• Our new ticketing site is now live! Using either this or the original site (both powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

Calmac / Northlink Ferry discussion

43055

Established Member
Joined
8 Mar 2018
Messages
3,350
Bad news, she’s going back to dry dock with no prediction as to when she’ll re-enter service.
From a CalMac Facebook group which is public.
Further delays...
"I am getting in touch to let you know that MV Caledonian Isles is returning to drydock. Following attendance by divers yesterday and discussions with the manufacturer, the vessel will now be moved to drydock in the next stage of efforts to resolve the ongoing issue with pressure levels in the propulsion system.
Service impact
We had MV Caledonian Isles in the system from Wednesday 25 June. We are unable to confirm a return to service date until the vessel has been docked and inspected.
From that inspection, there are a range of scenarios and outcomes which could see a fix take anything from a few days to significantly longer. To give certainty to communities and customers, we are working at speed to review deployment plans for the next few weeks and will publish any amendments to timetables early next week. We see three phases of deployment plans, detailed below.
We have shared this update with the whole network, but recognise it is most important to Arran.
Phase 1
Between now and 6 July, MV Alfred and MV Glen Sannox will continue to operate Arran’s service with no other changes. Arran will have a single-vessel service with MV Glen Sannox for one day next week – Wednesday 25 June. This is due to MV Alfred requiring an essential day off-service for mandatory MES training.
Phase 2
MV Alfred requires essential maintenance, which has already been delayed once to support network requirements, between 7 and 21 July.
MV Lord of the Isles is due to be off-service for three days between 9 and 11 July for cylinder head works in Oban too.
Therefore, deployment plans to cover all routes for this period are being developed and more information will follow on these next week.
Phase 3
From 22 July until 18 September (when MV Isle of Arran goes to annual overhaul), we will again develop a plan for this period once we have more information available.
Everyone at CalMac is really disappointed we do not have the vessel back in service. I am sorry that Arran continues to experience disruption, particularly on Wednesday 25 June."
 
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

Cloud Strife

Established Member
Joined
25 Feb 2014
Messages
2,400
are they simply seeing this as the Scottish government paying the costs of the procurement of the new vessel via the back door and a charter agreement?

Andrew Banks is an excellent businessman, and the charter will have paid off the loans for the ship (and then some) by the time it finally ends. While Pentalina has a smaller capacity, they've added more sailings to cater for that, so it hasn't really had a detrimental effect on Pentland Ferries as a whole. In fact, I'd say that this charter is pretty much securing Pentland Ferries for the next 15-20 years while giving the Scottish Government a real headache about the future of the Stromness-Scrabster route.

Apparently not until at least September. Allegedly a bent prop shaft from something I’ve seen but we’ll wait for proper confirmation.

This is nothing short of a disaster for Arran and CalMac as a whole. The fleet is stretched almost to breaking point now, and one mishap elsewhere on the network is going to cause an untold amount of chaos this summer. It's possible that it's not a big repair, but CalMac surely know what they're looking at and they wouldn't be mentioning September (or later) if it was something minor.

I just wonder if they won't pull the plug on Caley Isles now. Arran doesn't need anything more than Glen Sannox and Alfred from September until June, Glen Rosa might (although I doubt it) be ready for next summer, and the Turkish ships will start to arrive too. At the same time, we don't know who is accepting responsibility for the latest issues, and it might turn out that it's not costing CMAL anything for the repairs.
 

BayPaul

Established Member
Joined
11 Jul 2019
Messages
1,336
Andrew Banks is an excellent businessman, and the charter will have paid off the loans for the ship (and then some) by the time it finally ends. While Pentalina has a smaller capacity, they've added more sailings to cater for that, so it hasn't really had a detrimental effect on Pentland Ferries as a whole. In fact, I'd say that this charter is pretty much securing Pentland Ferries for the next 15-20 years while giving the Scottish Government a real headache about the future of the Stromness-Scrabster route.



This is nothing short of a disaster for Arran and CalMac as a whole. The fleet is stretched almost to breaking point now, and one mishap elsewhere on the network is going to cause an untold amount of chaos this summer. It's possible that it's not a big repair, but CalMac surely know what they're looking at and they wouldn't be mentioning September (or later) if it was something minor.

I just wonder if they won't pull the plug on Caley Isles now. Arran doesn't need anything more than Glen Sannox and Alfred from September until June, Glen Rosa might (although I doubt it) be ready for next summer, and the Turkish ships will start to arrive too. At the same time, we don't know who is accepting responsibility for the latest issues, and it might turn out that it's not costing CMAL anything for the repairs.
The plan is for Caley Islds to become the Mull ship. I bet they wish they never started the repairs now and just ordered a 5th Turkish ship.
 

Blindtraveler

Established Member
Joined
28 Feb 2011
Messages
10,514
Location
Nowhere near enough to a Pacer :(
What's the betting that someone isn't already on the phone to the Turkish shipyard? Basically saying can we have another couple? I always thought they should have ordered six of those given how versatile they're meant to be
As for Andrew Banks and petland ferries, I would certainly agree that they've got their head screwed on in matters of business. I can see strongness certainly being looked at again when the existing northlink tonnage is replaced, little point. I suspect in doing it now, but one of the biggest objections that will be put up by locals and I should imagine a number of freight customers is the fact that to access PF from the orkney end you have to negotiate the highly weather susceptible Churchill barriers. If PF would be willing to relocate to use the strongness port facilities that might be an option, but again The crossing they currently use is according to them at least far less likely to be cancelled in the event of bad weather. But certainly when you take a look at it from a position of 25 years ago, nobody ever envisaged that. Such a service could operate commercially and sustain itself. It is certainly a talking point
 

Cloud Strife

Established Member
Joined
25 Feb 2014
Messages
2,400
The plan is for Caley Islds to become the Mull ship. I bet they wish they never started the repairs now and just ordered a 5th Turkish ship.

