• Our booking engine at tickets.railforums.co.uk (powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

45ft Containers on Rail

Status
Not open for further replies.

HSTEd

Veteran Member
Joined
14 Jul 2011
Messages
16,732
They have done for a very long time (easily forkliftable). Others are beginning to copy that concept...
It does potentially offer some interesting possibilities, as some of these containers are potentially small enough to fit on the back of a Transit sized vehicle.
 
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

HSTEd

Veteran Member
Joined
14 Jul 2011
Messages
16,732
Minilink Mark 2?

Well the ultimate objective would food delivery and things like Amazon.
They could load all their deliveries in the correct order at the warehouse and it wouldn't be handled again until the delivery is made.
 

hwl

Established Member
Joined
5 Feb 2012
Messages
7,398
It does potentially offer some interesting possibilities, as some of these containers are potentially small enough to fit on the back of a Transit sized vehicle.
Just too big and certainly to heavy for the 3.5 GVW vehicle segment.
 

HSTEd

Veteran Member
Joined
14 Jul 2011
Messages
16,732
Just too big and certainly to heavy for the 3.5 GVW vehicle segment.
An aluminium quadcon or tricon is not necessarily that heavy.

Quadcon has an empty weight of a few hundred kilos, but a Transit Chassis Cab (Cutawy is apparently the American term) is a couple hundred kilos lighter than the regular van, so the weight disbenefit is not that big.

EDIT:

Transit 350 L2 Chassis Cab apparently has a minimum kerb mass of 1619kg
Transit 350 L2H2 has a minimum kerb mass of 2054kg.
So we save something like 435kg.

So it gives you some weight to play with for a container system.

EDIT #2:

L2H2 has a load capacity of about 10 cubic metres, comparable to a Tricon container.

Tricon container masses down to about 1170kg in Corten steel apparently.

So on the face of it you lose about 700kg of payload mass, but you can the flexibility I mentioned, I wonder how many delivery companies are mass rather than volume limited in normal operation?

Also worth notign that a Tricon, thanks to being a box and taller than a regular transit body (more like a Luton van) could allow a short wheel base design to be built which would get more of the weight back, and also allow shorter turning circles.
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top