chorleyjeff
Member
- Joined
- 3 May 2013
- Messages
- 677
I contend that if the service were operated by and as part of the Railway, it matters little what sort of rolling stock is used. As long as there are such niceties as integrated timetabling and ticketing and interchange facilities.
Agreed that it makes through services impossible. In the case of the Esk Valley, they are not a substantial part of its pattern. The same is (or at least, could be) true of many other routes both open and shut. And if costs are substantially reduced, then increased frequency (and hence convenience for those connecting) might be feasible.
In all other respects, why would a vehicle on rubber tyres with steering (vs. a train proper) make any material difference to anyone (except, perhaps, enthusiasts!)?
It would have reduced costs, I suspect, by a big margin. It may even have been a means by which many other routes now sadly long lost might have been retained. It seems to me that running limited stop buses on a paved trackbed (in other words, a train-like service in all respects other than the vehicle itself) would offer trip times commensurate with those seen by branch line trains and much reduced over conventional bus services on conventional roads.
Sounds loke the Runcorn busways.