• Our new ticketing site is now live! Using either this or the original site (both powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

Bradford Forster Square 4th Platform Funding Announced: what improvements would you like to see made?

Status
Not open for further replies.

MichaelTrains

Member
Joined
9 Jun 2022
Messages
219
Location
Bradford
The new platform and station entrance starting to come along nicely.

I spoke to the Network Rail manager who was there and he said they hope to open the new platform next Easter.

Just in time for the new services to London.

It’s been a long time coming for Bradford.
 

Attachments

  • IMG_0516.jpeg
    IMG_0516.jpeg
    2.9 MB · Views: 75
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

Bantamzen

Established Member
Joined
4 Dec 2013
Messages
9,996
Location
Baildon, West Yorkshire
If anything it's been the opposite.
To go from announcement to "spades in the ground" in six months is lightspeed for the railway!
That's true for the platform, but any other improvements have been sitting on a shelf for years. Hopefully the new platform going in, and eventually more LNER services operating out of Forster Square will be the catalyst for further improvements around the station.
 

MichaelTrains

Member
Joined
9 Jun 2022
Messages
219
Location
Bradford
The disabled toilet block that hasn't worked for years is starting to come down.

I presume this project has been given extra resources because I must confess to being impressed with the speed of the work taking place.
 

30907

Veteran Member
Joined
30 Sep 2012
Messages
20,676
Location
Airedale
Huh? BDQ sees rather more than one train every two hours. Northern services are planned to use the various other platforms at all times of the day.
I think the reference is to LNER services, which are indeed proposed to be 2-hourly.
 

12LDA28C

Established Member
Joined
14 Oct 2022
Messages
5,058
Location
The back of beyond
I think the reference is to LNER services, which are indeed proposed to be 2-hourly.

Indeed, however depending on the time of day and other Northern-operated trains in the station at the time, it's not inconceivable that limiting LNER services to just one platform will not be possible.
 

GoneSouth

Member
Joined
17 Dec 2018
Messages
1,054
I think the reference is to LNER services, which are indeed proposed to be 2-hourly.
Yes apologies, I meant why do LNER need 2 platforms when they only have 1 train every 2 hours. Surely Northern will use 3 of them and LNER only need 1?

They manage with the current setup, adding 1 new platform and 1new service every 2 hours seems like a relatively simple equation. I’d be amazed to see 2 LNER trains there if I visit
 

12LDA28C

Established Member
Joined
14 Oct 2022
Messages
5,058
Location
The back of beyond
Yes apologies, I meant why do LNER need 2 platforms when they only have 1 train every 2 hours. Surely Northern will use 3 of them and LNER only need 1?

They manage with the current setup, adding 1 new platform and 1new service every 2 hours seems like a relatively simple equation. I’d be amazed to see 2 LNER trains there if I visit

Why should LNER be restricted to only using one platform?
 

IanXC

Emeritus Moderator
Joined
18 Dec 2009
Messages
6,506
I suspect they’ll be restricted by the length of some of the platforms anyway

This.

I think what was actually meant was, LNER will only use platform 1 or 2, Northern will be the only users of 3 and 0.
 

MichaelTrains

Member
Joined
9 Jun 2022
Messages
219
Location
Bradford
This.

I think what was actually meant was, LNER will only use platform 1 or 2, Northern will be the only users of 3 and 0.

Yes, similar to how Grand Central only use platforms one and two at the Interchange.

Plus what people don't realise is that the new platform will be longer than platform three, to take the new longer Northern trains in the peaks.
 

Britannia94

Member
Joined
12 Sep 2019
Messages
37
Location
York
Yes, similar to how Grand Central only use platforms one and two at the Interchange.

Plus what people don't realise is that the new platform will be longer than platform three, to take the new longer Northern trains in the peaks.

So does that mean it could take an LNER 5 car azuma if the need to do so ever arose?
 

MichaelTrains

Member
Joined
9 Jun 2022
Messages
219
Location
Bradford
So does that mean it could take an LNER 5 car azuma if the need to do so ever arose?

I don’t know the answer to that right now but I’m down there tomorrow, so will ask the question.

I’m amazed at how much space there was originally around the back of the retail units.

