Adrian Barr
Member
When looking into the history of coal trains, it quickly becomes clear that the different types of coal (anthracite, steam/thermal coal, coking coal) and their geographical spread around the UK coalfields had a big influence on rail movements, and resulted in some long-distance flows that would otherwise give the appearance of "taking coals to Newcastle."
Related to this were the requirements of different industrial sectors for different types of coal. There were also a variety of coal facilities beyond the standard colliery / opencast site / power station; from washeries to coking plants and smokeless fuel plants, coal blending facilities, coal concentration depots, coal staithes, coal hoists, a variety of industrial users. This is a general thread for discussion of the "black diamonds" moved by rail.
Growing up in Dorset, the coal industry is not exactly "in my blood" - my knowledge of coal movements before 2000 is mainly from books and the internet, so I'd be interested in hearing from anyone with memories of coal traffic in their local area, or the coal industry in general. Or maybe you have questions, comments, opinions about the underground enigma of coal and its mysterious movements by rail...
I'll start by responding to the comment that got me diving into this internet rabbit hole, discussing coal movements to the coal handling plant (CHP) at Scunthorpe Steelworks:
Anthracite was historically used for iron-making, but was displaced by coke which is more suitable for modern blast furnaces. As I understand it, compared to the qualities of coke, anthracite is the closest naturally occurring coal (high carbon content, low ash content, hard, low volatile content, low moisture content), but coke is superior in a blast furnace and bituminous coal (of the right type) is better suited for making coke.
A couple of relevant quotes from Wikipedia (you've got to start somewhere):
The first answer to this Quora question gives a comprehensive explanation as to why coke is preferred to anthracite in a blast furnace:
https://www.quora.com/Why-is-anthracite-coal-not-used-in-blast-furnaces
The main factors seem to be that coke is more porous (better at allowing gases to circulate), combusts more rapidly, and is less brittle, all of which are critical to the efficient functioning of a modern blast furnace.
Coal (including some anthracite) is used alongside coke in blast furnace operations, for example in pulverized coal injection (PCI), but can only replace a portion of the coke used. This passage from The Last of the Welsh Coal Trains by Chris Davies (2020) suggests that the coal from Cwmbargoed to Port Talbot was used for that purpose:
That book has some other interesting snippets of information. Referring to the types of coal found in South Wales:
The 'quality' is somewhat relative to the use of the coal, for example Welsh steam coal from the eastern part of South Wales was considered very high quality, and I doubt anthracite would burn well in steam locos. In fact (I should have known) there is a thread on this subject - Anthracite as a locomotive fuel - where the initial post (by 181) points out that "the slow combustion rate requires a large firebox."
Oakdale, which sent coal to Scunthorpe, is way over in the eastern part of South Wales (confusingly known as the western valley). In Railways and Industry in the Western Valley: Newport to Aberbeeg (p103) John Hodge describes Oakdale as "a prolific producer of steam and then coking coal."
Even within a coalfield, there were no doubt local variations between coal in different seams. For example, take this comment about Onllwyn:
I found a good general explanation of coal types here, summarized in the extracts below: https://www.steelscope.uk/raw-material-coal.php
One of the features of the South Wales coalfield was apparently its "semi-anthritic" (not arthritic) coal. Whilst South Wales produced excellent anthracite and (bituminous) steam coal, this 'semi-anthritic' coal was not ideal for power station use. As Chris Davies explains in The Last of the Welsh Coal Trains:
This coal was "economically important to the local area but more difficult to burn." This in turn caused problems with EU emissions regulations, and a switch to "high-volatile imported coal" in 2017.
The main use of anthracite is as domestic fuel, since it burns efficiently and the low volatile content makes it naturally smokeless, which is suitable for "smoke control areas" (such as the city of London) where only anthracite, semi-anthracite and low volatile steam coal (or natural gas of course!) can be burnt. This helps explain the use of Welsh anthracite as household coal in London, for example trains to West Drayton Coal depot.
56124 seen at West Drayton in 1997 with HEAs from Coedbach: https://www.flickr.com/photos/actonwellsjunction/54271808880/ (Photo: Ivan Stewart)
Although anthracite isn't an ideal power station fuel, it does have a high calorie (energy) content, and one use of the anthracite 'duff' (fine screenings, as opposed to the larger lumps suitable for house coal) was for blending with lower quality coal, as described in Paul Shannon's Rail Freight Since 1968: Coal
The anthracite duff could also be used to makes briquettes for use as smokeless fuel, such as those produced at the Coal Products Ltd (CPL) plant at Immingham, which was supplied by train from South Wales for many years. This is a useful summary of CPL's activities taken from evidence to a parliamentary report.
