• Our booking engine at tickets.railforums.co.uk (powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

Can't travel on set route - diversion?

Status
Not open for further replies.

oversteer

Member
Joined
26 Jan 2011
Messages
726
A relative has a Tring to Southampton Central route Via Kensington Olympia and wants to travel today.

There are no Southern trains between Milton Keynes and Clapham today due to engineering works, and no Overground trains between Watford and Queens Park.

London Midland have said they will accept tickets to Euston, but in this instance is it acceptable to travel via Waterloo ? Or do they have to go to Victoria then CLJ?

Half tempted to pay for the excess to via London to save any potential hassle..
 
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

oversteer

Member
Joined
26 Jan 2011
Messages
726
Ok, what makes it valid from Waterloo? Just checking as I need to explain this to the relative who will need to explain it to a gate line assistant at Euston :)
--- old post above --- --- new post below ---
Just noticed Victoria to Clapham Junction is a bus service too! Nightmare.
 

30907

Veteran Member
Joined
30 Sep 2012
Messages
18,062
Location
Airedale
Because Waterloo is a station with trains to Southampton on which the ticket is valid - in fact it's the normal one to use.

The only time when you would be forced to use VIC is with a Southern Only ticket, because Southern do not operate from Waterloo.

(The tube at Euston has a common gateline BTW - I presume the ticket will not operate the barriers but SHOULD be accepted at the staffed gate without the traveller having to explain there are engineering works)
 

oversteer

Member
Joined
26 Jan 2011
Messages
726
SWT say we have to pay an excess to go via WAT
Southern say 'you have to travel via Kensington Olympia or buy another ticket'
LM say they are happy to convey us via Euston, so good for them.

A minefield!
 

swt_passenger

Veteran Member
Joined
7 Apr 2010
Messages
31,439
I'm surprised previous posts have suggested going via Waterloo. LM accepting travel into Euston doesn't in any way imply SWT will accept it out of Waterloo. The fact that SWT set the fare doesn't help make it valid via Waterloo either.

You need to stick to what the advice of the normal operators through Kenny O give you, i.e. SN or LO, it's not normally advised to make up your own alternative.
 
Last edited:

MikeWh

Established Member
Associate Staff
Senior Fares Advisor
Joined
15 Jun 2010
Messages
7,872
Location
Crayford
I'm surprised previous posts have suggested going via Waterloo. LM accepting travel into Euston doesn't in any way imply SWT will accept it out of Waterloo. The fact that SWT set the fare doesn't help make it valid via Waterloo either.

You need to stick to what the advice of the normal operators through Kenny O give you, i.e. SN or LO, it's not normally advised to make up your own alternative.

Whilst I agree with the advice to check the operators, I can't help thinking that SWT are shooting themselves in the foot if they say no. Nowhere in the thread does it say that the plan was to use the slow Southern service to Southampton. It does say that for this ticket the usual route between Clapham Junction and Southampton is via Woking. On this basis it would seem logical to allow travel via Euston/Waterloo, especially if Victoria is also affected by engineering works. I wonder if the SWT representative has assumed that travel was going to be by Southern only?
 

oversteer

Member
Joined
26 Jan 2011
Messages
726
In the end I considered either sending them to CLJ via Victoria (and the replacement bus service) or directly to Waterloo.
She is not a confident traveller so I suggested the Waterloo route that she should explain the situation to any gate line staff and be prepared to pay an excess fare if there was any real demand for doing so, and the staff at WAT seemingly let her off the tube and onto a mainline service without issue!
 

30907

Veteran Member
Joined
30 Sep 2012
Messages
18,062
Location
Airedale
I am pleased, and would have been disappointed if it had been otherwise, whatever the enquiries staff may have said.

The only justification for refusing travel via London Terminals IMO would have been if Southern had arranged alternative transport between Shepherd's Bush and an appropriate LM station (Harrow and W being the nearest on the normal Sunday timetable) - I assume they didn't think it worth while (can't check the notices as they've been deleted from websites).
 

30907

Veteran Member
Joined
30 Sep 2012
Messages
18,062
Location
Airedale
But clear enough to confirm that cross London by tube was the intended alternative .
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top