If you leave BDQ on a train you'll understand when you see where the new overhead wire poles are being positioned.

I still think Easter 2025 is ambitious but they are really cracking on with it now.

I just hope the redevelopment of the station itself matches the new platform because it’s in desperate need of modernisation.
 

GoneSouth

Member
Joined
17 Dec 2018
Messages
1,054
I just hope the redevelopment of the station itself matches the new platform because it’s in desperate need of modernisation.
It’s fair to say Bradford is in desperate need of much transport investment. The place is badly connected by rail, now has a totally broken bus network without a central bus station and traffic chaos because the powers in the city have decided they want to pedestrianise the whole place.

Chaotic for locals and unattractive for business investment, the place is just descending into an economic wilderness.

Slightly off topic, apologies, but a new platform at a station in the a*** end of a failing city doesn’t make the slightest bit of difference
 

thejuggler

Established Member
Joined
8 Jan 2016
Messages
1,358
So does that mean it could take an LNER 5 car azuma if the need to do so ever arose?
I thought the original 2 hourly London service plan was to run a 5 unit from Bradford and a 5 from Harrogate and join the two in Leeds for the onward trip to London.
 

Cowley

Forum Staff
Staff Member
Global Moderator
Joined
15 Apr 2016
Messages
17,280
Location
Devon
Just a reminder that the thread for actual work updates is here:
 

Rikki Lamb

Member
Joined
24 Jan 2019
Messages
99
It’s fair to say Bradford is in desperate need of much transport investment. The place is badly connected by rail, now has a totally broken bus network without a central bus station and traffic chaos because the powers in the city have decided they want to pedestrianise the whole place.

Chaotic for locals and unattractive for business investment, the place is just descending into an economic wilderness.

Slightly off topic, apologies, but a new platform at a station in the a*** end of a failing city doesn’t make the slightest bit of difference
Bradford isn't poorly connected by rail and neither is it a failing city.

This forum is a railway forum, not a slag off bradford forum.
 

Bletchleyite

Veteran Member
Joined
20 Oct 2014
Messages
104,564
Location
"Marston Vale mafia"
Bradford isn't poorly connected by rail and neither is it a failing city.

It's certainly quite run down, though some of the city centre work is quite nice. I think it is necessary to accept that it is in need of more funding to help improve it, though. Very much a poor relation to nearby Leeds.

And yes, they need to either fix the bus station or pull it down and replace with a more basic facility.
 
Last edited:

Geeves

Established Member
Joined
6 Jan 2009
Messages
2,349
Location
Rochdale
Blackpool, Blackburn, Chester, Hull, Huddersfield, Leeds, Preston, London, Manchester, Skipton, York.

I'm not sure what other connections you would need for an easier journey to virtually anywhere in the country? One change would get you to Penzance or Aberdeen, Llandudno or Norwich
 

plugwash

Established Member
Joined
29 May 2015
Messages
1,808
Bradford is tricky to compare, because if you look at the "urban area" stats it's grouped with Leeds. If you look at the "city proper" stats it's just behind sheffield, but "city proper" stats can be quite misleading about the size of a settlement (London is down near the bottom of Wikipedia's "city proper" list).

For comparision I'm going to take the top 9 cities on Wikipedia's "City proper" list and arbitarily add London to the top, since "City of London" is a ridiculously narrow definition of London* to get a "top 10 cities" list.

* London
* Birmingham
* Leeds
* Glasgow
* Manchester
* Sheffield
* Bradford
* Edinburgh
* Liverpool
* Bristol

