• Our booking engine at tickets.railforums.co.uk (powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

18-car Pendolino

Status
Not open for further replies.

All Line Rover

Established Member
Joined
17 Feb 2011
Messages
5,222
Is the last train from Manchester to London this evening running as doubled-up 9-car Pendolinos, or is this an error with the data feeds?
 
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

zwk500

Veteran Member
Joined
20 Jan 2020
Messages
13,401
Location
Bristol
Almost certainly, it just means they've swapped the sets over and the feed hasn't quite got the update.
 

HamworthyGoods

Established Member
Joined
15 Jan 2019
Messages
3,949
Almost certainly, it just means they've swapped the sets over and the feed hasn't quite got the update.

Mods - wonder if it’s worth having a sticky thread on here explaining RTT stock allocations and how the diagram mis-matches occur as it’s getting raised an awful lot on here recently?
 

TT-ONR-NRN

Established Member
Joined
30 Dec 2016
Messages
10,480
Location
Farnham
I don’t understand why people have to ask this, especially regular posters who surely know our domestic railway network can’t take an 18x 23m train?
 

D365

Veteran Member
Joined
29 Jun 2012
Messages
11,468
I don’t understand why people have to ask this, especially regular posters who surely know our domestic railway network can’t take an 18x 23m train?
A needless statement. It's a cut-and-shut answer.
 

TT-ONR-NRN

Established Member
Joined
30 Dec 2016
Messages
10,480
Location
Farnham
A needless statement. It's a cut-and-shut answer.
Not quite as needless as replying to call it needless, but the statement is simple: for those asking, ask yourself has an eighteen carriage formation ever happened before, if not, that's probably the answer.

I wouldn't be quite so unsympathetic were this not the billionth thread created where such a question has been asked since Know Your Train (a great tool) was introduced, and in many circumstances common sense can answer it! ;)
 

D365

Veteran Member
Joined
29 Jun 2012
Messages
11,468
I wouldn't be quite so unsympathetic were this not the billionth thread created where such a question has been asked since Know Your Train (a great tool) was introduced, and in many circumstances common sense can answer it! ;)
That's the first I have heard of "Know Your Train". Thanks for the heads-up.
 

liamf656

Member
Joined
2 Aug 2020
Messages
575
Location
Derby
Mods - wonder if it’s worth having a sticky thread on here explaining RTT stock allocations and how the diagram mis-matches occur as it’s getting raised an awful lot on here recently?
A basic post explaining all the common misunderstood features would be good. Then you can include the difference between WTT/VAR/STP, explaining that “pathed as” doesn’t equal allocation, and so on
 

m79900

Member
Joined
28 May 2023
Messages
319
Location
North Derbyshire
I don’t think the 390s have multiple working equipment fitted anyway, the Dellners are just so the 57s can rescue them.
 

virgintrain1

Member
Joined
29 Jul 2011
Messages
209
I don’t think the 390s have multiple working equipment fitted anyway, the Dellners are just so the 57s can rescue them.
They were often coupled together during their testing stage.

 

SansHache

Member
Joined
31 Mar 2015
Messages
141
Location
Manchester
A doubled up Pendolino has happened during testing, not in passenger service.

I was involved with that testing, trains 390007 and 390055 (as were) in March 2012. We were investigating pantograph performance at high speed, in support of proposals for the introduction of 6-car 'Baby' Pendolinos to replace Voyagers.
The 6-car trains were planned to operate as 12-car multiple units to Crewe or Chester, before splitting for push-pull loco haulage to North Wales.
On the final night of testing the 18-car test train ran at 125mph with tilt operational between Crewe and Wembley. Total power draw was greater than 12.5MW, so there were several special dispensations in place for these trials.
Sadly all came to nothing following the 2012 WCML refranchise debacle.
 

Attachments

  • Image0710a.jpg
    Image0710a.jpg
    1.5 MB · Views: 148

PudseyBearHST

Member
Joined
28 Sep 2015
Messages
972
Location
South West
I was involved with that testing, trains 390007 and 390055 (as were) in March 2012. We were investigating pantograph performance at high speed, in support of proposals for the introduction of 6-car 'Baby' Pendolinos to replace Voyagers.
The 6-car trains were planned to operate as 12-car multiple units to Crewe or Chester, before splitting for push-pull loco haulage to North Wales.
On the final night of testing the 18-car test train ran at 125mph with tilt operational between Crewe and Wembley. Total power draw was greater than 12.5MW, so there were several special dispensations in place for these trials.
Sadly all came to nothing following the 2012 WCML refranchise debacle.

Were the trains electrically coupled and what was the pantograph arrangement like? Was it the outer pans used on both units? Thanks
 

Merle Haggard

Established Member
Joined
20 Oct 2019
Messages
1,979
Location
Northampton
Sorry, I'm a bit late to the discussion, but on the subject of RTT, what does 'VCN' mean? (as against 'CAN'). Is it the 22.00 P cancellation?
 

krus_aragon

Established Member
Joined
10 Jun 2009
Messages
6,045
Location
North Wales
I don’t understand why people have to ask this, especially regular posters who surely know our domestic railway network can’t take an 18x 23m train?
It's not that far removed from the 15-car Voyagers that Virgin used to run as "blockade busters" way back in the day...
 

SansHache

Member
Joined
31 Mar 2015
Messages
141
Location
Manchester
Were the trains electrically coupled and what was the pantograph arrangement like? Was it the outer pans used on both units? Thanks
Yes, the two trains operated electrically coupled, controlled from the lead cab.
Each train had a special instrumented pantograph installed on the H car.
The multiple unit operated with the instrumented pantograph raised on both trains i.e. with both leading pantographs raised in the Up direction and both trailing pantographs raised in the Down direction. This gave a spacing of 217m between raised pantographs.
 

swt_passenger

Veteran Member
Joined
7 Apr 2010
Messages
31,441
Sorry, I'm a bit late to the discussion, but on the subject of RTT, what does 'VCN' mean? (as against 'CAN'). Is it the 22.00 P cancellation?
I believe it means a train that was entered in the system as a “very short term plan“ VSTP, has been subsequently cancelled.

I’ve also found Tom’s explanation in the RTT discussion thread here:
 

Merle Haggard

Established Member
Joined
20 Oct 2019
Messages
1,979
Location
Northampton
I believe it means a train that was entered in the system as a “very short term plan“ VSTP, has been subsequently cancelled.

I’ve also found Tom’s explanation in the RTT discussion thread here:

Thanks.
 

PudseyBearHST

Member
Joined
28 Sep 2015
Messages
972
Location
South West
Yes, the two trains operated electrically coupled, controlled from the lead cab.
Each train had a special instrumented pantograph installed on the H car.
The multiple unit operated with the instrumented pantograph raised on both trains i.e. with both leading pantographs raised in the Up direction and both trailing pantographs raised in the Down direction. This gave a spacing of 217m between raised pantographs.
Thank you. What’s preventing 2 Class 390s coupling up now and using the electrical couple button in the cab as it’s not something that is allowed now?
 

Sun Chariot

Established Member
Joined
16 Mar 2009
Messages
1,375
Location
2 miles and 50 years away from the Longmoor Milita
Thank you. What’s preventing 2 Class 390s coupling up now and using the electrical couple button in the cab as it’s not something that is allowed now?
The electrical load upon the 25kv infrastructure. Post #13 mentioned: Total power draw was greater than 12.5MW, so there were several special dispensations in place for these trials
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top