muddythefish
On Moderation
- Joined
- 13 May 2014
- Messages
- 1,577
Nowt but state-endorsed revenge. Glad we scrapped it.
Quite right.
Capital punishment has no place in a civilised society
Nowt but state-endorsed revenge. Glad we scrapped it.
Quite right.
Capital punishment has no place in a civilised society
Quite right.
Capital punishment has no place in a civilised society
You think we live in a civilised society ?
Don't you ?
When I pick up the newspaper or watch the news I find it increasingly difficult to find anything 'civilised' about society whatsoever, do you think society to be civilised ?
Further reading suggests the Police obviously should have for basically setting this guy up , although at the time that was pretty typical behavior
The Judge should have for the way he led the Jury and was biased against the defendant .
The Jury though Im struggling to see why they should face any comebacks . Studies have proven that a judges summing up is very persuasive to the Jury so I personally dont think the Jury did anything wrong in convicting someone based off the evidence they would have had and the way they where instructed by the Judge .
That is a problem with the newspaper and the news. Sure there are things that we could do better but to imply that what's in the news is representative of the goings on in the world is false.
Sorry, you've stumped me on that one
How legally would those responsible for the unsafe convictions have actually committed the offence of Murder ?
Yes but then the money used to do loads of things could be better spent .
Do you think it would be any cheaper to administer a CJS with the massive and seemingly endless appeal processes that you would have to have in place if you where to execute people . Not to mention a special fund to compensate the families of those wrongfully convicted and executed ?
Good news stories don't sell papers.
What do you do with the increasing number of people who are too dangerous and nasty to turn out on to the streets ? Turn the Isle of Wight in to a Devils' Island/Alcatraz ? There are just some people too nasty to be out and about. My only real objection to the death penalty is that you need to implicitly trust the judicial process and system and we are still a long way from that here.
the California Commission found that the additional cost of confining an inmate to death row, as compared to the maximum security prisons where those sentenced to life without possibility of parole ordinarily serve their sentences, is $90,000 per year per inmate. With Californias current death row population of 670, that accounts for $63.3 million annually.
Indeed, they can of course but our 'civilised' society ensures that there aren't anywhere near as many good stories as bad, but that doesn't mean we can close our eyes and minds and pretend that our society isn't falling to pieces in a sea of violence and self interest
Sorry, you've stumped me on that one
Good news stories don't sell papers.
Indeed, they can of course but our 'civilised' society ensures that there aren't anywhere near as many good stories as bad, but that doesn't mean we can close our eyes and minds and pretend that our society isn't falling to pieces in a sea of violence and self interest
What he said
You have to divorce yourself from the notion that the papers and general news media is here to give us news. Instead they exist to make money like every other business (this is a good thing on its own) and will report whatever they feel makes them the most money[ This means sensationalist headlines which is nearly always bad news and/or rule breaking (would you go and tell everyone you crossed the road safely?) presumably due to human nature. It does not help that plurality in ownership is very weak in this country. Only the Guardian dared publish the Snowden files and next to no mainstream outlet is reporting on the current plans to fatally weaken encryption online.
.
Do you have any evidence to back up your claims that there are increasing numbers that are too dangerous and nasty to be on the streets?
Or are they just sensationalist claims ?
I suppose ill repeat my question because you didnt answer it .
Do you think it would be any cheaper to administer a CJS with the massive and seemingly endless appeal processes that you would have to have in place if you where to execute people . Not to mention a special fund to compensate the families of those wrongfully convicted and executed ?
I don't know but we could always change the laws to make it cheaper.
Am fed up with the so called civilized society garbage. This society benefited from a system that exploited half the planet and still sells and drops bombs on people. Most 'civilisations' have been built on the blood of others so why is there so much uproar about killing those who are a direct threat to you or your family ?
When I pick up the newspaper or watch the news I find it increasingly difficult to find anything 'civilised' about society whatsoever, do you think society to be civilised ?
The evidence from the US is that the death penalty is more expensive than life imprisonment,.
http://www.forbes.com/sites/kellyphillipserb/2011/09/22/death-and-taxes-the-real-cost-of-the-death-penalty/
News agendas are driven by the best stories of the day and nothing else.
Youve gone back round full circle . Youve already admitted you dont trust the judiciary or the state . How do you think changing the law to make the whole process any cheaper is going to fare for people that are wrongfully accused of and charged with crimes .I don't know but we could always change the laws to make it cheaper.
That's the US, where the main cause of death to Death Row prisoners is natural causes or old age . The UK used to schedule hangings for 3-4 weeks after the sentence was given (three Sundays had to elapse)...
But who decides what the best stories of the day are? The editorial teams, who answer to the management teams.
We, the public, have to trust the media to report what is going on. Until social media came along we had no idea how much was going on that wasn't getting reported. These days we are finding out a greater variety of news but from the unofficial channels, so we know more of what is going on but presumably we also know less accurately what is going on.
When I pick up the newspaper or watch the news I find it increasingly difficult to find anything 'civilised' about society whatsoever, do you think society to be civilised ?
In the 19th and first half of the 20th Century it was considered to be adequate. I'm not saying it was right or not, just that saying the cost of "Death Row" prisoners in the USA would be much the same if given life sentences in lieu, as the jail time for many years is equivalent. This cost could be stripped if they had a quicker "turn around"!does that really allow enough time for proper appeal processes to be carried out though ?
How come you say this, yet you criticised me for saying that having children is unethical?
Much better to keep these people locked up for the rest of their lives in a harsher environment and have them be confronted daily as to the impact of their crimes.
The trouble is the high security estate environment is anything but harsh and they are not and never have been confronted daily as to the impact of their crimes.
The trouble is the high security estate environment is anything but harsh and they are not and never have been confronted daily as to the impact of their crimes.
Prisons today are just like holiday camps - full of 1970's entertainers!
(Ba Bom tish!)