* London has direct trains to all cities on that list, though those to bradford are infrequent.
* Birmingham has direct trains to Everywhere on the list except Bradford.
* Leeds has direct trains to London, Birmingham, Edinburgh, Manchester, Sheffield, Bradford, Liverpool and Bristol. It misses direct trains to Glasgow..
* Glasgow has direct trains to London, Birmingham, Manchester, Edinburgh. It has one direct train a day to Leeds, Sheffield and Bristol and three trains per day to Liverpool. It has no direct trains to Bradford.
* Manchester has direct trains to Everywhere on the list.
* Sheffield has direct trains to London, Birmingham Leeds, Manchester, Edinburgh, Liverpool and Bristol. Like leeds it misses direct trains to Glasgow.
* Bradford has direct trains to London, Leeds and Manchester, though those to London are infrequent. It has no direct trains to Birmingham, Glasgow, Sheffield, Edinburgh, Liverpool and Bristol.
* Edinburgh has direct trains to London, Leeds, Glasgow, Manchester, Sheffield and Bristol. It has one train per day to Liverpool, It has no direct trains to Bradford
* Liverpool has direct trains to London, Birmingham, Leeds, Manchester, Sheffield, It has a few direct trains per day to Liverpool. It has no direct trains to Bradford, Edinburgh or Bristol.
* Bristol has direct trains to London, Birmingham, Leeds, Manchester, Sheffield, Edinburgh. It has no direct trains to Glasgow, Bradford or Liverpool.

In summary Bradford is by far the worst connected top-10 city in terms of direct trains to other top-10 cities.

\* Heck most of the London stations aren't even in the "City of London". That gives us a "top 10 cities" list of
 
Last edited:

Mcr Warrior

Veteran Member
Joined
8 Jan 2009
Messages
14,815
* Glasgow has direct trains to London, Birmingham, Manchester, Edinburgh. It has one direct train a day to Leeds, Sheffield and Bristol. It has no direct trains to Bradford or Liverpool.
Are the three daily TPE workings from Glasgow Central direct to/from Liverpool Lime Street no longer running?
 

Noddy

Established Member
Joined
11 Oct 2014
Messages
1,208
Location
UK
Bradford is tricky to compare, because if you look at the "urban area" stats it's grouped with Leeds. If you look at the "city proper" stats it's just behind sheffield, but "city proper" stats can be quite misleading about the size of a settlement (London is down near the bottom of Wikipedia's "city proper" list).

For comparision I'm going to take the top 9 cities on Wikipedia's "City proper" list and arbitarily add London to the top, since "City of London" is a ridiculously narrow definition of London* to get a "top 10 cities" list.

* London
* Birmingham
* Leeds
* Glasgow
* Manchester
* Sheffield
* Bradford
* Edinburgh
* Liverpool
* Bristol

* London has direct trains to all cities on that list, though those to bradford are infrequent.
* Birmingham has direct trains to Everywhere on the list except Bradford.
* Leeds has direct trains to London, Birmingham, Edinburgh, Manchester, Sheffield, Bradford, Liverpool and Bristol. It misses direct trains to Glasgow..
* Glasgow has direct trains to London, Birmingham, Manchester, Edinburgh. It has one direct train a day to Leeds, Sheffield and Bristol. It has no direct trains to Bradford or Liverpool.
* Manchester has direct trains to Everywhere on the list.
* Sheffield has direct trains to London, Birmingham Leeds, Manchester, Edinburgh, Liverpool and Bristol. Like leeds it misses direct trains to Glasgow.
* Bradford has direct trains to London, Leeds and Manchester, though those to London are infrequent. It has no direct trains to Birmingham, Glasgow, Sheffield, Edinburgh, Liverpool and Bristol.
* Edinburgh has direct trains to London, Leeds, Glasgow, Manchester, Sheffield and Bristol. It has one train per day to Liverpool, It has no direct trains to Bradford.
* Bristol has direct trains to London, Birmingham, Leeds, Manchester, Sheffield, Edinburgh. It has no direct trains to Glasgow, Bradford or Liverpool.

In summary Bradford is by far the worst connected top-10 city in terms of direct trains to other top-10 cities.

\* Heck most of the London stations aren't even in the "City of London". That gives us a "top 10 cities" list of

I’d also point out its connection to Manchester (Victoria) feels very slow and there’s no realistic prospect of major speed upgrades or electrification on the route or to Leeds (unlike many of the other cities mentioned which have recently had or are having improvements to at least one of their routes).
 
Last edited:

xotGD

Established Member
Joined
4 Feb 2017
Messages
6,837
I'd also add Manchester Airport, the North East, the East Midlands, all of Scotland, all of Wales, and anywhere to the south that isn't on the ECML to the list of places with no direct services to/from Bradford.

The city is poorly served when it comes to the range of direct links.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top