It's interesting to find out these bits and pieces of information about coal that help explain the overall pattern of rail movements. I stumbled across a thread on a Welsh Coal Mines forum [insert joke about the deep web] discussing the mysteries of anthracite. There are some good posts (made more intriguing by not fully understanding all the terms used), such as the one by 'blaen boy' with this comment:
I love the paradoxical expression "dry steam" which I assume means steam coal with a low moisture content, and the strange discussion about "a clock set in coal" as the ultimate measure of the highest quality anthracite.
This is a scandalous accusation against the fine quality of Yorkshire coal! People have disappeared down disused mineshafts for less! (Just kidding)
Below is a quote from a book I'm reading at the moment, Rail Freight - Today by B. Rogers and C.R. Anthony. It's a classic 1989 publication by OPC and a very good book on rail freight which achieves the aim stated in the introduction: "As well as outlining freight movements, we have also tried to put the British Rail operations in context by linking them with the industries they serve." Focusing mainly on the north east of the UK (including Humberside and part of Yorkshire), it's able to go into more detail than an overview of the whole country could. It's also absurdly cheap to obtain second-hand. From the chapter on Speedlink Coal:
Being bituminous housecoal, it would be more suitable for use in, say, the west of Scotland (served by the J.G. Russell depot at Gartcosh) than in London (where only smokeless fuel is allowed, as already mentioned).
I'll end this post with a couple of YouTube videos I watched recently, both made by the NCB in the 1970s. The first is focused on mining operations underground, the second on power station coal trains (pay attention to the first - if you got this far into the post, you've been selected to start work down 'pit on Monday!)
National Coal Board 1975 Training Film For New Miners (NCB)
NCB Film Unit - Merry Go Round Trains 1979
Related to this were the requirements of different industrial sectors for different types of coal. There were also a variety of coal facilities beyond the standard colliery / opencast site / power station; from washeries to coking plants and smokeless fuel plants, coal blending facilities, coal concentration depots, coal staithes, coal hoists, a variety of industrial users. This is a general thread for discussion of the "black diamonds" moved by rail.
Growing up in Dorset, the coal industry is not exactly "in my blood" - my knowledge of coal movements before 2000 is mainly from books and the internet, so I'd be interested in hearing from anyone with memories of coal traffic in their local area, or the coal industry in general. Or maybe you have questions, comments, opinions about the underground enigma of coal and its mysterious movements by rail...
I'll start by responding to the comment that got me diving into this internet rabbit hole, discussing coal movements to the coal handling plant (CHP) at Scunthorpe Steelworks:
The type of coal (anthracite) from South Wales was especially good for steel making. Anthracite (as well as South Wales anthracite is found in Canada, Poland, Russia, Ukraine, United States) is the densest and purist even when. Second to anthracite is bituminous coal, but requires turning into coking coal.
Anthracite was historically used for iron-making, but was displaced by coke which is more suitable for modern blast furnaces. As I understand it, compared to the qualities of coke, anthracite is the closest naturally occurring coal (high carbon content, low ash content, hard, low volatile content, low moisture content), but coke is superior in a blast furnace and bituminous coal (of the right type) is better suited for making coke.
A couple of relevant quotes from Wikipedia (you've got to start somewhere):
Anthracite has a history of use in blast furnaces for iron smelting; however, it lacked the pore space of metallurgical coke, which eventually replaced anthracite.
Metallurgical coal is low in ash, moisture, sulfur and phosphorus content, and its rank is usually bituminous. Some grades of anthracite coal are used for sintering, pulverized coal injection, direct blast furnace charge, pelletizing, and in production of ferro-alloys, silicon-manganese, calcium-carbide and silicon-carbide. Metallurgical coal produces strong, low-density coke when it is heated in a low-oxygen environment. On heating, the coal softens, and volatile components evaporate and escape through pores in the mass.
The first answer to this Quora question gives a comprehensive explanation as to why coke is preferred to anthracite in a blast furnace:
https://www.quora.com/Why-is-anthracite-coal-not-used-in-blast-furnaces
The main factors seem to be that coke is more porous (better at allowing gases to circulate), combusts more rapidly, and is less brittle, all of which are critical to the efficient functioning of a modern blast furnace.
