• Our new ticketing site is now live! Using either this or the original site (both powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

Class 707 to Southeastern Dates

Status
Not open for further replies.
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

Roast Veg

Established Member
Joined
28 Oct 2016
Messages
2,270
The case against the 465/2s is not very good, and only slightly better than the 466s. They're Angel owned (as are the 465/9s and 466s) so it requires no ROSCO cooperation to handle leasing arrangements, the brake pads need changing far more often than their /0 and /1 counterparts, and losing them wouldn't impact outer suburban routes like the loss of the 465/9s would.
 

Mikey C

Established Member
Joined
11 Feb 2013
Messages
7,629
The 465/2 are certainly the smallest 465 subclass (16 4 car units). It also feels that they were left behind, as the other 465/2s were heavily overhauled inside to make the 465/9s, while the BREL units had major mechanical changes made to them
 

Class 466

Established Member
Joined
5 Mar 2010
Messages
1,797
Location
Atherton, UK
The case against the 465/2s is not very good, and only slightly better than the 466s. They're Angel owned (as are the 465/9s and 466s) so it requires no ROSCO cooperation to handle leasing arrangements, the brake pads need changing far more often than their /0 and /1 counterparts, and losing them wouldn't impact outer suburban routes like the loss of the 465/9s would.
I wouldn’t be surprised if it was a mixture of /2s & /9s based on maintenance requirements given there are a lot of metro only 465/9 diagrams now that they don’t work anything on the Maidstone East Line and some of their Chatham Mainline work was cut back when the 377s came in. I think it’s a given that a number of 466s will go though, they’re the least PRM compliant and full of water! (Well most Met cams are thanks to the shoddy panel build quality from what became AnsaldoBreda).
 

Roast Veg

Established Member
Joined
28 Oct 2016
Messages
2,270
I wouldn’t be surprised if it was a mixture of /2s & /9s based on maintenance requirements given there are a lot of metro only 465/9 diagrams now that they don’t work anything on the Maidstone East Line and some of their Chatham Mainline work was cut back when the 377s came in. I think it’s a given that a number of 466s will go though, they’re the least PRM compliant and full of water! (Well most Met cams are thanks to the shoddy panel build quality from what became AnsaldoBreda).
I hadn't appreciated that the 377/5s had taken on some duties previously handled by 465/9s, but it makes sense.
 

Class 466

Established Member
Joined
5 Mar 2010
Messages
1,797
Location
Atherton, UK
707003 & 004 worked Wednesdays 5Qxx test runs between Sevenoaks & New Cross (having come ECS from Ashford first thing) and have now berthed at Grove Park CSD. This means there are no longer any 707s in Ashford. Expect a ramping up of the training runs now.
 

Bigfoot

Established Member
Joined
2 Dec 2013
Messages
1,290
SE were running over the flyover into Waterloo and shunting at queenstown road last week, might this have a link with Se drivers moving 707s as they are moved over?
 

swt_passenger

Veteran Member
Joined
7 Apr 2010
Messages
33,083
SE were running over the flyover into Waterloo and shunting at queenstown road last week, might this have a link with Se drivers moving 707s as they are moved over?
That’s how it was explained in a few posts last Saturday, but it was unusually brought up in the general Real Time Trains discussion thread...
 

ScotGG

Established Member
Joined
3 Apr 2013
Messages
1,512
It'd be a shame if the /9s go in terms of ambience and attracting discretionary travellers. Even ignoring first class, it's so much brighter and more pleasant onboard due to the colour scheme and brightness of materials such as flooring. This sort of thing doesn't matter for commuter traffic - but for leisure an appealing on board experience does matter. Most of the rest of the networkers are so drab and often dirty - which bizarrely despite the lighter materials doesn't appear to impact the /9s to any greater degree.

I know this is not a factor in any cascade/scrapping decision, but I do wish Networkers had a refurb to make them more pleasant - or at least the opportunity taken over recent years.

