course. The management factors part will be particularly interesting, I am skeptical anything will happen because of it, but it will be interesting to see what the RAIB says on that front.
Not sure anything new can be learnt but hopefully it will reveal how handicapped NR are by the system in dealing with trees near the lineside and some improvements to the process can be made.
 

Top