LNW-GW Joint
Veteran Member
The independent report on this major ATC outage has been published.
It led to many cancellations and delays as a result of ATC being only able to operate in manual mode, around 10% of normal, for a period of 6 hours.
Apart from being very interesting of itself, it is relevant to other major transport outages such as major rail incidents.
The incident was not under the control of airlines, so while the duty of care provisions for delay and cancellation under EU261 were applicable (eg rebooking, refreshments, accommodation), the wider compensation provisions were not.
The customer impact was considerable, with 700K passengers affected by cancellations and delays over several days, despite the original problem being fixed in 6 hours.
The report has few statistics on customer impact, as it proved impossible to obtain the details from the airlines.
As a result the examples given are largely from the media coverage of the event.
Overall, it's estimated that the event cost to the industry was between £75-100 million.
It isn't clear what the total cost to the passengers were; some are still waiting for reimbursement of costs.
Another interesting snippet was that the software in question was from Austrian/German firm Frequentis Comsoft.
The specific issue on the day was the presentation of flight plans including two waypoints with the identical code DVL.
DVL refers to Deauville in France, which was the one intended for the Los Angeles-Paris flight in question, but is also the code for Devil's Lake, North Dakota.
The clash caused the ATC software to go into maintenance mode, and the backup system did the same 20 seconds later.
The software supplier was able to remove the offending flight plan to allow the resumption of full ATC service.
It led to many cancellations and delays as a result of ATC being only able to operate in manual mode, around 10% of normal, for a period of 6 hours.
Apart from being very interesting of itself, it is relevant to other major transport outages such as major rail incidents.
The incident was not under the control of airlines, so while the duty of care provisions for delay and cancellation under EU261 were applicable (eg rebooking, refreshments, accommodation), the wider compensation provisions were not.
The customer impact was considerable, with 700K passengers affected by cancellations and delays over several days, despite the original problem being fixed in 6 hours.
The report has few statistics on customer impact, as it proved impossible to obtain the details from the airlines.
As a result the examples given are largely from the media coverage of the event.
Overall, it's estimated that the event cost to the industry was between £75-100 million.
It isn't clear what the total cost to the passengers were; some are still waiting for reimbursement of costs.
Another interesting snippet was that the software in question was from Austrian/German firm Frequentis Comsoft.
The specific issue on the day was the presentation of flight plans including two waypoints with the identical code DVL.
DVL refers to Deauville in France, which was the one intended for the Los Angeles-Paris flight in question, but is also the code for Devil's Lake, North Dakota.
The clash caused the ATC software to go into maintenance mode, and the backup system did the same 20 seconds later.
The software supplier was able to remove the offending flight plan to allow the resumption of full ATC service.
The impact of the failure was considerable. The CAA has estimated that there were over 700,000 passengers and others who were affected by the failure, often for several days, and this had considerable financial and emotional consequences for them. The Panel has commissioned consumer research which describes some of the experiences of passengers, and this is published alongside this report. In pursuing its work, the Panel has been motivated to draw lessons from the incident which may help the prevention of future incidents, or at least to reduce the scale of the impact on consumers, airlines, airports, and others should they occur. Based on the information provided by the airlines most affected by the incident, the Panel has estimated that the costs to airlines were approximately £65m. In addition, substantial costs were incurred by passengers, airports, tour operators, insurers, and others. The Panel was unable to accurately quantify these costs. It is likely that the total cost was in the region of £75m to £100m.