465/9 interior = https://www.flickr.com/photos/13209...hotolist-ibKFrC-W6DpNY-25TaCSb-oTKQsE-21BWhZz

Normal networker interior = https://www.flickr.com/photos/josht...hotolist-ibKFrC-W6DpNY-25TaCSb-oTKQsE-21BWhZz
 

Class 466

Established Member
Joined
5 Mar 2010
Messages
1,797
Location
Atherton, UK
It would be nice to think that once the 707s have settled in and a final number of networkers staying is decided on, that they and the 376s could get a refresh (seen as they won't be going anywhere for a number of years). I know that wont happen however much I'd like it!
 

FR510

Member
Joined
20 Oct 2020
Messages
85
Location
Kent
There was a 707 in Gillingham EMUD today in front of a 395 with its nose cone raised. Looked like they were testing coupling compatabilty?
 

ComUtoR

On Moderation
Joined
13 Dec 2013
Messages
9,571
Location
UK
there being reliveried there so, you never know, but we may see a blue 707....
About 5 weeks till the first blue one appears.

== Doublepost prevention - post automatically merged: ==

Expect a ramping up of the training runs now.
Driver training doesn't begin for a few months.

== Doublepost prevention - post automatically merged: ==

... and have now berthed at Grove Park CSD.
Not for long...
 

Aictos

Established Member
Joined
28 Apr 2009
Messages
10,403
Emergency coupling procedures or are they going to provide extra capacity on HS1? :lol:
Considering that there are parts of the Classic SE network that the Class 395s operate over eg Gravesend and the high probability that you will see Class 707s over the same parts of the network, I would say it's essential to ensure that emergency coupling procedures can be done.

Additional capacity on HS1 will only happen if a second batch of Class 395s are available.
 

Goldfish62

Veteran Member
Joined
14 Feb 2010
Messages
11,909
Given how long it's likely to be before SWR release a significant proportion on the fleet I imagine there won't be any major driver training taking place just yet.
 

ComUtoR

On Moderation
Joined
13 Dec 2013
Messages
9,571
Location
UK
Given how long it's likely to be before SWR release a significant proportion on the fleet I imagine there won't be any major driver training taking place just yet.
It only takes 2 units to carry out Driver training and SE has 4 with a other 2 due to arrive on the 3rd.

Driver training isn't due for a few months but that is because others are being trained first and service doesn't begin until... Drivers need to be trained as the units enter service so there is less of a gap between training and driving them.
 

Goldfish62

Veteran Member
Joined
14 Feb 2010
Messages
11,909
It only takes 2 units to carry out Driver training and SE has 4 with a other 2 due to arrive on the 3rd.

Driver training isn't due for a few months but that is because others are being trained first and service doesn't begin until... Drivers need to be trained as the units enter service so there is less of a gap between training and driving them.
Thanks for the explanation.
 

Class 466

Established Member
Joined
5 Mar 2010
Messages
1,797
Location
Atherton, UK
It only takes 2 units to carry out Driver training and SE has 4 with a other 2 due to arrive on the 3rd.

Driver training isn't due for a few months but that is because others are being trained first and service doesn't begin until... Drivers need to be trained as the units enter service so there is less of a gap between training and driving them.
Be interesting to see which depot the next arrivals go to on the 3rd, what with Grove Park being in the middle of a possession :D
 

brad465

Established Member
Joined
11 Aug 2010
Messages
8,961
Location
Taunton or Kent
I wouldn’t be surprised if it was a mixture of /2s & /9s based on maintenance requirements given there are a lot of metro only 465/9 diagrams now that they don’t work anything on the Maidstone East Line and some of their Chatham Mainline work was cut back when the 377s came in. I think it’s a given that a number of 466s will go though, they’re the least PRM compliant and full of water! (Well most Met cams are thanks to the shoddy panel build quality from what became AnsaldoBreda).
Do we know yet if there will be a net gain in carriages or if the number of Networker carriages leaving is equal to the number of 707s arriving? Given how stretched the whole SE fleet has been and Chart Leacon reopening works allowing some stabling capacity increase, having a net gain makes sense.

While the outcome doesn't sound decided, all the 466s going but nothing more with them would be a net gain of 64 once all 707s arrive, which would allow 10 car needs to be covered by 707s and 376s, with 465s previously involved in 10 car workings going to make more 8 cars from previously 6 car formations, and potentially more 12 car formations where permitted.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top