GTR can recommend but decision rest with Dept of T. Not renewing lease with 379's saves real money so they only get released if passenger demand somewhere is high enough to cover the charges.Yes, although ultimately the decision to use the 379s has nothing to do with Greater Anglia employees or management now. It is a decision for GTR and the DfT so would appear to have greater weighting if included in a GTR newsletter.
There doesn't appear to be any doubt that 379s were planned for GN but that doesn't mean the deal has actually been done.
Will be interesting to see what they have lined up, especially as the GN move seems to be dead in the water.The four 379s in the Wensum sidings at Norwich will be moved around by one of the resident 08s over the next few days again & spend sometime under a wired road in keeping with their warm storage. Rumours circulating that they will be leaving for a new home (wherever that may be) in September/October.
It could, of course, just be getting them off GA depots and storing them somewhere else.Will be interesting to see what they have lined up, especially as the GN move seems to be dead in the water.
The long line of 321s formerly between Harwich Parkeston quay and Dovercourt has been replaced by a long line of 379s. Seems strange to them stored like that.It could, of course, just be getting them off GA depots and storing them somewhere else.
Southern have just binned their 455s, these could help replace or are they planning to keep to their reduced timetable for good?Will be interesting to see what they have lined up, especially as the GN move seems to be dead in the water.
I don't think the 379s would be much help because as far as I know these are AC only trains.Southern have just binned their 455s, these could help replace or are they planning to keep to their reduced timetable for good?
Was on the agenda at one point, but appears as though it’s dead in the water, especially with the rumoured transfer of the c2c 387s.Mentioned many a time... there was speculation and an educated guess that the 379s would go to GN so their 387s could move to southern. Could still happen but currently the dft are looking to cut costs and may not want to pay the 379 leasing costs I'll probably get told off by the mods again for posting this here again lol
...which is why it's been suggested they'll go to the GN instead to cascade the same amount of third rail capable 387's to Southern.The 379s are AC only trains so they are useless to Southern.
It makes sence when you know that the rumoured cost of the 379s was 13 Million pa, GN was never getting the 379s at that price while everywhere else was making cut backs.But the DfT don't know what the meaning of sense is
It is a mistake if they want more people to go back to the office. i get the feeling from a recent online conference that all they want at the mo is to cut costs and have full trainsIt makes sence when you know that the rumoured cost of the 379s was 13 Million pa, GN was never getting the 379s at that price while everywhere else was making cut backs.
Had the 379s cost less then maybe GN might have gotten the 379s.
A new home for the 379s will be found but it will be a while before that happens as the DFT are waiting for the leasing costs to come down I think.
I do feel the DFT making cut backs to services is a mistake though, but that is for different thread.
I can't see them going to GN at this present time, since the latest passengers numbers for GTR are between 64% to 68%.
Many GTR routes are still operating an reduced timetable (eg off peak weekday Moorgate services - 2 trains per hour instead of 4 trains per hour).
In an email to my local MP, the DfT refused to provide funding for GTR to operate a full timetable due to low passenger numbers.
It makes sence when you know that the rumoured cost of the 379s was 13 Million pa, GN was never getting the 379s at that price while everywhere else was making cut backs.
Had the 379s cost less then maybe GN might have gotten the 379s.
A new home for the 379s will be found but it will be a while before that happens as the DFT are waiting for the leasing costs to come down I think.
I do feel the DFT making cut backs to services is a mistake though, but that is for different thread.
I checked my email and its actually 68% to 70%.Are the numbers really this low? It feels a lot higher when you’re out there driving addition peak-only services that leave commuters on the platform.
If people partially work from home, then the "commuting" numbers on Tuesday to Thursday may be higherThe figures were for GTR and not GA. However I expect its similar for GA.
From what I hear the long distance and regional TOCs are near back to normal in respect of passenger numbers. Its the South East TOCs which are struggling to get back to normal passenger numbers.
Passenger numbers on the tube reached 91% on Saturday, by Monday back down to 66%.
But Saturdays are a higher percentage of a smaller number overall.Passenger numbers on the tube reached 91% on Saturday, by Monday back down to 66%.
I think it is more a case of the Treasury having a stranglehold over DfT expenditure rather than sense.It makes sence when you know that the rumoured cost of the 379s was 13 Million pa, GN was never getting the 379s at that price while everywhere else was making cut backs.
Had the 379s cost less then maybe GN might have gotten the 379s.
A new home for the 379s will be found but it will be a while before that happens as the DFT are waiting for the leasing costs to come down I think.
I do feel the DFT making cut backs to services is a mistake though, but that is for different thread.
Will be interesting to see what they have lined up, especially as the GN move seems to be dead in the water.
379s to GN move was only ever mooted by railway followers not the actual railway industry.
379s to GN move was only ever mooted by railway followers not the actual railway industry.
it was definitely considered by the industry. just never confirmed.