Coal (including some anthracite) is used alongside coke in blast furnace operations, for example in pulverized coal injection (PCI), but can only replace a portion of the coke used. This passage from The Last of the Welsh Coal Trains by Chris Davies (2020) suggests that the coal from Cwmbargoed to Port Talbot was used for that purpose:
MSW invested £10 million in a new state-of-the-art processing facility at the washery in 2015 to produce coal suitable for the high-pressure injection furnaces at Port Talbot.
That book has some other interesting snippets of information. Referring to the types of coal found in South Wales:
The coal increases in grade from east to west. Bituminous coal is dominant in the east, higher-grade bituminous (steam coal) is found in the central coalfields and higher-grade anthracite coal generally occurs in the west.
The 'quality' is somewhat relative to the use of the coal, for example Welsh steam coal from the eastern part of South Wales was considered very high quality, and I doubt anthracite would burn well in steam locos. In fact (I should have known) there is a thread on this subject - Anthracite as a locomotive fuel - where the initial post (by 181) points out that "the slow combustion rate requires a large firebox."
Tomos y Tanc: It's a less suitable fuel than steam coal and generally more expensive to mine. In the UK the only anthracite coalfield of any real significance was in the western portion of the south Wales coalfield and it's produce was almost always in short supply and sold at a premium price to steam coal.
Oakdale, which sent coal to Scunthorpe, is way over in the eastern part of South Wales (confusingly known as the western valley). In Railways and Industry in the Western Valley: Newport to Aberbeeg (p103) John Hodge describes Oakdale as "a prolific producer of steam and then coking coal."
Pre-1960s and the opening of Llanwern Steelworks, large volumes of Western Valley sized coal were used to supply GWR and SR engine sheds, the coal being sold unwashed and passing from colliery to Rogerstone Yard for conveyance thence in through trains to destination. With the end of this traffic during the early 1960s, the coal was produced as prime coking coal for supply to the new Llanwern works, and also was used to supply Ebbw Vale, Cardiff Guest Keens and Margam steelworks.
Even within a coalfield, there were no doubt local variations between coal in different seams. For example, take this comment about Onllwyn:
The washery at Onllwyn washes coal from their 3 opencasts,the one above, Selar/Glyn neath and the Tairgwaith operation, so 3 lots of different seams and qualities.
https://www.welshcoalmines.co.uk/forum/read.php?14,43828,page=4
I found a good general explanation of coal types here, summarized in the extracts below: https://www.steelscope.uk/raw-material-coal.php
Coal is classified as either lignite, sub-bituminous, bituminous, or anthracite, where lignite contains the least carbon and anthracite the most.
Bituminous coal is typically divided into three sub-groups - low volatile, medium volatile, and high volatile. Bituminous coal has the required properties to generate steam electric power and is used in manufacturing as well as in coke production.
Anthracite - 90% fixed carbon - burns without smoke (smokeless fuel). Used in domestic and industrial applications.
Fine anthracite / semi-anthracite is used in the steel industry for pulverized coal injection. PCI is a technique developed by the steel industry that involves the injection of coal directly into the blast furnace, improving operational efficiency and replacing some of the coke used in the blast furnace. Traditionally, coals for PCI have been typically high volatile content coals. In recent times, it has been recognized that some anthracite / low volatile coals, previously considered of little value, were suitable for PCI use [due to higher replacement ratio of coke, and being softer and easier to pulverize].
Metallurgical coal, also known as coking coal... is used extensively in steelmaking, and comes in various quality grades, including hard coking coal, semi-hard coking coal, semi-soft coking coal, and pulverized coal for injection (PCI). Compared to thermal coal, which is primarily used for electricity generation, metallurgical coal typically contains higher carbon content, lower ash content, and lower moisture levels.
One of the features of the South Wales coalfield was apparently its "semi-anthritic" (not arthritic) coal. Whilst South Wales produced excellent anthracite and (bituminous) steam coal, this 'semi-anthritic' coal was not ideal for power station use. As Chris Davies explains in The Last of the Welsh Coal Trains:
Aberthaw 'B' burned approximately 5,000-6,000 tonnes of coal a day. It was designed specifically to burn bituminous (steam coal) and the semi-anthritic low-volatile Welsh coal peculiar to the South Wales coalfield, providing a crucial lifeline for the coalfield. It was the only coal-fired power station in the UK designed to burn low- to mid-volatile coal.
This coal was "economically important to the local area but more difficult to burn." This in turn caused problems with EU emissions regulations, and a switch to "high-volatile imported coal" in 2017.
