• Our booking engine at tickets.railforums.co.uk (powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

Competition 208 :: Voting

208

  • 01

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • 02

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • 03

    Votes: 13 56.5%
  • 04

    Votes: 2 8.7%
  • 05

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • 06

    Votes: 6 26.1%
  • 07

    Votes: 1 4.3%
  • 08

    Votes: 1 4.3%

  • Total voters
    23
  • Poll closed .
Status
Not open for further replies.
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

me123

Established Member
Joined
9 Jul 2007
Messages
8,510
Same choice as Baggy, but I went for the other one ;)
 

Craig

Established Member
Joined
15 Jun 2005
Messages
3,958
Location
Newcastle
3. A local location, brings back memories of following 37s round on those lines.

I thought there'd be more entries this week.
 

Gizmogle

Established Member
Joined
28 Aug 2006
Messages
6,015
I was actually thinking ich, ni, san, shi, go, rokku, etc...

But yes, three :p
 

Jordy

Established Member
Joined
9 Jun 2005
Messages
8,465
Location
WCML South
Something went wrong somewhere then, did it definately go through alright?
 

Gizmogle

Established Member
Joined
28 Aug 2006
Messages
6,015
Number 8 has a very old, vintage look to it. I was suprised when I read it was taken in 2007.
 

Gizmogle

Established Member
Joined
28 Aug 2006
Messages
6,015
It cant be too "vintage", 37059 there has the newer style nose front.

Yes, it just looks it somehow. Maybe the picture was scanned or something? I don't know. I like the way it looks though. It looks like all the old BR pictures you see from the 80s and that..but it's not.
 

Jordy

Established Member
Joined
9 Jun 2005
Messages
8,465
Location
WCML South
Congrats to 33056

thumb_37261_1997_09_15-4%7E0.jpg


01 - Aureol
02 - CraigS
03 - 33056
04 - Craig
05 - mparsonz
06 - Liam
07 - Jordy
08 - 156401
 

P156KWJ

Established Member
Joined
26 Nov 2007
Messages
4,133
Location
Nottinghamshire
Yes, it just looks it somehow. Maybe the picture was scanned or something? I don't know. I like the way it looks though. It looks like all the old BR pictures you see from the 80s and that..but it's not.

it was taken on 35mm film and then scanned from a 6"x4" frame, I have a few like that, makes em look old, I agree, think it's because it looses colour and intensity slightly :neutral:
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top