So, clearly until there's any judgement made, you cannot say he's a tax avoider.
Actually I was being too generous to Professor Lineker. At the moment, in the eyes of the law, he is a tax evader (not paying the taxes you legally owe), and only if he wins his appeal, does he return to being merely a tax avoider (using legal but ethically questionable means to reduce your tax bill).
He dodged nearly £5m in tax over five years. That's a fair few NHS nurses right there.
Could you be any more condescending?
What do you mean by "evident support"? If you had stopped at "Impartiality if about presenting all views deemed suitable for broadcast", I'd be agreeing with you. In this case you clearly don't agree with Lineker's point of view, therefore you don't think it's suitable for broadcast.
You've no idea when I was born. Stop being so patronising.
I'm sorry if you find it patronising or condescending, but all you need to do to understand what is meant by evident support, is read what I wrote. The BNP's opinion was only considered worthy of of broadcast by the BBC once they'd shown a certain level of electoral support.
My opinion that Lineker is an ignorant Idiot who needs to read a few history books before speaking about things he clearly doesn't understand, doesn't matter, because I am not in charge of BBC editorial decisions.
The BBC is under no obligation to treat everyone's opinion as if it was equal and special. If that's what you think impartiality means, then to my generation, you are showing how old you are, because believing everyone is special and nobody's firmly held beliefs can be challenged even if they are talking nonsense, is a very recent phenomenon.
We're better off with the BBC than without, but it really needs reform. Aside from the recent issue of political appointments in it, for a long time it has seemingly tried to take impartiality too far by giving more weighting to groups than their representation in society, and also trying to give voices to those pedalling factually incorrect stuff to "balance" against factual stuff. We saw this with Fiona Bruce's remarks about domestic violence on Thursday's Question Time, which has now led to her stepping down from Refuge, albeit the Lineker affair largely overshadowed it.
If there is one thing I'd advise the BBC to do, it's to learn this quote: "If someone say's it's raining, and another person says it's dry, the job of a journalist is not the cite both, it's to look out of the [expletive] window and see who is correct."
I don't know where you get your information from, but the BBC have always taken the view that balance is not about airing nonsense alongside truth. And the BNP controversy was all about the often very difficult task of giving the right weight to opinions.