All Line Rover
Established Member
- Joined
- 17 Feb 2011
- Messages
- 5,222
Is the last train from Manchester to London this evening running as doubled-up 9-car Pendolinos, or is this an error with the data feeds?
Almost certainly, it just means they've swapped the sets over and the feed hasn't quite got the update.
A needless statement. It's a cut-and-shut answer.I don’t understand why people have to ask this, especially regular posters who surely know our domestic railway network can’t take an 18x 23m train?
Not quite as needless as replying to call it needless, but the statement is simple: for those asking, ask yourself has an eighteen carriage formation ever happened before, if not, that's probably the answer.A needless statement. It's a cut-and-shut answer.
That's the first I have heard of "Know Your Train". Thanks for the heads-up.I wouldn't be quite so unsympathetic were this not the billionth thread created where such a question has been asked since Know Your Train (a great tool) was introduced, and in many circumstances common sense can answer it!
A basic post explaining all the common misunderstood features would be good. Then you can include the difference between WTT/VAR/STP, explaining that “pathed as” doesn’t equal allocation, and so onMods - wonder if it’s worth having a sticky thread on here explaining RTT stock allocations and how the diagram mis-matches occur as it’s getting raised an awful lot on here recently?
They were often coupled together during their testing stage.I don’t think the 390s have multiple working equipment fitted anyway, the Dellners are just so the 57s can rescue them.
I was involved with that testing, trains 390007 and 390055 (as were) in March 2012. We were investigating pantograph performance at high speed, in support of proposals for the introduction of 6-car 'Baby' Pendolinos to replace Voyagers.A doubled up Pendolino has happened during testing, not in passenger service.
I was involved with that testing, trains 390007 and 390055 (as were) in March 2012. We were investigating pantograph performance at high speed, in support of proposals for the introduction of 6-car 'Baby' Pendolinos to replace Voyagers.
The 6-car trains were planned to operate as 12-car multiple units to Crewe or Chester, before splitting for push-pull loco haulage to North Wales.
On the final night of testing the 18-car test train ran at 125mph with tilt operational between Crewe and Wembley. Total power draw was greater than 12.5MW, so there were several special dispensations in place for these trials.
Sadly all came to nothing following the 2012 WCML refranchise debacle.
It's not that far removed from the 15-car Voyagers that Virgin used to run as "blockade busters" way back in the day...I don’t understand why people have to ask this, especially regular posters who surely know our domestic railway network can’t take an 18x 23m train?
Yes, the two trains operated electrically coupled, controlled from the lead cab.Were the trains electrically coupled and what was the pantograph arrangement like? Was it the outer pans used on both units? Thanks
I believe it means a train that was entered in the system as a “very short term plan“ VSTP, has been subsequently cancelled.Sorry, I'm a bit late to the discussion, but on the subject of RTT, what does 'VCN' mean? (as against 'CAN'). Is it the 22.00 P cancellation?
I believe it means a train that was entered in the system as a “very short term plan“ VSTP, has been subsequently cancelled.
I’ve also found Tom’s explanation in the RTT discussion thread here:
RealTimeTrains website
I think you’re doing a great job @Tom Fully agree. :) There is one thing I'm curious about, which I think has been answered before after someone asked, but why do some routes on RTT not show the mileages by the trains when set in detail mode?www.railforums.co.uk
Thank you. What’s preventing 2 Class 390s coupling up now and using the electrical couple button in the cab as it’s not something that is allowed now?Yes, the two trains operated electrically coupled, controlled from the lead cab.
Each train had a special instrumented pantograph installed on the H car.
The multiple unit operated with the instrumented pantograph raised on both trains i.e. with both leading pantographs raised in the Up direction and both trailing pantographs raised in the Down direction. This gave a spacing of 217m between raised pantographs.
The electrical load upon the 25kv infrastructure. Post #13 mentioned: Total power draw was greater than 12.5MW, so there were several special dispensations in place for these trialsThank you. What’s preventing 2 Class 390s coupling up now and using the electrical couple button in the cab as it’s not something that is allowed now?
Ah of course, thanksThe electrical load upon the 25kv infrastructure. Post #13 mentioned: Total power draw was greater than 12.5MW, so there were several special dispensations in place for these trials