• Our new ticketing site is now live! Using either this or the original site (both powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

Class 379 updates (all are OFF LEASE)

Status
Not open for further replies.
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

dk1

Veteran Member
Joined
2 Oct 2009
Messages
17,871
Location
East Anglia
379003 + 379024 5P18 13+24 IL to NC (for storage in 'new' Wensum sidings). I don't think those sidings are wired, so 'warm' storage might be difficult.
Certainly not wired. Not been used in a good while either. Richard Clinnick was saying warm storage.
 

ashkeba

Established Member
Joined
13 May 2019
Messages
2,171
Certainly not wired. Not been used in a good while either. Richard Clinnick was saying warm storage.
I think Wensum sidings were used to store 755 units before introduction. Maybe 745s too. Not overhead wired but there seem to be a lot of modern lights there, so was shorr supply installed with the lights?
 

dk1

Veteran Member
Joined
2 Oct 2009
Messages
17,871
Location
East Anglia
I think Wensum sidings were used to store 755 units before introduction. Maybe 745s too. Not overhead wired but there seem to be a lot of modern lights there, so was shorr supply installed with the lights?
Only 755s & MK3 stock. The 745s wouldn’t fit in there. The sidings where completely rebuilt & made secure in 2019. Unfortunately they are a pain to use so can only have a limited purpose. No shore supply afaik.
 
Last edited:

Wivenswold

Established Member
Joined
24 Jul 2012
Messages
1,570
Location
Essex
I think Wensum sidings were used to store 755 units before introduction. Maybe 745s too. Not overhead wired but there seem to be a lot of modern lights there, so was shorr supply installed with the lights?
Terminology changes obviously, from my railway days the two status types for stored traction was "Serviceable" and "Unserviceable" but my understanding of modern "warm storage" is that it kept ready for service but not necessarily powered-up, shoes down/pans up or engine running.
 

dk1

Veteran Member
Joined
2 Oct 2009
Messages
17,871
Location
East Anglia
Terminology changes obviously, from my railway days the two status types for stored traction was "Serviceable" and "Unserviceable" but my understanding of modern "warm storage" is that it kept ready for service but not necessarily powered-up, shoes down/pans up or engine running.
Trouble is at Norwich that nobody would sign them. A WA driver would need to be sent to do anything with them.
 

CBlue

Member
Joined
30 Mar 2020
Messages
860
Location
East Angular
I think Wensum sidings were used to store 755 units before introduction. Maybe 745s too. Not overhead wired but there seem to be a lot of modern lights there, so was shorr supply installed with the lights?

I don't think the 379s have shore supply capability going by the answers to another thread on here.
 

dk1

Veteran Member
Joined
2 Oct 2009
Messages
17,871
Location
East Anglia
GAs internal staff magazine has an article in it today regarding the 379s that states:-

“They are planned to be used by Great Northern on their routes between London Kings Cross, Ely and Kings Lynn”.
 

Mamorin

Member
Joined
21 Sep 2020
Messages
287
Location
Cheshire
I would thought given that the 379s will never go back to GA, that all the 379s would have been de-branded by now tbh.
 

Mamorin

Member
Joined
21 Sep 2020
Messages
287
Location
Cheshire
Ah right ok, I was unaware if any had been de-branded.

If the units in Wensum Sidings are clean that perhaps the 379s are going to GN after all?

I meen the 379s kinda can’t really go anywhere else.
 

Mamorin

Member
Joined
21 Sep 2020
Messages
287
Location
Cheshire
Ture, but like the costs of training for any other TOC besides GN would be a huge put off for other TOCs.

That and the units may have gauging issues that limit where they can and can’t go.

Still not 100% sure the units are going to GN given the high leasing costs and that TOCs are being forced to cut costs by the DFT.
 

dk1

Veteran Member
Joined
2 Oct 2009
Messages
17,871
Location
East Anglia
Ture, but like the costs of training for any other TOC besides GN would be a huge put off for other TOCs.

That and the units may have gauging issues that limit where they can and can’t go.

Still not 100% sure the units are going to GN given the high leasing costs and that TOCs are being forced to cut costs by the DFT.
Why would it cost GN less to train crews than say GWR?
 