The main use of anthracite is as domestic fuel, since it burns efficiently and the low volatile content makes it naturally smokeless, which is suitable for "smoke control areas" (such as the city of London) where only anthracite, semi-anthracite and low volatile steam coal (or natural gas of course!) can be burnt. This helps explain the use of Welsh anthracite as household coal in London, for example trains to West Drayton Coal depot.
56124 seen at West Drayton in 1997 with HEAs from Coedbach: https://www.flickr.com/photos/actonwellsjunction/54271808880/ (Photo: Ivan Stewart)
Although anthracite isn't an ideal power station fuel, it does have a high calorie (energy) content, and one use of the anthracite 'duff' (fine screenings, as opposed to the larger lumps suitable for house coal) was for blending with lower quality coal, as described in Paul Shannon's Rail Freight Since 1968: Coal
Anthacite was mined mainly at the western end of the south wales coalfield. It was often moved in two stages: first to washeries such as those at Coedbach, Abernant, Gwaun-cae-Gurwen and Onllwyn, then to the final consumer, either in the form of high-quality domestic coal or as "duff" used to increase the calorific content of poorer grades of power station coal.
The anthracite duff could also be used to makes briquettes for use as smokeless fuel, such as those produced at the Coal Products Ltd (CPL) plant at Immingham, which was supplied by train from South Wales for many years. This is a useful summary of CPL's activities taken from evidence to a parliamentary report.
CPL is the European leader in smokeless domestic fuels, based in Sheffield, with 600 employees in the UK. The firm operates over 40 depots across the UK and has manufacturing and sales facilities across the country, as well as in Ireland and South Africa. CPL was founded in 1973 from the non-mining operations of British Coal, and was privatized in 1995 through a management buy-out. Since then it has gone through a period of evolution, encompassing a range of industries from charcoal and activated carbon, to refractory repairs and renewable energy. CPL’s high quality, high performance products have become brand leaders in the market, with well-known names including Homefire, Phurnacite and Ecoal50. CPL’s main manufacturing hub is the modern briquetting plant based in Immingham...
It's interesting to find out these bits and pieces of information about coal that help explain the overall pattern of rail movements. I stumbled across a thread on a Welsh Coal Mines forum [insert joke about the deep web] discussing the mysteries of anthracite. There are some good posts (made more intriguing by not fully understanding all the terms used), such as the one by 'blaen boy' with this comment:
"This anthracite has very low volatile matter just 4.9% , the dry steam has 12.4% ", Little dai said "what does that mean in layman terms", Big dai said "there is more gas and other material in the dry steam than the anthracite and you will get more flames with the dry steam coal "
https://www.welshcoalmines.co.uk/forum/read.php?14,43828,page=4
I love the paradoxical expression "dry steam" which I assume means steam coal with a low moisture content, and the strange discussion about "a clock set in coal" as the ultimate measure of the highest quality anthracite.
The coal from the North/South/West Yorkshire was low grade (probably lignite) and so was preferred to fuel coal-fired power stations.
This is a scandalous accusation against the fine quality of Yorkshire coal! People have disappeared down disused mineshafts for less! (Just kidding)
Below is a quote from a book I'm reading at the moment, Rail Freight - Today by B. Rogers and C.R. Anthony. It's a classic 1989 publication by OPC and a very good book on rail freight which achieves the aim stated in the introduction: "As well as outlining freight movements, we have also tried to put the British Rail operations in context by linking them with the industries they serve." Focusing mainly on the north east of the UK (including Humberside and part of Yorkshire), it's able to go into more detail than an overview of the whole country could. It's also absurdly cheap to obtain second-hand. From the chapter on Speedlink Coal:
Because Yorkshire is especially rich in high-quality bituminous housecoal, there is a heavy flow to Preston in the North West and especially to Scotland.
Healey Mills became a trunk yard specialising in both trainload and wagonload coal. Feeder services arrive from Brodsworth, Grimethorpe Coalite, Kellingley, Markham Main and Monckton, and trunk haulage is to Gartcosh, Hull and Preston via Blackburn.
Being bituminous housecoal, it would be more suitable for use in, say, the west of Scotland (served by the J.G. Russell depot at Gartcosh) than in London (where only smokeless fuel is allowed, as already mentioned).
I'll end this post with a couple of YouTube videos I watched recently, both made by the NCB in the 1970s. The first is focused on mining operations underground, the second on power station coal trains (pay attention to the first - if you got this far into the post, you've been selected to start work down 'pit on Monday!)
National Coal Board 1975 Training Film For New Miners (NCB)
NCB Film Unit - Merry Go Round Trains 1979