Yeah, it's pretty clear now that the damage has been so severe and difficult to resolve that it didn't make any sense at all to spend so much time on a vessel that's already over 30 years old. She can (and will be) very useful on the Mull run with her huge passenger capacity, but having a fifth Turkish ship would be the less problematic route by far.

What's the betting that someone isn't already on the phone to the Turkish shipyard? Basically saying can we have another couple? I always thought they should have ordered six of those given how versatile they're meant to be

Wouldn't surprise me at all. They're exactly what CalMac needs for most routes: high levels of car capacity, but relatively low passenger capacity. The major sticking point for most routes are car lane capacity, not passenger capacity, with the exception of a few weekends a year for various events.

If PF would be willing to relocate to use the strongness port facilities that might be an option, but again The crossing they currently use is according to them at least far less likely to be cancelled in the event of bad weather. But certainly when you take a look at it from a position of 25 years ago, nobody ever envisaged that. Such a service could operate commercially and sustain itself. It is certainly a talking point

It's certainly an interesting question as to why the Scottish Government keep subsidising Scrabster-Stromness when there's a perfectly good alternative available. Yes, the terminals in Gills Bay and St Margaret's Hope are as basic as they come, but paying for improvements there would be cheaper than building a new ship for Northlink. The only 'but' is that Northlink handle a lot of freight, and Pentland Ferries would probably need another Alfred to be able to handle it.
 

43055

Established Member
Joined
8 Mar 2018
Messages
3,350
I just wonder if they won't pull the plug on Caley Isles now. Arran doesn't need anything more than Glen Sannox and Alfred from September until June, Glen Rosa might (although I doubt it) be ready for next summer, and the Turkish ships will start to arrive too. At the same time, we don't know who is accepting responsibility for the latest issues, and it might turn out that it's not costing CMAL anything for the repairs.
The plan is for the Cal Isles to go on the Oban - Mull route. I do wonder what if they can't solve the issue. Could they keep the Isle of Lewis and then have Hebrides or Clansman on Mull instead?
 

Cloud Strife

Established Member
Joined
25 Feb 2014
Messages
2,400
The plan is for the Cal Isles to go on the Oban - Mull route. I do wonder what if they can't solve the issue. Could they keep the Isle of Lewis and then have Hebrides or Clansman on Mull instead?

It's possible that Hebrides could take on the Mull route along with Clansman, but I'm not sure that CalMac would want to have two large vessels instead of one larger one and one smaller one on such a route, as they would have problems replacing one of them in the event of breakdown. The problem with Mull is that traffic keeps growing, although the gossip suggests that RET is on the way out for non-islanders after the next election and so demand might be suppressed that way.

They'll need a replacement for Isle of Mull which is pretty much being held together with sticky tape at this point, so it's really hard to see what could happen, as it's not really an option to keep Isle of Arran on the Mull route as well.

My crystal ball at this time suggests that CMAL might give up on returning Caley Isles to Arran, with Troon simply becoming the permanent port and abandoning Ardrossan for vehicular traffic. They could easily source a fast passenger-only ferry to handle passengers for Ardrossan, leaving the new Glen twins to handle vehicles only.
 

Blindtraveler

Established Member
Joined
28 Feb 2011
Messages
10,514
Location
Nowhere near enough to a Pacer :(
There's nothing stopping the Glenn twins accepting foot passengers should they wish to use that port. But as you say, a passenger catamaran or similar from the other would make a deal of sense. I suspect the complete looney bin decision of selling Isla Lewis will also be reversed at this point

On the side topic of PF and northlink at stromness, it would not surprise me if they downgrade this to a freight only service on which discounted fares or whatever as a lifeline, freight operation could be levied and leave the passenger traffic PF, the only issue would be on days when PF could not operate, but the other route could, perhaps need to keep some standby provision for strom nest to carry passengers on these days. Albeit that, I suspect if they did go freight only the ship facilities would be much more basic than currently.
 

43055

Established Member
Joined
8 Mar 2018
Messages
3,350
It's possible that Hebrides could take on the Mull route along with Clansman, but I'm not sure that CalMac would want to have two large vessels instead of one larger one and one smaller one on such a route, as they would have problems replacing one of them in the event of breakdown. The problem with Mull is that traffic keeps growing, although the gossip suggests that RET is on the way out for non-islanders after the next election and so demand might be suppressed that way.

They'll need a replacement for Isle of Mull which is pretty much being held together with sticky tape at this point, so it's really hard to see what could happen, as it's not really an option to keep Isle of Arran on the Mull route as well.

My crystal ball at this time suggests that CMAL might give up on returning Caley Isles to Arran, with Troon simply becoming the permanent port and abandoning Ardrossan for vehicular traffic. They could easily source a fast passenger-only ferry to handle passengers for Ardrossan, leaving the new Glen twins to handle vehicles only.
I believe one of the Hebrides or Clansman is doing Coll/Tiree/Colonsay with the other planned to take over Castlebay from Isle of Lewis. My thoughts being by keeping the Lewis would allow one of the pair to run the Mull route alongside Loch Frisa in place of the Cal Isles.
 

Top