JonathanH

Veteran Member
Joined
29 May 2011
Messages
21,189
GAs internal staff magazine has an article in it today regarding the 379s that states:-

“They are planned to be used by Great Northern on their routes between London Kings Cross, Ely and Kings Lynn”.
There is no guarantee that the people writing the magazine know exactly what is planned. It seems that the future of the 379s now depends very much on how passenger loadings recover on the Southern network and whether 387s are actually needed there. If the 377 fleet copes with the demand on Southern, 387s won't be needed there and 379s won't be needed on GN.
 

43102EMR

Established Member
Joined
28 Mar 2021
Messages
1,264
Location
UK
The pair at Orient Way have now been debranded
379005’s been debranded for a while now - guess they finally got round to 007

There is no guarantee that the people writing the magazine know exactly what is planned. It seems that the future of the 379s now depends very much on how passenger loadings recover on the Southern network and whether 387s are actually needed there. If the 377 fleet copes with the demand on Southern, 387s won't be needed there and 379s won't be needed on GN.
I mean, they work for Greater Anglia and obviously talk to management, so you would have thought they would?
 

JonathanH

Veteran Member
Joined
29 May 2011
Messages
21,189
I mean, they work for Greater Anglia and obviously talk to management, so you would have thought they would?
Yes, although ultimately the decision to use the 379s has nothing to do with Greater Anglia employees or management now. It is a decision for GTR and the DfT so would appear to have greater weighting if included in a GTR newsletter.

There doesn't appear to be any doubt that 379s were planned for GN but that doesn't mean the deal has actually been done.
 

43102EMR

Established Member
Joined
28 Mar 2021
Messages
1,264
Location
UK
Yes, although ultimately the decision to use the 379s has nothing to do with Greater Anglia employees or management now. It is a decision for GTR and the DfT so would appear to have greater weighting if included in a GTR newsletter.

There doesn't appear to be any doubt that 379s were planned for GN but that doesn't mean the deal has actually been done.
Fair point - it’s anyone’s guess what will happen now. Would be a shame if they end up meeting the chop this early on during their lifecycle.
 

Skimble19

Established Member
Joined
12 Dec 2009
Messages
1,503
Location
London
There doesn't appear to be any doubt that 379s were planned for GN but that doesn't mean the deal has actually been done.

This is correct, and to date, no deal has been done. That’s not to say things won’t change again in the future, but right now it’s not happening.
 

bramling

Veteran Member
Joined
5 Mar 2012
Messages
18,749
Location
Hertfordshire / Teesdale
Yes, although ultimately the decision to use the 379s has nothing to do with Greater Anglia employees or management now. It is a decision for GTR and the DfT so would appear to have greater weighting if included in a GTR newsletter.

There doesn't appear to be any doubt that 379s were planned for GN but that doesn't mean the deal has actually been done.

It’s certainly gone cold, not so long ago it was certainly being planned.

Whether this is cost cutting or an attempt to get more favourable leasing costs (or both) is less clear.

DFT do have some spare stock in the form of the stored 465/2s, which in turn can influence what happens with the 377/5s. Was it ever confirmed these are definitely moving to Southern?

In the slightly longer term, there’s the issue that the only spare “modern” EMUs are going to be the 350/2 and 379. If the leasing company can ride out a few months, I’d say there will be demand for them. If the intention was ever to create a glut of EMUs to drive leasing charges down, this doesn’t seem to have gone to plan - the leasing companies seem quite happy to scrap stuff.
 

Roger B

Member
Joined
16 Jun 2018
Messages
1,054
Location
Gatley
It’s certainly gone cold, not so long ago it was certainly being planned.

Whether this is cost cutting or an attempt to get more favourable leasing costs (or both) is less clear.

DFT do have some spare stock in the form of the stored 465/2s, which in turn can influence what happens with the 377/5s. Was it ever confirmed these are definitely moving to Southern?

In the slightly longer term, there’s the issue that the only spare “modern” EMUs are going to be the 350/2 and 379. If the leasing company can ride out a few months, I’d say there will be demand for them. If the intention was ever to create a glut of EMUs to drive leasing charges down, this doesn’t seem to have gone to plan - the leasing companies seem quite happy to scrap stuff.
And as I passed Wembley Yard heading north yesterday afternoon, I saw at least two 720s.
 

Energy

Established Member
Joined
29 Dec 2018
Messages
4,953
It’s certainly gone cold, not so long ago it was certainly being planned.
Going cold might be a tactic from the DfT for the leasing company to lower the leasing charges to regain the DfT's interest.

This is assuming that its gone cold on internal discussions on not just on here...
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top