Thanks Paul, I've now caught up on the referenced thread.
I think that what you say is true - clearly both St Helens Council ans Merseytravel have aspirations for the station to be built - and it is a case of getting funding from somewhere. As you say, even if that is a case of burying it within another funding application.
As long as I can remember, Carr Mill station has been a priority of some form or another for both public bodies. I've been surveyed at least 3 times in 15 years by either Merseytravel or the council.
I learned two things at the public consultation, which may be useful for informing the debate:
-the council view it now, in conjunction with LPS 41, as a mechanism to tidy up the area - there's a derelict cafe, and two, I believe now vacant businesses in a small rectangle of land. The motor auction and paddock are I believe, the last active occupiers, houses on Woodlands Rd and Carr Mill Rd notwithstanding.
-there is a small degree of local opposition to the idea. Admittedly, some of this was simply ignorance or misinformation. Some residents did not appear to be aware that they had an active railway line around the corner and were concerned about a "new railway line" cutting through their estate. Conversely, some residents had the more reasonable concern surrounding increased foot and vehicular traffic in the area. The council plans did take some account of this concern, though steps such as proposing the dead end of Laffak Rd were more to do with satisfying highways-related concerns, according to the planning officer in attendance.
These points aside, securing funding is still a big deal - and seemingly some way in the distance, particularly when Merseytravel's priorities are laid out in the LCR document.
Best wishes
David